Highway Data Discussion > In-progress Highway Systems & Work
canabs: Alberta Provincial Highways 500-986
yakra:
AB633
http://www.transportation.alberta.ca/projects/edmontonarea_flash.html
--- Quote ---New Roadway - Hwy 43 to Hwy 779
PROJECT INFORMATION
Location: Hwy 633 from Hwy 43 to Hwy 779,
14.4 km in total.
Description: A planning study has been
completed to identify the future alignment and
configuration of Highway 633 between Highway
43 and Highway 779. The objectives of the study
are to confirm the feasibility and cost of
constructing Highway 633 on the previously
designated straight-through alignment, review
expected traffic changes in the highway network
with construction of the missing Highway 633
link, and identify future right-of-way
requirements and access points.
A Public Information Session was held on May 5,
2011 at Muir Lake Community Hall. Information
shown at the session is available for download.
Schedule: Planning has been completed.
Construction is outside the three-year program.
Consultant: AMEC Earth & Environmental
For more information, contact: Roberta
Clifford, P. Eng., Sr. Transportation Engineer,
AMEC Earth & Environmental, ph. 780-377-3692,
roberta.clifford@amec.com
PROJECT DOCUMENTATION
Location Plan
Information Session - Fact Sheet (24MB)
Information Session - Display Boards (1.9MB)
Information Session - Alignment Drawings (8.2MB)
--- End quote ---
With this as the most recent info on the Alberta Provincial Highway Projects site, I'm more comfortable taking the path I was already considering for AB633; including two sections:
AB633, from AB757 to AB43.
AB633 (St. Albert), from AB779 to AB2.
Here's my original analysis, transferring the text into this post from the AB600 - 699 master post upthread.
Section 1, AB757 to AB43:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 633
ProChart: Asphaltic Surface Course - Final
Include.
Section 2, AB43 to Range Road 21:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 633
ProChart: Graded / Gravelled
GMSV: No signage pointing east from AB43 in May 2013; no imagery further east.
Include? Treat as unsigned; wait for updated GMSV or field reports.
Section 3, Range Road 21 to (53.657542°, -114.150049°):
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = None; L_STNAME_C = "633 Highway"
ProChart: Proposed Route
GMSV: No coverage
Do not include.
Section 4, (53.657542°, -114.150049°) to (53.657541°, -114.137948°):
355072-2 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.657542&lon=-114.150049
355072-1 +243004-2 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.657542&lon=-114.148982
243004-1 +82103-2 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.657541&lon=-114.141671
82103-1 +15433-2 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.657541&lon=-114.141507
15433-1 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.657541&lon=-114.137948
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 633
ProChart: Graded / Gravelled
GMSV: No coverage
Include? A Segment of Independent Not-Much-Utility. Assume it's unsigned; wait for updated GMSV or field reports.
Section 5, (53.657541°, -114.137948°) to Range Road 15:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = None; L_STNAME_C = "633 Highway"
ProChart: Proposed Route
GMSV: No coverage
Do not include.
Section 6, Range Road 15 to Range Road 14:
GIS: No road segment here
Satellite: No road segment here
ProChart: Proposed Route
GMSV: No coverage
Do not include.
Section 7, Range Road 14 to AB779:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 633
ProChart: Graded / Gravelled
GMSV: just this in Aug 2009
Include? Follow Section 2's precedent and wait for definitive evidence of signage to the west.
Section 8, AB779 to St. Albert:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 633
ProChart: Asphaltic Surface Course - Final
GMSV: Signed east from AB44. From there...?
Include.
Section 9, St. Albert limits to AB2:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 633
ProChart: Multi-lane / Divided
GMSV: no shields at AB2, RgeRd260, or corporate limits just west of there.
blade signs = "Sec Rd 633" @ RgeRd260; "Villeneuve Rd" @ RayGibbon Dr & east.
Highway Connector?
Initially included; ask @julmac his opinion; now thinking delete.
The southern temp. route / detour that OSM & Google show via RgeRd20, TwpRd541, and RgeRd14 appears apocryphal; I'm unable to confirm it in any official source. (Official sources *do* seem to point to a routing via TwpRd542 -- albeit a proposed & incomplete one.) If it turns out to be signed, I can add it later on.
yakra:
AB761
No projects listed on the Provincial Highway Projects site.
Section 1, AB54 to AB12:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 761
ProChart: Asphaltic Surface Course - Final
GMSV: Well signed
Include, AB761
Section 2, AB12 to just south of Township Road 413:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 761
ProChart: Asphaltic Surface Course - Final
GMSV: signed from AB12; no coverage N of there
Include, AB761
Section 3, just south of Township Road 413 to (52.594330°, -114.625562°):
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 761
ProChart: Graded / Gravelled
GMSV: No coverage
Include, AB761
Section 4, (52.594330°, -114.625562°) to just south of Township Road 423:
GIS: No road segment here
ProChart: Proposed Route
GMSV: No coverage
Do not include.
Section 5, just south of Township Road 423 to AB53:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 761
ProChart: Graded / Gravelled
GMSV: No coverage
Include, AB761 (Ponoka County)
Section 6, implied concurrency with AB53:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 53; L_STNAME_C = "53 Highway"
GMSV: No coverage
Include, AB761 (Ponoka County)
Section 7, AB53 to AB607:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 761
ProChart: Graded / Gravelled
GMSV: No coverage
Include, AB761 (Ponoka County)
Section 8, AB13 to Township Road 465:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 761
ProChart: Graded / Gravelled
GMSV: signed from AB13; no coverage N of there
Include, AB761 (Wetaskiwin No. 10 County)
Section 9, Township Road 465 to (53.032574°, -114.733621°):
GIS: No road segment here
ProChart: Proposed Route
GMSV: No coverage
Do not include.
Section 10, (53.032574°, -114.733621°) to AB616:
GIS: RTNUMBER1 = 761
ProChart: Graded / Gravelled
GMSV: signed from AB616; no coverage S of there
Include, AB761 (Brazeau County)
yakra:
a couple tricky waypoint labeling scenarios / decimal points?
(topic may not be visible to all forum members)
*Old Township Road 862
*Old Range Road 152
Range Road 174.6
Township Road 640.5
Range Road 171.3
Range Road 173.3
Township Road 672.5
yakra:
*Old Township Road 862 -> *OldTR862
*Old Range Road 152 -> *OldRR152
Stylistically a bit different from the "TwpRd" & "RgeRd" conventions otherwise used, but forward-compatible with a potential province-wide TwpRd -> TR / RgeRd -> RR relabeling, which may or may not end up happening.
I think that makes everything just about ready to hit the HB in devel mode.
I'll put some CSVs together & do whatever else I need, and open a pull request.
convenient link for future reference
oscar:
FWIW, in Saskatchewan there is an active route with an RR abbreviation for a Range Road. Some of the in-dev cansk routes I've been slowly adding to the HB have RR abbreviations and/or TR for Township Roads.
We probably should have consistent abbreviations for the prairie provinces, though I don't feel strongly about RgeRd vs. RR, or TwpRd vs. TR.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version