Author Topic: MI points & labels  (Read 89 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
  • Last Login:October 18, 2019, 03:13:53 pm
MI points & labels
« on: September 25, 2019, 06:24:12 pm »
MI26:
US41Lau -> US41_Lau
US41_A -> US41_Pho for consistency? (unless you prefer A/B/C)

MI94:
+x90 & +x91 can be converted into visible points while staying within tolerance, allowing travelers more visible options for use in their .lists files. ;)

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 889
  • Last Login:Today at 07:09:47 pm
Re: MI points & labels
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2019, 08:22:04 pm »
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3182


I took care of M-26 and found a couple other adjustments to make (repositioning and renaming a point shared with US 41 and deleting a few unnecessary shaping points). Interesting that you didn't point out the US41_S & _N labels mixed in with the others, which I'm keeping for now.


As for M-94, there are a few other deserving visible points worth adding too. But the western part needs some point-drift-related TLC that I'm unable to provide for now, so I'll put all of this off until I have time to do a full system review. Ohio's comes first so there's no timetable for this yet.
Clinched: