Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => In-progress Highway Systems & Work => Completed Highway Systems Threads => Topic started by: mapmikey on February 20, 2016, 03:05:07 pm

Title: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on February 20, 2016, 03:05:07 pm
Returning from my trip to Texas, I am trying to figure out if I need to do anything with any SC .wpt files to have the system put into official development and peer review.

Based on this aaforums thread - http://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=17029.0 it seems like it was decided that the small number on non-conforming labels weren't worth fixing...

Mike
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapcat on February 20, 2016, 07:23:51 pm
Regardless of whether they're worth fixing, I think we should move this system up to preview. The label issue could still be debated while the peer review is proceeding.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Jim on February 23, 2016, 01:11:14 pm
Having heard no objections to the move, I am promoting usasc to preview status.  I hope to run a site update shortly that will include it.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: si404 on June 08, 2016, 08:23:27 am
Having skimmed a few routes and getting frustrated by the 'show markers' function not working (hence why this isn't a more thorough review), they seem mostly fine.

One issue, however, is where (say State St on SC2) the road turns off a road onto another and you've labelled it with the road name that the highway was on, but turns off. Directional suffixes (ie StaSt_S) are surely needed as the state highway runs concurrent with the road of that name.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Ib3kii on June 08, 2016, 12:19:07 pm
I agree with si404.

Thanks,
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on June 08, 2016, 08:16:56 pm
A couple thoughts on this...

State St is the street SC 2 turns onto from Frink in the regular convention of directions.  Also, the amount of State St south of this intersection is 150 ft before the road is closed (i.e. it is not a real road).

There are, however, probably a few other examples like this in the SC set.  If what you are describing is what the policy is (best I can tell this is not covered in the CHM rules) then I will fix any that are pointed out to me...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on August 06, 2016, 02:57:07 pm
The SC 5 CONNECTOR created by SC 5's reroute in Rock Hill a few years back is shown in GMSV to be fully posted at both SC 5/901 and SC 322.

A file was created for this and sent in for update...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Jim on August 07, 2016, 02:17:03 pm
The SC 5 CONNECTOR created by SC 5's reroute in Rock Hill a few years back is shown in GMSV to be fully posted at both SC 5/901 and SC 322.

A file was created for this and sent in for update...

Changes are now in.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: oscar on October 07, 2016, 10:55:29 pm
For SC 19, SC118 => US1Trk/78Trk ?

SC118 would be OK if it weren't concurrent with the two US truck routes, which I think "outrank" the state route for waypoint labeling purposes. Also, when I edited my list file to add an SC 19 entry for my travels earlier today, I was initially thrown off by the current label.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: froggie on October 09, 2016, 12:49:06 pm
Given that, by and large, TRUCK US routes are not recognized by AASHTO, I feel that the state route would "outrank" the truck routes.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on October 09, 2016, 08:12:44 pm
If I were to change it to a truck route it would be SC 19 TRUCK...

Note that none of the 3 truck routes that follow SC 118 are posted from SC 19 NB...only SC 118.

Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: theFXexpert on January 13, 2017, 10:02:26 am
Other than copying over what's in usansf, Anything else needed to activate this?
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on January 13, 2017, 03:20:40 pm
Other than copying over what's in usansf, Anything else needed to activate this?

I don't know if anyone has done a complete review behind me...only a couple issues have been raised in this thread.

I was going to offer to review the Georgia set in exchange for a SC review, if nobody has committed to reviewing the Georgia routes...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: theFXexpert on January 17, 2017, 09:44:25 am
I don't know if anyone has done a complete review behind me...only a couple issues have been raised in this thread.

I was going to offer to review the Georgia set in exchange for a SC review, if nobody has committed to reviewing the Georgia routes...
Nobody has yet. I can take a more thorough look at SC once I'm done getting the remaining GA routes uploaded unless someone wants to beat me to it. I assume review consists of making sure waypoint labels and locations are correct. Right?
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on January 19, 2017, 09:15:10 pm
Also checks for convention violations; doesn't need shaping points, etc.

When you complete the Georgia set I can look through it...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: theFXexpert on February 09, 2017, 11:15:54 am
I should ask this before I start reviewing: Are secondary highway numbers such as 'S-27-17' acceptable as labels even if road is named?
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on February 09, 2017, 07:39:08 pm
Don't see why not...secondary numbers are used in Virginia's set sometimes and sometimes not.

I have just returned from Florida and can now address the feedback I received on Virginia.  once done with that I will start reviewing Georgia routes...

Thanks-
mike
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: oscar on February 09, 2017, 09:26:51 pm
And for weird secondary route numbers, there's 3-1-09 in Newfoundland. Its junction with the TCH is a waypoint in the latter's route file. It's also well signed, and indeed I clinched it in 2011 (not that it ever is likely to end up in our HB).
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: theFXexpert on February 11, 2017, 01:08:29 pm
My question has more to do with whether they are considered to be visibly numbered highways or not. Virginia at least has shields for secondary routes. SC secondary routes are signed with small black and white blades on stop signs (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.464486,-81.0271018,3a,16.8y,48.09h,85.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sHgMfwXPBgJ2O6TOPVxx9Tg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en). Is that enough? Or should they be treated like PA's quadrant routes and ignored.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on February 11, 2017, 01:32:46 pm
Again there are probably too many to bother so they should probably be ignored.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on February 11, 2017, 02:29:27 pm
My question has more to do with whether they are considered to be visibly numbered highways or not. Virginia at least has shields for secondary routes. SC secondary routes are signed with small black and white blades on stop signs (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.464486,-81.0271018,3a,16.8y,48.09h,85.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sHgMfwXPBgJ2O6TOPVxx9Tg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en). Is that enough? Or should they be treated like PA's quadrant routes and ignored.

These markers are visible at highway speeds...

Also, in some counties (Horry being the most prominent) the street names for some secondary routes are just Highway x, with x being the secondary route number.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: theFXexpert on February 12, 2017, 01:24:02 pm
Alright. Thanks.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: dfilpus on February 11, 2018, 01:31:15 pm
On SC 34, the waypoint for US1/601_S is not identical to the waypoints on US 1 and US 601, breaking concurrency.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: dfilpus on March 01, 2018, 11:05:33 am
The intersections of US 278, SC 125 and SC 28 in Beech Island SC need to be cleaned up.
There are three waypoints on US 278 that follow the east bound route through the interchange. I think these should be collapsed into one waypoint, which is used on all three routes.
If the three points are kept, SC 28 should have a waypoint at the SC28 waypoint on US 178 and SC 125 should have a waypoint at the SC 125 waypoint on US 278.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on March 08, 2018, 08:47:39 pm
The intersections of US 278, SC 125 and SC 28 in Beech Island SC need to be cleaned up.
There are three waypoints on US 278 that follow the east bound route through the interchange. I think these should be collapsed into one waypoint, which is used on all three routes.
If the three points are kept, SC 28 should have a waypoint at the SC28 waypoint on US 178 and SC 125 should have a waypoint at the SC 125 waypoint on US 278.

Believe it or not, that dogleg is the official route of US 278 in both directions (posted in the field that way too and is explicitly shown on SCDOT official map of Beech Island), so that is actually correct.  I added a point to SC 125 at the interchange itself and moved the SC 28 point at S-2-5 over to the adjacent US 278 split...

Quote
On SC 34, the waypoint for US1/601_S is not identical to the waypoints on US 1 and US 601, breaking concurrency.

Corrected and submitted
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 05, 2019, 07:14:28 pm
Mike, I am going to be editing this post route by route until you do each set of your updates.  Then I will start on the next post.  I hope to finish by the end of the month, but I honestly cannot promise anything.

SC 2:
1.  StaSt should be StaSt_S.  I am surprised that the at-grade railroad crossing just south of here (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9731157,-81.0510116,3a,75y,347.47h,86.42t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ssfpxh3EnyU2yO3KLJFqMTQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) was removed.
2.  It is interesting that it has two intersections with US 21/US 176/US 321.  I believe just using US21_S and US21_N is fine though.

SC 3:
1.  The TwoSisFerRd label should be shortened due to the road name (Two Sisters Ferry Rd) being three words.
2.  The route gets close to going out of tolerance at Orangeburg Rd west of Estill.  A point here would take it out of tolerance at Gravel Pass to the northwest.
3.  Branch Rd (BraRd) should be Beech Branch Church Rd (according to SCDOT Street Finder (http://206.74.144.42/streetfinder/Streetnames.htm)).
4.  S-3-41 should be Cohens Bluff Rd (CohBluRd) (based on SCDOT Street Finder, S-3-41 is probably correct, but 2008 GSV is too fuzzy to tell if it is correct.)
5.  +X001 could be replaced with a point at S-3-22 (Bluff Rd), but it would barely be within tolerance.
6.  I would consider a point at Hydrick Rd (HydRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.6692259,-81.1660117,17z), but it is not truly necessary as the route is still within tolerance either way.

SC 4:
1.  I see a SC 19 TRUCK (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5468255,-81.6773829,3a,75y,287.84h,72.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sNjYfjDrWY90yLunvpEVheA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) at the US 1 TRUCK/US 78 TRUCK/SC 118/SC 302 SB intersection.  I will look more into this when I get to SC 19, but this route is not synced with the intersection if it is in the HB.
2.  A SC 4 TRUCK seems to begin at the same intersection mentioned above.  It goes south to US 78 and then east on it (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.544908,-81.6776876,3a,75y,20.37h,79.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sZ1xVcGiU93D2GeABhW-kuA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) to State Park Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4846594,-81.5166541,3a,75y,133.93h,85.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sffYRJ7nnhyW-3SaXjDVspQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).  It follows State Park Rd to its eastern terminus at the north end of the SC 4 concurrency with SC 302 (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5777551,-81.4771328,3a,75y,141.99h,95.76t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sd2BDGo0N1VoTBddZfekBNw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192)
3.  Maybe add a shaping point or visible point at Harness Race Ln (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5604572,-81.4628218,3a,37.5y,253.84h,94.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWJdZvW-6T1K9zDEl1OCwxA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) between SC 394 and Tabernacle Rd (TabRd) as the route almost leaves tolerance.
4.   Replace +X200 with regular points at Dean Swamp Church Rd (DeepSwaChuRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5130956,-81.3263002,3a,75y,330.84h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sLSzTHNkR9m99Qubzut26bQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DLSzTHNkR9m99Qubzut26bQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D17.63195%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656)  and/or Samaria Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5075573,-81.2985084,3a,15y,95.66h,82.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sZ59KZn8orHBRklosqP_Ttw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
5.  Consider adding visible shaping points at Juniper St (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.511142,-81.1600216,3a,75y,215.62h,82.01t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sG02fXFQMicntfuabIVNLaA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and Rice St (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5285402,-81.133045,3a,75y,320.63h,73.32t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7jFwHNrnki0dYmuk__g88g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
6.  SlaLanRd should be SlabLanRd (Slab Landing Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.521421,-81.048518,3a,37.5y,173.52h,77.64t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sgThGrUuAsJzC0Li3lZQtaA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
7.  It looks like the eastern end of SC 4 should be truncated to US 21/US 21 BUS (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4707452,-80.8484471,3a,75y,87.48h,71.76t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sX64MM6MIFQQ9_sf7HYXeBA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) (with the label changed to US21/21Bus).  The posting in Orangeburg is sparse to begin with, but it is definitely not posted at the US 21/US 178/US 178 BUS intersection (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4713059,-80.8467718,3a,75y,305.03h,82.81t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sxuHggQRbF4u_w8sRcsGX1A!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

SC 5:
1. Maybe add a point at Reservation Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.86412,-80.9085681,3a,75y,326.15h,91.49t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sp7w4c-WpzEmhkP1U5trJvA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) for the Catawba Reservation.
2.  ESprRd should just be SprRd (Springdale Rd).  (also affects US 21)
3.  MaiSt should be moved to the Main St intersection and relabeled as MainSt_W.
4.  EasDr should be EasRd (Eastview Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9556847,-81.1282442,3a,75y,134.34h,83.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sd48Zc0uHDBCSBbJYGG-VEg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
5.  There seems to be a realignment around SC 97.  The new SC 5/SC 97 intersection can be seen on here (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.076148,-81.4346441,3a,75y,282.96h,83.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1svQNJ7eq4emkMJfbawCSTCA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on September 08, 2019, 08:21:30 pm
Mike, I am going to be editing this post route by route until you do each set of your updates.  Then I will start on the next post.  I hope to finish by the end of the month, but I honestly cannot promise anything.

SC 2:
1.  StaSt should be StaSt_S.  I am surprised that the at-grade railroad crossing just south of here (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9731157,-81.0510116,3a,75y,347.47h,86.42t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ssfpxh3EnyU2yO3KLJFqMTQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) was removed.
2.  It is interesting that it has two intersections with US 21/US 176/US 321.  I believe just using US21_S and US21_N is fine though.

SC 3:
1.  The TwoSisFerRd label should be shortened due to the road name (Two Sisters Ferry Rd) being three words.
2.  The route gets close to going out of tolerance at Orangeburg Rd west of Estill.  A point here would take it out of tolerance at Gravel Pass to the northwest.
3.  Branch Rd (BraRd) should be Beech Branch Church Rd (according to SCDOT Street Finder (http://206.74.144.42/streetfinder/Streetnames.htm)).
4.  S-3-41 should be Cohens Bluff Rd (CohBluRd) (based on SCDOT Street Finder, S-3-41 is probably correct, but 2008 GSV is too fuzzy to tell if it is correct.)
5.  +X001 could be replaced with a point at S-3-22 (Bluff Rd), but it would barely be within tolerance.
6.  I would consider a point at Hydrick Rd (HydRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.6692259,-81.1660117,17z), but it is not truly necessary as the route is still within tolerance either way.

SC 4:
1.  I see a SC 19 TRUCK (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5468255,-81.6773829,3a,75y,287.84h,72.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sNjYfjDrWY90yLunvpEVheA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) at the US 1 TRUCK/US 78 TRUCK/SC 118/SC 302 SB intersection.  I will look more into this when I get to SC 19, but this route is not synced with the intersection if it is in the HB.
2.  A SC 4 TRUCK seems to begin at the same intersection mentioned above.  It goes south to US 78 and then east on it (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.544908,-81.6776876,3a,75y,20.37h,79.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sZ1xVcGiU93D2GeABhW-kuA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) to State Park Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4846594,-81.5166541,3a,75y,133.93h,85.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sffYRJ7nnhyW-3SaXjDVspQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).  It follows State Park Rd to its eastern terminus at the north end of the SC 4 concurrency with SC 302 (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5777551,-81.4771328,3a,75y,141.99h,95.76t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sd2BDGo0N1VoTBddZfekBNw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192)
3.  Maybe add a shaping point or visible point at Harness Race Ln (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5604572,-81.4628218,3a,37.5y,253.84h,94.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWJdZvW-6T1K9zDEl1OCwxA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) between SC 394 and Tabernacle Rd (TabRd) as the route almost leaves tolerance.
4.   Replace +X200 with regular points at Dean Swamp Church Rd (DeepSwaChuRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5130956,-81.3263002,3a,75y,330.84h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sLSzTHNkR9m99Qubzut26bQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DLSzTHNkR9m99Qubzut26bQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D17.63195%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656)  and/or Samaria Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5075573,-81.2985084,3a,15y,95.66h,82.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sZ59KZn8orHBRklosqP_Ttw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
5.  Consider adding visible shaping points at Juniper St (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.511142,-81.1600216,3a,75y,215.62h,82.01t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sG02fXFQMicntfuabIVNLaA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and Rice St (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5285402,-81.133045,3a,75y,320.63h,73.32t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7jFwHNrnki0dYmuk__g88g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
6.  SlaLanRd should be SlabLanRd (Slab Landing Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.521421,-81.048518,3a,37.5y,173.52h,77.64t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sgThGrUuAsJzC0Li3lZQtaA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
7.  It looks like the eastern end of SC 4 should be truncated to US 21/US 21 BUS (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4707452,-80.8484471,3a,75y,87.48h,71.76t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sX64MM6MIFQQ9_sf7HYXeBA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) (with the label changed to US21/21Bus).  The posting in Orangeburg is sparse to begin with, but it is definitely not posted at the US 21/US 178/US 178 BUS intersection (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4713059,-80.8467718,3a,75y,305.03h,82.81t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sxuHggQRbF4u_w8sRcsGX1A!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

SC 5:
1. Maybe add a point at Reservation Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.86412,-80.9085681,3a,75y,326.15h,91.49t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sp7w4c-WpzEmhkP1U5trJvA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) for the Catawba Reservation.
2.  ESprRd should just be SprRd (Springdale Rd).  (also affects US 21)
3.  MaiSt should be moved to the Main St intersection and relabeled as MainSt_W.
4.  EasDr should be EasRd (Eastview Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9556847,-81.1282442,3a,75y,134.34h,83.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sd48Zc0uHDBCSBbJYGG-VEg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
5.  There seems to be a realignment around SC 97.  The new SC 5/SC 97 intersection can be seen on here (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.076148,-81.4346441,3a,75y,282.96h,83.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1svQNJ7eq4emkMJfbawCSTCA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).


I have started on this but have not caught up to you yet.

My guess about the RR crossing in Cayce is that whenever a train came through it backed up traffic on both directions of SC 2 (which has had its loop through Cayce back to when SC 2 ran from Charleston to Greenville and US 21 bypassed Cayce in 1933).

SC 4 does end at US 21/21 Bus...not sure why I had it to US 178.  The SC 4 Truck is news to me (haven't been to those parts in 20+ years) through it is poorly posted leaving Aiken to get trucks to use US 78.  I will add that.  SC 19 Truck is already in the HB.

Oddly, I have the SC 5-97 intersection movement noted on my SC website...not sure why I had it wrong in the HB.  incidently, there is an error SC 5 Jct shield on SC 5 WB instead of a SC 97 Jct shield...

I have also already added the SC 6 Conn waypoint in Santee to the SC 6 file on my end when you get there.

Thanks for doing the SC peer review....i drafted this set before I had a ton of experience doing this and didn't know all the rules yet...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 09, 2019, 07:03:28 am
Quote
My guess about the RR crossing in Cayce is that whenever a train came through it backed up traffic on both directions of SC 2 (which has had its loop through Cayce back to when SC 2 ran from Charleston to Greenville and US 21 bypassed Cayce in 1933).

Yeah I saw on your website that SC 2 went from 250 miles to about 4.  I honestly would be fine if it was decommissioned.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 12, 2019, 05:31:22 pm
Starting with SC 6:

SC 6:
1.  Points at Irmo Drive (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0966603,-81.2220017,3a,75y,52.32h,68.89t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sZ1sciMfGKpRgnCKUbIPVNA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DZ1sciMfGKpRgnCKUbIPVNA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D267.75104%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) and River Road (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0727463,-81.2287553,3a,15y,278.35h,86.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s0crw5rVqAFRHT6BTCIFixg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (to move the line off the lake and stay in tolerance)
2.  A point should be added at Pleasant View Dr (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8785669,-81.2170762,3a,15y,30.42h,82.17t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sZrtpg3fIgBWMiMUQzckdDQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route goes out of tolerance just north of there.
3.  SC 302 is posted east-west (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8392964,-81.2119193,3a,75y,172.04h,78.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sbxDcOU5dwsnlzZ4_NdiE6w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) here instead of north-south.  (may affect SC 4, I am glad to just see a directional banner.)
4.  PinPlaRd should be PinePlaRd (Pine Plain Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7431544,-81.0633494,3a,75y,280.61h,86.56t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sS1YmPWgT9570sYawA24iwA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)).
5.  Potentially add a point around Andrew Chapel Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7028248,-80.9539838,3a,75y,66.56h,83.96t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sl0OmU7xBRXVcKejYPpr4kQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Dl0OmU7xBRXVcKejYPpr4kQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D311.07327%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) as the route gets close to the tolerance line here.
6.  There should be a point at State Park Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4918826,-80.4921446,3a,75y,39.66h,77.82t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWZX5ofocb8uHxHAmrx7GSA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for Santee State Park.
7.  RanDr (Ranger Dr) should be RanDr_N (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.3448064,-80.1427568,3a,75y,200.09h,92.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-lWNaIquVQWedpaUAims5w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
8.  The route almost goes out of tolerance between ShoCutRd and SC 311.

SC 6 TRUCK (Moncks Corner):  US52_N should be US52_W (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.2022325,-79.9898102,3a,75y,88.62h,81.37t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXdgjXMlVWZdezSKPusmBSg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

SC 8:
1.  FirStaRd should be FireStaRd (Fire Station Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7396622,-82.575794,3a,75y,313.5h,73.87t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sUg-mamzTtVAcR4ccgkX_mw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). 
2.  The SC 183 points should be S and N (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8893903,-82.6974009,3a,75y,148.48h,89.76t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sapvvvcmWD00YAOU8dQnmHw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of W and E.
3.  LogRd should be LogHouRd (Log House Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9692152,-82.6634603,3a,75y,296.69h,85.48t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s6DHQmiCTag7nr6a18vYiVg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)).
4.  Potentially add a point at White Crest Way (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0265347,-82.6424496,3a,75y,265.97h,73.01t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sXPAPpoDRlYk5HjKRCBM22w!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DXPAPpoDRlYk5HjKRCBM22w%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D20%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) as the route is close to going out of tolerance here.
5.  Since SC 8 is posted east-west (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.053735,-82.6148438,3a,75y,340h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sgCUcPS4lF5oWlKO9u56qeQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DgCUcPS4lF5oWlKO9u56qeQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D340%26pitch%3D-20%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656), the route should be flipped to go from west to east.

