Recent Posts

41

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usatr: United States select tourist routes

« Last post by Duke87 on April 13, 2024, 08:31:31 pm »

I could use a point where the National Rd leaves MD 27 on the north side of I-70.  I am not 100% sure whether I clinched the short section between MD 27 and MD 808.

Added, tidied up a few other bits in that area too

42

Updates to Highway Data / Re: MS US 61 Business (Vicksburg)

« Last post by froggie on April 13, 2024, 07:17:50 pm »

I see that Si has already added Historic US 80...

43

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usatr: United States select tourist routes

« Last post by Markkos1992 on April 13, 2024, 07:08:00 pm »

I could use a point where the National Rd leaves MD 27 on the north side of I-70.  I am not 100% sure whether I clinched the short section between MD 27 and MD 808.

44

Updates to Highway Data / Re: AR/TN: US 78 moved to Crump and posted on I-55

« Last post by Markkos1992 on April 13, 2024, 03:45:52 pm »

TBKS1 on the AARoads Wiki Discord reported that US 78 is signed in Jonesboro.

45

Updates to Highway Data / AR: AR 384 (Balch) Decommissioned

« Last post by Markkos1992 on April 13, 2024, 02:37:32 pm »

As reported by TBKS1 on the AARoads Wiki Discord.

GSV shows signage up as of June 2023.

46

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usatr: United States select tourist routes

« Last post by neroute2 on April 13, 2024, 01:20:44 am »

At Lima it probably comes in on North (the route in the 1920 Automobile Blue Book jogs south on Dewey to High, but that's been cut off) and then uses Main-McKibben and then north on West into 65 to 115 to rejoin the main route.

It doesn't use Elizabeth or Grand at all; this needs to be fixed.

47

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usatr: United States select tourist routes

« Last post by neroute2 on April 12, 2024, 10:26:14 pm »

Ohio River Scenic Byway in Illinois:

Market Street in Metropolis

Ohio River Scenic Byway in Indiana:
Randolph Avenue in Clarksville, then jog on Harrison Avenue to Clark Boulevard



The Lincoln Heritage Trail is signed in at least Illinois and Indiana. I can try to figure out the details if you'd like.

48

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usatr: United States select tourist routes

« Last post by Duke87 on April 12, 2024, 09:41:55 pm »

MD National Road:

Eastbound uses Mulberry and westbound uses Locust in Hagerstown. Neither direction uses Potomac.

Eastbound in Frederick uses East Street, while MD 144 east continues to Franklin. But westbound is the same. So should the overlap be broken or not?

Here I've kept the overlaps along Mulberry (with US40Alt) and Patrick (with MD144) as concurrent with those routes, but this can be changed. Both existing routes are not well mapped.

So the Frederick situation is a nice hot mess. Officially, only Patrick Street is part of the state highway system as MD 144. But Patrick becomes one way westbound west of East Street, so where's MD 144 eastbound? Officially currently, nowhere, but formerly it used South St to Franklin St before those were downloaded to local maintenance. At least one or two signs or MD 144 east along this alignment remain in place. So, by the principle of "there are no one way routes, if a route officially only follows a one-way street there must be an implied one-way pair", MD 144 is mapped as though what used to be officially its eastbound routing was not dumped.

The National Road being run through the area using a slightly different one-way pairing makes properly mapping this impossible since whether the two are concurrent between East St and Franklin St depends on which direction you are traveling.

But I do think leaving it as is as the least bad solution.


Over in Hagerstown, I see no reason not to map it as signed, but yes this requires adjusting US40AltHag and US40's files to create waypoints in the right place. I can appreciate Si did not want to mess with other people's stuff but as this is mine I'll go ahead and do it.

EDIT: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7332
Also made a few adjustments in Baltimore to accommodate

49

Updates to Highway Data / Re: freeways missing from usasf

« Last post by SSOWorld on April 12, 2024, 08:42:36 pm »

Re the LL Tisdale Pkwy in Tulsa: yes, it does have an at-grade intersection at its north end: its intersection with the Gilcrease Expy, which is in the HB. OSM shows both of these routes as county-maintained there (the eastern part of the Gilcrease is OK 11 and the future section will be OTA-controlled). It's about 3 miles long according to Wikipedia, so I wouldn't mind seeing it added in.

Hate to dig up an old relic, but I would like to request clarification on LL Tisdale and Gilcrease.

LL Tisdale: I did not see this get added.  Keeping it off?  It is fully signed and runs up one block past Gilcrease.
Gilcrease: I do not see signage of Gilcrease east of US 75 - though the USDOT has it in their roll, I understand that this is Highway 11 based on signage.

50

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usatr: United States select tourist routes

« Last post by neroute2 on April 12, 2024, 08:10:54 pm »

IA Lincoln Highway:
Signs east of Lisbon do not seem to have been updated (as of September 2023) for the realignment of US 30 Bus. Do you have any sources showing the backtrack on Kirkwood? If not, I'd recommend using as much of the old alignment as possible via Adams and Old Lincoln to Charles.

Everything else looks perfect