Author Topic: usaca (California State Highways), preview system  (Read 12478 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1718
  • Last Login:Today at 10:25:40 am
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #180 on: September 27, 2018, 10:02:25 am »
Some discussion in the usanyp thread mentions the closure of CA39. I presume on San Gabriel Canyon Rd north of the Azusa segment. I checked this thread and searched the forum to jog my memory about the circumstances surrounding its closure, and came up empty. ISTR some discussion about this (by Oscar? Someone else?) somewhere (Here? AARoads? GitHub? Somewhere else?) sometime... Any leads?

Offline neroute2

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 71
  • Last Login:Today at 07:49:37 am
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #181 on: September 27, 2018, 11:06:29 am »
Some discussion in the usanyp thread mentions the closure of CA39. I presume on San Gabriel Canyon Rd north of the Azusa segment. I checked this thread and searched the forum to jog my memory about the circumstances surrounding its closure, and came up empty. ISTR some discussion about this (by Oscar? Someone else?) somewhere (Here? AARoads? GitHub? Somewhere else?) sometime... Any leads?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_State_Route_39#History

Offline neroute2

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 71
  • Last Login:Today at 07:49:37 am
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #182 on: September 29, 2018, 09:33:02 pm »
CA12 and CA88 need a point at CRJ5_S at what OSM labels "Jack Tone Bypass". The current TulRd should be CRJ5_N.
http://www.google.com/maps/@38.1562256,-121.1548214,3a,33.2y,38.25h,79.44t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGANYRj6Xzq4oFqZP9AWMew!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Online oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 637
  • Last Login:Today at 01:34:06 pm
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #183 on: September 29, 2018, 10:36:47 pm »
^ Looks consistent with other (including older) GMSV imagery in the area. In my queue, along with the CA 49 Historic you spotted in San Andreas.

Online oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 637
  • Last Login:Today at 01:34:06 pm
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #184 on: October 24, 2018, 10:05:39 pm »
There is a signed CA 49 Historic on Gold Strike Road from San Andreas north. Signs:
south end
north end

After I drove through San Andreas earlier today, to check out and clinch that route you spotted, I noticed (and think I clinched) a similarly-signed Historic CA 49 in Mokelumne Hill a few miles to the north. This one appears to consist of Main Street and Center Street.

Before I add this to the HB, worth poking around GMSV and cahighways.org for any other missing Historic CA 49s. I'm pretty sure there are no others on the part of CA 49 I drove today, between Coulterville and Jackson, but maybe there are others in or north of Jackson.

BTW, the town of San Andreas, in the Sierra Nevada foothills, is nowhere near the San Andreas Fault, and also is in the part of California that won't fall into the ocean. :)
« Last Edit: October 24, 2018, 11:04:40 pm by oscar »

Online oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 637
  • Last Login:Today at 01:34:06 pm
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #185 on: November 02, 2018, 07:31:08 pm »
I just got back home from northern California, where I did some field-checking while I think clinching all the state routes in northern California I hadn't already covered. The only ones I'm still missing are some in the four coastal counties from Los Angeles County to San Luis Obispo County.

I'll be shortly submitting the following changes to route files, which might affect your list files so watch your error logs:

-- Add CA 49 Historic (Mokelumne Hill), per preceding post, with conforming changes to the CA 49 route file

-- Delete CA 114 as unsigned

-- Truncate CA 87 north of US 101 (Caltrans' Postmile Query Tool says the route ends at US 101)

-- Truncate CA 82 east of I-880, removing mileage relinquished to the city of San Jose (some remnant old route signage, but not enough to guide travelers through several turns in downtown; plus this does not break the route in two), with conforming relabel of north endpoint in San Francisco

-- Adding a few more visible points for CA 61 (Oakland Airport), most notably for the turnoff for the Oakland airport's consolidated car rental facility, and also the winding CA 130 to the Lick Observatory atop Mt. Hamilton

-- Corrected some labels for CA 1 Business (Monterey) and CA 68.

The eastern segment of CA 146, to the east entrance to Pinnacles National Park, also appears to be unsigned. 2012 GMSV shows route signage within or just outside the park (junction markers on CA 25, End 146 marker at the old entrance station, postmiles between the old entrance station and CA 25), even after the park was expanded in 2006 to include all of CA 146's eastern segment. That route signage now has all disappeared. However, this may be temporary, pending decisions by the National Park Service on building a new east entrance station somewhere closer to CA 25, which might result in decommissioning all of eastern CA 146 or only part of it (Caltrans' Postmile Query Tool indicates none of it has yet been decommissioned). So I would hold off for now on removing the segment from the HB. The legislature has authorized the total relinquishment of CA 146, but that hasn't happened except the short stretch of the western segment within Soledad city limits, which has adequate continuation signage so I would leave that alone.

EDIT: I'm adding to today's pull request the removal of relinquished segments of CA 92, CA 185, and CA 238 in Hayward. This set of relinquishments was unusual, in that Hayward was not required to maintain signage pointing to the rest of each route, only to direct travelers to the rest of the state highway network. Sure enough, I saw no continuation signage on the relinquished segments. My changes will remove a few blocks from the east end of CA 92 and the south end of CA 185, and a few miles from the middle of CA 238 (splitting that route into the main Fremont segment, and a short stub in Castro Valley connecting to the I-238 and I-580 freeways).

cahighways.org indicates that in October 2017, the California Transportation Commission approved additional relinquishments for CA 92 east of Santa Clara St., CA 185 south of Rose St., and CA 238 between Industrial Pkwy and Hayward's southern city limit. However, the Postmile Query Tool indicates these latest relinquishments have not yet been implemented -- such delays are common, such as when the city in question wants the state to catch up on roadwork before taking the road off Caltrans' hands. I'll wait on these additional truncations before removing them from the HB.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2018, 09:19:35 pm by oscar »

Online oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 637
  • Last Login:Today at 01:34:06 pm
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: usaca (California State Highways), preview system
« Reply #186 on: November 03, 2018, 05:33:19 pm »
Pull request submitted for above changes, and also to clean up unused usaca route files:

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2336

EDIT: In addition to removing CA 114 from the HB, I've made a follow-up pull request to rename the CA114 point in the CA 84 (Fremont) route file to WilRd.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2018, 04:37:48 pm by oscar »