Author Topic: usasc: South Carolina State highways  (Read 4287 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
  • Last Login:Today at 09:09:10 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #30 on: September 13, 2019, 04:34:18 pm »
I have caught up through SC 8.

The SC 296 change evidently occurred in 2016.  Current Spartanburg County and State Officials now show Daniel Morgan as not primary anywhere along its path from Reidville Rd to US 176.  SC 296 has definitely been rerouted to stay on Reidville Rd to US 29.

The US 29 Bypass postings may be to specifically route folks around a lane closure where St John approaches Church St (see the Oct 2018 GMSV)

My philosophy on South Carolina's CONN routes:  If they have route signage with TO banners on either end then I tend to want to call the road its designated CONN route.  In the US 176/221 CON example for SC 9, this should be changed to Wood St because there is no route signage on either end.  However, on the US 221 file the other US 176 CON route that follows old SC 9 should remain called that because it is posted as TO US 221 South from I-585 and as SC 9 from US 221...

I would only put the CONN routes in the HB with their own route files if they are actually posted in the field as a CONN route (like SC 5 CONN).

Thanks-
Mike

Thanks for the clarification.   I did find two leftover SC 296 shields on US 29 in both directions at Daniel Morgan Ave, but I never saw any other shields so truncating it should be fine IMO.

Otherwise I am fine with you leaving out US 29 Bypass for now since I did not see a posting NB at Daniel Morgan Ave.

I hope to finish SC 9 and its auxiliary routes tonight.

EDIT:  SC 9 is done.  I have a wedding to go to tomorrow so I will not resume with SC 10 before Sunday at the earliest.
« Last Edit: September 13, 2019, 08:16:30 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 433
  • Last Login:Today at 09:04:31 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #31 on: September 14, 2019, 01:09:32 pm »
All changes SC 2-9 made and sent in.  I tried to update other files to reflect SC 9's directional changes so that you won't have to point these out later...

SC 19 Truck appears to be posted on the entire loop around Aiken now.  Currently I have it only around the west half.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
  • Last Login:Today at 09:09:10 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #32 on: Yesterday at 04:18:16 am »
For SC 4 TRUCK (Windsor),  the StaParkRd point should be US78_E with the corresponding point on US 78 changed to SC4Trk_E.

Also there is a Datacheck Error for SC 6 Truck (Moncks Corner) (SC6TrkMon) that I pasted below that should be marked as a FP.

sc.sc006trkmon;SC6_W;US52_W;SC6_E;SHARP_ANGLE;137.05

Thirdly, I found some Datacheck FPs that can be removed (also pasted below).

sc.us176;US176/221Con;;;LABEL_SELFREF;
sc.us221;US221/176ConSpa;;;LABEL_SELFREF;
sc.us221;US221/176ConSpar;;;LABEL_SELFREF;

I also marked the US 178 BUS (Orangeburg) topic as solved.

I'll start with SC 10 in a separate post.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 04:48:14 am by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
  • Last Login:Today at 09:09:10 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #33 on: Yesterday at 05:27:40 am »
SC 10:
1.  MaiSt should be MainSt.
2.  The US 221 labels for SC 10 should potentially be W and E instead of S and N.  However, the south to north routing in general (and that I did not see any further directional banners) makes me think I may be fine with it as-is.
3.  +X001 should be replaced with visible points at Creswell Rd (CreRd) and Briarwood Rd (BriRd).

SC 11:
1.  LakHarStPk should be LakeHarSP.
2.  The SC 24 point should be recentered to the overpass.
3.  +X021 (SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Ridgecrest Rd (RidRd).
4.  +X020 (SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Stewart Rd (SteRd).
5.  SC 28 should be recentered.
6.  +X016 (SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Dynamite Rd (DynRd).
7.  +X015(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Bluewater Trail (BluTr).
8.  RoyJonRd should be RoyJonHwy.
9.  There should be a point added for Table Rock State Park (multiple if tolerance becomes an issue).
10.  +X015(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at New Hope Rd.
11.  More of a side note and not directly related to this, but US 276 needs to be flipped from west to east.
12.  +X000(US276) should be replaced with a visible point at River Falls Rd (RivFalRd).  (also affects US 276)
13.  A point would not be needed for Pleasant Ridge County Park, but I maybe would consider it.
14.  The US 25 point needs to be synced with the route.
15.  +X011(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at OldHwy11.
16.  NGlaMouRd should just be GlaMouRd.
17.   +X008(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Red Hill Rd.
18.  The SC 14 point needs to be synced with the route.
19.  +X007(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Burnt Chimney Rd (BurChiRd).
20.  +X006(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Island Ford Rd (IslFordRd).
21.  +X005(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Rainbow Lake Rd (RaiLakeRd) or Cannon Ford Rd.
22. MarCamRd should be MarCampRd (Martin Camp Rd).
23.  +X003(SC11) should probably be replaced with a visible point at Henderson Rd (HenRd).
24.  I am unable to tell if US221Con is correct,  but if it is an official designation, it would be fine as-is based on your rules.
25.  +X000(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Furnace Rd (FurRd).
26.  The SC 150 point needs to be synced with both SC 11 and SC 18.

SC 12:
1.  N9thSt on the corresponding points to US 1 and US 378 should just be 9thSt (prefix removed).
2.  I am unsure if the SC12Sp label for SC 12 SPUR should be different.
3.  I would change DecBlvd to I-77(13) just because the ramps go directly to/from I-77 east of here.  This is an either-or scenario though that would require the I-77 point to be I-77(15).
4.  The SpeCreChuRd should be shortened based on the rules for labels for three plus words in the Manual.
5.  WhiPonRd should be WhiPondRd (White Pond Rd).


« Last Edit: Today at 05:57:38 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2134
  • Last Login:Today at 09:33:38 am
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #34 on: Yesterday at 10:10:59 am »
3.  +X001 should be replaced with visible points at Creswell Rd (CreRd) and Briarwood Rd (BriRd).
Creswell Rd alone is enough to stay within tolerance.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
  • Last Login:Today at 09:09:10 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #35 on: Yesterday at 12:47:23 pm »
3.  +X001 should be replaced with visible points at Creswell Rd (CreRd) and Briarwood Rd (BriRd).
Creswell Rd alone is enough to stay within tolerance.

You are right.  It does get a bit close just to the south of Briarwood Rd, and Greenwood Mills Farm Rd was not worthy of a point IMO.