Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => In-progress Highway Systems & Work => Completed Highway Systems Threads => Topic started by: michih on May 17, 2019, 10:23:47 am

Title: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on May 17, 2019, 10:23:47 am
DJ106 wp DN1 should be renamed to DN1/7.
DJ106C needs a wp for Bulevardul Mihai Viteazul just east of DJ106A wp (it's the only segment I've traveled of the route)
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: panda80 on May 20, 2019, 03:22:40 am
Corrected these 2 issues, should come with the next update.
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: michih on July 14, 2019, 03:50:09 am
I've added all unprocessed wpt files to csv files so that the 610 drafted routes are in HB now. More to come.

@panda80, I've not completed the "city" fields. Please check for the correct names. If the main route is not much longer than the other one, please replace "(Main)" by a name of the location.

Code: [Select]
roudj;ROU;DJ194B;;;(Main);rou.dj194b
roudj;ROU;DJ194B;;Dar;Dar;rou.dj194bdar
roudj;ROU;DJ194B;;Oar;Oar;rou.dj194boar
roudj;ROU;DJ195;;;(Main);rou.dj195
roudj;ROU;DJ195;;Pot;Pot;rou.dj195pot
roudj;ROU;DJ222D;;;(Main);rou.dj222d
roudj;ROU;DJ222D;;Car;Car;rou.dj222dcar
roudj;ROU;DJ222D;;Cri;Cri;rou.dj222dcri
roudj;ROU;DJ222D;;Sul;Sul;rou.dj222dsul
roudj;ROU;DJ562;;;(Main);rou.dj562
roudj;ROU;DJ562;;Dev;Dev;rou.dj562dev
roudj;ROU;DJ709A;;;(Main);rou.dj709a;
roudj;ROU;DJ709A;;Mas;Mas;rou.dj709amas
roudj;ROU;DJ682E;;;(Main);rou.dj682e;
roudj;ROU;DJ682E;;Nad;Nadlac;rou.dj682enad;


btw: Have you seen the note (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/commit/fcaeea7ae20ffd41ebf382a28cc52b8ac5215757) on Github?
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: michih on August 12, 2019, 12:53:33 pm
I've added the last routes to the csv files.

List of "city" fields to be completed:

Code: [Select]
roudj;ROU;DJ105D;;;(Main);rou.dj105d;
roudj;ROU;DJ105D;;Car;Carta;rou.dj105dcar;
roudj;ROU;DJ159;;;;rou.dj159;
roudj;ROU;DJ159;;Car;Car;rou.dj159car;
roudj;ROU;DJ194B;;;(Main);rou.dj194b;
roudj;ROU;DJ194B;;Dar;Dar;rou.dj194bdar;
roudj;ROU;DJ194B;;Oar;Oar;rou.dj194boar;
roudj;ROU;DJ195;;;(Main);rou.dj195;
roudj;ROU;DJ195;;Pot;Pot;rou.dj195pot;
roudj;ROU;DJ208G;;;(Main);rou.dj208g;
roudj;ROU;DJ208G;;Hel;Hel;rou.dj208ghel;
roudj;ROU;DJ222D;;;(Main);rou.dj222d;
roudj;ROU;DJ222D;;Car;Car;rou.dj222dcar;
roudj;ROU;DJ222D;;Cri;Cri;rou.dj222dcri;
roudj;ROU;DJ222D;;Sul;Sul;rou.dj222dsul;
roudj;ROU;DJ255A;;;;rou.dj255a;
roudj;ROU;DJ255A;;Cis;Cis;rou.dj255acis;
roudj;ROU;DJ562;;;(Main);rou.dj562;
roudj;ROU;DJ562;;Dev;Dev;rou.dj562dev;
roudj;ROU;DJ682E;;;(Main);rou.dj682e;
roudj;ROU;DJ682E;;Nad;Nadlac;rou.dj682enad;
roudj;ROU;DJ707L;;;Orastie;rou.dj707l;
roudj;ROU;DJ707L;;Fol;Folt;rou.dj707lfol;
roudj;ROU;DJ709A;;;(Main);rou.dj709a;
roudj;ROU;DJ709A;;Mas;Mas;rou.dj709amas;
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: michih on August 13, 2019, 02:26:21 pm
System is in preview now.