SC 9: (currently at HerPlyRd)
1.  The shaping point between NC/SC and SC 11 should be at Little Africa Rd (LitAfrRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1684155,-82.0278974,3a,75y,37.94h,67.4t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sddwOeRqGEb_sD5NRk1CV2Q!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DddwOeRqGEb_sD5NRk1CV2Q%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D308.25534%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  A point at Valley Falls Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0362677,-81.9724959,3a,75y,179.65h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sp6SSL-Mtbtc83TRlUB3EKg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) may be useful (helps with shaping and has an interchange with US 176).
3.  Is the US176/221Con designation correct?  (also affects US 176 and US 221 in the area)
4.  IsoSt should be IsomSt (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9632677,-81.9270241,3a,75y,128.98h,98.67t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sxOq0k4DPJdbRxyr4jkt3Sw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  (also affects US 176)
5.  SC 296 seems to not be posted here, but instead there is a US 29 BYPASS (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9579798,-81.9230615,3a,75y,13.25h,89.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_H1UUS-2Ks55vJ9D6cS2cA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) that seems to follow US 176 WB/SC 9 NB (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9538248,-81.9200296,3a,75y,327.09h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sHF3xBxInNdYTQFLzFiNjdw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) to Daniel Morgan Ave back to US 29 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9508396,-81.9360352,3a,75y,195.61h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sjrwsItjypjJiy4bFqL6-dg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DjrwsItjypjJiy4bFqL6-dg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D192.89923%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).  This probably needs to be looked into further.  (also affects US 176 and maybe a truncation of SC 296)
5.  +X000(US176) would be better served at Whitestone Glendale Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9253835,-81.8374726,3a,75y,153.62h,75.82t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1skOud3W1BQhJI7uaWxBAjyg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as it easily stays within tolerance.  (also affects US 176)
6.  A shaping point between SC 150 and CedGroRd may be useful as the route almost leaves tolerance.
7.  +X003(SC9) should be replaced with a visible point at Littlejohn Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8494737,-81.6951011,3a,37.5y,7.83h,90.84t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1svZJkbN7i74M1zwDcS5tbsQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (LitRd).
8.  Visible points at Old Pump Station Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8029033,-81.5573134,3a,60y,236.16h,88.91t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sbs1ejRh2QIFI7neVMgVR0A!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Dbs1ejRh2QIFI7neVMgVR0A%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D27.795004%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656), Philippi Church Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7912346,-81.5427817,3a,75y,200.71h,84.53t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sARuT5wG7jnbLu4XQd7swTw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DARuT5wG7jnbLu4XQd7swTw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D300.15698%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656), and Bailey Town Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8001962,-81.517695,3a,15y,82.41h,86.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1siaXD7jfMB5qslbnkiDx0xg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) should be able to easily replace the shaping points +X005(SC9) and +X006(SC9).
9.  The points for SC 49 should be S and N (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7865014,-81.4626332,3a,75y,234.43h,74.77t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sVDKQQdQYBo3s30v37W8SyA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of W and E. 
10.  Visible points at Mt Pleasant Church Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7556139,-81.39582,3a,75y,33.24h,77.66t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sUK7OsYY4CiQ9xTfxbVakgg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and Roy Wade Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7462351,-81.3884005,3a,15y,153.77h,83.71t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3_aTU7rjpzvFr6fxfaYSHQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) should be easily able to replace the shaping point +X007(SC9). 
11. WCheSchRd should just be CheSchRd.
12.  GasFarRd should be GasFarmRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7547138,-81.0615514,3a,75y,280.8h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snDrl3WfgfAO7UuZ0mKMhKg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)(Gaston Farm Rd).
13.  +X012(SC 9) should be replaced by a visible point at Sunshine Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7209331,-80.7169034,3a,75y,82.17h,82.77t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1syb4Qb9qQJY0M0YrwYw7_Rw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (SunRd).
14.  +X014(SC 9) should be replaced by a visible point at Tradesville Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7541503,-80.5563542,3a,75y,14.42h,86.54t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ss_0RuHRhw1fcvo7d1zihpg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (TraRd).
15.  GriTerRd would be better served at Airport Rd (AirRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7667528,-80.3566282,3a,75y,197.69h,97.39t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s2ZGSZTFavTCTcPWBaCE2Gw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
16.  +X014(SC 9) should be replaced by a visible point at Wamble Hill Rd (WamHillRd).  (Verified via SCDOT Street Finder (http://206.74.144.42/streetfinder/Streetnames.htm))
17.  +X018 should be replaced by visible points Teal's Mill Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7284325,-80.0711285,3a,75y,133.05h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ssTm3FdStOlz_jVHtlVhQqA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (TeaMillRd) and Sand Bed Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7289846,-80.0385843,3a,75y,63.96h,82.71t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_o-rCzofZVU9lJylxr-1pg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
18.  2ndSt should be 2ndSt_S. (also affects US 1 and US 52)
19.  US52_N should be US52_W (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.702029,-79.8868532,3a,75y,340.81h,86.69t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sL9jpF0SFKX8yRKo5YZuBoA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
20.  BeaSpoRd should be BeaSpotRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.659504,-79.716043,3a,75y,108h,91.68t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sIkkHsDkAJAngsNFnuyu_SA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (Beauty Spot Rd).
21.  +X020(SC 9) should be replaced by a visible point at Palmetto Chase Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5963276,-79.6410183,3a,37.5y,188.95h,83.77t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sdeLz1nFuC1s7c9Dt0w_ysw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (PalChaRd).
22.  A point at Tatum Hwy (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5854957,-79.5528282,3a,75y,87.54h,89.54t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1seMV0EZzFPiRCwipif0d3dw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (TatHwy) would be useful as the route is close to the tolerance line.
23.  StaParRd should be StaParkRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.3844251,-79.2636301,3a,75y,195.31h,70.77t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sC2_vYPffnfoZgiKQQbTh8A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (State Park Rd).
24.  +X023(SC9) should be replaced by a visible point at Piney Grove Rd.  (verified via SCDOT Street Finder). 
25.  The SCDOT Street Finder shows SC 41 CONN as SC 9 CONN.
26.  A point at Scott St (ScoSt) would be useful for shaping purposes.
27.  +X026(SC9) should be replaced with a visible point at Old Stage Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.187096,-79.0548864,3a,75y,20.33h,79.71t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGdfGnSZF9AcjCtLqSmlbcQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (OldStaRd).
28.  The MouOliChuRd label should be shortened based on the manual.  (maybe MouOCRd)
29.  +X028(SC9) should be replaced with visible points at Camp Swamp Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0059112,-78.7611964,3a,75y,307.94h,85.48t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1srZ2hZkqeQHDp8yfdc_shmQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (CampSwaRd) and Hemingway Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9938798,-78.7503859,3a,75y,203.91h,82.61t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sDLSDnNhCVtvJlGgAqLwGyQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DDLSDnNhCVtvJlGgAqLwGyQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D300%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) (HemRd).
30.  Since SC 9 is posted south-north (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0920334,-82.0394189,3a,75y,300.13h,79.36t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sTGgQ6mrk6DAroWvAJTtAPg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656), the route should be flipped to go from south to north. Note that this includes the labels for referencing both the business routes and the business routes referencing SC 9 need to be N-S instead of W-E.

SC 9 BUS(Chester):
1.  GadSt should be GadSt_W.

SC 9 TRUCK(Cheraw):
1.  The US 52 points should be W and E instead of N and S (see #19 under SC 9).

SC 9 BUS(Loris):
1.  The point with US 701 needs to be synced.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on September 13, 2019, 03:21:38 pm
I have caught up through SC 8.

The SC 296 change evidently occurred in 2016.  Current Spartanburg County and State Officials now show Daniel Morgan as not primary anywhere along its path from Reidville Rd to US 176.  SC 296 has definitely been rerouted to stay on Reidville Rd to US 29.

The US 29 Bypass postings may be to specifically route folks around a lane closure where St John approaches Church St (see the Oct 2018 GMSV)

My philosophy on South Carolina's CONN routes:  If they have route signage with TO banners on either end then I tend to want to call the road its designated CONN route.  In the US 176/221 CON example for SC 9, this should be changed to Wood St because there is no route signage on either end.  However, on the US 221 file the other US 176 CON route that follows old SC 9 should remain called that because it is posted as TO US 221 South from I-585 and as SC 9 from US 221...

I would only put the CONN routes in the HB with their own route files if they are actually posted in the field as a CONN route (like SC 5 CONN).

Thanks-
Mike
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 13, 2019, 04:34:18 pm
I have caught up through SC 8.

The SC 296 change evidently occurred in 2016.  Current Spartanburg County and State Officials now show Daniel Morgan as not primary anywhere along its path from Reidville Rd to US 176.  SC 296 has definitely been rerouted to stay on Reidville Rd to US 29.

The US 29 Bypass postings may be to specifically route folks around a lane closure where St John approaches Church St (see the Oct 2018 GMSV)

My philosophy on South Carolina's CONN routes:  If they have route signage with TO banners on either end then I tend to want to call the road its designated CONN route.  In the US 176/221 CON example for SC 9, this should be changed to Wood St because there is no route signage on either end.  However, on the US 221 file the other US 176 CON route that follows old SC 9 should remain called that because it is posted as TO US 221 South from I-585 and as SC 9 from US 221...

I would only put the CONN routes in the HB with their own route files if they are actually posted in the field as a CONN route (like SC 5 CONN).

Thanks-
Mike

Thanks for the clarification.   I did find two leftover SC 296 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.949929,-81.9363388,3a,75y,101.57h,94.82t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_g6P3KFioS3ZtQb4I1OCLg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) shields (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9508034,-81.9346192,3a,75y,266.97h,96.63t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sybQMNaFohBe5eryMR4RRWg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) on US 29 in both directions at Daniel Morgan Ave, but I never saw any other shields so truncating it should be fine IMO.

Otherwise I am fine with you leaving out US 29 Bypass for now since I did not see a posting NB at Daniel Morgan Ave.

I hope to finish SC 9 and its auxiliary routes tonight.

EDIT:  SC 9 is done.  I have a wedding to go to tomorrow so I will not resume with SC 10 before Sunday at the earliest.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on September 14, 2019, 01:09:32 pm
All changes SC 2-9 made and sent in.  I tried to update other files to reflect SC 9's directional changes so that you won't have to point these out later...

SC 19 Truck appears to be posted on the entire loop around Aiken now.  Currently I have it only around the west half.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 15, 2019, 04:18:16 am
For SC 4 TRUCK (Windsor),  the StaParkRd point should be US78_E with the corresponding point on US 78 changed to SC4Trk_E.

Also there is a Datacheck Error for SC 6 Truck (Moncks Corner) (SC6TrkMon) that I pasted below that should be marked as a FP.

sc.sc006trkmon;SC6_W;US52_W;SC6_E;SHARP_ANGLE;137.05

Thirdly, I found some Datacheck FPs that can be removed (also pasted below).

sc.us176;US176/221Con;;;LABEL_SELFREF;
sc.us221;US221/176ConSpa;;;LABEL_SELFREF;
sc.us221;US221/176ConSpar;;;LABEL_SELFREF;

I also marked the US 178 BUS (Orangeburg) topic as solved.

I'll start with SC 10 in a separate post.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 15, 2019, 05:27:40 am
SC 10:
1.  MaiSt should be MainSt.
2.  The US 221 labels for SC 10 should potentially be W and E (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0242726,-82.2610265,3a,75y,232.07h,97.84t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sxo7CVcuVhwGnj-7RPVDeMw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of S and N.  However, the south to north routing in general (and that I did not see any further directional banners) makes me think I may be fine with it as-is.
3.  +X001 should be replaced with visible points at Creswell Rd (CreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0822781,-82.2526521,3a,15y,222.23h,84.58t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqywu3EC2AJwoXqg0pZD77A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and Briarwood Rd (BriRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1066965,-82.2469996,3a,37.5y,30.19h,91.11t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swwBbDa4frEm8VxUUvSpbMQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 11:
1.  LakHarStPk should be LakeHarSP.
2.  The SC 24 point should be recentered to the overpass.
3.  +X021 (SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Ridgecrest Rd (RidRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6520796,-83.0476612,3a,75y,37.19h,83.23t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sa5nPReilXxqQAe6F4yZKHA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
4.  +X020 (SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Stewart Rd (SteRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7262444,-83.0561649,3a,75y,302.18h,90.35t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sniQ76glvCGu0OxTwDt_0EA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
5.  SC 28 should be recentered.
6.  +X016 (SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Dynamite Rd (DynRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8817649,-83.0216169,3a,75y,200h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sacBchP6NG9DJXFAV7bsS7w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
7.  +X015(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Bluewater Trail (BluTr) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9138255,-82.9188847,3a,75y,109.67h,87.77t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1slP0uAcwyWH7VH9keqaKjrA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
8.  RoyJonRd should be RoyJonHwy (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9607048,-82.8329549,3a,75y,197.29h,83.92t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sIQED-pE2gNBak60xDIg5Yw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
9.  There should be a point added for Table Rock State Park (multiple if tolerance becomes an issue).
10.  +X015(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at New Hope Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0385453,-82.6690658,3a,37.5y,257.86h,87.1t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1smz1fCy1PsxA7phsoDr0kSQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
11.  More of a side note and not directly related to this, but US 276 needs to be flipped from west to east.
12.  +X000(US276) should be replaced with a visible point at  River Falls Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0788252,-82.5375841,3a,75y,133.34h,71.65t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sK6ZUdEF2R4exGgjDBJ53pA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (RivFalRd).  (also affects US 276)
13.  A point would not be needed for Pleasant Ridge County Park, but I maybe would consider it.
14.  The US 25 point needs to be synced with the route.
15.  +X011(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at OldHwy11 (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1069166,-82.3918564,3a,75y,58.38h,84.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQvHRvidQ5IZBrYO949Uh1Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
16.  NGlaMouRd should just be GlaMouRd.
17.   +X008(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Red Hill Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1232365,-82.2531672,3a,37.5y,349.69h,95.29t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s9D94qQuPkiAh_HK8sOffFQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
18.  The SC 14 point needs to be synced with the route.
19.  +X007(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Burnt Chimney Rd (BurChiRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1420371,-82.0764293,3a,75y,39.74h,89.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sfs0RZuMvipvRmHqq28BBkw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
20.  +X006(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Island Ford Rd (IslFordRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1219215,-82.0211661,3a,75y,111.98h,77.35t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sR9Z_5z94F4FIMUXOVV1BOQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
21.  +X005(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Rainbow Lake Rd (RaiLakeRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1336516,-82.0069903,3a,75y,303.24h,89.76t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQI_qVIrV6asGjKzIOpzojw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) or Cannon Ford Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1391874,-81.9937469,3a,75y,299.6h,74.68t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s4vQFPHyqDqRCst8PBYaakA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D4vQFPHyqDqRCst8PBYaakA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D21.020987%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
22. MarCamRd should be MarCampRd (Martin Camp Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1501671,-81.9544362,3a,75y,166.45h,82.87t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sb1f-wEWMX2pp5qo-GaPhGQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Db1f-wEWMX2pp5qo-GaPhGQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D269.47913%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
23.  +X003(SC11) should probably be replaced with a visible point at Henderson Rd (HenRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1617907,-81.8814967,3a,75y,261.08h,76.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_I6Rq99AEXTLlN4DgEdXYQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
24.  I am unable to tell if US221Con is correct,  but if it is an official designation, it would be fine as-is based on your rules.
25.  +X000(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Furnace Rd (FurRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1304838,-81.7425627,3a,15y,317.48h,88.14t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFKIW0n3TYWpJfnrbbcInuw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
26.  The SC 150 point needs to be synced with both SC 11 and SC 18.

SC 12:
1.  N9thSt on the corresponding points to US 1 and US 378 should just be 9thSt (prefix removed).
2.  I am unsure if the SC12Sp label for SC 12 SPUR should be different.
3.  I would change DecBlvd to I-77(13) just because the ramps go directly to/from I-77 east of here.  This is an either-or scenario though that would require the I-77 point to be I-77(15).
4.  The SpeCreChuRd should be shortened based on the rules for labels for three plus words in the Manual.
5.  WhiPonRd should be WhiPondRd (White Pond Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1337661,-80.7447848,3a,75y,81.68h,75.49t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1su4Mmr4EfJpeWVMr0i3cNqQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

SC 14:
1. FriRd should be FriChuRd (Friendship Church Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6327332,-82.1338386,3a,75y,11.34h,80.43t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1syE_FEygWQ83RXwi8QmQzGg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
2.  PowRd should be FaiRd (Fairview Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7220738,-82.2531083,3a,75y,327.23h,84.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqYlsFj2MLPqHU0C9O30CDg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  (This is technically correct though, but Fairview Rd intersects I-385.)
3.  AdaMilRd should be AdaMillRd (Adams Mill Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.774389,-82.25623,3a,37.5y,345.44h,84.75t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sfCAcficJzIUjEl_olUHU7A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
4.  +X001 should be replaced with a visible point at Westmoreland Rd (WesRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8637499,-82.2210263,3a,37.5y,202.12h,91.62t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s34wQG9lX_RF0anY_9ijgSw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
5.  SC14TrkGre_S needs to be synced with SC 14 and changed to SC14TrkGre_E.
6.  EGapCreRd should just be GapCreRd.
7.  A point should be added at Fews Chapel Rd (FewChaRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0426683,-82.2663639,3a,75y,268.5h,85.43t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMpapD7AdgsV5vFCkIEy4VA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route almost leaves tolerance here.  This may also led to a point needed at Cockrell Rd (CocRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0671545,-82.2447468,3a,75y,77.51h,74.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQfvxZ_UaOvuRXzXRwMnZFw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
8.  The SC 11 point needs to be synced with the route. (mentioned on SC 11)
9.  This route should be flipped as it is posted east-west (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4983284,-82.0188671,3a,75y,100.6h,92.37t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sEqGedNwfHm5Qln_s4qlBgw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 14 TRUCK (Greer):
1.  SC101/290 should be SC101/290_S to match US 29 (since there is a concurrency here).
2.  SC14_S needs to by synced with SC 14.
3.  The SC 14 endpoints should be E and W instead of S and N.

SC 16:
1. SHarSt should just be HarSt.
2.  Is Crosshill Rd a US76Con route?
3.  +X001 could easily be removed without a replacement, but it does take .08 miles  off of the route distance.
4.  The SC 277 point needs to be synced with that route.

SC 18:
1.  Should SC215Con be SC18Con? (maybe changed to Harwood Heights, I am looking at the SCDOT Street Finder (http://206.74.144.42/streetfinder/Streetnames.htm) again here)
2.  I would recommend a point at Oak Grove Rd (OakGroRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7767175,-81.6463706,3a,15y,210.94h,90.73t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3QuEjA46twtAMRGZ0JcpLw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route almost leaves tolerance here.
3.  ResRd should be replaced with Robinson Farm Rd (RobFarmRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8623867,-81.6653184,3a,75y,0.71h,86.8t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGcUUJcsX9_Mnpa2ETBBlRA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
4.  The SC 211 points should be N and S (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.917964,-81.6262371,3a,75y,131.94h,94.98t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sUT-YtlA9RYGfHDSCYo1h0w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of E and W.
5.  RouTreRd should be RouTreeRd (Round Tree Rd).
6.  The SC 105 points should be S and N (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0572056,-81.6398042,3a,75y,176.43h,88.97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1saP1fDwQZUmm87OaUEefS9A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of E and W.  Also they need to be synced.
7. The SC150_S point needs to be synced with this route and SC 11.
8.  SC11 should be SC11_N.
9.  I would add a point at Limestone St (LimSt_S) on the north end of Gaffney due to the connection to SC 150 and US 29.
10.  Is something going on around I-85 Exits 95 and 96? (may also affect SC 329)
11.  Note that SC 18 also seems to be an east-west (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7387014,-81.6347694,3a,75y,194.62h,76.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s2RShfcXUdrJ1P2CCZ8r3ng!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) route.

SC 18 TRUCK (Union):
1.  The SC49Trk point should be SC49Trk_S.  (also affects SC 215 and US 176 (which labels it as SC496))
2.  SC215 should be SC215_N.  (also affects SC 215 and US 176 (which has this point as US176_N instead of US176_W)
3.  US176 should be US176_W.

SC 19:
1.  Does this route end south of US 278?  (see here (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.3854034,-81.6847198,3a,75y,130.12h,79.11t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sgHpUYtgqW24fSq6XuVvMwQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) and at US 278 (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.3915513,-81.6845033,3a,75y,11.48h,93.4t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sui7-iP6eUDIK2GwExp4Zjg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192))
2.  Should SC302 be SC118/302? 
3.  +X001 can be removed without crazily affecting the shaping (lessens the route by .05 miles).  I would consider adding a point at Silver Bluff Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5307075,-81.7238286,3a,75y,216.44h,82.81t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sEDkf8qZj8Yaszmxm5b_dRw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) since it connects directly to SC 302.
4.  Should the one-way posting of SC 19 NB on SC19Con be reflected in the HB? (between SC19Con (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.558646,-81.7200684,3a,75y,31.56h,78.38t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFzBLWRflFWJGGzhKKNKgQw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) to US 1 SB/US 78 WB (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5604979,-81.7191827,3a,75y,6.91h,92.02t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sBucwPs6Z4rJoWTE-t6E4jQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) back west to Laurens St (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.561559,-81.7217872,3a,75y,316.02h,91.91t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sQM5U8GAjm8DxvYsEzdmrzg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DQM5U8GAjm8DxvYsEzdmrzg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D102.46569%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) where it rejoins)
5.  LauSt should be LauSt_S if it stays. (The best way to reflect both directions is to remove this point IMO.)
6.  +X002 should be replaced by a visible point at Springfield Church Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.6985406,-81.7973813,3a,37.5y,328.57h,86.83t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sbUfZmj8kwCUnjs9s0Dewbw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) (SprChuRd).
7.  SC121Con should be Greenhouse Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7260702,-81.8431802,3a,37.5y,173.62h,93.81t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sO3t9_WOWe-VwaljY93Vj0A!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) (GreRd).

SC 19 TRUCK (Aiken): (will be relooked at when doing SC 118)
1.  To follow up on my SC 4 comment, I think that SC 19 TRUCK may be circumferential like SC 118. 
2.  SC302 should be SC302_W.
3.  ArbCt should be converted to a shaping point.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: yakra on September 15, 2019, 10:10:59 am
3.  +X001 should be replaced with visible points at Creswell Rd (CreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0822781,-82.2526521,3a,15y,222.23h,84.58t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqywu3EC2AJwoXqg0pZD77A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and Briarwood Rd (BriRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1066965,-82.2469996,3a,37.5y,30.19h,91.11t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swwBbDa4frEm8VxUUvSpbMQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
Creswell Rd alone is enough to stay within tolerance.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 15, 2019, 12:47:23 pm
3.  +X001 should be replaced with visible points at Creswell Rd (CreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0822781,-82.2526521,3a,15y,222.23h,84.58t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqywu3EC2AJwoXqg0pZD77A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and Briarwood Rd (BriRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1066965,-82.2469996,3a,37.5y,30.19h,91.11t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swwBbDa4frEm8VxUUvSpbMQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
Creswell Rd alone is enough to stay within tolerance.

