Author Topic: usasc: South Carolina State highways  (Read 4358 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 05:58:20 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #30 on: September 13, 2019, 04:34:18 pm »
I have caught up through SC 8.

The SC 296 change evidently occurred in 2016.  Current Spartanburg County and State Officials now show Daniel Morgan as not primary anywhere along its path from Reidville Rd to US 176.  SC 296 has definitely been rerouted to stay on Reidville Rd to US 29.

The US 29 Bypass postings may be to specifically route folks around a lane closure where St John approaches Church St (see the Oct 2018 GMSV)

My philosophy on South Carolina's CONN routes:  If they have route signage with TO banners on either end then I tend to want to call the road its designated CONN route.  In the US 176/221 CON example for SC 9, this should be changed to Wood St because there is no route signage on either end.  However, on the US 221 file the other US 176 CON route that follows old SC 9 should remain called that because it is posted as TO US 221 South from I-585 and as SC 9 from US 221...

I would only put the CONN routes in the HB with their own route files if they are actually posted in the field as a CONN route (like SC 5 CONN).

Thanks-
Mike

Thanks for the clarification.   I did find two leftover SC 296 shields on US 29 in both directions at Daniel Morgan Ave, but I never saw any other shields so truncating it should be fine IMO.

Otherwise I am fine with you leaving out US 29 Bypass for now since I did not see a posting NB at Daniel Morgan Ave.

I hope to finish SC 9 and its auxiliary routes tonight.

EDIT:  SC 9 is done.  I have a wedding to go to tomorrow so I will not resume with SC 10 before Sunday at the earliest.
« Last Edit: September 13, 2019, 08:16:30 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 434
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:14:56 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #31 on: September 14, 2019, 01:09:32 pm »
All changes SC 2-9 made and sent in.  I tried to update other files to reflect SC 9's directional changes so that you won't have to point these out later...

SC 19 Truck appears to be posted on the entire loop around Aiken now.  Currently I have it only around the west half.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 05:58:20 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #32 on: September 15, 2019, 04:18:16 am »
For SC 4 TRUCK (Windsor),  the StaParkRd point should be US78_E with the corresponding point on US 78 changed to SC4Trk_E.

Also there is a Datacheck Error for SC 6 Truck (Moncks Corner) (SC6TrkMon) that I pasted below that should be marked as a FP.

sc.sc006trkmon;SC6_W;US52_W;SC6_E;SHARP_ANGLE;137.05

Thirdly, I found some Datacheck FPs that can be removed (also pasted below).

sc.us176;US176/221Con;;;LABEL_SELFREF;
sc.us221;US221/176ConSpa;;;LABEL_SELFREF;
sc.us221;US221/176ConSpar;;;LABEL_SELFREF;

I also marked the US 178 BUS (Orangeburg) topic as solved.

I'll start with SC 10 in a separate post.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2019, 04:48:14 am by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 05:58:20 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #33 on: September 15, 2019, 05:27:40 am »
SC 10:
1.  MaiSt should be MainSt.
2.  The US 221 labels for SC 10 should potentially be W and E instead of S and N.  However, the south to north routing in general (and that I did not see any further directional banners) makes me think I may be fine with it as-is.
3.  +X001 should be replaced with visible points at Creswell Rd (CreRd) and Briarwood Rd (BriRd).

SC 11:
1.  LakHarStPk should be LakeHarSP.
2.  The SC 24 point should be recentered to the overpass.
3.  +X021 (SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Ridgecrest Rd (RidRd).
4.  +X020 (SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Stewart Rd (SteRd).
5.  SC 28 should be recentered.
6.  +X016 (SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Dynamite Rd (DynRd).
7.  +X015(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Bluewater Trail (BluTr).
8.  RoyJonRd should be RoyJonHwy.
9.  There should be a point added for Table Rock State Park (multiple if tolerance becomes an issue).
10.  +X015(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at New Hope Rd.
11.  More of a side note and not directly related to this, but US 276 needs to be flipped from west to east.
12.  +X000(US276) should be replaced with a visible point at River Falls Rd (RivFalRd).  (also affects US 276)
13.  A point would not be needed for Pleasant Ridge County Park, but I maybe would consider it.
14.  The US 25 point needs to be synced with the route.
15.  +X011(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at OldHwy11.
16.  NGlaMouRd should just be GlaMouRd.
17.   +X008(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Red Hill Rd.
18.  The SC 14 point needs to be synced with the route.
19.  +X007(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Burnt Chimney Rd (BurChiRd).
20.  +X006(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Island Ford Rd (IslFordRd).
21.  +X005(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Rainbow Lake Rd (RaiLakeRd) or Cannon Ford Rd.
22. MarCamRd should be MarCampRd (Martin Camp Rd).
23.  +X003(SC11) should probably be replaced with a visible point at Henderson Rd (HenRd).
24.  I am unable to tell if US221Con is correct,  but if it is an official designation, it would be fine as-is based on your rules.
25.  +X000(SC11) should be replaced with a visible point at Furnace Rd (FurRd).
26.  The SC 150 point needs to be synced with both SC 11 and SC 18.

SC 12:
1.  N9thSt on the corresponding points to US 1 and US 378 should just be 9thSt (prefix removed).
2.  I am unsure if the SC12Sp label for SC 12 SPUR should be different.
3.  I would change DecBlvd to I-77(13) just because the ramps go directly to/from I-77 east of here.  This is an either-or scenario though that would require the I-77 point to be I-77(15).
4.  The SpeCreChuRd should be shortened based on the rules for labels for three plus words in the Manual.
5.  WhiPonRd should be WhiPondRd (White Pond Rd).