@panda: The system name is not correct on the site:
Romania Drumuri Judetene
->
Romania Drumuri Județene
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: panda80 on August 14, 2019, 08:49:29 am
Corrected, please wait a few days with the review, I still want to check some entries, and add the city (or , in most cases, village) name in the csvs.
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: michih on August 14, 2019, 01:55:01 pm
The backlog of preview systems is still huge. I won't start the roudj review soon. Minimum espcm, espcb, espcl, espex and gbnb should be done first (maybe systems on other continents too?). If you want, you could also review gbnb...
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: michih on September 14, 2019, 06:41:08 am
Please check the data errors first, e.g. LABEL_SELFREF, DUPLICATE_LABEL and MALFORMED_URL: http://travelmapping.net/devel/datacheck.php?rg=ROU
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: michih on September 20, 2019, 11:42:20 am
I had a look at NMPs, please fix them before I'll start the "real" review:

rou.dj207m@DJ208G 47.153852 26.845398
rou.dj208ghel@DJ207M 47.153854 26.845397

rou.dj209b@DN17B 47.178746 25.787
rou.dn17b@DJ209B 47.178746 25.787036

rou.dj159@DJ241A 46.752063 27.044209
rou.dj241a@DJ159 46.75208 27.044217

rou.dj108a@DJ193E 47.579594 23.324919
rou.dj193e@DJ108A 47.579627 23.324919

rou.dj108d@DJ193E 47.510237 23.23705
rou.dj193e@DJ108D 47.510237 23.237023

rou.dj108b@DJ108S 47.135512 23.470144
rou.dj108s@DJ108B 47.135533 23.470107

rou.dj110b@DN1F_W 47.382108 22.78031
rou.dn01f@DJ108B_W 47.382108 22.780312
rou.dj110b@DN1F_W 47.382108 22.78031
rou.e81@DJ108B_W 47.382108 22.780312

rou.dj135a@DJ153 46.69225 24.824381
rou.dj153@DJ135A 46.692243 24.824386

rou.dj150@DJ151C 46.590687 23.954068
rou.dj151c@DJ150 46.590684 23.954052

rou.dj142@DJ142C 46.407237 24.608873
rou.dj142c@DJ142 46.407238 24.608876

rou.dj151a@DJ152A 46.57924 24.373459
rou.dj152a@DJ151A 46.579247 24.373381

rou.dj132b@DJ133 46.167683 25.362046
rou.dj133@DJ132B 46.167668 25.362067

rou.dj142@DJ142A 46.33528 24.357854
rou.dj142a@DJ142 46.33529 24.357859

rou.dj705a@DJ705F 45.814017 23.206708
rou.dj705f@DJ705A 45.814014 23.20673

rou.dj678a@DJ703H 45.219587 24.55853
rou.dn07d@DJ678A 45.219594 24.558536

rou.dj797@CalSan 47.049829 21.8863
rou.e671@DJ797_N 47.049891 21.885967
rou.dj797@CalSan 47.049829 21.8863
rou.e79@DJ797 47.049891 21.885967

rou.dj682a@DJ691 45.973867 21.422487
rou.dj691@DJ693 45.973863 21.422482
rou.dj682a@DJ691 45.973867 21.422487
rou.dj693@DJ691 45.973863 21.422482

rou.dj101i@DJ720D 44.977434 25.759215
rou.dj720d@DJ101I 44.977421 25.759204

rou.dj301@DJ412_E 44.312976 26.436822
rou.dj412@DJ301_N 44.312965 26.436834

rou.dj301@DJ412_W 44.28703 26.44785
rou.dj412@DJ301_S 44.287045 26.447852

rou.dj508@DJ703B 44.752484 25.081197
rou.dj703b@DJ508 44.752486 25.081197

rou.dj503@DJ703B 44.696259 25.018868
rou.dj703b@DJ503 44.696252 25.018868

rou.dj659@DJ703B_N 44.687686 24.999518
rou.dj703b@DJ659_N 44.687664 24.999529

rou.dj659@DJ703B_S 44.676496 24.989021
rou.dj703b@DJ659_S 44.676466 24.988999

rou.dj546@DN67B 44.663373 24.317207
rou.dj703c@DN67B 44.663533 24.317363
rou.dj546@DN67B 44.663373 24.317207
rou.dn67b@DJ546/703C 44.663533 24.317363