You are right.  It does get a bit close just to the south of Briarwood Rd, and Greenwood Mills Farm Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1033607,-82.2449724,3a,15y,144.23h,87.97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sTjMMEsQnd7AVm-YOU65s2Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) was not worthy of a point IMO. 
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 18, 2019, 05:16:50 pm
Starting with SC 20:

SC 20:
1.  SC 20 is also posted east-west (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2017821,-82.3898084,3a,75y,49.99h,89.49t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_-lZUQlu8FCTMBd7AuPn6g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) theroretically meaning it should be flipped.  The east-west note applies to SC 20 TRUCK (Abbeville) and SC 20 CONN (Anderson County) as well.
2.  SC20TrkAbb_N should be SC20TrkAbb_W.
3.  The SC 185 points should be S and N (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.3045674,-82.3644731,3a,75y,178.19h,90.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5t4jfrMwiMzPCjE9Afbarg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) instead of E and W.
4.  S-4-67 should be Sauer Farm Rd (SauFarmRd) as I do not see a sign for the route.  (verified via SCDOT Street Finder (http://206.74.144.42/streetfinder/Streetnames.htm))
5.  TraRd should be TraRd_N.  (verified via SCDOT Street Finder)
6.  FloWriRd should be FloWriDr (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4946174,-82.4853797,3a,75y,54.39h,88.08t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1svVUPYdIEtzjnBH43WHTWBQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DvVUPYdIEtzjnBH43WHTWBQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D9.29695%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) (Floyd Wright Drive).
7.  A point should be added at Crawford Dr (CraDr) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5629221,-82.4893084,3a,75y,349.31h,95.42t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1svFS5k_aglVrFYD6Dft7AwA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route almost goes out of tolerance.
8.  SHamSt should be HamSt.
9.  The PieGolCouRd label should be shortened.
10.  AugSt should be AugSt_S.
11.  FalParDr should be FalParkDr_E (or FalParkDr if SC 20 does not actually end at US 123, I did not see any SC 20 signs at the Falls Park Dr/US 123 intersection, but saw this (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.84643,-82.4044176,3a,75y,289.34h,86.36t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sD016VJRTajptDxOQHPDITg!2e0!5s20160401T000000!7i13312!8i6656) nearby on River St.)

SC 20 TRUCK (Abbeville):
1.  SC28_S should be SC28_E (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1523672,-82.394659,3a,75y,348.44h,84.72t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s6cuLCpflPiv-Uq1SHcMJWg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  SC71 should be synced with SC 71 and SC 28.
3.  SC28_N should be SC28_W.
4.  The SC 20 points should be E and W instead of S and N.

SC 22:
1.  The US 501 point needs to be synced with it.   

SC 23:
1  The RedOakGroRd label should be shortened.
2.  ColSprRd should be ColdSprRd (Cold Springs Rd).
3.  +X001 is not truly needed (loses .05  miles of mileage).
4.  The OldFivNotRd label should be shortened.
5.  SC23TrkEdg_W should be SC23TrkEdg_S.
6.   The SC430 point needs to be recentered.  (also affects SC 23 TRUCK (Edgefield))
7.  The SC39_S point needs to be synced.
8.  +X003 could easily be replaced by a visible point though the roads in the area are gravel (such as Dickert Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8948284,-81.5795734,3a,75y,116.32h,88.47t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s33xlLtpCCaBkOS2X04wFEQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)).
9.  US178 should be US178_W.

SC 23 TRUCK (Edgefield):
1.  The US25/430 intersection needs to be relooked at to clarify if all three routes should be synced.  I'll relook at this when I get to SC 430.
2.  EasRd should be EastViewRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8000203,-81.913592,3a,75y,95.79h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sta33FZ2cVNkAWdaYcb22Nw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (also affects SC 430)

SC 24:
1.  The SC 11 point should be recentered to the overpass. (mentioned on SC 11)
2.  The SC 59 points need to be recentered due to intersection realignments.  (The HERE Hybrid Day Maps show this)
3.  ONeiFerRd should be ONeFerryRd (It is O'Neal Ferry Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5577976,-82.8702195,3a,75y,43.32h,80.15t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sYI-Jkxme5-Dl9QvD-Bu1jQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).)
4.  SC187_N could use a minor recentering.

SC 27:
1.  US78_W should be recentered (potentially an intersection realignment based on the HERE Hybrid Maps).
2.  The SprHilChuRd label should be recentered.

SC 28 (Beech Island): (will need to be flipped from west to east)
1.  The US278/125 point needs to be synced with US 278 and SC 125.
2.  For US 278, SC28 should be SC28_W.

SC 28: (will need to be flipped from west to east (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9269035,-82.3184683,3a,75y,347.5h,83.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sv144o5fqNOZAUFRtiSjY8Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656), I do see a north banner (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.911651,-82.2956673,3a,75y,358.74h,86.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sKGUct2vLDDcHBoFDH8yRKQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) here though just past US 221 NB/US 378.)
1.  A point should be added for Hamilton Branch State Park (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7541752,-82.2023115,3a,37.5y,252.56h,90.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sglj7e1EFoYWZpjGPXHH1ww!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  (also affects US 221)
2.  S-33-26 should be Williams Long Rd (WilLongRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7593311,-82.2025968,3a,37.5y,45.73h,87.25t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sjUeuEHTgcpJuZR1JyTISJw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as I do not see a black sign marking that number.  (also affects US 221)
3.  I would add a point at Price's Mill Rd (PriMillRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7861527,-82.2194788,3a,75y,13.85h,88.89t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1splyf8_AAi_2zW5ZEbNQf7g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) to cover Parksville (verified via SCDOT Street Finder (http://206.74.144.42/streetfinder/Streetnames.htm)).  (also affects US 221)
4.  I would also add a point at Dordon Creek Rd (DorCreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8013527,-82.231857,3a,75y,295.05h,73t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1st69s16Agnk9RaoKpnaoTbA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for the Parksville Recreation Area. (also affects US 221)
5.  S-33-70 should be Pine Grove Church Rd (PGChuRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8364408,-82.2620247,3a,15y,292.47h,91.97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sbKRhavkNGCs_JfZdliQSMw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as I do not see a black sign marking that number.  (also affects US 221)
6.  Also for US 221, SC28_S should maybe be SC28_E.
7.  S-33-19 should be recentered slightly.
8.  TroRd should be TroyRd.
9.  SC 20 TRUCK (Abbeville) needs to be synced with SC 28 from here to the north end of the concurrency (where SC20Trk should be SC20Trk_W).  This was sort of mentioned on the SC 20 TRUCK Review.
10.  ShrCluRd should be ShrClubRd (Shrine Club Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2317492,-82.4402991,3a,75y,327.57h,85.04t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s0qARSX_Uc5E3YXVwSY9Zcw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
11.  The SC 284 points should be W and E (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2940321,-82.5352614,3a,75y,282.61h,96.39t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQ3eYpbMJ6w-hla6jIsqKoA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of S and N.  That shield in the GSV link is the wrong direction banner (should be west).
12.  SMcDRd should be McDSt.
13.  SC28Bus_S should be SC28Bus_E and be synced with SC 28.
14.  PeaDaiRd should be OPDaiRd (since Pearman Daily Rd is SC 28 intersecting Old Pearman Daily Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5442949,-82.6994627,3a,75y,233.97h,84.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1su8zmb8rpLEfakXYcr6q1Ng!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)).
15.  The US76/28Bus point needs to be synced with both US 76 and SC 28 BUS.  Also the SC28Trk point on US 178 should be SC28 or maybe SC28Con...
16.  +X002(US76) should be replaced with visible points at Milwee Creek Rd  (MilCreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5953175,-82.7496051,3a,75y,1.37h,88.48t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1siUP7h4pqogBplt2TWVzi3g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) and Williams St (WilSt) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6043215,-82.7604946,3a,75y,333.41h,75.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sCaFgV97vCKkllYvmoVb-QA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192). (also affects US 76)
17.  SC187_S is an unused alternate label that can be removed.
18.  +X001(US76) should be replaced by a visible point at Queen St (QueSt) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6467647,-82.8039468,3a,75y,333.38h,74.96t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5kmVzDo-59ZqPd0C0k4dKA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (also affects US 76)
19.  US123_E should be US123_N.  US76/123_W should be US76/123.
20.  WelHwy_E can be WelHwy for just SC 28.  That label seems to make sense for US 76 and US 123.
21.  A point at Sheep Farm Rd (SheFarmRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7156505,-83.0036531,3a,75y,138.28h,83.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sB0WqZXNbHd_13KMwz9iIOg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) seems to be useful.
22.  I would recenter the WUniRd (should be UniRd) point to the Poplar Springs Rd overpass.
23.  SC11 should be recentered slightly.  (see SC 11)
24.  MaiSt should be MainSt_E.
25.  The SC 183 points should be N and S (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7658994,-83.0638631,3a,75y,33.75h,76.96t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqP7wNmBY6du1rC49LdmRog!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of E and W.
26.  LakJemRd should be LakeJemRd (Lake Jemiki Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7740026,-83.0991545,3a,37.5y,229.48h,90.99t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sEcoEpgg4s8LrjOVWcJM0Jg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
27.  I would add a shaping point here (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.905739&lon=-83.180097) in order to keep the line from crossing the river and entering the line into GA south of the SC/GA line.

SC 28 BUS (Anderson):
1.  SC28_S should be SC28_E.
2.  It looks like the route (posted anyway) turns left at Sayre St (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4927616,-82.6477855,3a,75y,24.01h,81.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sR7UAr5o3Dw2XzYmImxTBkg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656), turns right onto Murray Ave (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4930068,-82.6490259,3a,75y,267.88h,96.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQUAjljyBbxnQhuEyrJnx5A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) to follow US 29 BUS/SC 81 to Greenville St (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5082584,-82.6528912,3a,75y,10.3h,77.66t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sTlp_gexIvOwf2qA1G-vCSg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192), and then turns back onto Main St (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5090518,-82.6518913,3a,75y,80.64h,82.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sA8piMUJtURHrdCraDPFNHA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) at the current US29Bus/81 label.  (affects US 29 BUS (Anderson), SC 81, US 76, US 178, and probably other routes I may have missed)
3.  Do the US 76 TRUCK and US 178 TRUCK routes in Anderson still exist?  (I saw no posting following their routes in the HB, but saw this following what is marked as US 76/US 178 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5377687,-82.6672994,3a,75y,249.09h,79.43t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJvhQccDt5_9aCse9hgVQjg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).)
4.  I would add points at Whitehall Rd on both US 76/US 178 and SC 28 BUS (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5324494,-82.6639242,3a,75y,214.67h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sAmC9ew-9QK3_OfBDq_-1mQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DAmC9ew-9QK3_OfBDq_-1mQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D209.67671%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192) to keep the US 76/US 178 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5318384,-82.666437,3a,75y,128.36h,81.86t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1slbSDEKBHmlUZXlVUw9ldyQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DlbSDEKBHmlUZXlVUw9ldyQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D354.68323%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) line from being on SC 28 BUS.
5.  EWPkwy should be EastWestPkwy.  (also affects US 76 and US 178)
6.  SC28_N should be SC28_W and be synced with US 76 and SC 28.

SC 28 BUS (Pendleton):
1.  The SC 28 points should be E and W instead of S and N.

SC 28 TRUCK (Anderson):
1.  SC28_S needs to be SC28_W and synced with it and SC 28 BUS.  US 178 needs to be synced as well.

SC 31: (all changes affect I-74 FUT (Myrtle Beach)
1.  I would add a thread in the "6-Month+ Outlook" section about the extension to SC 707 that should open later this year.  I would go-ahead and add a hidden shaping point on SC 707 for when it opens.
2.  WatTowRd should only be WatRd (one-word) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7929187,-78.8027866,3a,75y,343.95h,89.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swTLNaiq4fw5tz5nG0oTiDw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on September 18, 2019, 08:09:14 pm
South Carolina made this more difficult by apparently recently changing all even routes to E-W and all odds N-S regardless of how ridiculous it looks.  So there will unfortunately be a lot of these errors to correct.

For SC 18 at I-85, they are reconfiguring the two interchanges as part of the widening of I-85.  Well under construction at this point.  Should I put the SC 18 points in their new locations now? 
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 19, 2019, 07:15:20 am
South Carolina made this more difficult by apparently recently changing all even routes to E-W and all odds N-S regardless of how ridiculous it looks.  So there will unfortunately be a lot of these errors to correct.

For SC 18 at I-85, they are reconfiguring the two interchanges as part of the widening of I-85.  Well under construction at this point.  Should I put the SC 18 points in their new locations now? 

Yeah I saw your post on AARoads about that.  It makes sense now that you said that.

For SC 18, the current points should stay as-is for now unless the configuration already changed. I purposedly had added hidden shaping points (http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=3156.msg14739#msg14739) on PA 980 knowing that I would want them there due to future connections to PA 576.  I recommend either doing that or posting a new topic regarding this under "6-Month+ Outlook" as a reminder for later.  It personally does not matter for me. 

EDIT:  Thinking about it after I posted this, the new thread to hold it for later is the better option.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 20, 2019, 07:47:39 pm
I have completed SC 10-SC 31 via the posts above.  When I restart, I will start with a new post for SC 33.

EDIT: I quickly did SC 33 and had no suggested changes.  I will restart with SC 34.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on September 21, 2019, 10:35:30 pm
Changes for SC 10-31 (minus mainline SC 28) have been submitted...

Thanks-
Mike
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 22, 2019, 08:27:02 am
SC 20:
11.  FalParDr should be FalParkDr_E (or FalParkDr if SC 20 does not actually end at US 123, I did not see any SC 20 signs at the Falls Park Dr/US 123 intersection, but saw this (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.84643,-82.4044176,3a,75y,289.34h,86.36t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sD016VJRTajptDxOQHPDITg!2e0!5s20160401T000000!7i13312!8i6656) nearby on River St.)

I had thought that SC 20 should have been truncated to Falls Park Dr instead of all the way down to SC 124 (erroneously labeled as MainSt now).  This sign (that I should have linked before) is from January 2019 GSV (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8460885,-82.4044217,3a,75y,209.3h,84.66t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1svQh7sSMxu-EgsC1P7ITtDw!2e0!5s20160401T000000!7i13312!8i6656) and is just south of the Falls Park Dr/River St intersection.

The only other major issue I see on my quick review of your changes is that the new WhiRd point on SC 28 BUS (Anderson) needs to be synced with US 76 TRUCK and US 178 TRUCK if  the latter two routes are not being deleted.

One further minor issue:

Quote
SC 23 TRUCK (Edgefield):
2.  EasRd should be EastViewRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8000203,-81.913592,3a,75y,95.79h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sta33FZ2cVNkAWdaYcb22Nw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (also affects SC 430)

This was only put in as EastRd instead of EastViewRd on both routes.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on September 22, 2019, 08:49:08 am
SC 20:
11.  FalParDr should be FalParkDr_E (or FalParkDr if SC 20 does not actually end at US 123, I did not see any SC 20 signs at the Falls Park Dr/US 123 intersection, but saw this (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.84643,-82.4044176,3a,75y,289.34h,86.36t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sD016VJRTajptDxOQHPDITg!2e0!5s20160401T000000!7i13312!8i6656) nearby on River St.)

I had thought that SC 20 should have been truncated to Falls Park Dr instead of all the way down to SC 124 (erroneously labeled as MainSt now).  This sign (that I should have linked before) is from January 2019 GSV (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8460885,-82.4044217,3a,75y,209.3h,84.66t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1svQh7sSMxu-EgsC1P7ITtDw!2e0!5s20160401T000000!7i13312!8i6656) and is just south of the Falls Park Dr/River St intersection.

The only other major issue I see on my quick review of your changes is that the new WhiRd point on SC 28 BUS (Anderson) needs to be synced with US 76 TRUCK and US 178 TRUCK if  the latter two routes are not being deleted.

One further minor issue:

Quote
SC 23 TRUCK (Edgefield):
2.  EasRd should be EastViewRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8000203,-81.913592,3a,75y,95.79h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sta33FZ2cVNkAWdaYcb22Nw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (also affects SC 430)

This was only put in as EastRd instead of EastViewRd on both routes.

Per Street Finder and SCDOT Greenville County and City of Greenville Maps, SC 20 ends at Main St and SC 81 and SC 124 end at each other, despite postings for SC 20 and SC 124 beyond those points.

US 76-178 Truck no longer exists and I will get them deleted on my next submission.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 22, 2019, 04:30:06 pm
Starting with SC 34:

SC 34:
1.  CamAve should be CouFarmRd (County Farm Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1708974,-82.0803685,3a,75y,171.81h,65.94t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sLT6p3YAmo6gbuwAxb4T4lA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  EddRd should be EddyRd.
3.  BucPlaRd should be for Scurry Church Rd (ScuChuRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.163146,-81.8939348,3a,75y,347.37h,93.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ssGzfnCVGfqpCvabE8CBoNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
4.  +X003 could be replaced easily with a visible point at Glenn St (GleSt) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2626828,-81.6006524,3a,15y,308.64h,87.54t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1shEuBHER4xd9e3htVOrUejQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (minus .08 miles in mileage).
5.  I would add a point at Jackson Creek Rd (JacCreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4113127,-81.204959,3a,75y,108.18h,86.46t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sKAfcM0cxztpTr53LvjolMw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route is close to leaving tolerance just east of here.
6.  +X004(US321) should be replaced with a visible point at Moultrie St (MouSt) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.3708188,-81.1005864,3a,75y,185.41h,70.79t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQ0b6Bc-2a0jvvhd9ZPzeTA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  (also affects US 321)
7.  I did not see shields indicating to use US21Con to get to US 21 SB and vice versa to SC 34 WB from US 21 NB.
8.  The SmaRd point needs to be recentered.
9.  +X006 could easily be replaced with a visible point at Gettys Rd (GetRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2453253,-80.7475522,3a,75y,140h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sYw7PA-rOdz5715zqGkmAPA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DYw7PA-rOdz5715zqGkmAPA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D140%26pitch%3D-20%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
10.  US521/601Trk should be US521Trk/601Trk.  (could affect US 1 and US 601, I doubt it would affect the truck routes.)
11.  US521/601_N should be US521/601.  (US521/601_N should be US521/601 on US 1 as well.  US601/1_S should be US1/601 on US 521.  I would change US1_N to US1/521 on US 601 even though the former is technically correct.)
12.  EYorSt should just be YorkSt.
13.  AntSt should be AntRd (Antioch Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2393405,-80.4688961,3a,75y,51.08h,103.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sDi3ecya7RRfq92sdIo-rTA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
14.  JohPonRd should be JohPondRd.
15.  SC 151 seems to be posted up to US401Con (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.295481,-79.8849992,3a,75y,260.41h,74.16t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sEbbNQgto8jjpCRBD29DbkQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DEbbNQgto8jjpCRBD29DbkQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D31.257168%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).  (I may relook at this at SC 151, but it would save a few minutes to check this out now.)
16.  The US52Bus point needs to be synced with US 52 BUS (Darlington).
17.  SocHilRd should be SocHillRd.
18.  I would add a point at Arcadia Rd (ArcRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.3820309,-79.6379803,3a,75y,308.12h,83.51t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sX3g37ghBGEswddqrRHdfVQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (shown as River Rd on the SCDOT Street Finder) due to the 9.35 miles between GeoRd and SC38.
19.  HooRd should be HoodRd.
20.  +X009 should be replaced with a visible point at Pelt Rd (verified via SCDOT Street Finder).
21.  The 9thAve point could be easily removed (losing .07 miles of mileage).  You could also replace it with a point at MLK, Jr.  Blvd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4184524,-79.3746432,3a,75y,177.09h,76.21t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1swt8S9XnqgSQ6RHm4nml6mA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Dwt8S9XnqgSQ6RHm4nml6mA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D247.21928%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
 
SC 34 TRUCK (Camden):
1.  YorkSt should be YorkSt_E.  (affects US 1 TRUCK (East Camden) and US 521 TRUCK (East Camden)
2.  All 3 truck routes need to be synced with US 521 at the southern end.  That label on US 521 should be changed from US1/521Trk to US1Trk/521Trk.
3.  US 1 TRUCK (East Camden) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2307469,-80.6057075,3a,75y,49.67h,94.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s8hb1dnAN2rI8f0nFlWc35w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) is posted on US 521 NB at the southern end of US 521 TRUCK (Camden).

SC 34 TRUCK (Darlington):
1.  US52Bus_S should be US52_S (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2954998,-79.8905505,3a,75y,337.77h,91.34t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1skMA1DnQ48wE_DM25qAVBcg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (I would have thought that it would have been US52_E, but US 52 seems to be posted N-S here.)
2.  SChaRd should be ChaRd_S.
3.  A point should be added at Pocket Rd (PocRd).  (see "TO I-95 shield" near the intersection (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2917238,-79.7744423,3a,75y,131.07h,64.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sU2MnE1H78T_ZCvDGAN0P1g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))

SC 35:
1.  The I-77 point needs to be synced with it.

SC 37:
1.  The US278 point at its southern end needs to be relocated.  This seems to be due to an intersection alignment.  (will also affect US 278)
2.  SpaMosRd should be SpaMossRd.

SC 38:  (will need to be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2847151,-79.4340488,3a,75y,335.05h,89.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sezeTEvRw99WtyA1qZIIUJg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  OldSC38 is probably correct, but I would change it to Christmas Farm Rd (ChrFarmRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2908855,-79.4489724,3a,15y,183.54h,89.66t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqmFDkcTSyYOeaH1eV1Q3tw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) to match the road name.
2.  CoxRd should be CoxeRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5451552,-79.6548176,3a,37.5y,344.79h,84.57t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sfPo9Se2AfkB3qhTfaIm1Vw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  SC38BusBen_N should be SC38BusBen_W.  (The town abbreviation though is unnecessary here.)
4.  OldWirRd should be OldWireRd.

SC 38 BUS (Bennettsville):  (route also needs to be flipped)
1.  SC9Bus_W should be SC9Bus_N.
2.  The SC 38 points should be E and W instead of S and N.

SC 39:
1.  The SCDOT Street Finder indicates that it extends to the Savannah River Site entrance south of US 278.
2.  The US78_W point needs to be recentered.  (maybe an intersection realignment)
3.  WooDobRd should be WooDobyRd.
4.  +X001 could easily be removed.  (mileage loss is .04 miles)
5.  YalSt should be YaleSt.
6.  RawMilPonRd should be shortened and corrected.
7.  HolPonRd should be HolPondRd.
8.  SC121_S needs to be synced with SC 121 (where US178_S should be US178_E).  (also affects US 178) 
9.  The alternate label US178/378Con for SC121_N can be removed as it is not in-use.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: rickmastfan67 on September 23, 2019, 02:12:44 am
1.  US52Bus_S should be US52_S (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2954998,-79.8905505,3a,75y,337.77h,91.34t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1skMA1DnQ48wE_DM25qAVBcg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (I would have thought that it would have been US52_E, but US 52 seems to be posted N-S here.)

US-52 keeps swapping from E-W to S-N in different states.  SC is one of the S-N states.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 23, 2019, 06:36:54 am
1.  US52Bus_S should be US52_S (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2954998,-79.8905505,3a,75y,337.77h,91.34t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1skMA1DnQ48wE_DM25qAVBcg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (I would have thought that it would have been US52_E, but US 52 seems to be posted N-S here.)