SC 14:
1. FriRd should be FriChuRd (Friendship Church Rd).
2.  PowRd should be FaiRd (Fairview Rd).  (This is technically correct though, but Fairview Rd intersects I-385.)
3.  AdaMilRd should be AdaMillRd (Adams Mill Rd).
4.  +X001 should be replaced with a visible point at Westmoreland Rd (WesRd).
5.  SC14TrkGre_S needs to be synced with SC 14 and changed to SC14TrkGre_E.
6.  EGapCreRd should just be GapCreRd.
7.  A point should be added at Fews Chapel Rd (FewChaRd) as the route almost leaves tolerance here.  This may also led to a point needed at Cockrell Rd (CocRd).
8.  The SC 11 point needs to be synced with the route. (mentioned on SC 11)
9.  This route should be flipped as it is posted east-west.

SC 14 TRUCK (Greer):
1.  SC101/290 should be SC101/290_S to match US 29 (since there is a concurrency here).
2.  SC14_S needs to by synced with SC 14.
3.  The SC 14 endpoints should be E and W instead of S and N.

SC 16:
1. SHarSt should just be HarSt.
2.  Is Crosshill Rd a US76Con route?
3.  +X001 could easily be removed without a replacement, but it does take .08 miles  off of the route distance.
4.  The SC 277 point needs to be synced with that route.

SC 18:
1.  Should SC215Con be SC18Con? (maybe changed to Harwood Heights, I am looking at the SCDOT Street Finder again here)
2.  I would recommend a point at Oak Grove Rd (OakGroRd) as the route almost leaves tolerance here.
3.  ResRd should be replaced with Robinson Farm Rd (RobFarmRd).
4.  The SC 211 points should be N and S instead of E and W.
5.  RouTreRd should be RouTreeRd (Round Tree Rd).
6.  The SC 105 points should be S and N instead of E and W.  Also they need to be synced.
7. The SC150_S point needs to be synced with this route and SC 11.
8.  SC11 should be SC11_N.
9.  I would add a point at Limestone St (LimSt_S) on the north end of Gaffney due to the connection to SC 150 and US 29.
10.  Is something going on around I-85 Exits 95 and 96? (may also affect SC 329)
11.  Note that SC 18 also seems to be an east-west route.

SC 18 TRUCK (Union):
1.  The SC49Trk point should be SC49Trk_S.  (also affects SC 215 and US 176 (which labels it as SC496))
2.  SC215 should be SC215_N.  (also affects SC 215 and US 176 (which has this point as US176_N instead of US176_W)
3.  US176 should be US176_W.

SC 19:
1.  Does this route end south of US 278?  (see here and at US 278)
2.  Should SC302 be SC118/302? 
3.  +X001 can be removed without crazily affecting the shaping (lessens the route by .05 miles).  I would consider adding a point at Silver Bluff Rd since it connects directly to SC 302.
4.  Should the one-way posting of SC 19 NB on SC19Con be reflected in the HB? (between SC19Con to US 1 SB/US 78 WB back west to Laurens St where it rejoins)
5.  LauSt should be LauSt_S if it stays. (The best way to reflect both directions is to remove this point IMO.)
6.  +X002 should be replaced by a visible point at Springfield Church Rd (SprChuRd).
7.  SC121Con should be Greenhouse Rd (GreRd).

SC 19 TRUCK (Aiken): (will be relooked at when doing SC 118)
1.  To follow up on my SC 4 comment, I think that SC 19 TRUCK may be circumferential like SC 118. 
2.  SC302 should be SC302_W.
3.  ArbCt should be converted to a shaping point.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 04:59:04 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2143
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:57:14 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #34 on: September 15, 2019, 10:10:59 am »
3.  +X001 should be replaced with visible points at Creswell Rd (CreRd) and Briarwood Rd (BriRd).
Creswell Rd alone is enough to stay within tolerance.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 05:58:20 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #35 on: September 15, 2019, 12:47:23 pm »
3.  +X001 should be replaced with visible points at Creswell Rd (CreRd) and Briarwood Rd (BriRd).
Creswell Rd alone is enough to stay within tolerance.

You are right.  It does get a bit close just to the south of Briarwood Rd, and Greenwood Mills Farm Rd was not worthy of a point IMO. 

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 05:58:20 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #36 on: Yesterday at 05:16:50 pm »
Starting with SC 20:

SC 20: (currently at SC 247)
1.  SC 20 is also posted east-west theroretically meaning it should be flipped.  The east-west note applies to SC 20 TRUCK (Abbeville) and SC 20 CONN (Anderson County) as well.
2.  SC20TrkAbb_N should be SC20TrkAbb_W.
3.  The SC 185 points should be S and N instead of E and W.
4.  S-4-67 should be Sauer Farm Rd (SauFarmRd) as I do not see a sign for the route.  (verified via SCDOT Street Finder)
5.  TraRd should be TraRd_N.  (verified via SCDOT Street Finder)
6.  FloWriRd should be FloWriDr (Floyd Wright Drive).

SC 20 TRUCK (Abbeville):
1.  SC28_S should be SC28_E.
2.  SC71 should be synced with SC 71 and SC 28.
3.  SC28_N should be SC28_W.
4.  The SC 20 points should be E and W instead of S and N.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 05:58:20 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 434
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:14:56 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #37 on: Yesterday at 08:09:14 pm »
South Carolina made this more difficult by apparently recently changing all even routes to E-W and all odds N-S regardless of how ridiculous it looks.  So there will unfortunately be a lot of these errors to correct.

For SC 18 at I-85, they are reconfiguring the two interchanges as part of the widening of I-85.  Well under construction at this point.  Should I put the SC 18 points in their new locations now?