Author Topic: NC: New I-73 segment opening 5/19  (Read 2770 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dfilpus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 87
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 07:13:28 pm
    • Filpus Roadgeek
Re: NC: New I-73 segment opening 5/19
« Reply #30 on: May 07, 2018, 07:45:15 pm »
This may seem like an odd question, but is there anything involved with the recent changes you made to I-73 Future Madison and I-840 Future --> I-840 around Greensboro that would cause someone's numbers to drop?  Possibly some road mileage was being double counted and it no longer is.
The change to I-73 Future Madison fixed the concurrency between I-73 Future Madison and US 220. Before the fix, if you had both routes clinched, the segment between US 311/220 Bus and NC 65 was counted twice. Now, it is correctly counted once. This reduces overage mileage in NC to drop by the length of that segment.

Offline mikeandkristie

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
  • Last Login:December 07, 2018, 03:14:05 pm
Re: NC: New I-73 segment opening 5/19
« Reply #31 on: May 08, 2018, 10:31:59 am »
This may seem like an odd question, but is there anything involved with the recent changes you made to I-73 Future Madison and I-840 Future --> I-840 around Greensboro that would cause someone's numbers to drop?  Possibly some road mileage was being double counted and it no longer is.
The change to I-73 Future Madison fixed the concurrency between I-73 Future Madison and US 220. Before the fix, if you had both routes clinched, the segment between US 311/220 Bus and NC 65 was counted twice. Now, it is correctly counted once. This reduces overage mileage in NC to drop by the length of that segment.
I did in fact have both of those clinched, so that makes sense.  I was focusing in on the I-840 change as the culprit.  Thank you.

Mike

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 591
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:December 03, 2018, 05:54:33 am
Re: NC: New I-73 segment opening 5/19
« Reply #32 on: May 16, 2018, 11:19:45 pm »
I would change the '107(73)' label on I-840 to '3' since it's posted going 'WB' on I-840 at least.  I mean, if it had been posted with an I-73, I would have no problems with the current label.  But since there is a 'true' I-840 exit number posted there, that should be the number to go with for the label, IMO.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=4121.msg2296193#msg2296193

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 325
  • Last Login:Today at 06:53:17 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: NC: New I-73 segment opening 5/19
« Reply #33 on: June 23, 2018, 10:33:40 am »
adjusted the label name ('3' was an alternate name and it is now the primary) and in the queue for suubmission
Clinched:
I: 4 12 16 17 20 26 27 30 59 64 66 68 72 73 ew74 77 78 79 82 83 ew84 85 ew86 e88 97 99
US: 4 6N 9W 11E 11W 13 15 19W 21 44 46 48 58 72 92 113 117 123 130 158 163 176 178 192 206 209 211 219 220 221 222 258 264 276 290 311 319 322 340 360 378 401 ew422 501 521 522 601 701
PriSystems: VA, DE

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1234
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 03:11:06 pm