Highway Data Discussion > Completed Highway Systems Threads

lvap: Latvia Reģionālie Autoceļi

(1/4) > >>

michih:
System is in preview: http://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=lvap

I'll peer-review it soon but anyone can already put comments here.

michih:
Link under credits doesn't work.

Route list source should be http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=198589 (last update Oct 2019)


P2:
Is indicated with a length of 2.7km but we have 9.7km. It should run from A4 to V36 only "Juglas papīrfabrikas ciemats – Upesciems" as it is indicated on OSM.


P64:
Is indicated with a length of 31.5km but we have 26.7km only.
It extends at east end to Višķi. It's confirmed by GM and 2019 GSV. OSM seems to be wrong.


P77:
Is unsigned (GM + GSV) but should extend to A10 at west end according to the official list "Dzintaru iela, Talsu iela". You've gone with OSM but 2019 GSV (just as 2012) indicate the OSM segment as V8 1307.
I'd extend it according to the official list.


P95:
Is indicated with a length of 43.6km but we have 45.0km. I think it ends at RupIela wp as indicated on OSM. There are no P95 but P97/P98 signs at the next roundabout. The list indicates "Tērvetes iela" which could confirm my assumption.


P108:
OSM and GM do both indicate different routes through Ventspils than we have in HB.
http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=198589 and 2019 GSV confirm OSM. GM extends from there to the east but 2019 GSV shows "To" P124.


P110:
Is indicated with a length of 7.8km but we have 12.0km in HB. It's fully unsigned according to 2019 GSV. GM indicates it ending at P111 which would be about 6km. You've gone with OSM and yes, the official list also indicates "Tāši" being the end of the route. I'd leave as-is.


P114:
Is indicated with a length of 38.1km but we have 22.7km in HB only. It should extend at north end to Ilmāja. GSV is from 2011 and has no signs.


P128:
Is indicated with a length of 73.9km but we have 78.1km in HB. I think it should end at the roundabout where we have AsaPro wp.


P131:
Is indicated with a length of 107.5km but we have 111.6km in HB. OSM and GM indicate different routes in Tukums but I think 2011 and 2019 GSV confirm OSM. Leave as-is.


Please fix the SELFREF + DL data errors:
http://travelmapping.net/devel/datacheck.php?rg=LVA&hide=VISIBLE_DISTANCE

Please fix the P5/P10/E22 NMP.

si404:

--- Quote from: michih on May 26, 2020, 02:32:02 pm ---P108:
OSM and GM do both indicate different routes through Ventspils than we have in HB.
http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=198589 and 2019 GSV confirm OSM. GM extends from there to the east but 2019 GSV shows "To" P124.
--- End quote ---
GSV doesn't confirm OSM's route at all, because it's what I based my route on. 1, 2.

This is clear that the route through the town is discouraged in favour of the new route (they are still doing finishing works on GSV)

Though I don't know what this is about - straight on is to where OSM's route is, behind us is the roundabout! I presume it's linked with this and was a older avoid the centre route.

I can be persuaded to change this, and leave the end dangling, rather than connected, per the lists.

I've done everything else listed above.

michih:

--- Quote from: si404 on May 28, 2020, 11:40:04 am ---I can be persuaded to change this, and leave the end dangling, rather than connected, per the lists.
--- End quote ---

What does "per the list" mean? http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=198589 says "Kuldīgas iela, Zvaigžņu iela, Kuldīgas iela". And it indicates a length of 106.1km but we currently have 107.4km in HB. I think that we should truncate the route. Likely to ZvaIela_N wp @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=5/57.380/21.566

si404:

--- Quote from: michih on May 28, 2020, 11:53:19 am ---I think that we should truncate the route. Likely to ZvaIela_N wp @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=5/57.380/21.566
--- End quote ---
Oh, I thought you wanted the OSM route to the point further north that you gave the GSV sign at - which is what I interpret that document as saying.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page