Highway Data Discussion > In-progress Highway Systems & Work

canmbp: Manitoba Provincial Roads

<< < (11/11)

yakra:

--- Quote from: michih on October 28, 2019, 03:20:40 pm ---I think I should report everything as I did except of cases like "MB12 -> MB12_W" and "MB52/302" (tier 4/5 mix)?
--- End quote ---
All of the latter:
MB/canmbp/mb.mb210.wpt: MB52/302 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.517504&lon=-96.510521
MB/canmbp/mb.mb215.wpt: MB44/302 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.061679&lon=-96.498092
MB/canmbp/mb.mb222.wpt: MB9/231 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.640116&lon=-96.994943
MB/canmbp/mb.mb231.wpt: MB9/222 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.640116&lon=-96.994943
MB/canmbp/mb.mb283.wpt: MB10/285 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.823322&lon=-101.252648
MB/canmbp/mb.mb285.wpt: MB10/283 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.823322&lon=-101.252648
MB/canmbp/mb.mb302.wpt: MB52/210 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.517504&lon=-96.510521
MB/canmbp/mb.mb302.wpt: MB44/215 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.061679&lon=-96.498092
MB/canmbw/mb.rt042.wpt: MB75/100 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.777055&lon=-97.156611
MB/canmbw/mb.rt052.wpt: MB9/101 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.972122&lon=-97.073833
MB/canmbw/mb.rt090.wpt: MB7/101 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.989898&lon=-97.229020
MB/canmbw/mb.rt115.wpt: MB15/101 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.886108&lon=-96.958879
MB/canmbw/mb.rt135.wpt: MB1/150 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.855334&lon=-97.103906
MB/canmbw/mb.rt150.wpt: MB1/135 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.855334&lon=-97.103906
MB/canmbw/mb.rt155.wpt: MB3/100 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.775347&lon=-97.318590
MB/canmbw/mb.rt180.wpt: MB8/101 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.986739&lon=-97.106652

In case I were to go the other way with it... Saving some code I temporarily added to siteupdate.cpp, between
#include "functions/concurrency_detection.cpp"
and
// Create hash table for faster lookup of routes by list file name

ofstream mbplog("canmbp.log");
for (HighwaySystem *h : highway_systems)
  if (h->systemname == "canmbp")
    for (Route &r : h->route_list)
      for (Waypoint *w : r.point_list)
      {   if (strchr(w->label.data(), '/')) continue;
   if (w->colocated && w->colocated->size() >= 3)
   {   size_t mb = 0;
      size_t mbp = 0;
      for (Waypoint *p : *w->colocated)
        if (p != w)
          if       (p->route->system->systemname == "canmbp")   mbp++;
          else if  (p->route->system->systemname == "canmb")   mb++;
      if (mb && mbp) mbplog << r.root << ' ' << w->label << '\n';
   }
      }
mbplog.close();
return 0;

The only real examples to change would be
MB224: MB325 -> MB17/325
MB304: MB12 -> MB12/59
MB416: MB17 -> MB17/229

yakra:

--- Quote from: yakra on October 28, 2019, 01:44:35 pm ---
--- Quote from: michih on October 21, 2019, 02:22:30 pm ---OSM has it as MB458 (Thunderforest and Stamen too)
--- End quote ---
Notably, "458" and not "PR 458" as per OSM SOP. Interestingly, the NRN shapefiles list both L_STNAME_C & R_STNAME_C as "458 Highway", though MB458 itself is elsewhere. This may be a vestigial trace of an old decommissioned route. I'll have to check out Historical Highway Maps of Manitoba and see what I can see.

--- End quote ---
http://content.gov.mb.ca/mit/maparchive/high/1990_1991_map.pdf
http://content.gov.mb.ca/mit/maparchive/high/1992_1993_map.pdf
There was once a MB458 there, that appears to be a victim of the 1992 Great Decommissioning.
At the same time, the modern MB458 was created when MB340's alignment through Treesbank and Stockton to Belmont was downloaded.


--- Quote from: yakra on August 15, 2018, 12:23:48 am ---VISIBLE_DISTANCE: check draft MB MB304 AnnSt coords

--- End quote ---
Annex St appears to refer to MB304 itself here. No name available for point; deleting.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page