Author Topic: MD: Should MD 286 be extended to MD 213?  (Read 165 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 08:53:12 pm
MD: Should MD 286 be extended to MD 213?
« on: February 07, 2019, 05:28:38 pm »
The Cecil County HLR is definitely not in support of this due to the MD 537C designation.  However, it seems that bannerless MD 286 shields follow MD 537 south to MD 213.  I saw the same thing when I drove in this area last Saturday. 

Oddly enough MD 213's label here is already MD 286.  Any changes here would also affect MD 342.

Also I would change the MD 342 point at Hessey Lane (HesLn) into a regular shaping point.  At best it is a private driveway.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2019, 05:45:41 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline Duke87

  • TM Collaborator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 224
  • Last Login:April 20, 2019, 11:56:22 pm
Re: MD: Should MD 286 be extended to MD 213?
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2019, 01:02:03 am »
I'm interpreting this as a case of a missing "TO" (note that there IS a "TO" posted in the other direction from MD 213). So no, I do not thing MD 286 should be extended.


As for the HesLn point on MD 342, it is worth noting that GMSV is clearly outdated here. In 2008 it is indeed a driveway for that one house and nothing more, but satellite imagery shows a second home built further back, and possibly some slight improvement (though still not pavement) to the area in front. Still, Mapillary imagery from 2017 shows there is still no street sign.
I'm going to go ahead and make this a shaping point.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 08:53:12 pm
Re: MD: Should MD 286 be extended to MD 213?
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2019, 06:03:47 am »
Quote
Oddly enough MD 213's label here is already MD 286.

Should this label be changed to George St (GeoSt) or even MD 342 since it is not being extended (at least for now)?

I think there are a lot of these missing "TOs" for MD 286 in this area from what I remember seeing there.