Author Topic: usasc: South Carolina State highways  (Read 2163 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline theFXexpert

  • TM Collaborator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 88
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:February 22, 2017, 01:35:32 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #15 on: February 09, 2017, 11:15:54 am »
I should ask this before I start reviewing: Are secondary highway numbers such as 'S-27-17' acceptable as labels even if road is named?

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 262
  • Last Login:Today at 12:54:02 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #16 on: February 09, 2017, 07:39:08 pm »
Don't see why not...secondary numbers are used in Virginia's set sometimes and sometimes not.

I have just returned from Florida and can now address the feedback I received on Virginia.  once done with that I will start reviewing Georgia routes...

Thanks-
mike
Clinched:
I: 4 12 16 17 20 26 27 30 59 64 66 68 72 73 ew74 77 78 79 82 83 ew84 85 ew86 e88 97 99
US: 4 6N 9W 11E 11W 13 15 19W 21 44 46 48 58 72 92 113 117 123 130 158 163 176 178 192 206 209 211 219 220 221 222 258 264 276 290 311 319 322 340 360 378 401 ew422 501 521 522 601 701
PriSystems: VA, DE

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
  • Last Login:Today at 01:57:51 pm
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #17 on: February 09, 2017, 09:26:51 pm »
And for weird secondary route numbers, there's 3-1-09 in Newfoundland. Its junction with the TCH is a waypoint in the latter's route file. It's also well signed, and indeed I clinched it in 2011 (not that it ever is likely to end up in our HB).

Offline theFXexpert

  • TM Collaborator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 88
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:February 22, 2017, 01:35:32 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2017, 01:08:29 pm »
My question has more to do with whether they are considered to be visibly numbered highways or not. Virginia at least has shields for secondary routes. SC secondary routes are signed with small black and white blades on stop signs. Is that enough? Or should they be treated like PA's quadrant routes and ignored.

Offline Markkos1992

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:54:07 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2017, 01:32:46 pm »
Again there are probably too many to bother so they should probably be ignored.

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 262
  • Last Login:Today at 12:54:02 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2017, 02:29:27 pm »
My question has more to do with whether they are considered to be visibly numbered highways or not. Virginia at least has shields for secondary routes. SC secondary routes are signed with small black and white blades on stop signs. Is that enough? Or should they be treated like PA's quadrant routes and ignored.

These markers are visible at highway speeds...

Also, in some counties (Horry being the most prominent) the street names for some secondary routes are just Highway x, with x being the secondary route number.
Clinched:
I: 4 12 16 17 20 26 27 30 59 64 66 68 72 73 ew74 77 78 79 82 83 ew84 85 ew86 e88 97 99
US: 4 6N 9W 11E 11W 13 15 19W 21 44 46 48 58 72 92 113 117 123 130 158 163 176 178 192 206 209 211 219 220 221 222 258 264 276 290 311 319 322 340 360 378 401 ew422 501 521 522 601 701
PriSystems: VA, DE

Offline theFXexpert

  • TM Collaborator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 88
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:February 22, 2017, 01:35:32 pm
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #21 on: February 12, 2017, 01:24:02 pm »
Alright. Thanks.

Offline dfilpus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 12:15:40 pm
    • Filpus Roadgeek
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #22 on: February 11, 2018, 01:31:15 pm »
On SC 34, the waypoint for US1/601_S is not identical to the waypoints on US 1 and US 601, breaking concurrency.

Offline dfilpus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 12:15:40 pm
    • Filpus Roadgeek
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #23 on: March 01, 2018, 11:05:33 am »
The intersections of US 278, SC 125 and SC 28 in Beech Island SC need to be cleaned up.
There are three waypoints on US 278 that follow the east bound route through the interchange. I think these should be collapsed into one waypoint, which is used on all three routes.
If the three points are kept, SC 28 should have a waypoint at the SC28 waypoint on US 178 and SC 125 should have a waypoint at the SC 125 waypoint on US 278.

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 262
  • Last Login:Today at 12:54:02 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: usasc: South Carolina State highways
« Reply #24 on: March 08, 2018, 08:47:39 pm »
The intersections of US 278, SC 125 and SC 28 in Beech Island SC need to be cleaned up.
There are three waypoints on US 278 that follow the east bound route through the interchange. I think these should be collapsed into one waypoint, which is used on all three routes.
If the three points are kept, SC 28 should have a waypoint at the SC28 waypoint on US 178 and SC 125 should have a waypoint at the SC 125 waypoint on US 278.

Believe it or not, that dogleg is the official route of US 278 in both directions (posted in the field that way too and is explicitly shown on SCDOT official map of Beech Island), so that is actually correct.  I added a point to SC 125 at the interchange itself and moved the SC 28 point at S-2-5 over to the adjacent US 278 split...

Quote
On SC 34, the waypoint for US1/601_S is not identical to the waypoints on US 1 and US 601, breaking concurrency.

Corrected and submitted
Clinched:
I: 4 12 16 17 20 26 27 30 59 64 66 68 72 73 ew74 77 78 79 82 83 ew84 85 ew86 e88 97 99
US: 4 6N 9W 11E 11W 13 15 19W 21 44 46 48 58 72 92 113 117 123 130 158 163 176 178 192 206 209 211 219 220 221 222 258 264 276 290 311 319 322 340 360 378 401 ew422 501 521 522 601 701
PriSystems: VA, DE