US-52 keeps swapping from E-W to S-N in different states.  SC is one of the S-N states.

Quote
SC 6 TRUCK (Moncks Corner):  US52_N should be US52_W (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.2022325,-79.9898102,3a,75y,88.62h,81.37t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXdgjXMlVWZdezSKPusmBSg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

I brought it up due to inconsistency (see my SC 6 TRUCK comment from before).  I presume that it will eventually be posted E-W in its entirety based on SC making all odd-numbered routes N-S and even-numbered routes E-W (not dependent on the actual direction of the route).

South Carolina made this more difficult by apparently recently changing all even routes to E-W and all odds N-S regardless of how ridiculous it looks.  So there will unfortunately be a lot of these errors to correct. 

Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on September 23, 2019, 07:13:46 am
1.  US52Bus_S should be US52_S (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2954998,-79.8905505,3a,75y,337.77h,91.34t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1skMA1DnQ48wE_DM25qAVBcg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (I would have thought that it would have been US52_E, but US 52 seems to be posted N-S here.)

US-52 keeps swapping from E-W to S-N in different states.  SC is one of the S-N states.

The Florence-Darlington area appears to be the only N-S posted parts of US 52 anymore which is a change from 30 years ago when a lot more N-S postings existed.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: froggie on September 23, 2019, 08:07:43 am
US-52 keeps swapping from E-W to S-N in different states.  SC is one of the S-N states.

On this note, I recall Tim was very adamant that US 52 be labeled as an east-west route in CHM, regardless of what the signs in a given state said.  Are we reversing this for TM?
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: rickmastfan67 on September 23, 2019, 08:18:33 am
US-52 keeps swapping from E-W to S-N in different states.  SC is one of the S-N states.

On this note, I recall Tim was very adamant that US 52 be labeled as an east-west route in CHM, regardless of what the signs in a given state said.  Are we reversing this for TM?

I think only Tim wanted the 'main' route to all go in the same direction, W->E.  I don't recall him having any issues with us using '_S' or '_N' for the bannered children of it, depending on what state it was and how it was posted there.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 24, 2019, 04:38:16 pm
The last post included SC 34-SC 39.  I also added SC 28 TRUCK (Anderson) further up on the list.

Starting with SC 41:

SC 41:
1.  I would add a point at Dunes West Blvd (DunWestBlvd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8978497,-79.8153736,3a,37.5y,307.05h,87.56t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sYzrUOTIjS-H50iYCtfG6OQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) to have an intermediate point between US 17 and the Wando River.
2.  It looks like the Clements Ferry Rd (CleFerRd) intersection and the area around it was realigned based on the HERE Hybrid Maps.  The current CleFerRd should be *OldSC41_A with another point added for *OldSC41_B.

*OldSC41_A http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=32.928262&lon=-79.820634
CleFerRd http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=32.929940&lon=-79.820287
*OldSC41_B http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=32.930719&lon=-79.819214

3.  A shaping point just north of US17Alt_N may be useful as the route almost leaves tolerance.
4.  KnoRd should be KnoSidRd (Koonce Siding Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1294023,-79.2731946,3a,37.5y,294.27h,89.65t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1slXFaDgLq1Ay0wBvlqAHgNA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
5.  Signage shows SC 917 to follow Park St to US 76 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2002811,-79.251487,3a,75y,46.81h,97.66t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sa6OnZskdQR7GWMCog36hlw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) to SC 41 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2002026,-79.2532332,3a,75y,124.74h,81.07t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swsrmLqhYTBK7-OvnrYLoiw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) in Mullins instead of using Proctor St to SC 41.
6.  SC917_W should probably be SC917_N.

SC 41 ALT (Marion):
1.  ESelRd should be SelRd.

SC 45:
1.  GemDr needs to be synced with SC 453 TRUCK (Holly Hill).
2.  I would consider adding a point at Ranger Dr (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.3823089,-80.1420433,3a,75y,222.82h,92.11t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1srhCq1NE8uEFmnK2tdF28xw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (connects to SC 6 but not a CONN route).
3.  GenFraMarAve should be renamed for the Francis Marion Historic Burial Site (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4392106,-80.0876719,3a,75y,317.05h,90.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWGJYuy7JaUtd_dFDcCw7lw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
4.  I think S-8-134 should be WrenRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.3257546,-79.7941436,3a,15y,190.58h,89.22t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_zP7eSJ9cYbX257J_BS0tg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) as I do not see a sign for the route here.
5.  GilLakRd should be GuiLakeRd (Guilliard Lake Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.2537837,-79.6475365,3a,37.5y,352.81h,94.53t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sfEHYfd8ZGvayCWQHX-mbPQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
6.  HonHillRd should be PalBriRd (Palmers Bridge Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.1487858,-79.5452295,3a,75y,350.7h,84.35t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s6_SxpIaJ72DMpe2JbzImhg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 46:
1.  US321 should be recentered.
2.  The SC 170 points should be W and E  (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.2321787,-81.0201989,3a,75y,67.84h,94.63t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sE6JlFPpaxHv4dvepEUNZSA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)instead of S and N.
3.  I would consider adding a point at Buckwater Pkwy (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.2344393,-80.9024962,3a,75y,15.6h,81.38t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s73fdHi0zPcp2yXCgdJmaXw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) due to the 7.5 mile gap in visible points from SC170_N to BouSt.
4.  I would add a point at Bluffton Pkwy (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.25238,-80.8553462,3a,75y,239.17h,94.06t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sk-qG6SkU7-r0utP3wNEpwQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as it is signed as a Truck Route (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.2508218,-80.8559792,3a,75y,250.47h,85.17t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swH6TyqQeYwS_BetygsOWKw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) from SC 46 WB.  Not directly related, however, US 278 needs a point at Bluffton Pkwy (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.2329599,-80.7981825,3a,75y,287.9h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1slaTWf2n63U5Lu9Sp0w9bOw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) east of here as well.

SC 47 TRUCK (Elloree):
1.  SniSt should be FelRd_S (Felderville Rd) and needs to be recentered.  (verified via SCDOT Street Finder (http://206.74.144.42/streetfinder/Streetnames.htm))
2.  SC47Trk on SC 6 and SC 267 should be SC47Trk_S.  (I am not sure why I did not mention that on SC 6.)

SC 48:
1.  I think US 21 CONN and US 76 CONN for Columbia should be removed from the HB.  I did not see any CONN shields.  The US21Con label is acceptable.
2.  BluRd should be BluRd_W.
3.  I am tempted to suggest a point at Pineview Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9282261,-80.9642307,3a,75y,22.88h,88.23t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3HaRSNU1kOVb8jkmWW2wVQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).  It is not necessary, but it would add an intermediate point between I-77 and OldBluRd.
4.  Should a point be added (maybe Mount View Rd) for Congaree National Park?

SC 49:
1.  TerRd should be Fincher Rd (FinRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6537866,-81.758429,3a,15y,283.96h,93.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1seL-tLiHBLGKoMlRQXYXuEg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  LowFaiChuRd needs to be shortened.
3.  SC49TrkUni_W should be SC49TrkUni_S.
4.  MaiSt should be MainSt_W.
5.  The SCDOT Street Finder refers to SC215Con as SC 49 CONN.
6.  BroCreChuRd needs to be shortened.
7.  HorRd should be HordRd.
8.  +X003 should be replaced with a visible point at Sutton Spring Rd (SutSprRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9633776,-81.3233569,3a,75y,359.38h,83.58t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1shRhVsrgrypxRYJtKUa8YSw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
9.  CamRd should be recentered.
10.  SC274_S should be SC274_E (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0888515,-81.0981828,3a,75y,166.85h,93.69t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sVxuZtfRsGHL4SMnsknP1ig!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 49 TRUCK (Union):
1.  The SC 49 points should be S and N instead of W and E.

SC 51 (Pineville):
1.  +X001 could easily be removed, but it loses .04 miles in mileage of only a 1 mile route.

SC 51 will be started in the next post.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 26, 2019, 05:01:09 pm
SC 51:
1.  +X000 could be replaced by a visible point at ColColeRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4663702,-79.321728,3a,75y,10.43h,84.69t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGk45M_7G-s0mdjP0U444yg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
2.  BasRd should be BassRd.
3.  MaiSt should be MainSt.
4.  SGraRd should be GraRd.
5.  The point from US 52 TRUCK (Florence) at SC 51 needs to be added.
6.  Should US52Con be SC51Con?  (based off the SCDOT Street Finder)
7.  +X002 should be replaced by a visible point at Marsh Ave (MarAve) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1670788,-79.7900657,3a,75y,247.84h,69.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1stsAPeSzqaWcNhFfGdD9cig!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
8.  SCasDr should be CasDr.

SC 53:
1.  The SC 58 points should be W and E (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9688001,-80.0463982,3a,75y,95.05h,75.21t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s67sgQYb-dLWelGFsaPL6Dg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of N and S.

SC 55:
1.  DeaRd should be DealRd.

SC 56: (actually posted north-south (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4531865,-81.8758281,3a,75y,219.76h,77.78t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1skHCRYo7MXu6ecbej3qPP3w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) in Clinton, but here is the west shield (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.92802,-81.8913464,3a,75y,355.52h,86.13t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1shz1FhkxciYiIMrHrCdoWjQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  The BelRd point should be recentered.
2.  +X001 could be replaced by a visible point at Green Plain Rd (GrePlaRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4112082,-81.8627812,3a,75y,224.61h,95.13t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqhbFYCdt2XiZ542WmGP7Og!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  (However, it would lose 0.09 miles in mileage.)
3.  The SC56BusCliRd_N point should be recentered.
4.  A point should be added at State Park Rd (StaParkRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5874516,-81.8518307,3a,75y,299.69h,67.85t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sxbuEFAiULp-rcIR0bwkHwA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DxbuEFAiULp-rcIR0bwkHwA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D93.84947%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) for the Musgrove Mill State Historic Site.
5.  ZimLakRd should be ZimLakeRd.
6.  UniSt should be UniSt_S.
7.  EHenSt should be HenSt_E (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9475235,-81.9230159,3a,75y,350.8h,69.77t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1suocgHCKhOEPjhKpxA0CgKw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 56 BUS (Clinton):
1.  SC56_N should be recentered.

SC 57:
1.  A point should be added at State Park Rd for the Little Pee Dee State Park (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.31066,-79.3047799,3a,75y,358.68h,90.17t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1scCCBWfXjVSdHJOONJDqsvw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  This maybe should be added to SC 9 if not already.
2. ECouRd should be CouRd.

SC 58:  (this route needs to be flipped)
1.  +X001 should be replaced by a visible point at Olive Grove Rd (OliGroRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9075788,-80.0435572,3a,75y,219.02h,69.9t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sGjyjUOP6Bwy395emYhNx_A!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DGjyjUOP6Bwy395emYhNx_A%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D309.79694%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  The SC 341 point needs to be recentered and synced with it.

SC 59:
1.  HarDr should be HartDr.
2.  StrFarRd should be StrFarmRd.
3.  SFaiSt should be FaiSt.

SC 60:
1.  +X001 should be replaced by a visible point at Weed Dr.

SC 61:  (will need to be flipped from south to north (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.1145523,-80.7031247,3a,75y,163.01h,92.67t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sH33FklvQyD0POJkMPy_QfQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  This comment is specifically for US 15, which should have a point added for the Colleton State Park (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.0610391,-80.6158271,3a,75y,294.97h,96.28t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sxsBFGaiRKM5PQfi8zDJIqw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) entrance just north of SC 61.
2.  OldBeeHilRd needs to be shortened and edited.
3.  The US17Alt points need to be recentered.
4.  +X003 should be replaced with a point at Summers Dr (SumDr).
5.  SC165Con should be SC61Con.
6.  A point should be added at Tobias Garden Blvd on this route (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8116288,-80.0285834,3a,75y,177.11h,88.05t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sa1r8Gz5gtzUwkSokS7aYAA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Da1r8Gz5gtzUwkSokS7aYAA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D181.04272%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192) and SC 461 (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8073378,-80.0305395,3a,75y,78.77h,90.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1spddtR48hr3ntJOUw18d_kA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).  (covers only change for SC 461)

SC 63:
1.  SnyHwy should be Moselle Rd (MosRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.90873,-80.9443976,3a,37.5y,315.08h,93.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sZsJjw-Ei3_-Qg_nvaXswfA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
2.  AdrChuRd should be AdnChuRd (Adnah Church Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8900639,-80.886589,3a,15y,325.06h,86.79t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWLfGPXswa2hwALhv3uQ9kQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
3.  PinGroRd should be PineGroRd.
4.  The SC 63 (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8875513,-80.6920799,3a,75y,284.39h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s01cXbercTF6maOaHLCZg7g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) points on US 17 ALT should be S and N instead of W and E.
5.  FisSt could easily be removed.

SC 64:
1.  SRS should be lengthened.  (I presume SavRivSite or whatever you may have used for SC 39)
2.  +X001 should be replaced with a point at Patterson Mill Rd (PatMillRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.240367,-81.3987402,3a,75y,215.65h,67.93t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1shhwFLY6HaT--rB5Lq0VhqA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  BurSt should be BurrSt.
4.  I would change S-6-14 to Friendship Rd (FriRd) (clarified via SCDOT Street Finder) as GSV is too old to clarify the route number.
5.  The SC 212 point needs to be synced.
6.  The DocCreRd needs to be recentered.
7.  +X003 could easily be replaced with a point at Featherbed Rd (FeaRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8253453,-80.559223,3a,75y,267.78h,83.03t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sBzG611LnE6rGgaNfDADCIw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (loses .06 miles of mileage).
8.  The US17 point should be recentered.

SC 65:
1.  27thAve should be OceBlvd_S (for Ocean Blvd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8023621,-78.7121949,3a,75y,13.08h,98.57t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sP6CscS1EScvCHBqAh0G7OA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 66:
1.  +X002 could easily be replaced with a point at Indian Creek Rd (IndCreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4218489,-81.7845802,3a,37.5y,308h,94.21t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sSegYQnXuVQaEF4NE0ygeog!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DSegYQnXuVQaEF4NE0ygeog%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D318.05136%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192)
2. S-36-356 should be replaced with Cromer Rd (CroRd).  (verified via SCDOT Street Finder)
3.  +X006 could be replaced with a point at Little Egypt Rd (LitEgyRd).  (verified via SCDOT Street Finder, loses .013 miles if done though)

SC 67:
1.  I would add a point at Five Notch Rd (FiveNotRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9916223,-82.1318127,3a,75y,245.35h,91.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sdePcRVjJpfHJcxUO8YsaRA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) due to the route being near out-of-tolerance and to add mileage.
2.  McFerRd should be McFRd.

SC 70:
1.  MaiSt should be MainSt_W.
2.  YalRd should be YaleRd.
3.  GooHopRd should be GoodHopeRd.
4.  I'd consider adding a point at Slab Landing Rd due to the connection to Cope and the lack of points between SC 332 and US 301/601, but it is not truly necessary.

SC 71:  (route will need to be flipped as SB is EB (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2169994,-82.5865008,3a,75y,184.47h,94.07t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snj-WIPRTMb9Kxsq8TsxJkA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  +X001 could easily be replaced with a point at Ferguson Rd (FerRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1842976,-82.4313981,3a,37.5y,118.89h,96.78t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sLOP6LBBLuouHE3b65VvG0A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 71 TRUCK (Abbeville):
1.  SC71_W should be SC71_N and synced with SC 71, SC 28, and SC 20 TRUCK (Abbeville). 
2.  Note that the OldCalFalRd change to HaiSt on SC 20 TRUCK (Abbeville) applies here too.
3.  Note that the entire route is concurrent with SC 20 TRUCK (Abbeville) and should be synced with it.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on September 28, 2019, 03:35:09 pm
SC 28-61 changes completed and will be sent in shortly, including deletion of US 21 CON Columbia and US 76-178 Truck Anderson

The US 21 CON in Ridgeway is posted as US 21 CONN with secondary style markers on both ends - https://goo.gl/maps/S4i92HL3rqgtbiDAA - so I left that label intact.

I also extended SC 151 to US 401 CON as it is also posted to do so from US 52-401 and from US 401 CON...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 28, 2019, 08:37:59 pm
SC 63-SC 71 were completed in my previous post.

Submission Comments: (finalized 9/29/2019 at 8:30 AM)
SC 28: 
1.  The SC20Trk label should have been changed to SC20Trk_W. (from what I saw on GitHub before it went in the HB)
2.   I still think that US76/123_W should be US76/123 based on the manual (see below).
Quote
At splits where two concurrent routes leave, usually no suffix is needed. So if US 90 joins US 25, then US 80 joins, and then US 80/US 90 splits off together, the US80/90 point needs no suffix.
SC 28 TRUCK (Anderson):  SC28_E needs to be synced with SC 28, SC 28 BUS (Anderson), and US 76.
SC 34 TRUCK (Camden)/US 1 TRUCK (Camden): YorkSt should be YorkSt_E.  (This was done on US 521 TRUCK (East Camden)).
US 521 TRUCK (Camden): CheFerRd should be YorkSt_E (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2426321,-80.6183705,3a,75y,219.12h,87.17t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sYDlttEkOXvMfnCTKOk2cMg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
SC 39:  My Savannah River Site (SRS) label comment for it being lengthened from SC 64 applies to this route as well presuming that you edited SC 39 before I looked at SC 64.
SC 917:  US76 should be US76_W.
US 76 CONN (Columbia):  Should this have been deleted from the HB? (US 21 CONN was.)

I will restart with SC 72 below.

SC 72:
1. Noting here so it is not forgotten later, but SC 203 TRUCK (Abbeville) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1735302,-82.3734862,3a,37.5y,296.29h,92.71t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sL2618oY4NMzjX1YPQseMRw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) nearby is signed from the SC 20/SC 72 intersection.
2.  OldFaiRd should be for Cambridge St Ext (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1865799,-82.3480673,3a,75y,297.79h,92.66t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ss-7ATwiauNTixXVOyf0yjw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). 
3.  The SC254 point needs to be synced with SC 254, US 25, and US 178.
4.  RidRd needs to be relocated to the correct intersection.
5.  US176/121_S should be US176/121.  (Note that SC72_S on SC 121 should be SC72_W.)
6.  US176_N should be US176_W.  (correct on SC 121, the label on US 176 should be SC72/121)
7.  A point should be added at State Park Dr (StaParkDr) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6834622,-81.2488343,3a,75y,99.21h,78.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAQhQLUK4-9b5ljc2Ydvr7Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for Chester State Park.  (also affects SC 121)
8.  The SC9_S point needs to be synced with SC 97.
9.  +X007 should be replaced with a visible point at Hall Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7579642,-81.1426838,3a,75y,21.27h,78.51t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sl4SydpkmF6Ik9krkDSgHIA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  (also affects SC 121)

SC 72 BUS (Greenwood):
1.  CamAve should be CamAve_E (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1952437,-82.1611386,3a,75y,203.59h,85.73t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snwWAjV_qfHUcf9D7qgSGXA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 72 BUS (Clinton):
1.  The SC56Bus points should be E and W instead of S and N.

SC 75:
1.  +X006(US521) could be replaced with a visible point at Steel Hill Rd (SteHillRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8893924,-80.797898,3a,15y,205.52h,87.71t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1szwS0ClSPfy71_p67_7mtFg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  (loses .07 miles in mileage for only an 8 mile route)  (change would also affect US 521)

SC 75 TRUCK (Van Wyck):
1.  The SC 75 points should be S and N instead of W and E.  (I did not see any directional banners though.)
2.  SC5_E should be SC5_S.
3.  A point should be added for Andrew Jackson Park Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8426833,-80.8102266,3a,30y,2.58h,92.22t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAov5PwSsaXovbjyQgKaoEQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) at the entrance to Andrew Jackson State Park.  (also affects US 521)

SC 80:
1.  I am noting this SC 101 TRUCK shield (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8937405,-82.2319406,3a,75y,314.79h,87.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1afCm7dND8Puo4j-jhyv1Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as a reminder to check this out later.
2.  SC80 on SC 290 TRUCK (Greer) should be US29/80.

SC 81:
1.  SC28_S should be SC28_E.
2. RusDamOveRd needs to be shortened.
3.   +X002 could be replaced by a visible point at Millwood Ramp Rd (MilRampRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0750607,-82.5949865,3a,75y,175.94h,89.21t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1siNNABIwU41WzZ--Ppt47hA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DiNNABIwU41WzZ--Ppt47hA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D20.500824%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).  (loses .06 miles of mileage)
4.  A point should be added at Calhoun Falls State Park Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1076717,-82.5983735,3a,75y,196.02h,86.28t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sawdV8xYm6MDeyKudDszFpw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DawdV8xYm6MDeyKudDszFpw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D160%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) for Calhoun Falls State Park.
5.  SC 413 seems to be signed along SC 184 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.3073824,-82.6624562,3a,75y,273.47h,90.83t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snsSx1OV0UZGCuNwXDpz3SQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) west to SC 81 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.3068813,-82.6635147,3a,75y,81.47h,96.64t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMHAGN76lPCBzJpgSpHJfZQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
6.  FreDeaRd should be FredDeanRd.
7.  FlaRd should be FlatRockRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4352054,-82.6614496,3a,15y,25.78h,89.23t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1soICAMf7cm3dsfVCUTFElCQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
8.  Based on what you did with SC 20, I presume that you are maybe truncating SC 81 at SC 124.

SC 88:
1.  EQueSt should be QueSt_E.
2.  I believe EigMilRd should be 18MileRd.

SC 90:
1.  ECoxFerRd should be CoxFerRd.
2.  The IntDr (International Dr) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8219511,-78.9141867,3a,75y,63.24h,89.58t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sEkb4DNM46rQLVmNbjkNX4w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) point needs to be relocated.
3.  +X002 should be replaced by a visible point at Live Oak Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8530387,-78.7729499,3a,75y,5.87h,89.47t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s9FKxK-eJ4kxF_bepKJcucA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
4.  The SCDOT Street Finder tells me WamRd should be Hwy57. 
5.  RobEdgPky should be RobEdgePkwy.
6.  A point should be added at Sea Mountain Hwy (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8572351,-78.6609289,3a,75y,76.43h,90.64t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXlVfv5uIHQtrKkzrui2Jow!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) just west of US 17/SC 9.  I arguably could recommend a point on SC 9 at Sea Mountain Hwy as well.
7.  There also seems to be a SC90Con just north of Sea Mountain Hwy at OldeHwy17.

