Recent Posts

11

Updates to Highway Data / Re: AR: AR 8 and AR 274 rerouted through Fordyce, AR 274 E. Camden Truncated

« Last post by TBKS1 on Today at 01:36:21 pm »

Gonna personally bump this (and same with AR 7S Hot Springs as well). While I personally can't provide proof of this since I never got a photo, I did see that AR 205 Thornton appears to have been decommissioned as well, and I assume AR 274 Hopeville is also gone. I'll be heading out of town for over two weeks starting tomorrow and won't be able to visit this area for a little while.

12

Solved Highway data updates / Re: OK: L.L. Tisdale Parkway

« Last post by yakra on Today at 01:00:17 pm »

Ah, I wondered about the "3 interchanges". Added.
GilExpy's point recentered, with the LL added to the label along the way.
Changes staged locally, to be submitted along with annoying US60 & US70 relocations.

13

Other Discussion / Re: Mapping 6+ lane freeways

« Last post by Markkos1992 on Today at 07:21:56 am »

Also for IA I-80, currently only 240-246 are marked as 6lane, but it should be 237-249.. roughly doubling the marked 6-lane stretch near Iowa City.

Just bumping this as I am unsure who takes care of IA or if there is somewhere else to be reporting this.

Update made here: https://github.com/TravelMapping/UserData/pull/13525

14

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usams: Mississippi State Highways

« Last post by rlee on Today at 06:39:10 am »

The north end of the Moss section of MS 537 is at this location north of the Jones/Jasper County Line (31.814043,-89.178297). The road continues signed as county maintained Hwy 537 until it meets CR 8.

MS15:
Add another MS537 route. It's signed from 2008 thru 2024

15

Updates to Highway Data / Re: TX: I-27 extension to County Road 7500

« Last post by si404 on Today at 02:33:08 am »

Surely it's a we do and don't? We include unsigned routes, but we also wait for signage on newly approved routes, and only include signed parts of partially signed routes.

16

Updates to Highway Data / Re: TX: I-27 extension to County Road 7500

« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Today at 02:06:44 am »

I thought we didn't care about signs when it came to Interstates.

If that were the case, we'd have a TN I-69 file for the section in Memphis that both the AASHTO & FHWA approved (but TN refused to sign) @ the same time as the MS section.

17

Updates to Highway Data / Re: TX: I-27 extension to County Road 7500

« Last post by neroute2 on Today at 01:42:51 am »

I thought we didn't care about signs when it came to Interstates.

18

Updates to Highway Data / TX: I-27 extension to County Road 7500

« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Today at 12:31:20 am »

NOTE: This possibly hasn't happened yet, but, knowing Texas, they got the ball moving almost instantly to post shields at least once they got the FHWA approval back on Sept 5, '24.

Both Google & OSM now show this (hence this post), however, no new GSV pre-'24 in that area.  However, OSM did jump the gun here for sure, showing it back in '23 when the AASHTO approval happened.

https://www.kcbd.com/2024/09/26/i-27-extension-hwy-87-officially-approved/

Also:

As those on current I-27 know, the current mile markers start at Exit 1 in Lubbock and continue to 124 in Amarillo. With the designated future interstate now beginning at Laredo, those mile markers will be updated. Lubbock and Amarillo TxDOT Districts are working on a plan to update mile markers.

However, this other news article says signs will be installed 'soon'. https://www.equipmentworld.com/roadbuilding/article/15706201/texas-dot-approves-i27-expansion

The new stretch of interstate will run concurrently with U.S. Highway 87 from the current I-27 terminus in Lubbock to 0.1 mile north of County Road 7500. New I-27 signs will soon be installed.

And at the end of September '24, the 'Texas Transportation Commission' approved this too.
https://www.lubbockonline.com/story/news/2024/09/26/ports-to-plains-corridor-i-27-expansion-sees-new-milestone-in-lubbock/75395395007/

19

Updates to Highway Data / Re: AASHTO Fall 2023 Meeting

« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Today at 12:18:01 am »

• Item 28: Texas, US 87, I-27 Establishment of New Segment
  Description: TX DOT proposes a new routing, IH 27 to coincide with US 87 from the existing IH 27. The route will extend 4.2 miles to the South of the current IH 27 terminus in Lubbock, TX to the limits of US 87. Lubbock, TX is the focal point city with access control located approximately 0.1 mile north of Country Road 7500 South of Lubbock

FHWA has approved the extension recently (September 5, 2024).  Both Google & OSM now show this as well..  Can't find any news post 'saying' the signs are up yet however.

https://www.kcbd.com/2024/09/26/i-27-extension-hwy-87-officially-approved/

Also:

As those on current I-27 know, the current mile markers start at Exit 1 in Lubbock and continue to 124 in Amarillo. With the designated future interstate now beginning at Laredo, those mile markers will be updated. Lubbock and Amarillo TxDOT Districts are working on a plan to update mile markers.

However, this other news article says signs will be installed 'soon'. https://www.equipmentworld.com/roadbuilding/article/15706201/texas-dot-approves-i27-expansion

The new stretch of interstate will run concurrently with U.S. Highway 87 from the current I-27 terminus in Lubbock to 0.1 mile north of County Road 7500. New I-27 signs will soon be installed.

<< >>
Separate thread for this: https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=6765.0

20

Updates to Highway Data / TX: I-40 updates

« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Today at 12:02:29 am »

missing -> 69A (Crockett St)
69 -> 69B