Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: yakra on May 04, 2022, 04:39:25 pm
-
CR69_S & CR101 should refer to US169Bus, if not convert to exit numbers.
Interesting (https://www.google.com/maps/@44.7776502,-93.5617647,3a,15y,107.3h,90.27t/data=!3m9!1e1!3m7!1stk2ibz040nz1clTruKsunw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192!9m2!1b1!2i40) shields (https://www.google.com/maps/@44.7949428,-93.4013129,3a,15y,212.22h,93.76t/data=!3m10!1e1!3m8!1s21PguSN_3MkYZIwP8U-Sqg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D21PguSN_3MkYZIwP8U-Sqg%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D311.8225%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192!9m2!1b1!2i40) on the BGSes here.
-
With two exceptions, business routes in Minnesota are by and large "afterthoughts". I wouldn't even put them at the same level as county routes.
The two exceptions are BUS 2 in East Grand Forks and 371 in Brainerd...both of those, at least, are on the state highway system.
-
Define "afterthought" - Bus US169 looked very signed to me.
-
Despite the signage, MnDOT doesn't consider them as being routes aside from the two aforementioned exceptions. Purely local in nature...71/23 through Willmar is an excellent example of that as they have unique signage that existed before MnDOT standardized business route signage for local jurisdictions to use.
That said, I do have the known ones in the HB except for BUS 60 in St James as signage no longer exists for that one.