SC 92:
1.  +X001 should be replaced with a visible point at Browning Rd (BroRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6588878,-81.920733,3a,75y,82.06h,88.11t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sEjxKekNEpJBLeco2JKrKew!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 93:
1.  The SCDOT Street Finder shows it ending at US 76/SC 28 east of downtown Clemson though it is posted at US 76/US 123/SC 28 northwest of downtown (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6911476,-82.8679399,3a,75y,155.07h,97.53t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sY8tixgnXhQTPb6RssJMy2Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  It seems to be fully posted through Clemson so it should stay IMO.
2.  OldSC133 (if kept) should be College Ave (ColAve) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6832477,-82.8375159,3a,75y,261.49h,77.28t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sgvkIgx0lgZZ3J-bbqcRgsw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  +X002 could be replaced with a point at B St (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8315375,-82.5978798,3a,75y,85.34h,77.79t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s-Y0GpVKz219D-XKGfBq5ig!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D-Y0GpVKz219D-XKGfBq5ig%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D325.9024%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).    US 123 should have a point added at B St (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8232893,-82.5878848,3a,75y,183.39h,99.14t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sCTYKgeN5aRQ6LfuoyTEWhw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as well.

SC 97:
1.  NeaSwiRd should be NealSwiRd.
2.  SC200_N should be SC200_E (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5983382,-80.8858352,3a,75y,134.38h,97.35t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sAXB9WbOmIx3EdvUrMFM3Uw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DAXB9WbOmIx3EdvUrMFM3Uw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D260%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  US21/200_S should be US21/200.
4.  I would consider adding a point at Brown Rd (BroRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6225347,-81.0743166,3a,75y,319.21h,84.37t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1soRSPq7L1xkc9Ue3lAffzLw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and then a hidden shaping point west of there for shaping purposes.
5.  The SC9_S point needs to be synced with SC 9, SC 9 BUS (Chester), SC 72, and SC 121. (may have been done via SC 72)
6.  SC72/121_N should be SC72/121.
7.  OldYorRd should be OldYorkRd.
8.  I would consider adding a point at Grant Rd (verified via SCDOT Street Finder) as the route is close to going out of tolerance here.
9.  SuzBolRd should be SuzyBoleRd.  (verified via SCDOT Street Finder)
10.  The SC 211 points should be N and S (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9831467,-81.416599,3a,75y,76.23h,84.46t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sDFhQ59_KHPQ99FvLzIks3w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of W and E.
11.  I would consider adding a point at McKnight Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0242371,-81.4030897,3a,15y,52.64h,92.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_YhbMOqiAHvac7CLaokTxA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route is close to going out of tolerance here.
12.  EMaiSt should be NimRd (Nimitz Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0429899,-81.4061241,3a,75y,1.29h,82.47t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s426Grf-9y7WRngyUWdZohg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
13.  WMaiSt should be LegRd (Legion Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0413581,-81.4116141,3a,75y,211.41h,94.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sVO95dCfdd7CB71yWBFKMhw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
14.  The SC5 point should be S-11-687 (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0719028,-81.4393544,3a,75y,287.01h,93.46t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sD-QepwSSXw1-9P80LJ2HMQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  The new SC5 point should be at the relocated SC 5/SC 97 intersection (mentioned on SC 5.)

SC 101:
1.  DixChuRd should be DiaChuRd (Dials Church Rd) (verified via SCDOT Street Finder).
2.  NMaiSt should be MainSt_N.
3.  SC14_S should be SC14_E.
4.  I would add a point at Edwards St (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7352051,-82.0444588,3a,75y,218.21h,83.79t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sOxN0PSyZyLmrzzSBPgcm0w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for shaping purposes.
5.  I would add a point at Old Woodruff Rd (verified via SCDOT Street Finder) between I-85 and BroMcCRd as the out almost goes out of tolerance here.
6.  The SC 101 TRUCK route I mentioned on SC 80 has a beginning point there based on 2008 GSV (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.911659,-82.2078421,3a,75y,302.08h,83.34t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sUL05SdHZkVzNgBHjPtJhVA!2e0!5s20090901T000000!7i3328!8i1664).  This sign is not there in January 2019 GSV.
7.  SLinSt should be SnowSt (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9279214,-82.2223307,3a,75y,343.06h,83.02t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ss9jrWDvHD4wHmN7x7ATsUA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and slightly relocated.
8.  SC14_N should be SC14_W.
9.  I would add points at Fews Chapel Rd (FewChaRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0365462,-82.3023349,3a,75y,349.76h,97.89t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sv88u4klL1AgxOSE2yayTAw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and Jordan Rd (JorRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0749506,-82.3085523,3a,75y,31.75h,96.43t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQPjrUMZdHEzPIw27_gtXXQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.

SC 102: (probably needs to be flipped)
1.  I am not sure offhand what this US 15 TRUCK (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.3981247,-80.0588901,3a,75y,244.04h,75.46t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sNcP--qZy75QehsV20x7mEg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (on US 15 BUS) may be about.  I see no reason to include it if it just follows US 15 BUS from SC 102 to US 15.
2.  EOldCamRd should be OldCamRd.
3.  PatSocHilRd needs to be shortened.
4.  S-13-716 should be Turnage Rd (TurRd) due to the old GSV from 2008.  (verified via SCDOT Street Finder)
5.  The SC9 point should be slightly recentered.

SC 105:
1.  WalFarRd should be WalFarmRd.  (also affects SC 211)
2.  SmiForRd should be SmiFordRd and recentered.
3.  I would put a point at Brick House Rd (BriHouRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0001732,-81.5658396,3a,37.5y,168.34h,92.15t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJpDqENQnPxy_AaNM8OyQ2Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.
4.  Is there a SC 105 CONN on the southwest connector road near SC 329?
5.  The SC 18 points should be W and E (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0571459,-81.6402279,3a,75y,205.31h,72.4t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sTT5IjWiWS6zMd9SZn5tHDQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of S and N and synced with it.
6.  The SC 150 points should be E and W (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8966828,-81.7602685,3a,75y,20h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sEPN0oT0Ef_udQjfz4O9y_g!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DEPN0oT0Ef_udQjfz4O9y_g%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D20%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) instead of N and S.

SC 107:
1.  OcoStPk should be OcoSP or State Park Rd (StaParkRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8670748,-83.1078777,3a,75y,70.63h,78.98t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1srHes2iEFTD4PHU3MbgJKBw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DrHes2iEFTD4PHU3MbgJKBw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D194.58867%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  A point should be added for the Cherry Hill Recreational Area (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9423155,-83.088648,3a,75y,57.07h,91.38t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sjgVuYf0LrTooxGRLksei2g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  FisHatRd should have been FishHatRd.
4.  The SC/NC could could arguably be relocated.  (also affects NC 107)

SC 109:
1.  BoMelLp should be for Woodward Mill Rd (WooMillRd).  (verified via SCDOT Street Finder)
2.  SC9_E should be SC9_S.

SC 110: (should be flipped from west to east (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0411406,-81.8152208,3a,75y,193.27h,82.86t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sOmfQMSLb9rLgXjRJTmicdw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  A point should be added on his route and US 29 at Moore St (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0222982,-81.8027017,3a,75y,27.91h,82.33t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s02xu6wiNjTV6MkUpzeJb9w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  (practically a CONN route)
2.  I should have suggested a point at the Cowpens National Battlefield entrance (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1420258,-81.8162539,3a,75y,131.36h,83.64t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_EcJFctDH3Zov40eKMSJfw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) on SC 11 just east of the US 221 ALT/SC 11/SC 110 intersection.

SC 113:
1.  The SC 302 points should probably be W and E instead of S and N.

SC 114:
1.  The SC 18 points should be W and E instead of S and N.
2.  I would add a point at Tump Smith Rd (TumpSmiRd) (verified via SCDOT Street Finder) as the route is dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.  (also it would add some distance to a short route)

SC 116:
1.  Is there a better label at the western end than just End?

SC 118:
1.  Note that SC 19 TRUCK (Aiken) should be completely concurrent with this route.  Ultimately the only part of SC 19 TRUCK (Aiken) that is not part of SC 118 seems to be the southeast quadrant that is SC 302 from SC 19 (south of Aiken) to US 78 (east of Aiken).
2.  SC302 should be SC302_W.
3.  The ArbCt point should become a hidden point just like on SC 19 TRUCK (Aiken).  (also affects US 1 TRUCK (Aiken) and US 78 TRUCK (Aiken).
4.  It is posted from SC 19 pointing west (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5228207,-81.7192068,3a,75y,3.63h,94.82t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s0c3S5B7-mtaxYNR5xIEa2A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). 

SC 120:
1.  I would add a point at Cox Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8206443,-80.4451586,3a,75y,12.89h,62.96t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1szQjXUCJmMyATlLVpNdt14g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) as the route id close to going out of tolerance nearby.
2.  I would add a point at McCrays Mill Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9042114,-80.3791871,3a,37.5y,216.11h,93.37t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1szv0BPniYvARaQmwAgAg_Cw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)(McCMillRd) as the route id close to going out of tolerance nearby.
3.  The SC 763 points should be S and N (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9208335,-80.3729269,3a,75y,102.5h,89.23t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sp9f6e1DsS07BVkfw3hFYNw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of W and E.
4.  A point should be added on US 521 at Alice Dr (AliDr) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9662562,-80.3851177,3a,75y,219.3h,96.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sei4dS390tYsJICIvgWJiiQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) due to the connection to SC 120.

SC 121:
1. The SCDOT Street Finder shows two SC 125 CONNs here.  (affects US 25 and potentially US 1, US 78, and US 278)
2.  SC 230 is posted at the SC 125 intersection (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4919031,-81.9536932,3a,75y,263.02h,86.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sIopUml1xR64c_kdbsK1hzw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).  I think this may be a "MISSING TO" situation.  (also affects US 25, SC 125, and SC 125 TRUCK (North Augusta))
3.  If SC 230 is extended, SC230 will need to be SC230_W.  (also affects US 25 and maybe SC 125 TRUCK)
4.  The SCDOT Street Finder shows I-520Con as US25Con.  (also affects US 25)
5.  It looks like S-19-29 should be relocated and maybe be renamed Greenhouse Rd (GreRd).  Note that it looks like US 25/SC 121 is being widened to four lanes (I did not check a source) from a few miles north of I-20 almost to SC 19.  I would relook at this section very closely. (also obviously affects US 25)
6.  I would add a point at McCreight St (McCSt) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8296764,-81.7965313,3a,75y,279.24h,64.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sSoqPcLQNLwlNI_1eoIDj8Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for shaping purposes.
7.  FruHilRd should be FruHillRd.
8.  NJenSt should be JenSt.
9.  ColSt should be ColSt_S. (clarified via SCDOT Street Finder)
10.  SC72_S should be SC72_W.
11.  See numbers 7-9 on SC 72.
12.  US21_S needs to be relocated and synced with it.  (also affects US 21)

SC 122:
1. WJohSt should be JohSt_W (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9265735,-81.0326671,3a,37.5y,93.02h,95.37t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sg3HlK367THFK0iVTQlhS5g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
2.  MaiSt should be MainSt.
3.  It looks like OakAve should be replaced with AnnLn (Annie Ln) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9297592,-81.021456,3a,75y,130.94h,80.09t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sR-TkDlAUwcBUyCCyLbSYqg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  Oakland Ave has an overpass over SC 122 without an interchange.

SC 124:
1.  LoiAve should be LoisAve.
2.  Based on what you did with SC 20, I presume that you are maybe truncating SC 81 at SC 124.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on October 02, 2019, 06:39:46 am


SC 93:
1.  The SCDOT Street Finder shows it ending at US 76/SC 28 east of downtown Clemson though it is posted at US 76/US 123/SC 28 northwest of downtown (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6911476,-82.8679399,3a,75y,155.07h,97.53t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sY8tixgnXhQTPb6RssJMy2Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  It seems to be fully posted through Clemson so it should stay IMO.


There is late 2018 GMSV at the US 76/SC 28 interchange that shows SC 93 being truncated to that point.  The current Pickens County and Clemson SCDOT maps show it truncated too.  So I will truncate SC 93 and change appropriate routes that cross it west of here.

The SC 230 thing is weird.  It is posted from all 3 directions including JCT SC 230 advance markers.  These go back to 2008 but I know there didn't use to be any 230 markers there.  There is a SC 230 END posting where it meets US 25/SC 121.  No SCDOT maps show it extended so I am inclined to leave it be.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 02, 2019, 04:42:41 pm
SC 125:
1.  PatMilRd should be PatMillRd.
2.  I am fine with the Savannah River Site set-up despite its rarity though I still think SRS should be SavRivSite and OldSC64 should be *OldSC64 (marked as closed).
3.  A point should be added at Hammond Rd (HamRd) for the Redcliffe Plantation State Historic Site (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4039334,-81.8541794,3a,75y,62.25h,83.6t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sRxRRtgkkavumVR-Lr495EA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192). (US 278 (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4229768,-81.8606828,3a,75y,152.71h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1st9coHybpIDABz667eiRtkw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) should have a corresponding point at Hammond Rd as well.)
4.  The label on US 278 where it splits from SC 125 at US 1/78 should be US 1/78 instead of US1/78_N (matches SC 125).
5. +005 should be replaced with a visible point at Carolina Springs Spur (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4942649,-81.9399903,3a,37.5y,171.04h,98.03t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sje96yDOuViywmq1LVIAXJQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (loses .07 miles in mileage)
6.  US25Con should be SC125Con based on the SCDOT Street Finder.

SC 125 TRUCK (North Augusta):
1.  SC230 should be US25Bus/230.
2.  I would prefer US25/121 be US25/121_N here as both are north-south routes.  (though I am fine with it as-is due to SC125_S handling the south end of the Truck Route)
3.  Theoretically, this route should be flipped from south to north.  It seems to be a SB Truck Route only though based on signage.

SC 126:
1.  I recommend recentering the I-520 point.

SC 127:
1.  SHarStExt should be HarStExt (S Harper St Extension) based on the SCDOT Street Finder.  (also affects US 221 TRUCK (Laurens))
2.  US76/221 should be just US76 or US76/76Bus.

SC 129:
1.  SC292_N should be SC292_E (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0418581,-82.0901552,3a,75y,34.25h,84.18t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sOJ9c0O_wr3EbAV2S7Z0EyA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  +X001 should be replaced with a visible point at Old Landfill Rd (OldLanRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9692208,-82.097147,3a,75y,307.47h,87.61t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1spxpxAoxX4Bgr5Lmr33zdHw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DpxpxAoxX4Bgr5Lmr33zdHw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D132.78006%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  JohDodRd should be JohnDoddRd.

SC 130: (should be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7122264,-82.9246568,3a,75y,150.99h,85.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sVOZxMO8sWXfAPBDvBgxujw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) though the EAST banner (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6853065,-82.956539,3a,75y,108.65h,99.34t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sdpiE8sDYf77r0EthNW6RGQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) at the beginning makes it seem otherwise)
1.  I would replace +X000 with a point at Walnut St (WalSt) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6860478,-82.9499924,3a,75y,132.25h,81.07t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sofoKqlway32YBDh2E5tBIw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DofoKqlway32YBDh2E5tBIw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D304.21848%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  The SC 183 points should be N and S (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8070301,-82.9090095,3a,75y,340.96h,86.41t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sbwzzEJVluVefhSw0_7M6Yw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of E and W.
3.  NLitRivRd should be LitRivRd.

SC 133:
1.  I would consider adding a point at the Twelve Mile Recreational Area (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7045511,-82.8336002,3a,75y,311.94h,84.54t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1scU4WYYnXzBY9XPGKduv9rw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DcU4WYYnXzBY9XPGKduv9rw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D100%26pitch%3D-10%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  JonMilRd should be JonMillRd.
3.  KeoBapChuRd should be shortened.
4.  I would consider a point at Little Grove Creek Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8908061,-82.8360987,3a,75y,89.98h,84.43t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sv6ajC7yLYMc1I8qtuygFKw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Dv6ajC7yLYMc1I8qtuygFKw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D338.9036%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) as the route almost goes out of tolerance here.

SC 135:
1.  FlaRocRd should be FlaRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7556709,-82.642768,3a,75y,302.36h,87.76t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1szYCyAzhVaVgMK2W9ynOAhw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
2.  The SC 8 points should be E and W (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8188133,-82.6004816,3a,75y,271.63h,91.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sj2DthDlZt9b-ZBA4qgDJaw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of S and N.
3.  I should have previously recommended a point on SC 8 for Ross Ave (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8176066,-82.6045476,3a,75y,213.18h,89.79t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sszBerX7eQtarO3gK5Ar2oQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DszBerX7eQtarO3gK5Ar2oQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D22.903366%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
4.  LenRd should be GleRd (Glenwood Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8445789,-82.5975709,3a,75y,115.07h,85.81t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1svCv6M-EQZ2ZvoCzeeV1-Bw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and relocated.
5.  I would consider a point at Oolenoy Church Rd (OolChuRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9916503,-82.6389043,3a,37.5y,355.76h,92.79t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sl1qEiwyIvABPxC6cQlzuBg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.  A couple of other areas between SC 93 and SC 11 get somewhat near the tolerance lines as well.

SC 137:
1.  KelMilRd should be KelMillRd.

SC 145:
1.  RefVisDr should be LakeBeeRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5787572,-80.233251,3a,75y,20.64h,89.97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1skm-xDBcV16wxD-ksdor-og!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  MaiSt should be MainSt.  (The Wikipedia article on SC 145 refers this road as SC 9 BUS (Chesterfield) for some reason...)

SC 146:
1.  The SC 417 points should be S and N (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7902742,-82.1801642,3a,75y,118.39h,78.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s0Ig3EqQReXFuT7ExzXnWNQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of W and E.

SC 150:
1.  LimSt should be LimSt_N.
2.  OldPostRd should be GraPondRd (Grassy Pond Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1368559,-81.6723983,3a,75y,240.67h,103.32t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPrJtMcPEhDvXL8v2EUGhyA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 151:
1.  WOldCamRd should be OldCamRd.
2.  I would add a point at Sowelltown Rd (SowRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4804713,-80.2947365,3a,15y,164.92h,91.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1suQIrXsRHBDhbFcuq4oAVEA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route almost leaves tolerance here.
3.  MacRd should be MacAngRd (Macedonia-Angelus Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5809905,-80.3637067,3a,37.5y,67.56h,91.35t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFEcviQ4y_JOijfJykMuadA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
4.  EvaMilRd should be EvaMillRd.

SC 151 BUS (Hartsville)
1.  CarAve should be CarAve_E (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.3752013,-80.0708409,3a,75y,303.2h,84.96t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sw37CmqQKIZMF6OzTHpf-ug!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 153:
1.  These shields (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7634604,-82.4494808,3a,75y,214.14h,98.94t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sdxjXsjiQ-AQ_Gn63KNU0Fg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DdxjXsjiQ-AQ_Gn63KNU0Fg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D289.59552%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) and the SCDOT Street Finder shows this route extended past I-185.  Also note for later that SC 153 is currently under construction to be extended north of US 123 to Saluda Dam Rd (https://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/news/local/2019/05/31/sc-state-highway-153-expansion-aims-help-easley-traffic-not-powdersville-congestion/1262560001/) with a scheduled completion of December 2020. (article behind paywall)

SC 154: (should probably be flipped, but I saw this just north of US 76 (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9820006,-80.2091795,3a,75y,15.66h,91.77t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sKACaZV2I7gSd8RjSCQATxg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  MarMcLBetRd should be shortened.
2.  I would add a point at Manville-St Charles Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0869595,-80.2258184,3a,75y,323.33h,80.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sYOWaZmDxss2b-jJdk-w0Pw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route gets very close to leaving tolerance just north of here.
3.  US15/34 should just be US15 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2100563,-80.2605057,3a,75y,74.84h,94.68t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sU_MeRk4xNr-KpNiD2yopgw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 157 TRUCK (Kershaw):
1.  SC157_E should be SC157_S (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5495582,-80.5770156,3a,75y,82.75h,102.85t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_kGxsJuyjHY3a96wsz7WWg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 160 TRUCK (Fort Mill):
1.  I think it is safe to ignore this odd error on SC 160 at the west end (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0197537,-80.9573964,3a,75y,142.03h,85.78t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWDLE7WTeyE_75sWsyj2Pqw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 161:
1.  The SC 274 points should be E and W (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9759339,-81.057922,3a,75y,236.03h,92.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1tODy3f1EoLOAohxpExjlg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of S and N.

SC 162:
1.  The SC 174 point should be recentered.

SC 165:
1.  The SC61Con point should be recentered.

SC 170:
1.  I'd consider recommending recentering the border point, but I do not want to mess with GA.
2.  On US 17, the SC 170 points should be W and E (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.1659208,-81.1241353,3a,75y,60h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sU_0PthGd3oBTBL4IkGbdTQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of S and N.
3.  I would add a point at Central Ave (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.208027,-81.0705306,3a,75y,5.42h,85.97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5kZtZMO6UK9vQ1x-CPWCyw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) (CenAve) in order to get the line further away from US 17.
4.  LimRd should be LimHouRd (two words based on SCDOT Street Finder).
5.  The US21Bus intersection needs to be relocated.

SC 171:
1.  The SCDOT Street Finder shows its existing on Center St to Arctic Ave.
2.  Should FtJohRd be FortJohRd?  (I think FtJohRd may be acceptable...)
3.  A point should be added at Harbor View Rd (HarViewRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7549441,-79.9723579,3a,75y,212.17h,99.32t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sjOr4EjOuK0k8EeJfgrPzxA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) due to the connection to SC 30.
4.  The SC 61 points should be S and N (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7964309,-79.9946303,3a,75y,277.52h,80.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sEaqJu6m-pBdKj2rkWIkUTw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) instead of E and W.
5.  A point should be added for the Charles Towne Landing State Historic Site (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8102773,-79.9951869,3a,75y,34.72h,95.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1stEQSGz9L0MO7bCC47epoQw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).  There is also a "TO SOUTH SC 7" (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8114451,-79.9949203,3a,75y,34.72h,95.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sM6UTVjk59dFNeoMpvoEnmQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) shield at nearby Charlestowne Dr.  I did not see a "TO SC 171" on SC 7 at Charlestowne Dr.

SC 172:
1.  In GSV, SC 692 (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.6271003,-81.0480748,3a,75y,67.47h,93.32t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3GW6jID4_I4M4hftQiMBAg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) is posted along with this route from US 178.
2.  If 1 is done, SC692 should be SC692_W.
3.  DusTraDr should be AmbRd (Amber Rd) based on the SCDOT Street Finder.