rou.dj643d@DJ651A 44.637649 23.884799
rou.dj651a@DJ643D 44.637651 23.884806

rou.dj542a@DJ642A 43.987566 24.30738
rou.dj642a@DJ542A 43.987583 24.30738

rou.dj552a@DJ561A 44.017453 23.431213
rou.dj561a@DJ552A 44.017457 23.431209

rou.dj552@DJ561A 44.171796 23.183447
rou.dj561a@DJ552 44.171775 23.183452

rou.dj552@DJ562 44.146217 23.097435
rou.dj562@DJ552 44.146216 23.097446
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: michih on September 20, 2019, 11:42:59 am
Not NMPs but please merge into one wp

DJ204E junctions with DN2/E85:

rou.dj204e@DN2_E 45.91688 27.209313
rou.dj204e@DN2_N 45.917111 27.209288
rou.dj204e@DN2_E 45.91688 27.209313
rou.dn002@DJ204E_N 45.917111 27.209288
rou.dj204e@DN2_E 45.91688 27.209313
rou.e85@DJ204E_N 45.917111 27.209288
rou.dj204e@DN2_N 45.917111 27.209288
rou.dn002@DJ204E_S 45.91688 27.209313
rou.dj204e@DN2_N 45.917111 27.209288
rou.e85@DJ204E_S 45.91688 27.209313
rou.dn002@DJ204E_N 45.917111 27.209288
rou.dn002@DJ204E_S 45.91688 27.209313
rou.dn002@DJ204E_N 45.917111 27.209288
rou.e85@DJ204E_S 45.91688 27.209313
rou.dn002@DJ204E_S 45.91688 27.209313
rou.e85@DJ204E_N 45.917111 27.209288
rou.e85@DJ204E_N 45.917111 27.209288
rou.e85@DJ204E_S 45.91688 27.209313


DJ205S and DN2D junctions with DN2M:

rou.dj205s@DN2M 45.712931 27.165402
rou.dn02d@DN2M 45.713072 27.165799
rou.dj205s@DN2M 45.712931 27.165402
rou.dn02m@DN2D 45.713072 27.165799
rou.dn02d@DN2M 45.713072 27.165799
rou.dn02m@DJ205S 45.712931 27.165402
rou.dn02m@DJ205S 45.712931 27.165402
rou.dn02m@DN2D 45.713072 27.165799


DJ205P wps at E85 and check whether DJ205P exists (it's not in HB, rename or remove wps if route doesn't exist):

rou.e85@DJ205P_E 45.774382 27.206177
rou.e85@DJ205P_W 45.774608 27.206306


DJ100H and DJ102D wps at DN1B/E577

rou.dj100h@DN1B 45.002399 26.442332
rou.dj102d@DN1B 45.002504 26.442659
rou.dj100h@DN1B 45.002399 26.442332
rou.dn01b@DJ102D 45.002504 26.442659
rou.dj100h@DN1B 45.002399 26.442332
rou.e577@DJ102D 45.002504 26.442659
rou.dj102d@DN1B 45.002504 26.442659
rou.dn01b@DJ100H 45.002399 26.442332
rou.dj102d@DN1B 45.002504 26.442659
rou.e577@DJ100H 45.002399 26.442332
rou.dn01b@DJ100H 45.002399 26.442332
rou.dn01b@DJ102D 45.002504 26.442659
rou.dn01b@DJ100H 45.002399 26.442332
rou.e577@DJ102D 45.002504 26.442659
rou.dn01b@DJ102D 45.002504 26.442659
rou.e577@DJ100H 45.002399 26.442332
rou.e577@DJ100H 45.002399 26.442332
rou.e577@DJ102D 45.002504 26.442659

