Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Other Discussion / Re: More African highways?
« Last post by jwood.ok on Today at 09:41:31 pm »
There is a chance. Your preference for Zambia and Zimbabwe is noted. You might have a wait, but...

Understood.  The nice thing about some of those countries is they don't have a great deal of infrastructure - certainly not many highways!
2
I was looking at the updates so I can see what I need to change to get my old US 93 (now the business route) miles back.  I did noticed one thing.  NV NV172 has a point self-referencing itself as NV172_S.  It looks like that point name was copied over from the concurrent NV US93BusBou. 
3
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: canmbp: Manitoba Provincial Roads
« Last post by yakra on Today at 03:17:41 pm »
Yes, it looks like that larger rural municipality is the Municipality of Hillsburg – Roblin – Shell River.
Backtracking, how did I arrive at that name? Aah yes -- from the MB_Municipal_Boundaries shapefiles, which IIRC came from Manitoba Land Initiative. In these files, LEGAL_NAME = "Municipality of Roblin" (Not actually the full legal name, it would appear). The shape of the municipality matches the post-amalgamation boundary shown here.
I like to go with the smaller, more speciic/local placenames in Canada, even if they don't match a de jure municipality.
"Shell River" is given as the placename in the NRN shapefiles, so I'm thinking I'll use that, and rename it MB482She, instead.
4
Updates to Highway Data / UT: UT-88 Waypoint suggestion
« Last post by navigator on Today at 02:17:02 pm »
The waypoint:

WilRefRd
Waypoint 2
Coords.: 40.124685°, -109.663725°


may have been added before there was a diversion placed in the road, but when I took UT-88 to Wildlife Refuge Rd, it was to the north of where the waypoint is and traffic to the refuge is directed through there, while the one it is marking now is not the main entrance (and may no longer be called the same name)
5
Updates to Highway Data / Re: NV: Today's updates in Boulder City area
« Last post by Highway63 on Today at 02:00:00 pm »
It's not a closed exit, but it's very near the point where the new freeway and (previously) existing four-lane separate. It's more obvious if you use OSM and the dashed lines for the new I-11 are marked. I-515 went to what had been labeled as Exit 56 and now that point doesn't exist on its file, as it starts at Exit 61.

It wouldn't be a point for I-515, but for US 93/95.
6
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: canmbp: Manitoba Provincial Roads
« Last post by oscar on Today at 05:27:16 am »
SK482's "Municipality of Roblin" segment, SK482Rob, should be relabeled as "Roblin". Roblin Municipality is now an unincorporated community, folded into a larger rural municipality as part of Manitoba's 2015 consolidation of many of its smaller municipalities.
7
Updates to Highway Data / Re: NV: Today's updates in Boulder City area
« Last post by oscar on Today at 05:10:25 am »
Could that shaping point south of Exit 56 be turned into an active "closed" point for those of us who will not have traveled the new I-11?

So did I-515 once end there? Satellite imagery doesn't seem to indicate a closed exit there, though I might be missing something. (I rechecked TM's update table but didn't see any relevant entry; CHM's updates table seems to be toast.) My offline draft update perhaps prematurely removed that shaping point.

OSM indicates that several exit numbers for I-11 south of exit 61 will need to change, too. But some discussion over at the AARoads forum indicates the new numbers have not yet been posted in the field, so I'm not rushing to make that set of changes.
8
Updates to Highway Data / Re: MD: MD-896 unsigned?
« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Today at 03:34:23 am »
Alright, I'd just thought I'd bring it up since I randomly came across it.
9
Updates to Highway Data / Re: NV: Today's updates in Boulder City area
« Last post by Highway63 on Today at 02:56:38 am »
FWIW, it looks like anyone who clinched I-515 (like me) has to re-send because it's been truncated to Exit 61. I need to resubmit I-515, US 93, and US 95.

Could that shaping point south of Exit 56 be turned into an active "closed" point for those of us who will not have traveled the new I-11?
10
Updates to Highway Data / Re: MD: MD-896 unsigned?
« Last post by oscar on Yesterday at 10:36:16 pm »
I traveled all 1100 feet of MD 896 last month. No MD 896 markers, still. But I agree with froggie and Duke87 that doesn't matter, and no point in disconnecting the PA and DE parts of state route 896.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10