Author Topic: frad/fram: France Routes Départementales / Routes Métropolitaines  (Read 111845 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 08:46:55 pm
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #105 on: October 17, 2019, 06:40:47 am »
Let me know anytime you'd like me to do the automated Multiplex checks again.
Yes please. With Spain tier-5 done, it's time to split France.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #106 on: October 17, 2019, 05:42:00 pm »
I need to look at my own code and have a refresher.
0 concurrent segments with same name+banner in different region: FRA A16 IDF/HDF_2 13
This kind of output may be fine, may be what I intended, but I just want to be sure.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 08:46:55 pm
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #107 on: October 17, 2019, 05:54:09 pm »
I need to look at my own code and have a refresher.
0 concurrent segments with same name+banner in different region: FRA A16 IDF/HDF_2 13
This kind of output may be fine, may be what I intended, but I just want to be sure.
That seems correct - there is a hidden_junction error on that section due to the broken concurrency. I've put in a pull request that fixes this.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #108 on: October 17, 2019, 06:24:10 pm »
I thought for a moment it might be listing the total number of concurrent segments (which would be bad for a 0), not just those other than the listed segment itself.
I'll change it to say "FRA A16 IDF/HDF_2 13 has 0 concurrent segments with same name+banner in different region(s) (1 expected)" so clearer language won't trip me up next time.
And will merge in your pull request before running it again.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #109 on: October 17, 2019, 07:04:40 pm »
These may not be the results we're looking for. Stay tuned.

eursf-concurrencies.log, eurtr-concurrencies.log & eurtrr-concurrencies.log are all 0 bytes, so nothing out of the ordinary there.

eure-concurrencies.log
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA A10 4 5
   FRA E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF A10 4 5
   FRA-IDF E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA-IDF N20-91 4(A10) 5(A10)
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA E15 ToA10 5(A6)
   FRA A6 ToA10 5
   FRA-IDF A6 ToA10 5
   FRA-IDF D118-91 A6(5) A6_N
   FRA-IDF E15 ToA10 5(A6)
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA A10 4 5
   FRA E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF A10 4 5
   FRA-IDF E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA-IDF N20-91 4(A10) 5(A10)

eurer-concurrencies.log
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA A10 4 5
   FRA E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF A10 4 5
   FRA-IDF E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA-IDF N20-91 4(A10) 5(A10)
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA E15 ToA10 5(A6)
   FRA A6 ToA10 5
   FRA-IDF A6 ToA10 5
   FRA-IDF D118-91 A6(5) A6_N
   FRA-IDF E15 ToA10 5(A6)
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA A10 4 5
   FRA E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF A10 4 5
   FRA-IDF E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA-IDF N20-91 4(A10) 5(A10)

eursfr-concurrencies.log
FRA-ARA AutSol 33(M6) 34(M6) has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol 34(M6) 35(M6) has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol 35(M6) +X53 has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol +X53 36(M6) has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol 36(M6) 37(M6) has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol 37(M6) 38(M6) has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol 38(M6) 39a(M6) has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol 39a(M6) 39b(M6) has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol 39b(M6) M6/M7 has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol M6/M7 1(M7) has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol 1(M7) 2(M7) has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol 2(M7) 3(M7) has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol 3(M7) 4(M7) has no concurrencies
FRA-ARA AutSol 4(M7) A7/A450 has no concurrencies

fraa-concurrencies.log
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA E15 ToA10 5(A6)
   FRA A6 ToA10 5
   FRA-IDF A6 ToA10 5
   FRA-IDF D118-91 A6(5) A6_N
   FRA-IDF E15 ToA10 5(A6)
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA A10 4 5
   FRA E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF A10 4 5
   FRA-IDF E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA-IDF N20-91 4(A10) 5(A10)
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA A104 9 D934
   FRA-IDF A104 9 D934
   FRA-IDF D934-77 A104_N A104_S

fraar-concurrencies.log
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA E15 ToA10 5(A6)
   FRA A6 ToA10 5
   FRA-IDF A6 ToA10 5
   FRA-IDF D118-91 A6(5) A6_N
   FRA-IDF E15 ToA10 5(A6)
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA A10 4 5
   FRA E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF A10 4 5
   FRA-IDF E50 5(A10) 4(A10)
   FRA-IDF E5 4(A10) 5(A10)
   FRA-IDF N20-91 4(A10) 5(A10)
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA A104 9 D934
   FRA-IDF A104 9 D934
   FRA-IDF D934-77 A104_N A104_S

