Highway Data Discussion > In-progress Highway Systems & Work

mexdfeje: Ejes Viales in Mexico City

(1/4) > >>

neroute2:
http://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=mexdfeje
http://travelmapping.net/user/system.php?sys=mexdfeje

I think this is ready for review. The readme has most of the info: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/hwy_data/MEX-DF/mexdfeje/README.md

These routes are practically the only signed routes in Mexico City, other than the D routes that serve the outskirts. They are a cross between a city grid (e.g. canmbw) and a small state (CDMX has more than half the land area of Rhode Island).

si404:
The system abbreviation can use 'e' instead of 'eje', as it's rather long otherwise.

michih:

--- Quote from: si404 on November 28, 2019, 05:15:32 am ---The system abbreviation can use 'e' instead of 'eje', as it's rather long otherwise.
--- End quote ---

Yes!

And the system update entry is missing.
To be entered here: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/systemupdates.csv

michih:
The route names should be renamed.

File names:
mexdf.eje1nte.wpt --> mexdf.e001n.wpt etc. (3-digit route numbers, cardinal directions just one-digit)

csv entry:
mexdfeje;MEX-DF;Eje1Nte;;;;mexdf.eje1nte;
-->
mexdfe;MEX-DF;E1N;;;Eje 1 Norte;mexdf.e001n;

neroute2:

--- Quote from: michih on November 28, 2019, 12:08:33 pm ---The route names should be renamed.

File names:
mexdf.eje1nte.wpt --> mexdf.e001n.wpt etc. (3-digit route numbers, cardinal directions just one-digit)

--- End quote ---
I'm not sure this is appropriate. The shields spell out the abbreviations, and we have no rules about how many letters to use in file names.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page