Highway Data Discussion > In-progress Highway Systems & Work

canmbp: Manitoba Provincial Roads

<< < (11/11)

yakra:

--- Quote from: michih on October 28, 2019, 03:20:40 pm ---I think I should report everything as I did except of cases like "MB12 -> MB12_W" and "MB52/302" (tier 4/5 mix)?
--- End quote ---
All of the latter:
MB/canmbp/mb.mb210.wpt: MB52/302 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.517504&lon=-96.510521
MB/canmbp/mb.mb215.wpt: MB44/302 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.061679&lon=-96.498092
MB/canmbp/mb.mb222.wpt: MB9/231 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.640116&lon=-96.994943
MB/canmbp/mb.mb231.wpt: MB9/222 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.640116&lon=-96.994943
MB/canmbp/mb.mb283.wpt: MB10/285 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.823322&lon=-101.252648
MB/canmbp/mb.mb285.wpt: MB10/283 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.823322&lon=-101.252648
MB/canmbp/mb.mb302.wpt: MB52/210 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.517504&lon=-96.510521
MB/canmbp/mb.mb302.wpt: MB44/215 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.061679&lon=-96.498092
MB/canmbw/mb.rt042.wpt: MB75/100 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.777055&lon=-97.156611
MB/canmbw/mb.rt052.wpt: MB9/101 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.972122&lon=-97.073833
MB/canmbw/mb.rt090.wpt: MB7/101 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.989898&lon=-97.229020
MB/canmbw/mb.rt115.wpt: MB15/101 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.886108&lon=-96.958879
MB/canmbw/mb.rt135.wpt: MB1/150 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.855334&lon=-97.103906
MB/canmbw/mb.rt150.wpt: MB1/135 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.855334&lon=-97.103906
MB/canmbw/mb.rt155.wpt: MB3/100 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.775347&lon=-97.318590
MB/canmbw/mb.rt180.wpt: MB8/101 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.986739&lon=-97.106652

In case I were to go the other way with it... Saving some code I temporarily added to siteupdate.cpp, between
#include "functions/concurrency_detection.cpp"
and
// Create hash table for faster lookup of routes by list file name

ofstream mbplog("canmbp.log");
for (HighwaySystem *h : highway_systems)
  if (h->systemname == "canmbp")
    for (Route &r : h->route_list)
      for (Waypoint *w : r.point_list)
      {   if (strchr(w->label.data(), '/')) continue;
   if (w->colocated && w->colocated->size() >= 3)
   {   size_t mb = 0;
      size_t mbp = 0;
      for (Waypoint *p : *w->colocated)
        if (p != w)
          if       (p->route->system->systemname == "canmbp")   mbp++;
          else if  (p->route->system->systemname == "canmb")   mb++;
      if (mb && mbp) mbplog << r.root << ' ' << w->label << '\n';
   }
      }
mbplog.close();
return 0;

The only real examples to change would be
MB224: MB325 -> MB17/325
MB304: MB12 -> MB12/59
MB416: MB17 -> MB17/229

yakra:

--- Quote from: yakra on October 28, 2019, 01:44:35 pm ---
--- Quote from: michih on October 21, 2019, 02:22:30 pm ---OSM has it as MB458 (Thunderforest and Stamen too)
--- End quote ---
Notably, "458" and not "PR 458" as per OSM SOP. Interestingly, the NRN shapefiles list both L_STNAME_C & R_STNAME_C as "458 Highway", though MB458 itself is elsewhere. This may be a vestigial trace of an old decommissioned route. I'll have to check out Historical Highway Maps of Manitoba and see what I can see.

--- End quote ---
http://content.gov.mb.ca/mit/maparchive/high/1990_1991_map.pdf
http://content.gov.mb.ca/mit/maparchive/high/1992_1993_map.pdf
There was once a MB458 there, that appears to be a victim of the 1992 Great Decommissioning.
At the same time, the modern MB458 was created when MB340's alignment through Treesbank and Stockton to Belmont was downloaded.


--- Quote from: yakra on August 15, 2018, 12:23:48 am ---VISIBLE_DISTANCE: check draft MB MB304 AnnSt coords

--- End quote ---
Annex St appears to refer to MB304 itself here. No name available for point; deleting.

LilianaUwU:
A bit late to the punch, but it seems like MB 334 was removed between MB1_E and MB425. There are ENDS assemblies on each side (SB, NB), and all 334 signs in between have been removed.

Additionally, there seems to be a long-term closure (as in, perhaps permanent) on 334 between the points 3E_N and 1E (SB, NB). There seems to be signage implying 334 is detoured on 247 (3 EB at 247, but not sure where it goes from there. I'd assume it's merely a detour along 247.

Also on MB 247, is another bridge that's been out for a while, between MB334_S and MB3_W. This one is simpler, as 247 was simply routed on 334 and 3. Here's EB at the former 247/334 split, EB at MB 3, WB 3 where 247 formerly split.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version