DJ149 wps at DJ100D:

rou.dj100c@DJ149_E 44.972518 26.443654
rou.dj100c@DJ149_W 44.972352 26.443657
rou.dj100c@DJ149_E 44.972518 26.443654
rou.dj149@DJ100C_S 44.972352 26.443657
rou.dj100c@DJ149_W 44.972352 26.443657
rou.dj149@DJ100C_N 44.972518 26.443654
rou.dj149@DJ100C_N 44.972518 26.443654
rou.dj149@DJ100C_S 44.972352 26.443657


D718 wps at DJ717:

rou.dj717@DJ718_N 44.95964 25.456112
rou.dj717@DJ718_S 44.959569 25.455917
rou.dj717@DJ718_N 44.95964 25.456112
rou.dj718@DJ717_N 44.959569 25.455917
rou.dj717@DJ718_S 44.959569 25.455917
rou.dj718@DJ717_S 44.95964 25.456112
rou.dj718@DJ717_N 44.959569 25.455917
rou.dj718@DJ717_S 44.95964 25.456112


Remove "End" wp of DJ106A - it's just a 0.03mi (50m) segment from the last wp.
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: panda80 on September 20, 2019, 04:20:24 pm
Will do the changes starting from mid October, I am on travelling now, just write down the remarks, I will take care of them when I'm back home.
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: michih on September 21, 2019, 03:30:46 am
Will do the changes starting from mid October, I am on travelling now, just write down the remarks, I will take care of them when I'm back home.

I know :) I was not sure whether I should start reviewing canmbp (or gbnb) but decided to have a look at roudj first :) I think I should not start a detailed peer-review which would be suspended for a few weeks due to my upcoming travel. It's better to do it "at once". That's why I just had a quick look on ROU concurrencies (look fine!) and NMPs.

I think that NMPs are a general issue for you but it's part of the learning process :) Just keep it in mind when you will be working on new systems in the future.
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: panda80 on December 09, 2019, 10:33:10 am
I recently done the corrections requested above, the last bunch will come with the next site update. Afterwards, the system is ready for review.
Title: Re: Romania Drumuri Județene (roudj)
Post by: michih on December 09, 2019, 02:05:21 pm
Afterwards, the system is ready for review.

I'll review it parallel to the English B route review and Grand Est D route development. I'll start anytime later this month :)
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 19, 2019, 05:28:39 am
DJ100:
There is no DJ301A, rename (or remove) wp


DJ100B:
Exceeds limits b/n DC96 and DJ101D
Exceeds limits b/n DN1D and DJ100C


DJ103C:
DJ102D_S is off


DJ100E:
Move DC5 to the center of the roundabout
StrPled -> StrPle (Strada Plevnei)


DJ106G:
Not sure how to position DJ102 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.146900&lon=25.989746). I should be either at the center of the triangle (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.147100&lon=25.989849) (I think that's the way the manual says?) or on the main route between both branches (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.147085&lon=25.989709). Check Esri WorldImagery, both branches are unpaved branches.
Exceeds limits between the wps


DJ100H:
DC72: There is no junction!?


DJ100M:
DJ233_N is off


DJ101:
DC14 is indicated being DJ101U on OSM. Is DJ101U missing or does it not exist? Please report the error to OSM if it doesn't exist


DJ101B:
DC14 should be moved to the center of the triangle
DC14 -> DJ101U? see DJ101
Exceeds limits b/n A3 and DJ101C_N (concurrent DJ101C too)
Nic -> DC159 ?


DJ101D:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.934836&lon=26.026525
DN1A_N is off


DJ101F:
DC81 is off


DJ101G:
DN1A_E -> DN1_W
DN1A_W -> DN1_E
Move DJ140_E to the center of the triangle
+X2 is off


DJ101T:
Change order of CalTra and DJ102I
Then, route will exceed limits b/n CalTra and +X4
Move DJ102I to the center of the triangle or b/n the DJ101T branches on DJ102I
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 20, 2019, 08:34:22 am
DJ100:
There is no DJ301A, rename (or remove) wp

There is a DJ301A, it's just unpaved between Posta and DJ100. That's not unusual for a DJ, I think some 30% of them are still unpaved.

