ISTR a route signed only on mile markers (or was it a blade sign? or was that a different route? mumble) being left out of usanj.
I'll add it to usasf.
This and 703 (neither had mile markers at the time) were left out of CHM for being too short. As we've since revisited those criteria, I'm fine with including it in TM.
Heck, I'd probably be the one most enthusiastic about including it; it's just laziness that's kept me from doing so. That and also wanting to include 703 at the same time, though there's no reason I'd have to do so. Adding in just ScaCon for now is fine.
On the topic of 703:
That's the Maine Turnpike spur from Exit 45 of I-95 to US1 in South Portland. I've left it out because I can't settle on anything good to name it.
There's no known, consistent, stable road name, nothing signed. So that's right out. It's just posted as [TO] (the stuff at the other end).
usasf;ME;METpk;spr;SPo;South Portland, ME;me.metpksprspo
doesn't sit quite right with me: IMO this implies an actual bannered route, signed with a SPUR banner above the route shield, etc. If shield.php evolves to the point where it shows banners above the shields, it might be shown this way, incorrectly.
One possible solution is to remove the "spr" from the banner field and include it in the route name:
usasf;ME;METpkSpr;;SPo;South Portland, ME;me.metpksprspo
Or, we could simple have it as
usasf;ME;METpk;;SPo;South Portland, ME;me.metpkspo
Denoting a section of Maine Turnpike in South Portland.
Thoughts?
