Author Topic: usaga (Georgia State Highways) - Preview  (Read 20912 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
  • Last Login:October 18, 2019, 03:13:53 pm
Re: usaga (Georgia State Highways) - Preview
« Reply #165 on: September 18, 2019, 11:57:14 pm »
GA15 has broken concurrencies near Tallulah Gorge SP.
WilCon <-> +X036(GA15)
GA15Lp_S <-> US441BusCla_N


Are GA19 & US41BusMac concurrent between I-75 and the Georgia Ave / College St intersection? They're plotted differently.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2019, 01:37:56 am by yakra »

Offline neroute2

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Last Login:Today at 09:48:10 pm
Re: usaga (Georgia State Highways) - Preview
« Reply #166 on: September 22, 2019, 05:21:58 pm »
US 41 and SR 3: GA3ConMan -> GA3ConMar
US 41 and SR 3: requesting a point at http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=33.88871&lon=-84.47428 for WinRidPkwy
SR 120: requesting a point at http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=33.969417&lon=-84.489090 for ELakePkwy (I turned off onto Robinson Road, but that name is ambiguous since it returns to SR 120)

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
  • Last Login:October 18, 2019, 03:13:53 pm
Re: usaga (Georgia State Highways) - Preview
« Reply #167 on: October 04, 2019, 01:50:09 am »
Just took a look at GA90. Many of the hidden shaping points are at or near road junctions, and should be converted to visible points.
"Prefer an intersection to act as a shaping point location wherever possible. Shaping points that coincide with intersections should be added as normal, visible waypoints labeled in the usual way."

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
  • Last Login:October 18, 2019, 03:13:53 pm
Re: usaga (Georgia State Highways) - Preview
« Reply #168 on: October 10, 2019, 06:51:49 pm »
US27:
GA100Ced_S -> GA100_Ced: this is a town suffix for disambiguation purposes, rather than a city abbreviation for one of multiple bannerless GA100 routes. With no other GA100_Ced point to disambiguate from (having US278_W instead), no need for the additional 'S' at the end.
GA100_End style labels have been deprecated a while; GA100/114, as GA1 has it, would work.

GA100:
US27Ced_S -> US27_Ced
US27 -> US27_Sum?

GA1: GA100Ced_S -> GA100_Ced
GA53: GA211_WinN -> GA211_Win
GA211: GA53Win_W -> GA53_Win

Similar labeling may be a wider issue.

There are some HIDDEN_JUNCTION data errors: http://travelmapping.net/devel/datacheck.php?rg=GA
A quick look at US27 & GA1 in side-by-side browser tabs shows lots of broken concurrencies. Some of these cases will be HIDDEN_JUNCTION, some VISIBLE_HIDDEN_COLOC, some NMPs, and some plain old points included in one route but not another. The HDX is a great help in checking concurrencies.
One especially tricky one I noticed:
US1: GA46/86 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=32.3692444&lon=-82.3236297
GA46: US1_S http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=32.3692444&lon=-82.3236297
These both use 7 decimal places while GA4 uses the standard 6, breaking the junction & concurrency.
GA4: GA46/86 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=32.369244&lon=-82.323630

Offline CharlotteAllisonCDTG

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:Today at 11:26:58 am
  • Transgender Lesbian and Traveler
    • My Wikipedia User Page
Re: usaga (Georgia State Highways) - Preview
« Reply #169 on: October 14, 2019, 05:40:44 am »
I just noticed that GA 73 Byp (Statesboro) is missing from the highway browser. It is entirely concurrent with US 301 Byp (Statesboro).
Completely clinched:  I-24, I-35W (MN), I-97, I-124, I-126, I-155 (MO-TN), I-190 (SD), I-195 (MD), I-240 (NC), I-295 (FL), I-375 (MI), I-516, I-520, I-526, I-564, I-585, I-640, I-675 (GA), I-895A, US 178, US 276

Offline CharlotteAllisonCDTG

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:Today at 11:26:58 am
  • Transgender Lesbian and Traveler
    • My Wikipedia User Page
GA: GA 73 Byp (Statesboro) Missing
« Reply #170 on: October 16, 2019, 02:41:11 am »
The GA 73 Bypass for Statesboro, Georgia is missing from the highway browser.  It is completely concurrent with US 301 Byp (Statesboro).
Completely clinched:  I-24, I-35W (MN), I-97, I-124, I-126, I-155 (MO-TN), I-190 (SD), I-195 (MD), I-240 (NC), I-295 (FL), I-375 (MI), I-516, I-520, I-526, I-564, I-585, I-640, I-675 (GA), I-895A, US 178, US 276

Offline kjslaughter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:October 18, 2019, 09:12:48 am
Re: usaga (Georgia State Highways) - Preview
« Reply #171 on: October 17, 2019, 09:47:30 am »
Hey, I made a post on another board/thread, but just wanted to say thanks for the work on this system (and the whole site really!).  I'd love to help if I knew what the need was.  I've lived in Georgia my whole life and my background is analytics (accounting, into finance and now business analytics) so I'm glad to lend a hand on this site doing whatever I can to help.  I don't want to just be a user if I can give back and help in anyway.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1804
  • Last Login:Today at 12:40:59 pm
Re: usaga (Georgia State Highways) - Preview
« Reply #172 on: October 17, 2019, 12:11:11 pm »
@kjslaughter:

I've added:

usaga Georgia State Highways reviewer: ntallyn

Sorry, I was being confusing. I'm not reviewing the GA highways, I'm doing the update work (I picked it up around Christmastime).

well, no. I thought that your "update work" is also the peer-review. But if I'm not mistaken, you are quite new, your first "new" system? If so, I think that another more experienced contributor should peer-review it. If you prefer being peer-reviewed, just edit the first post and replace your name by t.b.d.

You are not the "more experienced contributor" but any kind of review is better than no review. Just go through the routes and official state sources and report what seems to be wrong. I don't know how familar you are to our rules but you can find them in the manual.

I think ntallyn might want to complete the update work first?