Author Topic: mexf: Mexico federal routes  (Read 3493 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2655
  • Last Login:Today at 01:23:51 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #30 on: March 24, 2020, 03:57:53 pm »
Quote
ABORTING due to 3 errors:
1: Abbrev >3 characters in mexf.csv line: [mexf;MEX-COAH;MEX57;;Cañ;Cañada Ancha;mexcoah.mex057can;], Cañ
2: Could not find Route matching root mexcoah.mex057can in system mexf.
3: No roots in mexf_con.csv line [mexf;MEX57;;Saltillo - Santa Cruz, COAH;mexcoah.mex057can]
[/size]
The ñ appears to be a (unicode, UTF-whatever, etc.) multi-byte character. The database barfs on it, and so does the HB.
Since Region + " " + Route + Banner + Abbrev concatenated together = our .list name, we need to stick with standard Latin characters all users can easily type into a .list.

Cañ -> Can
« Last Edit: March 24, 2020, 04:05:42 pm by yakra »

Offline neroute2

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 598
  • Last Login:Today at 02:46:56 am
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #31 on: March 24, 2020, 09:33:06 pm »
Fixed in my version.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2655
  • Last Login:Today at 01:23:51 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #32 on: March 26, 2020, 05:09:50 pm »
I messed up the HB link above. Should be
travelmapping.net/hb/?r=mexcoah.mex057can .
This .list name still appears mangled though.

Offline neroute2

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 598
  • Last Login:Today at 02:46:56 am
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #33 on: March 26, 2020, 05:16:11 pm »
Probably because I haven't done a pull request since then. Tonight should add more routes and this fix.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2655
  • Last Login:Today at 01:23:51 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #34 on: March 28, 2020, 11:07:16 am »
Yes. I was mostly referring to how the HB in the initial link looked as mangled as it did due to my error in producing said link.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2454
  • Last Login:Today at 01:12:17 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #35 on: May 23, 2020, 12:06:11 pm »
I think that the tier should be changed from 2 to 3 or 4*.
mexsf and mexed should be tier 2. Freeways and expressways are higher categories.

* Does the international naca system also cover Mexico? If so, mexf should be tier 4, and the state route systems tier 5. If not, tier 3 is fine.

Offline neroute2

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 598
  • Last Login:Today at 02:46:56 am
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #36 on: May 23, 2020, 12:22:41 pm »
I think that the tier should be changed from 2 to 3 or 4*.
mexsf and mexed should be tier 2. Freeways and expressways are higher categories.
I numbered it the same as usaus.

* Does the international naca system also cover Mexico? If so, mexf should be tier 4, and the state route systems tier 5. If not, tier 3 is fine.
It does not.

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
  • Last Login:Today at 09:43:55 am
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #37 on: May 23, 2020, 02:28:47 pm »
I think these are categorized correctly.
Clinched:

Offline vdeane

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:June 02, 2020, 01:16:53 pm
    • New York State Roads
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #38 on: May 23, 2020, 05:46:06 pm »
I agree with keeping it as-is.  Not every country needs to follow the Euro model.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

Offline SSOWorld

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
  • Last Login:Today at 10:28:44 am
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #39 on: May 23, 2020, 09:56:19 pm »
Mexico Federal == US Routes.
It's the expressways (Mexico D) that equal tier 1.  State routes are lower tier (4) - and should be whether freeway or not.
Completed:
* Systems: WI
* by US State: AR: I; AZ: I; DE: I; IA: I, KS: I; MN: I; MA: I; MO: I; NE: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WI: I,US,WI;

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2454
  • Last Login:Today at 01:12:17 pm
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #40 on: May 24, 2020, 01:59:06 am »
It's the expressways (Mexico D) that equal tier 1.

yep, that's why I think they should be tier 2. That USA + CAN don't have such a expressway system doesn't mean that other countries don't have it.

Offline SSOWorld

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
  • Last Login:Today at 10:28:44 am
Re: mexf: Mexico federal routes
« Reply #41 on: May 24, 2020, 07:41:45 am »
It's the expressways (Mexico D) that equal tier 1.

yep, that's why I think they should be tier 2. That USA + CAN don't have such a expressway system doesn't mean that other countries don't have it.
No - disagree - Mexico D is freeway (Tolled) and are equivalent to a motorway in Europe or Interstate/ON 400/QC Autoroute in USA/CAN in the scheme.  Mexico is behind USA and CAN like much of Eastern Europe is behind its western counterparts.

North America != Europe.
Completed:
* Systems: WI
* by US State: AR: I; AZ: I; DE: I; IA: I, KS: I; MN: I; MA: I; MO: I; NE: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WI: I,US,WI;