Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / MA usaush: Historic US 20 Huntingdon
« Last post by froggie on March 14, 2025, 04:43:42 pm »
I realize usaush is a separate pot still in development, but was this route included because it was signed at one point?  I drove it today and found zero indications of signage.
92
Updates to Highway Data / IRN: Maragheh - Hashtrud Freeway section opened
« Last post by michih on March 14, 2025, 03:11:41 pm »
No road number is indicated on OSM though. There is no specific maintainer for Iran. Anyone can change it once we know a road number.

https://www.skyscrapercity.com/posts/192489494/
93
Updates to Highway Data / ALB: SH6/SH61 Murrizi tunnel
« Last post by michih on March 14, 2025, 03:01:54 pm »
A new road including the Murrizi tunnel was inaugurated today. It bypasses the villages of Tujan, Zall Dajt, Besh, Kurte, Zallbastar, Hysaj and Maricej.

https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=alb.sh061&lat=41.446522&lon=20.014086&zoom=13
https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=alb.sh006&lat=41.471255&lon=20.141244&zoom=14

https://www.skyscrapercity.com/posts/192487393/
94
Solved Highway data updates / Re: VT: VT 119 New Alignment
« Last post by froggie on March 14, 2025, 12:04:36 pm »
I was able to pop thru Brattleboro this morning and field check things.  Signage makes it abundantly clear that VT 119 ends at VT 142 and not US 5 and so that’s the path I’ll take.

It’s going to break a lot of lists, but can’t be helped.  This is the way.
95
Updates to Highway Data / MO: US 54/MO 19 Roundabouts
« Last post by shiggins on March 14, 2025, 12:07:58 am »
In the past few years, the intersections at the northern and southern ends of the US 54/MO 19 concurrency were converted to roundabouts which are not centered on the previously existing intersections. Therefore, the points at both intersections (but especially the southern one) should be recentered.
97
I did notice the last round of updates many routes were redrawn around Kyushu, and no longer had points for intersecting prefectural routes. I happened to have travelled onto those prefectural routes and noticed my cliches breaking. I think those points should be in?

If they were points in use, nezinscot should kept them - and should add them again now if the routing has not changed.
@nezinscot, are you aware of this rule set: https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/maintenance.php#break it's mandatory for active systems but whenever possible, we should obey it for preview systems too. ie keep points in use as alt labels. Just update entries are omitted for preview systems.
98
I did notice the last round of updates many routes were redrawn around Kyushu, and no longer had points for intersecting prefectural routes. I happened to have travelled onto those prefectural routes and noticed my cliches breaking. I think those points should be in?
99
Updates to Highway Data / Re: LA: LA 1018-4 and 1018-5
« Last post by cenlaroads on March 13, 2025, 10:51:57 am »
Just to follow up - I was able to check these in person yesterday and can confirm that 1018-4 and 1018-5 have no signage at either end.  LA 1018-3 is signed at both ends.  I also drove LA 124 to its end and found that it is now paved and signed to this intersection with LA 3102, instead of ending at the east intersection with LA 3102 as it currently is in TM.  You can see in the GMSV imagery that it was under construction a few years ago.  It is fully signed to that intersection now, so can be extended in TM.

Regarding the question about the route of LA 124 through Harrisonburg (in your link above), it is correctly routed in TM according to its signage.
100
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usams: Mississippi State Highways
« Last post by osu-lsu on March 13, 2025, 12:51:22 am »
Whenever Mississippi goes active, make sure the rest of MS 76 is added. Its been opened for 18 months and I drove it over a year ago.
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]