Author Topic: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint  (Read 756 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1627
  • Last Login:Today at 10:09:32 am
SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« on: May 15, 2022, 06:53:55 pm »
Based on signage, it looks like this route has been extended. Based on the 2019 map here, it extends to the dead end at a ranch gate (note 37 mile marker) close to where the section lines marked 284 St & 356 Ave intersect. A sign pointing that direction at the intersection of 281 St and 350 Ave indicates that the road continues for 8 miles. This sign is the last one posted, and it appears at the corner of 282 St and 352 Ave.
Clinched:

Offline vespertine

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:January 15, 2024, 09:49:44 pm
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2022, 09:02:57 pm »
I concur with these findings. I know I posted about the same thing with the same conclusion quite a while back. Given that I can't the post here, it may have been as far back as the CHM days.

v.

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
  • Last Login:Today at 11:38:25 am
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2022, 12:26:11 am »
I think I said something about this as well, but I don't remember. This also aligns with the SD pavement logs here (page 241). I know for sure I extended the route on OSM.

Does the endpoint you saw correspond with the end of the tertiary road segment? The tertiary road should correspond to the gravel section and the secondary to the paved section, unless I messed something up.
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1627
  • Last Login:Today at 10:09:32 am
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2022, 10:23:43 am »
Does the endpoint you saw correspond with the end of the tertiary road segment? The tertiary road should correspond to the gravel section and the secondary to the paved section, unless I messed something up.
Yes. My recollection is that the paved segment matches what you have as secondary in OSM, and also matches what appears in satellite imagery.
Clinched:

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
  • Last Login:Today at 11:38:25 am
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2022, 03:02:58 pm »
Does the endpoint you saw correspond with the end of the tertiary road segment? The tertiary road should correspond to the gravel section and the secondary to the paved section, unless I messed something up.
Yes. My recollection is that the paved segment matches what you have as secondary in OSM, and also matches what appears in satellite imagery.
Cool, then that gives a good point to which the route should be extended.
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
  • Last Login:Today at 11:38:25 am
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2022, 08:53:44 pm »
Sorry to bring this up again, but there was a miscommunication (that was probably my fault); the route ends at the end of the tertiary segment, not the secondary segment. Sorry if I wasn't clear on that.
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton

Offline Highway63

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:February 16, 2024, 01:40:37 am
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2022, 08:58:57 pm »
Does the new file not end at the correct place? Or did I edit the wrong segment? I added about half a mile; I thought based on the linked map that's what you wanted.

If I screwed up, a point suggestion would be welcomed.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2022, 09:05:07 pm by Highway63 »

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
  • Last Login:Today at 11:38:25 am
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #7 on: May 24, 2022, 02:32:01 pm »
If I screwed up, a point suggestion would be welcomed.
I don't think it's your fault, I think I was just unclear about where the route ended. Sorry about that.

The DOT GIS (https://sdbit.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=1ee135426efd435ab22d191e4e4ff776) has the correct endpoint (at the end of the tertiary segment on OSM) (attached a screenshot as well).
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton

Offline Highway63

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:February 16, 2024, 01:40:37 am
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2022, 11:45:01 pm »
That looks like the point I put in, and the point is also where the color turns from yellow to white in OSM.

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1627
  • Last Login:Today at 10:09:32 am
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #9 on: June 02, 2022, 05:41:23 am »
By "the end of the tertiary segment", the_spui_ninja meant the southeastern end of the tertiary segment (where the white road in OSM turns into a narrower white road). The route should be extended by about 5 miles.
Clinched:

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
  • Last Login:Today at 11:38:25 am
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2022, 10:38:59 pm »
By "the end of the tertiary segment", the_spui_ninja meant the southeastern end of the tertiary segment (where the white road in OSM turns into a narrower white road). The route should be extended by about 5 miles.
Yeah, sorry I haven't replied this week has been a doozy.
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton

Offline Highway63

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:February 16, 2024, 01:40:37 am
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #11 on: July 12, 2022, 08:59:51 pm »
I hope this listing has been correctly updated now.

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
  • Last Login:Today at 11:38:25 am
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
Re: SD: SD 1806 (Gregory County North) endpoint
« Reply #12 on: July 12, 2022, 09:07:45 pm »
Yes, it has! Sorry for any confusion I caused on my end!
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton