Author Topic: PA: PA 61 TRUCK (Sunbury)  (Read 526 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 340
  • Last Login:Today at 10:10:18 am
PA: PA 61 TRUCK (Sunbury)
« on: November 04, 2018, 02:33:20 pm »
The truck routes here are two different one-way routes per direction.  The one for the SB direction (via Chestnut St and Wolverton St) is the only one in the HB.

Should I add the NB direction (via 5th St and Arch St) as a separate file, leave as-is, or even consider removing the route as the two directions on their own would be centered onto PA 61 proper?

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1718
  • Last Login:Today at 10:25:40 am
Re: PA: PA 61 TRUCK (Sunbury)
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2018, 02:49:05 pm »
Ugh. I don't envy you, having to deal with this.  ::)
FWIW, PA147 already has a PA61Trk_N point.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 340
  • Last Login:Today at 10:10:18 am
Re: PA: PA 61 TRUCK (Sunbury)
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2018, 03:34:14 pm »
Ugh. I don't envy you, having to deal with this.  ::)
FWIW, PA147 already has a PA61Trk_N point.

Personally, I prefer the two file approach.  Would PA61TrkSun_S (SB direction) and PA61TrkSun_N (NB direction) be usable for .list names though?

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1718
  • Last Login:Today at 10:25:40 am
Re: PA: PA 61 TRUCK (Sunbury)
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2018, 11:37:33 pm »
I prefer PA61TrkSSu & PA61TrkNSu, for "(South) Sunbury" & "(North) Sunbury".

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 340
  • Last Login:Today at 10:10:18 am
Re: PA: PA 61 TRUCK (Sunbury)
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2018, 10:37:27 pm »
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2350

I did end PA61TrkNSu at PA 147 instead of sending it back down to PA 61 based on these shields in GSV.

Thankfully extending it down to the PA 61/PA 147 intersection is easily doable.

I am not yet marking this as solved in case there are objections.

EDIT:  Marking as solved as this is now in the HB.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2018, 03:16:47 am by Markkos1992 »