Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Topic started by: cvoight on January 10, 2020, 02:34:28 pm

Title: CA: US99WHisWlm/US99WHisWlw incorrectly formatted waypoint labels "I5BL_S"
Post by: cvoight on January 10, 2020, 02:34:28 pm

I believe these waypoint labels should be I-5BL_S. These points are in use according to pointsinuse.log.

region\system\wpt file : line number : result
CA\usaush\ca.us099whiswlm.wpt:1:I5BL_S http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.132678&lon=-122.132724
CA\usaush\ca.us099whiswlw.wpt:1:I5BL_S http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.494979&lon=-122.193176

Title: Re: CA: US99WHisWlm/US99WHisWlw incorrectly formatted waypoint labels "I5BL_S"
Post by: yakra on March 15, 2020, 06:24:45 pm

One or the other of these routes should have Wil as its abbrev.
Oscar, your thoughts on moving CA20/I-5BLWil/US99WHisWlm to the ends of the quadrant road?

Title: Re: CA: US99WHisWlm/US99WHisWlw incorrectly formatted waypoint labels "I5BL_S"
Post by: oscar on March 16, 2020, 08:42:21 am

Quote from: yakra on March 15, 2020, 06:24:45 pm

Oscar, your thoughts on moving CA20/I-5BLWil/US99WHisWlm to the ends of the quadrant road?

I think it should stay as is. The manual makes that the default. unless there is a trumpet or other interchange at one or both ends of the connecting road. In this instance, it's just simple at-grade crossings at both ends.

Title: Re: CA: US99WHisWlm/US99WHisWlw incorrectly formatted waypoint labels "I5BL_S"
Post by: yakra on March 18, 2020, 03:08:20 pm

I guess it comes down to what's "or similar" in a "a trumpet or similar"...

Title: Re: CA: US99WHisWlm/US99WHisWlw incorrectly formatted waypoint labels "I5BL_S"
Post by: michih on October 31, 2023, 01:27:27 pm

Can we close the topic?