Author Topic: SD: SD 63 should be continuous  (Read 106 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Last Login:September 13, 2019, 12:38:24 pm
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
SD: SD 63 should be continuous
« on: August 20, 2019, 06:27:23 pm »
So I just got back from a trip to the Omaha area, and drove down there on SD 63. Now, the situation in the HB matches the state maintenance laws, but there's a SD law on the books that allows counties/cities to sign routes through gaps in state maintenance if they so desire (like the situation in Sioux Falls). Mellette County has chosen to do so, with that section of road being in nicer shape than the state-maintained portions.

This wouldn't affect anyone directly, as it appears I'm the only one that's driven SD 63 between SD 44 and US 18 (I haven't put it in yet just so I don't have to go back in and edit it).
« Last Edit: August 20, 2019, 06:52:18 pm by the_spui_ninja »
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton

Offline Highway63

  • TM Collaborator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 223
  • Last Login:September 13, 2019, 02:02:16 am
Re: SD: SD 63 should be continuous
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2019, 01:52:09 am »
I don't have a problem with doing this. Frankly, the funnier/weirder part is that the gravel portion is retained.