fran-concurrencies.log
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N3 D422_E D404_S
   FRA-IDF D404-77 N3_N N3_E
   FRA-IDF N3 D422_E D404_S
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N3 D27_N D27_S
   FRA-IDF D27-77 N3_W N3_E
   FRA-IDF N3 D27_N D27_S
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N4 D15_N D204
   FRA-IDF D15-77 N4_W D204
   FRA-IDF N4 D15_N D204
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N4 D204 D15_S
   FRA-IDF D15-77 D204 N4_E
   FRA-IDF N4 D204 D15_S
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N4Sar D104A_N D104A_S
   FRA-GES D104A-57 N4_W N4_E
   FRA-GES N4Sar D104A_N D104A_S
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N6 D136_E D136_W
   FRA-IDF D136-94 N6_S N6_N
   FRA-IDF N6 D136_E D136_W
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N10Ram D13/D213 D13_W
   FRA-IDF D13-78 N10_S N10_N
   FRA-IDF N10 D13/D213 D13_W
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N52Rom D52A_W D52A_E
   FRA-GES D52A-57 N52_S N52_N
   FRA-GES N52Rom D52A_W D52A_E
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N52Rom D9_W D9_E
   FRA-GES D9-57 N52_S N52_E
   FRA-GES N52Rom D9_W D9_E
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N104Gou 90 D909
   FRA-IDF D9-95 90(N104) D909
   FRA-IDF N104Gou 90 D909
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N104Gou D909 Att
   FRA-IDF D9-95 D909 Att
   FRA-IDF N104Gou D909 Att
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N104Gou Att D9E
   FRA-IDF D9-95 Att D9E
   FRA-IDF N104Gou Att D9E
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N104Gou D9E 93
   FRA-IDF D9-95 D9E 93(N104)
   FRA-IDF N104Gou D9E 93
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N118 8 9
   FRA-IDF D446-91 8(N118) 9(N118)
   FRA-IDF N118 8 9

franr-concurrencies.log
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N3 D422_E D404_S
   FRA-IDF D404-77 N3_N N3_E
   FRA-IDF N3 D422_E D404_S
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N3 D27_N D27_S
   FRA-IDF D27-77 N3_W N3_E
   FRA-IDF N3 D27_N D27_S
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N4 D15_N D204
   FRA-IDF D15-77 N4_W D204
   FRA-IDF N4 D15_N D204
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N4 D204 D15_S
   FRA-IDF D15-77 D204 N4_E
   FRA-IDF N4 D204 D15_S
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N4Sar D104A_N D104A_S
   FRA-GES D104A-57 N4_W N4_E
   FRA-GES N4Sar D104A_N D104A_S
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N6 D136_E D136_W
   FRA-IDF D136-94 N6_S N6_N
   FRA-IDF N6 D136_E D136_W
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N10Ram D13/D213 D13_W
   FRA-IDF D13-78 N10_S N10_N
   FRA-IDF N10 D13/D213 D13_W
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N52Rom D52A_W D52A_E
   FRA-GES D52A-57 N52_S N52_N
   FRA-GES N52Rom D52A_W D52A_E
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N52Rom D9_W D9_E
   FRA-GES D9-57 N52_S N52_E
   FRA-GES N52Rom D9_W D9_E
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N104Gou 90 D909
   FRA-IDF D9-95 90(N104) D909
   FRA-IDF N104Gou 90 D909
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N104Gou D909 Att
   FRA-IDF D9-95 D909 Att
   FRA-IDF N104Gou D909 Att
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N104Gou Att D9E
   FRA-IDF D9-95 Att D9E
   FRA-IDF N104Gou Att D9E
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N104Gou D9E 93
   FRA-IDF D9-95 D9E 93(N104)
   FRA-IDF N104Gou D9E 93
Odd number of concurrencies:
   FRA N118 8 9
   FRA-IDF D446-91 8(N118) 9(N118)
   FRA-IDF N118 8 9


^ These may not be the results we're looking for. Stay tuned.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2019, 07:58:20 pm by yakra »
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #110 on: October 17, 2019, 08:18:24 pm »
Quote from: systems.csv
fraa;FRA;France Autoroutes;blue;1;active
fran;FRA;France Routes Nationales;lightsalmon;4;active
fraar;FRA;IGNORE TEST France Autoroutes with Regions;blue;1;preview
franr;FRA;IGNORE TEST France Routes Nationales with Regions;lightsalmon;4;preview
I originally wrote the code to expect stuff like this.

Quote from: systems.csv
fragesd57;FRA;Grand-Est Routes Départementales (Moselle);yellow;5;preview
fraidfd;FRA;Île-de-France Routes Départementales;yellow;5;preview
fragesd54;FRA;Grand-Est Routes Départementales (Meurthe-et-Moselle);yellow;5;devel
Routes Départementales. Entirely new systems, to remain after the split as they are now. No counterparts in FRA.
Right?
The simplest thing for me to do is just comment these out while running the concurrency checks.

Quote from: systems.csv
fracort;FRA;IGNORE TEST Corsica Routes Territoriales with Regions;lightsalmon;4;preview
fracort : frht :: fraar : fraa?
My code would expect "frhtr" as the system code, but no big deal; this is in FRH, not FRA, and so doesn't affect the main split (of FRA) I'm testing.
A quick shell script to compare FRH/frht/ vs FRA-COR/fracort/
Code: [Select]
wpts='t010.wpt t011.wpt t012.wpt t020.wpt t021.wpt t022.wpt t030.wpt t040bon.wpt t040.wpt t050.wpt t101.wpt t201.wpt t202.wpt t203.wpt t204.wpt t205.wpt t301.wpt t401.wpt t402.wpt'
for wpt in $wpts; do echo $wpt; diff FRH/frht/frh.$wpt FRA-COR/fracort/fracor.$wpt; done
and they look fine.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2019, 08:22:49 pm by yakra »
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #111 on: October 17, 2019, 08:38:33 pm »

Quote from: systems.csv
fragesd57;FRA;Grand-Est Routes Départementales (Moselle);yellow;5;preview
fraidfd;FRA;Île-de-France Routes Départementales;yellow;5;preview
fragesd54;FRA;Grand-Est Routes Départementales (Meurthe-et-Moselle);yellow;5;devel
Routes Départementales. Entirely new systems, to remain after the split as they are now. No counterparts in FRA.
Right?
The simplest thing for me to do is just comment these out while running the concurrency checks.
Commented out those three systems and ran it again.
AutSol is in eursfr but not eursf. Other than that, everything looks fine.
How should we proceed with list files?
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2731
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:28:32 pm
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #112 on: October 17, 2019, 08:50:56 pm »
Should I proceed as usual with tonight's site update, or are things in a transitional state right now?

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #113 on: October 17, 2019, 09:25:21 pm »
Nothing transitional AFAIK, that should hold back from an update.
The 6 test systems, added Mar 28 and commented out again Jun 17, are back to Preview for testing as of yesterday. This can gum up graph files a bit.
However, this is already in master and in the HB. All that's new I believe is the pull request Si mentioned above.

Yeah, let's do it. (Si?)
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2731
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:28:32 pm
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #114 on: October 17, 2019, 10:42:14 pm »
OK, launching...

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #115 on: October 17, 2019, 11:09:37 pm »
lists at http://yakra.teresco.org/tmtools_demos/splitregion/20191017/list_files/
diffs at http://yakra.teresco.org/tmtools_demos/splitregion/20191017/diffs/

For simplicity's sake, I've deleted .lists & .diffs where there was no diff from the original .list file.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4554
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 03:52:03 pm
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #116 on: October 18, 2019, 07:53:59 am »
Quote from: systems.csv
fragesd57;FRA;Grand-Est Routes Départementales (Moselle);yellow;5;preview
fraidfd;FRA;Île-de-France Routes Départementales;yellow;5;preview
fragesd54;FRA;Grand-Est Routes Départementales (Meurthe-et-Moselle);yellow;5;devel
Routes Départementales. Entirely new systems, to remain after the split as they are now. No counterparts in FRA.
Right?

yep!

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4554
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 03:52:03 pm
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #117 on: October 18, 2019, 07:58:58 am »
@Si, I'm surprised about the N88 update. Is 25 really intended? It's the wp in Baraqueville and no voie express exit. Why 25 and not Avenue du Centre? I need the wp since I only drove the old route.

Edit: And the wp is off ;)
« Last Edit: October 18, 2019, 08:03:27 am by michih »

Offline si404

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 08:46:55 pm
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #118 on: October 18, 2019, 08:17:25 am »
@Si, I'm surprised about the N88 update. Is 25 really intended? It's the wp in Baraqueville and no voie express exit. Why 25 and not Avenue du Centre? I need the wp since I only drove the old route.
It's one of those ones where, after copying it into a text editor, you notice an exit number, and rather than mucking around with the editor, you do it manually in the text file and do it on a similarly named and similarly located wpt.

It should be the D997 point that's given the 25 label. 25 still has it's original label of D911 as a hidden label, which will return to be its primary label once my fixes go in as the next bit is due to open 'Late 2019' and so I can't be bothered to change it for a few weeks before it gets removed.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4554
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 03:52:03 pm
Re: France Routes Départementales (frad)
« Reply #119 on: October 18, 2019, 09:02:40 am »
Fine to me. However, the next section is due to open 'Summer 2020'.