SC 174: (may need to be flipped)
1.  GSV shows a shield at the End point (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.4931078,-80.3402213,3a,75y,245.98h,98.72t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sdUyqPWRDcFrOTb0BRuB32w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656), but the SCDOT Street finder shows the end around YacCluRd (should be YacClubRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.4918366,-80.3434914,3a,75y,242.52h,98.99t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_2TVy8103Ym8d-TK6QKTcw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)).
2.  PinLanRd should be PineLanRd.
3.  I mentioned on SC 162 that the point there should be recentered.

SC 182: (may need to be flipped)
1.  +X001 could be replaced with a visible point at Fishers Cove Rd (FisCoveRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5130884,-83.0062308,3a,75y,221.45h,87.93t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s9a9G_A9CCeh7miV47HpyXA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D9a9G_A9CCeh7miV47HpyXA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D325.9042%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).  (the route would lose .08 miles though)
2.  This sign (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5567821,-83.0467286,3a,75y,243.3h,71.94t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sGlDTUVln7GTP2tNMhuTZ2A!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DGlDTUVln7GTP2tNMhuTZ2A%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D313.9499%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) leads me to want to suggest a point on SC 11 at Greer Rd, but I did not see a "TO SC 182" there.
3.  Not necessary, but a point at Bethel Church Rd (BetChuRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5960917,-83.0207817,3a,75y,131.64h,82.69t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s2LuvfIqb8WJd118LU8sQWw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D2LuvfIqb8WJd118LU8sQWw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D229.93771%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) would add .12 miles of mileage.

SC 183:
1.  I would add a point at Duck Pond Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7339491,-83.0722983,3a,75y,159.41h,78.68t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sKiYxnF-PeD8VpetyXtTy1A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route is dangeorusly close to going out of tolerance here.
2.  The SC 28 points should be W and E instead of N and S.
3.  The SC 130 points should be W and E (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8070813,-82.9091012,3a,75y,339.35h,87.61t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sng_FTropLnJldRtbRIAQJQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of N and S.
4.  GapHilRd should be GapHillRd.
5.  I would add a point at Stephens Rd (SteRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.870692,-82.7557913,3a,75y,22.84h,90.89t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s8Tx1bfgYx7B6K5YwM_-8TQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route is dangeorusly close to going out of tolerance here.
6.  The SC 8 points should be E and W (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8898756,-82.6983413,3a,75y,44.32h,97.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sZeZxYcWJDvnAGbgaPHHqyQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of S and N.
7.  I would add a point at Ireland Rd (IreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.879676,-82.6311816,3a,75y,0.89h,83.67t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1soQtTv0O3uE8461dXVRr6RQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route is dangeorusly close to going out of tolerance here.
8.  SalVieDr should be SalViewDr.
9.  The SCDOT Street Finder shows SC 183 continuing along North St (NB) and College St (SB) to US 29 though I do not see any shields east of the US 123/College St intersection (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8551801,-82.400394,3a,75y,269.47h,93.34t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swhCXeUiQlh-XEhrwyvu_Pw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) with none at the US 123/Buncombe St intersection.

SC 184:
1.  SC 413 seems to be signed along SC 184 west to SC 81. (see SC 81)
2.  FlaRocRd should be FlatRockRd.
3.  WalSt should be WallSt.
4.  SC284_S should be SC284_E.
5.  SC28_S should be SC28_E.
6.  BelRd should be BellRd.
7.  OliSmiRd should be OlinSmiRd.
8.  I would add a point at Tribble Rd (TriRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.3850411,-82.342922,3a,75y,323.86h,77.99t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQMlbsvJ0H47dx50QdnEm0g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) as the route is dangeorusly close to going out of tolerance here.

SC 185: (route should probably be flipped)
1.  The SC 20 points should be W and E instead of N and S.
2.  Note that SC 185 is posted from the US 25/US 178 WB intersection (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2817231,-82.2365242,3a,75y,223.15h,69.37t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGkA5mInQEA6-q0oqdJU4OA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 186:
1.  ShoCreChuRd should be shortened.
2.  PacBriRd should be PaceBriRd.

SC 187:
1.  A point should be added at Sadlers Creek Rd (SadCreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4182065,-82.7986667,3a,75y,39.42h,87.41t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1svdpmgtRSPa9TI8HQhuCLog!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) for Sadlers Creek State Park.

SC 188: (may need to be flipped)

SC 194:
1.  NJenSt should be JenSt_N.

SC 200:
1.  US321Bus should be PeaFerRd (Peays Ferry Rd) based on the SCDOT Street Finder.
2.  CamWelRd should be CampWelRd and probably be recentered.
3.  BroFerRd should be SweRubyRd (Sweet Ruby Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6605138,-80.8325304,3a,15y,244.51h,85.84t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1scE_C4vqwOsqa3Ptzh5fTUg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
4.  BarSt should be BarrSt_E.  (also affects US 521 BUS (Lancaster))
5.  MainSt should be MainSt_S.  (also affects US 521 BUS (Lancaster))
6.  ZioRd should be ZionRd.

SC 201:
1.  I would add points at Shrine Club Rd (ShrClubRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2432163,-82.4083578,3a,75y,205.42h,87.32t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sjNd0XNU7mMrYaILKhcxs8w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and Milford Dairy Rd (MilDaiRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2691287,-82.4191167,3a,75y,89.02h,93.8t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1shWHjIxYLwVXzBiqunUhpBg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.

SC 203 TRUCK (Abbeville):
1.  This is signed from the SC 72/SC 20 intersection (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1735302,-82.3734862,3a,75y,310.02h,88.84t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sL2618oY4NMzjX1YPQseMRw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  This would change SC20 to SC20_W. (done via comment on SC 72)
2.  PopSt should be PopSt_N (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1783764,-82.377075,3a,75y,84.71h,89.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1stN9e6kfnsgyTpCzq0TfWbg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  BraSt should be BraSt_E.

SC 207:
1.  DovSutRd should be DoveSutRd.
2.  BoaFunRd should be BoagFunRd.

SC 210:
1.  MacRd should probably be recentered.

SC 211:
1.  WalFarRd should be WalFarmRd.  (was probably done via SC 105)
2.  The SC 18 points should be W and E (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9171405,-81.6262546,3a,75y,234.7h,95.18t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWb-xLPeXsjSGghngv2HQqw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of S and N.

SC 212:
1.  The SC 212 point needs to be synced. (was done via SC 64)
2.  SC64Con should be SC212Con based on the SCDOT Street Finder.

SC 213:
1.  BraBlv should be BraBlvd. (also affects SC 215)
2.  StBarChuRd should be shortened.
3.  I would consider replacing +X002 with a point at Kincaid Bridge Rd(KinBriRd)(verified via the SCDOT Street Finder).  (adds .05 miles in mileage)
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on October 06, 2019, 08:04:14 pm
In the queue but not yet submitted- SC 63 through SC 116.

SC 105 at 329 is weird- SB is posted to follow the connector while NB goes to the 4 way intersection despite SC 105 conn being a 2 way road.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 07, 2019, 04:15:54 pm
In the queue but not yet submitted- SC 63 through SC 116.

SC 105 at 329 is weird- SB is posted to follow the connector while NB goes to the 4 way intersection despite SC 105 conn being a 2 way road.

I am inclined to leave that intersection as just one point as it is now. 

SC 125-SC 213 were done via the previous post.  My next post starts with SC 215.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: yakra on October 07, 2019, 04:26:26 pm
Tomatoes vs tomatoes: I'd might be inclined to treat it as a couplet, and yadda yadda, though I'll concede my way isn't the only way of doing things. :)
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 07, 2019, 06:09:57 pm
SC 215:
1.  I would consider a point at International Blvd (IntBlvd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0811662,-81.0703805,3a,75y,312.22h,80.35t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ssymiklnp6z7M16QoBPXY2w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) or nearby Heyward Brockington Rd (HeyBroRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0806176,-81.0670016,3a,15y,336.8h,94.89t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sVknKxHkI1lR3E-lttYwK5w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) due to the access to Columbia International University.
2.  CamRd should be CampGroRd (Camp Ground Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1535753,-81.1029889,3a,75y,126.01h,66.24t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sXpLqSLGZMmFbX0t1A2ZRhA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DXpLqSLGZMmFbX0t1A2ZRhA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D352.03842%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  I would add a point at Little River Rd (LitRivRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1948881,-81.1645759,3a,75y,351.58h,86.74t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFCpVByCJ_FLmQT_l3t770A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance north of here.
4.  I would add a point at Jenkinsville Rd (JenRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2660146,-81.287244,3a,75y,308.67h,92.16t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqDtaXQWEuZeBu6Zb-uNrzg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping and the connection to SC 213.
5.  The SC 213 point should be S and N (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2745407,-81.2894321,3a,75y,293.14h,89.04t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sczXOoqC4anTYXQ5oubJcuA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of W and E.
6.  BraBlv should be BraBlvd. (mentioned on SC 213)
7.  I would add a point at Clowney Rd (CloRd) (based on the SCDOT Street Finder) as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.
8.  DavJenRd should be DaveJenRd.
9.  CooBraRd should be CoolBraRd.
10.  SweHopChuRd should be shortened.
11.  WesSprHwy should be WestSprHwy.
12.  HugLn should be HughLn.
13.  The SC 56 points should be E and W (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8283137,-81.8705028,3a,75y,200h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sT3CnWxSxA0IrfRlhTtR6hw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of S and N.
14.   I would add a point at Lanford Rd (LanRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8390637,-81.8984828,3a,75y,118.44h,93.17t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sO72mCmOPVWWxQuCDyNfPdA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.

SC 216: (oddly is posted south to north (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1538284,-81.3969438,3a,75y,302.8h,80.28t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swV1SCCHqpW6fHqt4j_qUhQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))

SC 217:
1.  The SC 362 points should be W and E instead of N and S.
2.  The points on US 21 for SC 217 should be N and S (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.0894366,-80.8135501,3a,75y,186.6h,99.94t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sjZlE08EKSDyKaFxB4Jf-nQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of E and W.
3.  ClaFarRd should be ClaFarmRd.

SC 219:
1.  StPhiChuRd should be shortened.

SC 225:
1.  WAleRd should be AleRd.

SC 230: (I would have expected this to be flipped, but I see a NORTH shield (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5431674,-81.9954694,3a,75y,2.52h,80.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sEOxOtYcjWZvHXiEPM1xXgQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).)
1.  MurRd should be slightly recentered.
2.  I would consider making QuaRun a hidden shaping point because it is a dead end road.

SC 243:
1.  McAdaRd should be McARd.

SC 246: (should probably be flipped)
1.  The US 178 points should be W and E instead of S and N.
2.  I would add a point at Tillman Territory Rd (TilTerRd) (based on the SCDOT Street Finder) as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.

SC 248: (should probably be flipped but otherwise no comments)

SC 252:
1.  The SC20Con points should be W and E instead of N and S.
2.  I would consider adding a point at Barkers Creek Rd (BarCreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4375597,-82.443733,3a,75y,266.9h,92.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sK3p6jtheSwGUhBz5x68FEA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.
3. The US25Bus_S needs to be synced with US 25 BUS (Ware Shoals).  This point needs to be added US 25 BUS and labeled SC252_W.
4. HooCreRd should be HoodCreRd.
5.  I would add points at Lake Rabon Dr (LakeRabDr) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4708086,-82.1457396,3a,15y,24.78h,84.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1saczyM0ItA1BGx9Ve9O9Lwg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and Cain Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.4934238,-82.1100432,3a,75y,254.91h,78.36t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sRZlAZyQfgjx8kT_Sy2Ou_Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.

SC 252 TRUCK (Ware Shoals)
1.  This point on US 25 BUS (Ware Shoals) should be changed to SC252Trk_W.

SC 253:
1.  It looks like SC291 should be SC291_S.
2.  I would consider adding a point truly for State Park Rd (StaParkRd_S) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9129729,-82.3716489,3a,75y,55.05h,82.89t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s0IHQF28Gdio34_EK7LhHfA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for Paris Mountian State Park.  StaParRd farther north should be StaParkRd_N.
3.  MouCreChuRd should be shortened.
4.  The SC290_W point should be relocated to the correct intersection (seems to be an intersection realignment, before it looks like SC 290 left at Keller Rd (maybe add as KelRd)).

SC 254: (needs to be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2166757,-82.1686501,3a,75y,63.86h,102.46t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sz_fWKrW4MNu-wTqqsYs9KA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192))
1.  The SC254 point needs to be synced with SC 72. (mentioned on SC 72).
2.  GarRd should be GaryRd.

SC 260: (maybe should be flipped)
1.  End should be DamSt (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5190316,-80.1894888,3a,75y,103.24h,92.02t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sUTe5sImZp_tMVXYzniAf1Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  I would consider adding a point at Durant Ln (DurLn) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.5598064,-80.2032517,3a,75y,251.7h,84.21t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1swauaFzq2yPiMWXLrWyo5nQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DwauaFzq2yPiMWXLrWyo5nQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D320%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.
3.  I would add a point at Raccoon Rd (RacRd) (based on the SCDOT Street Finder) as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.

SC 261: (needs to be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1878525,-80.5791167,3a,75y,196.31h,77.75t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1siIqZqy9iqBQzy4QV-kXrUw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656), this route reminds me of NC 55 except being posted north-south)
1.  BoyMilRd should be BoyMillRd.
2.  I would consider a point at Horatio-Hagood Rd (HorHagRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0813929,-80.5628722,3a,75y,218.44h,87.65t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1skIIm-9e8SOV3wl2s2FVLmQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) due to the connection to Rembert.
3.  DinMilRd should be DinMillRd.
4.  I would consider a couple shaping points just south of US 76/US 378 as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.
5.  A point should be added at Poinsett Park Rd (PoiParkRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.804477,-80.506215,3a,37.5y,219.39h,89.57t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sF2qWbzfT1IFWtDH1dNAkBQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) for Poinsett State Park (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8071865,-80.5074839,3a,75y,221.5h,91.67t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sSC5yTGLw0_v6cWgutmBxnQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
6.  CamMacBoyRd should be shortened.
7.  I would consider a visible point at or shaping point around St Marks Church Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7447643,-80.4919971,3a,37.5y,193.51h,86.72t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1szOCA1Xm7kFcx4aNQUMRauQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.
8.  +X003 should be replaced with a visible point at Flinn Rd (FliRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.6898153,-80.0993343,3a,75y,117.53h,83.03t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1segOv8ocpZ52DCAQvGx6D6A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
9.  US52_S should be US52_E (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.6569464,-79.8757946,3a,75y,101.71h,96.66t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sIHi8HwImL_a7GQQf6pmIwQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
10.  +X005 could easily be replaced by a point at Elm Tree Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7169714,-79.658902,3a,75y,221.53h,85.7t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snnUSOGGRTb2_DFBP0SuM_w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
11.  CouLinRd should be CouLineRd.

SC 262:
1.  NewRd would be better served at Fairmont Rd (FaiRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.978213,-80.9293783,3a,75y,228.88h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1svzs96qw1bhwdaej20lGCPg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 265: (needs to be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6519551,-80.3770688,3a,75y,107.06h,96.7t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7VSeU7w-9-ut6_JSiTk7kw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  OgbRd should be S-13-770 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6396214,-80.4018387,3a,75y,37.77h,86.3t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ssp7s376tfazbBxc_MtiRfQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  LonBraChuRd should be shortened.

SC 274:  (should be flipped based on my SC 161 comments)

SC 283:
1.  UppMilRd should be UppMillRd.
2.  NMarRd should be MarRd.

SC 284: (should be flipped? (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1973114,-82.6130856,3a,75y,104.55h,77.93t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sjyuNmKwfbCnqFX3LzAESvg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  FlaRocRd should be FlatRockRd.
2.  JetLanRd should be JetsLanRd.
3.  SC28_N should be SC28_W.
4.  I would add a point at Suttles Rd (SutRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.33385,-82.5251441,3a,37.5y,107.12h,88.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sim1F4LEPSI9A4EFG8iafmg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.  (adds .08 miles of mileage)

SC 288:
1.  PacBriRd should be PaceBriRd.

SC 290:
1.  I would consider a visible point at Tigerville Rd (TigRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0180667,-82.3839116,3a,75y,341.49h,78.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMaP2RY1c3CvXS72_QyXJTA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.
2.  The SC253_N point should be relocated to the correct intersection (seems to be an intersection realignment, before it looks like SC 290 left at Keller Rd (maybe add as KelRd)). (mentioned on SC 253)
3.  I would consider a visible point at Darby Rd (DarRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.971214,-82.3263587,3a,37.5y,3.93h,89.29t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPUn6ALz2ft-zgWA1qQoAwQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.
4.  SaiMarRd should be SaiMarkRd.

SC 290 TRUCK (Greer):
1.  MemDr (Memorial Dr) needs to be added or synced to SC 14 TRUCK (Greer).

SC 291:
1.  AugRd should be AugRd_N.
2.  A point should be added here and on US 276 (at E Antrim Dr) at Antrim Dr (AntDr) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8417531,-82.3599522,3a,75y,339.03h,103.09t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Ov3U79UU4YcsVVH5QCyWA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as US 276 traffic has to use this road to access SC 291. 
3.  Should a point be added at Tower Dr(TowDr) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8500699,-82.3593311,3a,75y,70.95h,93.47t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s2USMOiNnG4TfDOO9GMZpQg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for the Greenville Downtown Airport?
4.  On US 29, US29ConGreen should be US29ConGre.

SC 292:
1.  SpaRd should be SpaRd_E.
2.  Points should be added at Pine Ridge Rd on US 29 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9556994,-82.1427079,3a,75y,310.31h,84.07t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1srh4b3ClFQeHcI_3Dxyuqyg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and SC 358 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9645434,-82.1404808,3a,75y,162.76h,101.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sOrXM1ibvIBFw0QHg1t-MJg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  Due to delineators (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9557538,-82.1268102,3a,75y,296.61h,84.14t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1siuUroAjz2To3gU1YjSD21g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) being put on SC 129/SC 292 at their SC 358 interection (can be seen on GSV from US 29), SC 358 EB traffic is expected to access SC 129 NB/SC 292 WB via US 29 NB.  Also US 29 SB and SC 292 WB traffic is expected to access SC 358 now via Pine Ridge Rd.  (As a note, I will not have any further changes to SC 358.)
3.  NMaiSt should be MainSt_N.

SC 295: (needs to be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9374604,-81.9905897,3a,75y,38.04h,82.77t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sx-dIHIsP10CHmpbZfq7oBw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  I would add a second point for HaySt and have two points (HaySt_W and HaySt_E).  As is, HaySt should be HaySt_W.
2.  DogCluRd should be DogClubRd.

SC 296:
1.  I would consider a visible point at Old Bethel Rd (OldBetRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8686711,-82.0876426,3a,75y,28.39h,76.82t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAmEC2dXxXe9OSE_yiH5JmQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.

SC 300: (should probably be flipped)
1.  I would change S-6-57 to Rays Crossing Rd (RayCroRd) (based on the SCDOT Street Finder) as I cannot see a black sign due to the GSV being from 2008.

SC 302:
1.  RicLakRd should be RicLakeRd.
2.  If SC 118 was extended east to SC 19, SC118 should be SC118_W.
3.  PinSt should be PineSt.
4.  JohHarExp should be JohnHarExp.

SC 303:
1.  The US 17 point needs to be relocated.
2.  I would consider a visible point at Rivers St (RivSt) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8723779,-80.6552322,3a,75y,57.48h,99.29t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sA0Td0_PJxJfNUOR2YjqP3Q!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) as the route gets dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.
3.  RobBlv should be RobBlvd.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 09, 2019, 05:21:56 pm
In the queue but not yet submitted- SC 63 through SC 116.

Comments on last update:
SC 64:  For the Savannah River Site, are the letters and numbers representing the gates (SRSB meaning SRS Gate B)? (could affect SC 19, SC 39, SC 64, and SC 125)
SC 71 TRUCK (Abbeville): OldCalFalRd still needs to be HaiSt and synced with SC 28 and SC 20 TRUCK (Abbeville).
SC 72:
1.  LauAve needs to be synced with US 25 and US 178.
2.  CheSP is way off and needs to be recentered.  (also will affect SC 121)
3.  SC9_S will need to be synced with SC 121, SC 9, and SC 9 BUS (Chester). (along with SC 97)
SC 75 and SC 75 TRUCK (Van Wyck):  I do not see the changes recommended for these routes, but I see the corresponding changes on US 521.
SC 90: RobEdgePky should be RobEdgePkwy.
SC 105:  The SC 18 points still need to be synced.
SC 114:  I did not see any changes to this route.
SC 121:  Note comments 10 and 11 that reference comments 7-9 on SC 72.  I would clarify that the SC 72/SC 121 concurrency is fully synced before finishing.

US 176: SC72/121_E should be just SC72/121.

Other Note:
SC 31: RobMGriPkwy should be RobGriPkwy based on the changes to US 501 and US 17.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on October 09, 2019, 07:29:07 pm
SRS references are not gate numbers. They are route designations - they have routes posted in pentagons using numbers, letters or both. If you GMSV the SC 19 endpoint you can find signage showing the intersection of SRS 1 and SRS 2
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 11, 2019, 08:45:03 pm
As of right now, I have reviewed up to SC 303.  (and also have done SC 358, SC 460, and SC 461 as they will have no further changes)

I am planning to take a few days to do some PA/DE work to help let mapmikey catch up a little bit.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on October 16, 2019, 10:08:44 pm
I have made changes on all routes up to SC 303 including fixes from the previous submission...

Sent in this evening...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 17, 2019, 07:07:49 am
I will look at the rest of the changes later, but I wanted to bring up these Datacheck Errors that have popped up now.  As you have edited SC 302, these routes should not be touched again.

These two are just FPs.  I have no issue putting in these entires myself if it would be easier on you for me to do so. 

sc.sc006trkmon;SC6_W;US52_W;SC6_E;SHARP_ANGLE;137.05
sc.sc019trkaik;SC19_S;SC19;;DUPLICATE_COORDS;(33.523718,-81.719668)

This one can be solved by just making the ArbCt a shaping point on US 1 TRUCK (Aiken) and US 78 TRUCK (Aiken) (though not shown as an error on the latter) as was done on SC 19 TRUCK (Aiken) and SC 118.

sc.us001trkaik;ArbCt;;;VISIBLE_HIDDEN_COLOC;sc.sc019trkaik@+X002
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on October 17, 2019, 10:10:29 am
You may resolve the FPs and I will submit fixes to US 1/78 Trk routes on my next submission...

