Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Markkos1992 on December 27, 2020, 09:10:49 pm

Title: MD: US 40 Corridor (I-895 to MD 152)
Post by: Markkos1992 on December 27, 2020, 09:10:49 pm

1.  Based on the manual, I would argue that both MD 151 and US 40 should have graph connections with I-895.

Quote

Double half interchanges: Usually use one central point and treat both halves as a single, full interchange. Exceptions: a clear gap of at least 0.5 mi/0.8 km separates the two halves, or each half connects to a different highway that we are also mapping.

2.  I think that the MD7Bal_W point should be relabeled to MD7_W or MD7Whi_W.  Also this point needs to be synced with MD7Whi's US40 point.
3.  I would look into changing the shaping point between MD 700 and MD 152 into one or two visible points.

Title: Re: MD: US 40 Corridor (I-895 to MD 152)
Post by: Duke87 on December 29, 2020, 02:29:45 am

Agreed totally on the first two points.

The third... is not out of line with policy as is, but sure, I'll go ahead and put a visible point at Joppa Farm Rd and kill the shaping point. That works.