Travel Mapping's main site is at https://travelmapping.net/ . Old tm.teresco.org URLs and http:// URLs are redirected there, and will continue to work indefinitely.
Recent Posts
There is no junction signage on AR126 for it, but there is one AR980 shield for this route.
I see the tiny bit of orange at Pforzheim now on the big map http://autobahnatlas-online.de/AutobahnkarteMitAS.pdf (dated April, so more recent than when you have the annual update) that I used. I'm not perfect.
I've changed them, given you don't seem to want to, instead flagging them here rather than just changing them.
I don't think it makes any sense to have a third point for E470 or a second point for I-70 here, given these would both represent points at which one cannot enter or exit the freeway and thus... not useful.
This means no graph connection, but that's fine - that's how it's done when an interchange between two routes has the connection points between them offset like this (every turnpike trumpet for example).
@si404:They weren't my US entries - they were copy-pasted from the aaroads thread.
- There are errors for your US and even ENG entries. Don't you use the "list tool" editor?
German A8 is not yet 6-laned at Pforzheim (u/c by 2026+).I see the tiny bit of orange at Pforzheim now on the big map http://autobahnatlas-online.de/AutobahnkarteMitAS.pdf (dated April, so more recent than when you have the annual update) that I used. I'm not perfect, and nor are you - eg occasionally we misread i as l (to take a mistake in your work I found today when peer reviewing - one that I make often too!), and we don't always get 100% when converting data from one form to another.
- A8 is also 6-laned from exit 61 to 62b, not 61 to 62a.
- I'd close A7's gap between exit 67 and 70 as it is already mostly 6-laned now, remainders to be opened "soon". autobahnatlas-online.de is only updated once per year ~ February/March.
Yeah the biggest limitation here is this will not catch cases where a route is 6 or more lanes on both approaches to an interchange, but does not maintain 6 thru lanes through it. A situation which is fairly common, so this is a nontrivial limitation.
I was thinking about this earlier this morning as I got the ball started before work. Where there are multiple interchange points to support it, things can be tweaked (I did such with some of the Minnesota routes). Where the route lists went with 1PPI, we'll just have to live with it.
That said, Jayhawk and I both agreed that where the lanes are strictly auxiliary lanes between interchanges that are not multiple miles apart, they do not count.