Thanks-
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 17, 2019, 05:01:45 pm
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3235 (for the FPs)
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 17, 2019, 08:19:51 pm
Comments on last update:
US 29: 
1.  I-385Bs should be I-385BS (if it still exists) or changed to SC183 since SC 183 was extended here.
2.  US29ConGreen should be US29ConGre.
SC 122:  WatParRd should be WatParkDr (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9402731,-80.9454446,3a,75y,348.26h,84.42t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXXYDahHbUIKW5Evpkf5CSA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  (I somehow forgot to mention this one.)
SC 265:  I still believe that this route should have been flipped based on the direction banners at SC 151 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6520811,-80.3773317,3a,75y,338h,91.48t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sbylYnUG9bn-Tw-UGKAUAig!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
SC 292:  I did not see the changes for comments 1 and 3.  Comment 2 was taken care of.
SC 295:  DogCluRd should have been changed to DogClubRd (http://DogCluRd should be DogClubRd.).


Other notes:
SC 20:
1.  SC203Trk should be SC203Trk_N.
2.  ColSprCenRd should have been shortened.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 18, 2019, 05:36:08 pm
SC 304: (should maybe be flipped)
1.  EMaiSt should be MainSt.

SC 308: (needs to be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.5168704,-81.8993814,3a,75y,169.94h,96.21t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1smWLGG2C76rhdC2FWKYJX1g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  FleMilRd should be FleMillRd.

SC 310: (should maybe be flipped)

SC 315:
1.  I would change S-27-92 to Bellinger Hill Rd (based on the SCDOT Street Finder) as there are no blades showing the number.
2.  LevRd should be LevyRd.

SC 319:
1.  GolLeaRd should be GolLeafRd.

SC 322:
1.  I would add a point at Simpson Rd (SimRd) to keep the line from being right next to US 321.
2.  It looks like Historic Brattonville (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8841788,-81.1940225,3a,75y,96.98h,78.48t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sns7yrquSkyiMJc5UB72J8Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) is worthy of a point at Brattonsville Rd (BraRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8854178,-81.1919139,3a,37.5y,241.39h,91.49t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sivqdFkm0Red04YdU729wjg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 324:
1.  I would add a point at Holland Rd (HolRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9141866,-81.1410582,3a,75y,33.79h,101.84t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7I8QXBuyfOxiQFHtlv-86g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route is dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.

SC 327:
1.  I would add a point at Poor Farm Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.071455,-79.704785,3a,75y,343.4h,86.09t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s0ANgn82hpTWy2HMWOlkDAA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.
2.  It looks like the intersection at SC51_N is being relocated looking at the July 2019 GSV (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0701816,-79.6815179,3a,75y,103.15h,80.39t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sM2VIPeO9MXv1O5DiU0jurw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  A point should be added at Planer Rd (PlaRd_E) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0842665,-79.6568882,3a,15y,208.46h,89.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1skjjl4UHsbQaZhD-os3j6fg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route goes out of tolerance here and seems to be an old routing of SC 327.
4.  FraMarRd should be FraMarRd_S (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0832879,-79.6432527,3a,75y,268.69h,87.87t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s8vVjJRwY_ZnjgPteJU9Izw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
5.  EOldMarHwy should be OldMarHwy.

SC 329:
1.  Just noting that the northern end will eventually be affected by the I-85 widening as referenced on SC 18.

SC 332:
1.  TilRd should be TillRd.
2.  SlaLanRd should be SlabLanRd_N.  (based on the SCDOT Street Finder)

SC 333: (posted east-west (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.6805282,-81.2430436,3a,75y,157.83h,95.7t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-7bd86jyN-QPyZZ4p0gwGw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656), does not need to be flipped)
1.  PleHilRd should be PleHillRd.

SC 336:
1.  I would change US17 to US17/278.
2.  I am unsure how to best handle S-27-13 that seems to be in a brief concuurency.  Maybe use the road name Bees Creek Rd (BeesCreRd) (from the SCDOT Street Finder) with two points.

SC 340:
1.  I would add a point at Center Rd (CenRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1972309,-79.930919,3a,75y,285h,90.76t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s2ER9z9s6z_K9740CqaRouQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.

SC 341:
1.  2ndNecRd should be 2ndNeckRd.
2.  NHalMooRd should be HalfMoonRd.
3.  SOldGeoRd should be OldGeoRd.
4.  SIndRd should be IndRd.
5.  SC341_E on US 378 BUS (Lake City) should be SC341_S.
6.  SC341_W on US 378 should be SC341_N.
7.  A point should be added at Lynches River Rd (LynRivRd_E) due to the "TO SC 403 shield" (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.013775,-79.9639598,3a,75y,176.41h,95.81t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s6bGBzXdvP_jo_Q7EWxJbjQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  (added 10/22/2019)
8.  RedOakCreRd should be shortened.
9.  +X001 should be visible and made for McNaughton Rd (McNRd).

SC 346: (should maybe be flipped)

SC 357:
1.  HolSprChuRd needs to be shortened.

SC 362: (may need to be flipped)
1.  The SC 217 points should be N and S (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.0891552,-80.813447,3a,75y,122.66h,93.54t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sEFP03n-0PrgHyL6gRs36CA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of E and W.
2.  HolRd should be BayViewRd (Bay View Rd) based on the SCDOT Street Finder.
3.  I would make S-5-18 for Farrells Rd (FarRd) due to the old GSV from 2008.
4.  TonHilRd should be TonyHillRd.
5.  I would consider a point at Deacon Rd (DeaRd) (based on the SCDOT Street Finder) as the route is dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.

SC 377:
1.  ShaCorRd should be ShawCorRd.

SC 381:
1.  McCorAve should be McCAve.
2.  KinRd should be KingRd.

SC 385:
1.  FamFarRd should be FamFarmRd.

SC 389: (should probably be flipped)

SC 391:
1.  MaiSt should be MainSt_S.
2.  I would consider a point at Langford St (LanSt)  (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2130997,-81.5358665,3a,75y,86.04h,66.81t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJNkBiIDOnTKW69b_3zQffQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) to keep the line off of US 76.  I would not add SC 391 TRUCK (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.2129498,-81.5357456,3a,75y,351.09h,84.65t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sgI4w0GeUIWLmTTfsSRd_Ww!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) despite this shield on US 76 WB just before Langford St.

SC 392: (should maybe be flipped)

SC 395:
1. StoHilRd should be StoHillRd.
2.  I would consider a point at St Lukes Church Rd (based on SCDOT Street Finder) as the route is dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.
3.  MaiSt should be MainSt.

SC 400:
1. SlaLanRd should be SlabLanRd.

SC 410: (needs to be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9734199,-79.0176263,3a,75y,24.6h,92.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sno5-h2-E2kBAr6sX7tboZA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192))
1.  The US 701 point needs to be recentered.
2.  I would consider a point at Coats Rd (CoaRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0745344,-78.9858629,3a,75y,196.89h,98.83t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sNuuVGQKB8ETKtAsf4EpP2w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) as the route is dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.
3.  I am unsure if Fair Bluff (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1291294,-78.9752025,3a,75y,351.54h,91.1t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1stN-9jo84KtlVoVRvCnFY2w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) at FaiBluHwy is one or two words.
4.  I would replace +X001 with a visible point at Elliott Rd (EliRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1424547,-78.9308601,3a,75y,3.78h,93.62t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sp4eGazzTpa7mPvMFcA5-CA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
5.  WDogRd should be DogRd.

SC 414 (added 10/23)
1.  I would add points at Goodwin Bridge Rd (GooBriRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0438552,-82.4392756,3a,75y,322.49h,93.73t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sO2SQ_UTrBmRiFtrXN6fEWQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and either Southerlin Rd or Bates Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.0823929,-82.3472257,3a,75y,324.37h,86.33t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swmymwqpG-ABjAGg6c4aW6g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.

SC 417:
1.  The SC 14 points should be W and E instead of N and S.
2.  I would add a point at Hunter Rd (HunRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7452243,-82.2288617,3a,75y,305.02h,78.77t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJt-SVffUrMshLRAzypq7Dg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping. (added 10/23)
3.  PinHilRd should be PineHillRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8345755,-82.071004,3a,75y,120.41h,92.64t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sj2VGAW-BhTC2_fUGT7A1VQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 418:
1.  GreRd should be GrePondRd (Green Pond Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6741042,-82.218656,3a,75y,90.98h,78.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1szAgkrpy4X_lPnxOz2zOLUA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 420:
1.  I would add a point at Old Shoals Junction Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.363459,-82.2953661,3a,75y,22.92h,94.75t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXOeIdoYal7uIIN20r-qKYQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as the route is dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.

SC 421:
1.  The SCDOT Street Finder shows SC 421 NB starting at the ramp from US 1 NB/US 78 EB/US 278 EB.  I am inclined to leave the points in this area as-is.  (considering the ramp as just the ramp)
2.  HubClaRd should be HubClayRd.

SC 430:
1.  SC 23 should be recentered.  (also affects SC 23 TRUCK(Edgefield))
2.  EastRd should be EastViewRd.  (also affects SC 23 TRUCK(Edgefield))

SC 441:
1.  SWisDr should be WiseDr.
2.  A point should be added at Shaw Dr due to the direct access to Shaw Air Force Base.
3.  FriDr should be relocated (maybe nearby Oakland Drive (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9855627,-80.4899327,3a,75y,196.8h,91.85t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sHY9M1kRzuXc68iKdyR7Nkg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)) or marked as closed (*FriDr).
4.  RedHilRd should be RedHillRd.

SC 453:
1.  BunForRd should be BunFordRd.
2.  I would add a point at Coach Rd (based on the SCDOT Street Finder) as the route is dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.

SC 462:
1.  BeeCreRd should be BeesCreRd (Bees Creek Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.5407166,-80.9120388,3a,75y,82.92h,93.48t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sUoSNK3CxEhiSFmQ-Jjvzyw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  SalRd should be SalLanRd (Salzburg Landing Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.4724803,-80.8834636,3a,37.5y,88.68h,98.48t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXByzdQxPhcdnVxW7GW5-tQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
3.  BolHalRd should be BolHallRd.

SC 512:
The SC 261 points should be N and S instead of W and E.

SC 513:
1.  CouLinRd should be CouLineRd_N.

SC 517: (needs to be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7886803,-79.7880208,3a,75y,38.54h,76.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5MgaTUnVYS0FPsaA8FNVXA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192))
1.  HunNecBlv should be HunBlvd (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8310781,-79.823796,3a,75y,328.86h,85.82t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1smu8NykbVZvqkQXDLTAL4eg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 522:
1.  RicHilRd should be RichHillRd.
2.  McIlwRd should be McIRd.  (also affects US 521)
3.  The SC 522 points on US 521 should be W and E instead of S and N.

SC 527: (needs to be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.6408798,-79.7741874,3a,75y,266.46h,87.03t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1scF0LTV0pKDZg6DsATcd_7Q!2e0!7i16384!8i8192))
1.  EppRd should be EppsRd.
2.  HebRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7299308,-79.9092682,3a,75y,56.31h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sIN7mXZvBQvqDSlEVP8wMpg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DIN7mXZvBQvqDSlEVP8wMpg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D51.279034%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) should be replaced with Springbank Rd (SprRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7343328,-79.9197868,3a,75y,190.16h,87.02t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1suJrffm8Q5dlo1uEBWJzvpg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  McClaRd should be McCRd.
4.  SC377Con should be SC527Con.

SC 541:
1.  OldNum4Hwy should be Old4Hwy_N.
2.  MarRd should be MaryRd.

SC 544: (needs to be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.6730948,-78.9995763,3a,75y,52.59h,110.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sf7Fk5ws81dg6-NvOzzVWGg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192))
1.  DickPonRd should be DickPonRd_W.
2.  I would consider points at University Blvd (UniBlvd) here and on US 501 for Coastal Carolina University.

SC 555:
1.  ColDr should be ColDr_W.
2.  KooRd should be KoonRd.
3.  NBriRd should be BriRd.

SC 557:
1.  I would add points at Glenn Rd (GleRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1102835,-81.1717327,3a,75y,335.36h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sF-33X1p_FT5e6nIlLe5Cmg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) and Cross Rd (CroRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.1204749,-81.1408109,3a,75y,198.07h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sr_he5rQJsl9pMvuDyXZSBg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Dr_he5rQJsl9pMvuDyXZSBg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D194.94263%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.
2.  NParRd should be ParRd.

SC 560:
1.  BusRivRd should be BushRivRd.

SC 576:
1.  US76 should be recentered.
2.  MilSt should be for Bobby L Davis Blvd (BobDavBlvd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1546984,-79.4101497,3a,75y,1.03h,94.62t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-N8stMpdSi2jSkMpVHF4lw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on October 26, 2019, 07:33:40 am
Comments on last update:
US 29: 
1.  I-385Bs should be I-385BS (if it still exists) or changed to SC183 since SC 183 was extended here.
2.  US29ConGreen should be US29ConGre.
SC 122:  WatParRd should be WatParkDr (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.9402731,-80.9454446,3a,75y,348.26h,84.42t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXXYDahHbUIKW5Evpkf5CSA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  (I somehow forgot to mention this one.)
SC 265:  I still believe that this route should have been flipped based on the direction banners at SC 151 (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6520811,-80.3773317,3a,75y,338h,91.48t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sbylYnUG9bn-Tw-UGKAUAig!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
SC 292:  I did not see the changes for comments 1 and 3.  Comment 2 was taken care of.
SC 295:  DogCluRd should have been changed to DogClubRd (http://DogCluRd should be DogClubRd.).


Other notes:
SC 20:
1.  SC203Trk should be SC203Trk_N.
2.  ColSprCenRd should have been shortened.

US29ConGree is 2 points over from US29ConGreen.  I don't know if there was a US29ConGre previously that precipitated these two designations (I had no involvement with the US route set in SC).  So I elected not to do anything.  A different solution could be to use the street name as part of the suffix...

I did not change SC 265 as a conscious decision because I believe they posted the banners wrong.  However I could find no other intersections on GMSV.  This is also why I did not flip SC 284 - I found another intersection posted as you indicated, then one with it posted west in both directions, then finally one posted the opposite of what you found.

Changes through SC 576 have now been submitted...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: yakra on October 26, 2019, 11:24:17 am
Quote
US29ConGree is 2 points over from US29ConGreen.  I don't know if there was a US29ConGre previously that precipitated these two designations (I had no involvement with the US route set in SC).
ISTR back in the CHM days a bunch of US route connectors were found to be unsigned, and thus removed from the HB.
With no actual routes intersecting here, we'd just use street names, I.E. WadeHamBlvd_S & PineKnoDr.
I also see a US29Spr point label with no corresponding route in the HB.
There may well be other cases lurking around the state (It could be possible with some effort to search for these programmatically, with the caveat that SC's 26 NMP pairs (a relatively small amount, not insurmountable) could throw some wrenches in the works. Or maybe not -- the only bannered US route label in these NMPs is a legitimate extant business route...)
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on October 26, 2019, 03:35:35 pm
My criteria for the state route set is that if a CONN route is signed with shields saying TO one of the routes connected then I keep the official connector designation as the waypoint name. If the connector route is actually signed with a connector banner then I give the connector it’s own route file in TM as well.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: yakra on October 26, 2019, 11:10:48 pm
A TO isn't a full-on route, though...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 27, 2019, 04:17:30 pm
yakra, as a note, I have been using the SCDOT Street Finder (http://206.74.144.42/streetfinder/Streetnames.htm) to clarify CONN designations.  From what I have seen, I think SC and GA seem to be the only states that regularly use this designation.

I went to the Newburyport meet yesterday so I have not had time to look at anything today.  I am thinking that I should finish reviewing all the routes within the next week or so.

Comments on last submission:  (I am surprised that I found time to do this today.)
Ths US29ConGre discussion can be continued as necessary.

SC 327:  I had recommended PlaRd_E instead of just PlaRd based on the SCDOT Street Finder showing Planer Rd leave the route there.
SC 341:  I had recommended LynRivRd_E instead of just LynRivRd based on the SCDOT Street Finder showing Lynches River Rd leave the route there.
SC 391:  I had recommended MainSt_S instead of just MainSt based on the SCDOT Street Finder showing Main St leave the route there.
SC 410:  FaiBluHwy should be FairBluHwy if keeping the label as two words.
SC 420:  OldSJunRd should be OldSJRd.
SC 513:  I had recommended CouLineRd_N instead of just CouLineRd based on the SCDOT Street Finder showing County Line Rd leave the route there.
SC 517:  HunBlv should be HunBlvd.
SC 557:  I did not see any changes for this route.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: yakra on October 27, 2019, 05:23:27 pm
Quote from: http://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php
Waypoint labels should avoid secret highway designations, i.e., designations travelers will not know about by driving and reading signs.
(and on that note... (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3254))
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: rickmastfan67 on October 29, 2019, 07:42:53 am
Quote from: http://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php
Waypoint labels should avoid secret highway designations, i.e., designations travelers will not know about by driving and reading signs.
(and on that note... (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3254))

However, SC loves to put them on the Street Blades a good chunk of the time, as it's sometimes the official name of the road.
https://goo.gl/maps/Yr7fAkyJv1aaMr368
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on October 29, 2019, 08:38:46 am
Quote
US29ConGree is 2 points over from US29ConGreen.  I don't know if there was a US29ConGre previously that precipitated these two designations (I had no involvement with the US route set in SC).
ISTR back in the CHM days a bunch of US route connectors were found to be unsigned, and thus removed from the HB.
With no actual routes intersecting here, we'd just use street names, I.E. WadeHamBlvd_S & PineKnoDr.
I also see a US29Spr point label with no corresponding route in the HB.
There may well be other cases lurking around the state (It could be possible with some effort to search for these programmatically, with the caveat that SC's 26 NMP pairs (a relatively small amount, not insurmountable) could throw some wrenches in the works. Or maybe not -- the only bannered US route label in these NMPs is a legitimate extant business route...)

Looking at GMSV, PineKnoDr is signed from US 276 as US 29 South.  Wade Hampton Blvd was signed from US 276 as US 29 North up until at least 2016.  Greenville has over the years removed more and more route signage.  The US 29 ConGreen is signed as SC 291 South from US 29.

Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: yakra on October 29, 2019, 12:48:38 pm
Hoo boy...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 29, 2019, 05:11:31 pm
I am trying to update my list file and work on the review tonight.  We will see how this works.

SC 602: (actually ends at US 21 CON)
1.  RamRd should be slightly relocated.
2.  JohHarExp should be JohnHarExp.

SC 641: (actually posted east-west (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.0311442,-80.9409778,3a,75y,339.61h,77.67t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sCL8LZN3KwFB6iSE9kQAUoA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  MilSwaChuRd needs to be shortened.
2.  I would change S-5-8 to State Park Rd (StaParkRd) based on the SCDOT Street Finder because I did not see a blade for S-5-8.

SC 642:
1.  The US17Alt point needs to be relocated to the new intersection.  (also affects US 17 ALT TRUCK (Summerville))
2.  Old Trolley Rd (OldTroRd) is correct based on the SCDOT Street Finder, but GSV shows it as just Trolley Rd (TroRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.952585,-80.1657504,3a,75y,343.9h,81.23t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sKGqfEeCAKd7Qm50gQJal2w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).
3.  I would consider a point at Cross County Rd (CroCouRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.9008054,-80.0768989,3a,37.5y,353.43h,93.55t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGJxhBaY0pLd6W9gkI3Kt0A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.
4.  WHilBlv should be HillBlvd.
5.  +X001 should be replaced with a point at Montague Ave (MonAve_W) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8563896,-80.0427456,3a,37.5y,156.68h,96.82t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sw-cLarRBhFdZ_x6w8y_ImA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  MonAve then becomes MonAve_E (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8575915,-80.0312972,3a,75y,255.96h,104.71t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXSugPP_1JeZr9RZWg4qeZQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

SC 692:
1.  CatBlv should be CatBlvd.

SC 700:
1.  +X001 could easily be replaced by a visible point at Boy Scout Rd (BoyScoRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.625612,-80.1900327,3a,75y,357.24h,79.8t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sFVqw1PyaatLQKQTceD79AA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DFVqw1PyaatLQKQTceD79AA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D334.87256%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
2. MaiRd should be MainRd.

SC 702:
1.  LakGreStPk should be LakeGreSP or State Park Rd (StaParkRd). (roadname based on SCDOT Street Finder)
2.  AulMilRd should be AullMillRd.

SC 703: (should be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7977456,-79.7584708,3a,75y,229.36h,64.49t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sS8MV_dDkxIIO_yfhNK-l3Q!2e0!7i16384!8i8192))
1.  JasBlv should be JasBlvd_W.
2.  PatPoiBlv should be PatPoiRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7976845,-79.8967848,3a,75y,213.11h,97.27t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sISsCRnLk78Bly7U7Oog0TQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

SC 707:
1.  I would add a point at Holmestown Rd (HolRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.6311929,-79.0343907,3a,75y,191.65h,76.14t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sSchH9UfYgDtNq5QPMWNEbw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) due to the connection to US 17 and US 17 BUS.
2.  A point will be needed at SC 31 when its extension opens.
3.  DicPonRd should be DickPondRd.

SC 742: (should maybe be flipped...)
1.  SC145 should be recentered.

SC 760:
1.  Wildcat Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9890254,-80.9731427,3a,75y,252.76h,85.55t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJ5W8bBC2wveWSTV_f2Zfew!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) should be added as it seems to be a US 76 CON (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9933367,-80.9665881,3a,75y,295h,81.45t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-9Ayb33Qi8YTfDDVJY2mGw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) as shown on the SCDOT Street Finder.

SC 763:
1.  I would add a point at Deschamps Rd (DesRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9130188,-80.4210976,3a,75y,294.7h,94.58t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s8CA_Ka1TqkcDU1zLjwEF9w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) as the route is dangerously close to going out of tolerance just to the west.
2.  The SC 120 points should be W and E (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9139666,-80.3835146,3a,75y,158.97h,87.47t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1lWPtx7rBmaiEW3CnrSiqw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) instead of S and N.

SC 764:  (should probably be flipped)

SC 768:
1.  ShoRd should be ShoRd_W.
2.  PinDr should be PinRd_S (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9547239,-80.9252861,3a,75y,202.96h,89.54t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sBtj8a6SkLugAielR_JiX7A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). (though the SC 48 PinDr point was left the same earlier, the blade there supports PinRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9282741,-80.9642235,3a,75y,32.46h,85.03t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sRk3PNoNHCzBppok5W53KZQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DRk3PNoNHCzBppok5W53KZQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D148.48485%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192) as well, the Street Finder supports PinDr.  I would support at minimum relocating the PinDr point on SC 48.)

SC 769:
1.  +X001 should be replaced with a visible point at Elm Savannah Rd (ElmSavRd).  (based on SCDOT Street Finder)
2.  AirBasRd should be AirBaseRd.
3.  +X002 should be replaced with a visible point at Crossing Creek Rd (CroCreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.931921,-80.8247166,3a,75y,53.61h,89.4t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sbPbvcjEG0UgN64UeNHY7ag!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

SC 781:
1.  The US78 point needs to be relocated due to an intersection realignment.

SC 802:
1.  AlsRd should be slightly relocated.

SC 823:
1.  CirARanRd should be shortened.
2.  I would change S-33-38 to Old Charleston Rd (OldChaRd) as I did not see a black blade.  I would also slightly relocate it.
3.  I would add a point at White Creek Rd (WhiCreRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1104333,-82.4202729,3a,75y,74.56h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sQrP_Ggxo6g6RWRD11mRalw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DQrP_Ggxo6g6RWRD11mRalw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D71.55226%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) as the route is dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.

SC 901:
1.  GolCouRd should be DeWRd (DeWitt Rd) based on the SCDOT Street Finder.
2.  I would add a point at William Martin Rd (WilMarRd) based on the SCDOT Street Finder as the route is dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.
3.  BeaRd should be BeaDamRd.
4.  I would add a point at Hunter Rd (HunRd) based on the SCDOT Street Finder as the route is dangerously close to going out of tolerance here.
5.  OldMilRd should be OldMillRd.
6.  ReiRd should be ReidRd.

SC 903:
1.  I would consider points at Mining Rd (MinRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6536166,-80.5913932,3a,75y,62.72h,77.36t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPP2WSJ6SWUM-rOSq4yocQA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and Fork Hill Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6644274,-80.6201875,3a,49.1y,186.98h,75.04t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-HXH6SPHo41rULXNRrb1PQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.
2.  TaxRd should be PotRd (Potter Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.7027097,-80.6768108,3a,75y,20.52h,76.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1saK-B5d2Ohhz3vzdYYj26LQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

SC 905:
1.  ECouCluDr should be CouClubDr.
2.  BucCreDr should be BuckCreDr.

SC 908: (should probably be flipped)
1.  +X001 could easily be replaced with a visible point at Reason Rd (ReaRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9548411,-79.3461105,3a,75y,254.42h,91.23t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sa-xJ0i4JTiWpUyXX6WioiQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

SC 909: (needs to be flipped (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8094631,-81.2449698,3a,75y,201.43h,85.73t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1saDcltlM--F7XIzf8g2W8oQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656))
1.  Based on the SCDOT Street Finder and the lack of a black blade, I would change S-12-1 to OldYorkRd_S.
2.  DarRd should be recentered.
3.  The SCDOT Street Finder indicates that SteVilRd should be MilRd (Millen Rd).
4.   BlaRd should be slightly relocated.

SC 912: (should maybe be flipped)
1.  I would add points at McCalls Mill Pond Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6094075,-79.7642012,3a,75y,89.74h,89.07t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s8RZM3iRyfwKlCmpJZI_JEw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192), Old River Rd (OldRivRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6304498,-79.7715397,3a,75y,240.08h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s-dd-VIXHlCQjqhE_wqrr8w!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D-dd-VIXHlCQjqhE_wqrr8w%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D235.02876%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192), and Brickyard Rd (BriRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6739028,-79.7608453,3a,75y,110.21h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sBVVkG6-CMsMhGcj9TmPuRw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DBVVkG6-CMsMhGcj9TmPuRw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D114.1138%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656) for better shaping.

SC 917:
1.  S-26-19 should considered being renamed as Hwy19.  I think S-26-19 is correct based on SC 905.
2.  LakSwaRd should be LakeSwaRd.
3.  PeeDeeHwy should be PeeDeeRd (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.1375908,-79.1761419,3a,75y,182.23h,73.55t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sNAKof-3ESUklr-7n7Sce3A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
4.  BarRd should be BarnRd.
5.  Apparently HenSt should be HenExt (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.3341038,-79.4582436,3a,75y,20.67h,68.36t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sntrUtK4M92x5XSuMbnpnLA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
6.  +X001 should be replaced by a visible point at Cattle Farm Rd (CatFarmRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.3420832,-79.4940026,3a,15y,289.49h,92.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQ8GIQYMnpYfYZuz0E0Ldmg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on October 31, 2019, 06:53:11 pm
I have finished going through all the SC State Highways through SC 917.  Once all the edits are caught up, I will check NMPs and let yakra do his grepping labels project.

Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on November 02, 2019, 03:44:20 pm
I have submitted all changes through SC 917 this afternoon to Jim.  Hopefully I got everything...

Thank you again for the hard detailed look at the SC state route set...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on November 02, 2019, 09:35:49 pm
NMP Notes:
1.  sc.us521@US521BusKer_N 34.561925 -80.587545
sc.us521busker@US521_N 34.561925 -80.58754

(Seems to be simple enough to fix, but I am unsure of the validity of the nearby US521ConKer points on both routes.  I cannot find an official road name or designation on the SCDOT Street Finder.)

2.  sc.sc009@SC72/121_N 34.706361 -81.190803
sc.sc072@SC9_S 34.706414 -81.190803
sc.sc009@SC72/121_N 34.706361 -81.190803
sc.sc097@SC9_S 34.706414 -81.190803
sc.sc009@SC72/121_N 34.706361 -81.190803
sc.sc121@SC9_S 34.706414 -81.190803
sc.sc009busche@SC9_S 34.706361 -81.190803
sc.sc072@SC9_S 34.706414 -81.190803
sc.sc009busche@SC9_S 34.706361 -81.190803
sc.sc097@SC9_S 34.706414 -81.190803
sc.sc009busche@SC9_S 34.706361 -81.190803
sc.sc121@SC9_S 34.706414 -81.190803

(SC 72, SC 97, and SC 121 still need to be synced with SC 9 and SC 9 BUS (Chester).  The coordinates for SC 9 and SC 9 BUS (Chester) should be used here.)

3. sc.i020@131 34.206186 -80.026292
sc.us401@I-20(131) 34.206159 -80.026217

(US 401 should be synced with I-20 here.)

4.  sc.sc022@US501 33.92046 -79.153683
sc.us501@SC22 33.920625 -79.15379

(Either point works fine here as long as they are synced.)

5.  sc.i026@15 35.027132 -82.035202
sc.us176@I-26(15) 35.027044 -82.03517

(The US 176 point should be synced with the I-26 point.)

6. sc.sc183@US178_E 34.88374 -82.707377
sc.sc183@US178_W 34.883645 -82.707732
sc.sc183@US178_E 34.88374 -82.707377
sc.us178@SC183_W 34.883645 -82.707732
sc.sc183@US178_W 34.883645 -82.707732
sc.us178@SC183_E 34.88374 -82.707377
sc.us178@SC183_E 34.88374 -82.707377
sc.us178@SC183_W 34.883645 -82.707732

(FPs, though on US 178, SC183_W should be SC183_S, and SC183_E should be SC183_N.)

7.  sc.sc003busspr@SC4_W 33.496662 -81.279323
sc.sc004@SC39_N 33.496539 -81.279639
sc.sc003busspr@SC4_W 33.496662 -81.279323
sc.sc039@SC4_E 33.496539 -81.279639
sc.sc004@SC39_N 33.496539 -81.279639
sc.sc004@SC3Bus_S 33.496662 -81.279323
sc.sc004@SC3Bus_S 33.496662 -81.279323
sc.sc039@SC4_E 33.496539 -81.279639

(FPs)

8.  sc.sc217@US21_N 33.089382 -80.813539
sc.sc217@US21_S 33.089157 -80.813446
sc.sc217@US21_N 33.089382 -80.813539
sc.us021@SC217_N 33.089157 -80.813446
sc.sc217@US21_S 33.089157 -80.813446
sc.us021@SC217_S 33.089382 -80.813539
sc.us021@SC217_N 33.089157 -80.813446
sc.us021@SC217_S 33.089382 -80.813539

(FPs, though I did see a SC5_W on US 21 while quickly looking that should be SC5_N.)

9.  sc.sc304@US78Bus 33.355025 -81.26943
sc.us078busbla@SC304 33.355025 -81.269432

(These should be synced with each other.)

10.  sc.us017@US78 32.796089 -79.943836
sc.us078@US17 32.796296 -79.944061

(These should be synced with each other since US 78 is King St.  I do not think I-26 should get a point here though.)

11.  sc.sc171@ArtAve 32.654985 -79.940525
sc.sc171@AshAve 32.65545 -79.940761

(FPs)

12.  ga.ga150@GA/SC 33.6612 -82.199836 LI
sc.us221@GA/SC 33.661201 -82.199836 LI
ga.us221@GA/SC 33.6612 -82.199836 LI
sc.us221@GA/SC 33.661201 -82.199836 LI

(These should have been synced previously.)



Last Submission Comments:  (I did this just using the commit for the most part if you are wondering why this was done before the 11/2/2019 update.)
SC 642:
1.   FortDorSP seems to be signed as the Colonial Dorchester State Historic Site (ColDorSHS) (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.9526058,-80.1718683,3a,75y,325h,88.02t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFW-cAcujyfd3-cqBtUKhTg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).  (label would be based on CTLanSHS from SC 171 (http://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?units=miles&u=markkos1992&r=sc.sc171))
2.  HillBlv should be HillBlvd.
SC 703:  JasBlvd should be JasBlvd_W. (Clarified with the SCDOT Street Finder)
SC 707: I have not seen an official opening date for the SC 31 extension.  While I doubt there is an issue with making the point visible now, I would have waited until it opened.
SC 763: Technically StPChuRd should be SPChuRd.
SC 905: CouCluDr should be CouClubDr.

Unused Alternate Labels:  (may as well be cleaned up while we are at it though these are mostly unrelated to usasc)
sc.i077(1): 82
sc.i074futmyr(1): WATTOWRD
sc.us001(3): 2NDST N9THST US521/601TRK_S
sc.us017(2): US21/17ALT_N US701/17ALT_N
sc.us021(4): SC217_E SC217_W US17CON US21BUSROC_S
sc.us025(4): I-520CON S-19-29 SC125CON US25/276CON
sc.us052(1): 2NDST
sc.us076(8 ): I-126(GREYBLVD) SC14_S SC187_S SC20_N SC20_S SC28BUSPEN_N SC28BUSPEN_S SC28BUS_S
sc.us176(2): SC49 SC496
sc.us178(1): US178/378CON
sc.us221(4): S-33-26 S-33-70 SC10_S US221/176CONSPA
sc.us321(1): SC9BUSCHE_W
sc.us378(1): N9THST
sc.us521(9): MAINST MCILWRD OLDCHURD SC522_N SC522_S SGUIPKWY US1/521TRK US15/521CON US521/601TRK_N
sc.us601(1): US521/601TRK_S
sc.us001trkaik(1): ARBCT
sc.us001trkcam(1): YORKST
sc.us017altsum(2): SC63_E SC642
sc.us078busbla(1): MAINST
sc.us078trkaik(1): ARBCT
sc.us178busora(1): US21/178CON
sc.us221trklau(1): SHARSTEXT
sc.us321busche(3): SC97/97BUS SC9BUS_E SC9BUS_W
sc.us378buslak(1): SC341_E
sc.us521busker(1): SC157
sc.us521buslan(3): BARST MAINST SC9BUS_W
sc.us521trkcam(2): CHEFERRD US1_S
sc.us601busker(1): SC157
sc.sc028(2): I-85(19) SC88
sc.sc763(1): US15/521

Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on November 07, 2019, 07:03:07 am
The extension of SC 31 (https://www.wmbfnews.com/2019/11/06/scdot-sc-extension-be-open-by-this-weekend/) is expected to open this weekend.  You may as well leave the new point on SC 707 as-is at this point. 

I guess an updates entry will still be needed for SC 31 whether we activate usasc or not since it is in usansf.

EDIT:  It is now open. (https://www.wmbfnews.com/2019/11/07/scdot-announces-highway-extension-is-finally-open-drivers/)
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on November 16, 2019, 09:44:43 pm
Everything addressed from two posts above except the GA syncing...

The US 521 Con is shown explicitly on the SCDOT map of Kershaw - http://info2.scdot.org//GISMapping/GISMapdl/KERSHAW_2017.pdf

SC 31 extension also added and in the queue
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on November 17, 2019, 01:38:07 pm
The only thing I see missed is the US 501/SC 22 NMP.  Otherwise I directed ntallyn here from the GA State Highways thread for the US 221/GA 150

I will probably upload the other NMPs into the nmpfps.log file later this week.  Also I plan to look further into the VA and NC NMPs at a later date.

Overall, I am fine with activating the system at this point.  (I believe it is up to whether yakra wants to do his grepping label program before or after activation.)

Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on November 17, 2019, 06:10:39 pm
SC 22 fix made and submitted...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: ntallyn on November 17, 2019, 06:20:06 pm
The only thing I see missed is the US 501/SC 22 NMP.  Otherwise I directed ntallyn here from the GA State Highways thread for the US 221/GA 150

Updated GA 150 and US 221 (GA) locally. Will be included with my next push.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on November 22, 2019, 08:43:40 am
Added the relevant SC NMPs to FP file:  https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3342 
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on November 28, 2019, 11:28:12 am
I forgot to do this before, but this pull request removes the Relevant FPs from the Datacheck FP file:  https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3364

This should end the SC clean-up minus yakra's label corrections.

Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: yakra on November 28, 2019, 03:57:22 pm
`Bout that time then is it?
I've come up with several new searches, to be copied to the grep thread (http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=3245) for staying organized. I'll do that, then go to town.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: yakra on November 28, 2019, 11:51:16 pm
prefix after slash

SC/usaus/sc.us521.wpt:US521Trk/US601Trk_N
We don't want the US after the slash:
Quote from: http://205.209.84.174/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#slash
Drop the prefix of the second highway if it is more than one character long.
...
If one of the two highways is already long as a label (e.g., a bannered route like US42BusKin), consider skipping the city abbrev. or even skipping the whole second route.

Avoid extra distinguishing suffixes on labels with 2 numbered designations unless necessary. (http://205.209.84.174/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#avoidsuffix)
Only in the case of two identical two-designation waypoints should the suffixes be added for distinction. (http://205.209.84.174/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#identicalmultiplex)



lower -> upper case

SC/usaus/sc.us076.wpt: I-20Bs -> I-20Bs



should be suffix, not abbrev

SC/usaus/sc.us001.wpt:US378Col_W
SC/usaus/sc.us076.wpt:US1Col_N
SC/usaus/sc.us378.wpt:US1Col_S
SC/usaus/sc.us378.wpt:US1Col_N

US##Col_W -> US##_ColW
Because this is part of a disambiguating city suffix, not an abbrev which is tied to this route segment as part of its .list file name.



long word

SC/usaus/sc.us029.wpt:US29ConGreen



too many words

SC/usaif/sc.i074futmyr.wpt:RobMGriPkwy
SC/usasc/sc.sc009.wpt:OldCamMonHwy
SC/usasc/sc.sc024.wpt:ONeFerRd
SC/usasc/sc.sc120.wpt:StPauChuRd
SC/usasc/sc.sc154.wpt:ManStCRd
SC/usasc/sc.sc213.wpt:StBChuRd
SC/usasc/sc.sc219.wpt:StPChuRd
SC/usasc/sc.sc395.wpt:StLChuRd
SC/usausb/sc.us017altsum.wpt:RemCDenBlvd
SC/usaus/sc.us017.wpt:BarRBrgRd
SC/usaus/sc.us052.wpt:RemCDenBlvd
SC/usaus/sc.us052.wpt:OldMtHRd
SC/usaus/sc.us076.wpt:StPauChuRd
SC/usaus/sc.us176.wpt:OldMtHRd
SC/usaus/sc.us378.wpt:StPauChuRd
http://205.209.84.174/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#truncate

Some borderline cases here. Weaseley ones though; one 2-letter abbreviation + another 1-letter abbreviation does not equal one three-letter abbreviATION. :) Excuse me, I sneezed. And it made me bump into the caps lock key.



potential leading directional specifiers

SC/usasc/sc.sc005.wpt:NMouSt
SC/usasc/sc.sc146.wpt:SJWorHwy
SC/usasc/sc.sc186.wpt:SCChuRd
SC/usasc/sc.sc215.wpt:SHChuRd
SC/usasc/sc.sc763.wpt:SPChuRd
SC/usausb/sc.us017altsum.wpt:ECarAve
SC/usausb/sc.us017busmyr.wpt:SOceBlvd
SC/usaus/sc.us029.wpt:EMainSt
SC/usaus/sc.us052.wpt:NADRd
SC/usaus/sc.us052.wpt:EMonAve
SC/usaus/sc.us076.wpt:EWPkwy
SC/usaus/sc.us076.wpt:EBreRd
SC/usaus/sc.us078.wpt:NADSt
SC/usaus/sc.us078.wpt:EMonAve
SC/usaus/sc.us123.wpt:NMainSt
SC/usaus/sc.us178.wpt:EWPkwy
SC/usaus/sc.us276.wpt:NMainSt
SC/usaus/sc.us378.wpt:SJenSt
SC/usaus/sc.us401.wpt:EMainSt
SC/usaus/sc.us401.wpt:WMainSt
These could very well all be false positives for all I know.



SC/usasc/sc.sc045.wpt: FraMarHBS -> FraMarAve
SC/usasc/sc.sc171.wpt: CTLanSHS -> OTPlaRd or similar
SC/usasc/sc.sc642.wpt: ColDorSHS -> OldDSPRd, ODorSPRd, etc
SC248: NinSixNHS could maybe be at Louden Rd instead, but it's not something I feel especially strongly about.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on November 30, 2019, 09:25:23 pm
I made changes to all routes cited below except SC 248 and the following which should be FPs.

Quote
SC/usasc/sc.sc024.wpt:ONeFerRd
This stands for O'Neal Ferry Rd

Quote
SC/usasc/sc.sc154.wpt:ManStCRd
This stands for Manville-St Charles Rd

Quote
SC/usaus/sc.us052.wpt:NADRd
SC/usaus/sc.us078.wpt:NADSt
NAD is itself an abbreviation and is the correct name of the road.

Quote
SC/usasc/sc.sc146.wpt:SJWorHwy
S J Workman Hwy is the name of this point

Quote
SC/usasc/sc.sc186.wpt:SCChuRd
SC/usasc/sc.sc215.wpt:SHChuRd
SC/usasc/sc.sc763.wpt:SPChuRd

S stands for St. x Church
Note fixes under "too many words" made a few more files with this dynamic

Sent to Jim this evening...

Thanks
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on December 01, 2019, 07:31:55 am
A duplicate label error showed up for:

sc.us076:I-20bs (now an alternate label for I-20BS)

Should that label be removed since I do not believe capitalization matters?
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: yakra on December 01, 2019, 10:08:43 am
A duplicate label error showed up for:
sc.us076:I-20bs (now an alternate label for I-20BS)
Should that label be removed since I do not believe capitalization matters?
Yes, labels are case sensitive & it should be removed, leaving us with
I-20BS http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.187275&lon=-79.809194

This stands for O'Neal Ferry Rd
NAD is itself an abbreviation and is the correct name of the road.
S J Workman Hwy is the name of this point
S stands for St. x Church
Note fixes under "too many words" made a few more files with this dynamic
All legitimate false positives then. Looking good.

Quote
Quote
SC/usasc/sc.sc154.wpt:ManStCRd
This stands for Manville-St Charles Rd
This one though, contains 2 abbreviated words, and should probably be ManSCRd, similar to how "St" was cut down to 'S' for the churches.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: CharlotteAllisonCDTG on December 01, 2019, 10:58:09 am
I lived in the Charleston area for about 25 years, but I never heard what "NAD" stood for.  Could someone enlighten me?  I actually lived about a mile or so from NAD Road for a while.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: neroute2 on December 01, 2019, 12:16:33 pm
I lived in the Charleston area for about 25 years, but I never heard what "NAD" stood for.  Could someone enlighten me?  I actually lived about a mile or so from NAD Road for a while.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Support_Activity_Charleston
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: CharlotteAllisonCDTG on December 01, 2019, 08:33:12 pm
The United States Naval Ammunition Depot.  Hmm, interesting.  Thank you for posting that.  I used to be in the Navy.  I actually attended the Naval Nuclear Power Training Command on what was known at the time as Naval Weapons Station Charleston (2002).
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapmikey on December 11, 2019, 09:42:45 am
A duplicate label error showed up for:
sc.us076:I-20bs (now an alternate label for I-20BS)
Should that label be removed since I do not believe capitalization matters?
Yes, labels are case sensitive & it should be removed, leaving us with
I-20BS http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.187275&lon=-79.809194

This stands for O'Neal Ferry Rd
NAD is itself an abbreviation and is the correct name of the road.
S J Workman Hwy is the name of this point
S stands for St. x Church
Note fixes under "too many words" made a few more files with this dynamic
All legitimate false positives then. Looking good.

Quote
Quote
SC/usasc/sc.sc154.wpt:ManStCRd
This stands for Manville-St Charles Rd
This one though, contains 2 abbreviated words, and should probably be ManSCRd, similar to how "St" was cut down to 'S' for the churches.

Fixed the US 76 and SC 154 files and sent to Jim.

Is there anything else needed to activate South Carolina State Highways?
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: michih on December 18, 2019, 03:11:45 am
Is there anything else needed to activate South Carolina State Highways?

7 days are past... Promote it to being active!
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on December 18, 2019, 06:30:48 am
Is there anything else needed to activate South Carolina State Highways?

7 days are past... Promote it to being active!

I have no issues with activating it.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: michih on December 26, 2019, 01:36:53 pm
The distance for this system is just one systems.csv (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/systems.csv) edit and one systemupdates.csv (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/systemupdates.csv) entry to being active. Can we get this done by the end of the year?
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Jim on December 26, 2019, 02:56:47 pm
The distance for this system is just one systems.csv (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/systems.csv) edit and one systemupdates.csv (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/systemupdates.csv) entry to being active. Can we get this done by the end of the year?

I'll make those edits right now and have it active in tonight's update.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Jim on December 26, 2019, 02:58:57 pm
Going active after a mere 46 months in preview status...
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapcat on December 28, 2019, 10:44:18 am
SC 22, SC 30, SC 31, & SC 277 still need to be moved from usansf to usasc.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: Markkos1992 on December 30, 2019, 08:35:14 pm
SC 22, SC 30, SC 31, & SC 277 still need to be moved from usansf to usasc.

I guess we are not being as urgent on this as we were when usava was being finalized.  I think we were getting questions on this at least once a month (mainly because portions of VA 7 and VA 168 were in both systems).
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: mapcat on December 30, 2019, 09:05:09 pm
It's not really an urgent matter, just something that was forgotten and will be dealt with. Nothing for you to be concerned about.
Title: Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
Post by: michih on March 29, 2020, 12:14:55 pm
SC 22, SC 30, SC 31, & SC 277 still need to be moved from usansf to usasc.

Done: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3709