Quote
DJ106G:
Not sure how to position DJ102 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.146900&lon=25.989746). I should be either at the center of the triangle (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.147100&lon=25.989849) (I think that's the way the manual says?) or on the main route between both branches (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.147085&lon=25.989709). Check Esri WorldImagery, both branches are unpaved branches.
Exceeds limits between the wps

Positioned on DJ102, between the branches. Both branches are paved, I drove there.

Quote
DJ101B:
Nic -> DC159 ?

No, DC159 is somewhat parallel to DJ101B, at WP Nic there is just a link between the 2 roads.

Done the other changes, will come with the next site update.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 20, 2019, 09:17:01 am
DJ100:
There is no DJ301A, rename (or remove) wp

There is a DJ301A, it's just unpaved between Posta and DJ100. That's not unusual for a DJ, I think some 30% of them are still unpaved.

sorry, there is one but it doesn't intersect. You only drafted it up to the next village (http://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?r=rou.dj301a). Extend DJ301A to DJ100 or rename the DJ100 wp to ToDJ301A.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 21, 2019, 01:39:48 pm
DJ102:
Move DJ100F wp between the two branches


DJ102C:
+X1 is off
DJ234_E is off
DJ102N is off


DJ102E:
+X1 is off


DJ102F:
DJ203L_E is off
DJ203L_W is off


DJ102I:
Exceeds limits b/n Pre and StrArm


DJ102K:
+X1A is off
DJ149 is off
DJ238 is off


DJ102N:
DJ103S is off
DC69 is off


DJ102R:
DJ238_S is off
DJ238_N is off
DC72 is off
+X2 is off


DJ103B:
DN1A_E is off


DJ103D:
DJ104A is off


DJ103F:
Does it extend at south end as indicated on OSM? If not, please report the error to OSM
DC77 is indicated being DJ109 on OSM. Is that right? Or error report to OSM?


DJ103H:
+X2 is off
+X1 is off


DJ103J:
Move DN1R between the two "branches"
Replace +X1 by a visible wp to Visagu ?


DJ103N:
DN1: There are two branches and the other one is indicated being DJ103N on GM, comfirmed by GSV. There is no sign at all at the location where the wp is.


DJ103U:
If this route is really a DJ route, DC75 is off and must be positioned at the GSJ with DN1N! :)


60 routes done, that's 4.63% :)
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 21, 2019, 01:45:02 pm
Why are routes like DJ100A, DJ100K, DJ102A etc. missing? Are they not on official lists or did you just not find where they are?
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 22, 2019, 05:31:48 am
DJ104A:
DN1 is off (should be on DN1 main track, a little bit to the north
DJ102D does not intersect here


DJ104C:
+X1 -> DC79 or Hur ?


DJ104D:
DJ104J does not exist, add route?


DJ104E:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.789440&lon=24.593123
DJ104F is off


DJ104K:
DJ131C_S is off
DJ105A_W is off


DJ105:
DJ104J doesn't exist, DJ105A intersects here though


DJ105Dcar:
Reverse order so that it's a continuation of DJ105D just split by the ferry


DJ105G:
Check route between StrGar and DJ105N. DC59 and a river crossing (swimming?) seems to be wrong ;)
Move DJ106C between the branches


DJ105H:
DN1 is off


DJ105J:
I'd move +X1 to the junction and call it Por


DJ105P:
DN7C is off
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 22, 2019, 07:30:36 am
Why are routes like DJ100A, DJ100K, DJ102A etc. missing? Are they not on official lists or did you just not find where they are?

Most of them are nor on official list, nor on the map. Mostly upgraded to DN or degraded to DC routes. But DJ100A is on the map, between Chitila and Mogosoaia. It's the old DNCB alignment, however, it's not on the list, not in GM, not signed in the field. I guess it's now just a normal city street.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 22, 2019, 08:41:15 am

DJ105:
DJ104J doesn't exist, DJ105A intersects here though


DJ104J exists, links DJ105 with DJ105A. DJ105A has another route, it intersects DJ105 in Cincu. Corrected now.

Corrected all the other issues.


Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 22, 2019, 10:10:12 am
DJ104J doesn't exist
DJ104J exists

I mean, it doesn't exist in HB ;)

And it won't... you've added a wpt file (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3448/files#diff-6c5e72aafad2391d0251e4a39bbe81e5) but didn't add it to the csv files.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 22, 2019, 12:32:30 pm
DJ106:
DN13 is off


DJ106A:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.765482&lon=24.132494 to match DJ106R wp StrLud
Astra -> Ast


DJ106B:
Move DJ107B_W between the branches
Move DJ107B_E between the branches
DN14 -> DN14B

DJ106C:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.778149&lon=24.148588
DJ106G -> DJ105G


DJ106D:
Cis -> StrPiaGoz


DJ106G:
DN1/7_E is off
Is DJ143B off? Move it to the other "branch" or between them?


DJ106I:
DJ107 is off


DJ106N:
+X1 is off


DJ106P:
DJ106G -> DJ105G


DJ107:
StrHor -> StrHor_W
Move DN14B_W between the two one-way streets


DJ107A:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.064613&lon=23.564483
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.938799&lon=23.292732 - is it a segment of DJ107U?
If not, DJ107U_N -> DJ107U but see DJ107U comment
Ban is off


DJ107B:
Exceeds limits b/n DN1 and DN14B_W
DN14B_W is off (realignmened)


DJ107C:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.032875&lon=23.562788


DJ107D:
DJ107P doesn't intersect


DJ107E:
Replace +X2 by a visible wp ?
DJ107P doesn't intersect


DJ107F:
Exceeds limits b/n DC2 and DC67


DJ107G:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.481553&lon=24.095896


DJ107J:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ107N_S and End


DJ107K:
Exceeds limits b/n +X1 and +X2


DJ107N:
I'd rename DJ107M to DJ107M/DJ107R, let me know what you prefer (a short label name is also nice)


DJ107R:
It extends at north end on OSM
+X3 is off
What does 'Bai' mean?


DJ107T:
DC110C doesn't intersect


DJ107U:
Is there another route south of the river? See DJ107A


9.71% of the routes done :)
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 22, 2019, 04:41:45 pm
DJ108A:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ182B_E and DJ108D
+X1 is off
DJ183 -> DJ193


DJ108C:
DC121 is off
DC140_W is off


DJ108F:
DJ110B_N is off


DJ108G:
Exceeds limits b/n DN1H and DJ191C_W


DJ108H:
DN1H is off


DJ108I:
Exceeds limits b/n DC173 and DC178


DJ108K:
+X1 is off


DJ108L:
DJ194_E is off
+X2 is off


DJ108M:
OSM indicates that it extends at north end to the Hungarian border?
Ber is off
Move DN19G to the center of the roundabout
DC42 is off


DJ108P:
DC154 is off
DJ196A_N is off


DJ109A:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ161_E and RecCri
+X2 is off
DJ109B_W --> DJ108B_W
DJ109B_E --> DJ108B_E


DJ109D:
Exceeds limits b/n Vis and DJ161_S


DJ109E:
DN1H is off
+X1 is off
+X6 is off
+X7 is off


DJ109F:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ109U and +X6
+X6 is off
Move DN18 to the center of the roundabout
DJ171_E is off
DJ184 is off
+X9 is off
DJ186B is off


DJ109G:
DJ110C is off


DJ109I:
DN19 is off


DJ109K:
DJ109L_W -> DJ109L/DJ197, see DJ107N


DJ109L:
DN1C is off


DJ109M:
End is off



DJ109P:
DN1H_E -> DN19B_E
DN1H_W -> DN19B_W


DJ109R:
DJ109A -> DJ108A
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 23, 2019, 03:41:27 am
DJ107N:
I'd rename DJ107M to DJ107M/DJ107R, let me know what you prefer (a short label name is also nice)
Chose DJ107M/107R

Quote
DJ107R:
It extends at north end on OSM
+X3 is off
What does 'Bai' mean?
The roads ends at a mountain resort called Statiunea Baisoara (Baisoara resort). Changed the WP name to StaBai.

Quote
DJ107T:
DC110C doesn't intersect
OSM shows that the 2 roads do intersect...

Quote
DJ107U:
Is there another route south of the river? See DJ107A
Yes, added. csvs will come separate.

Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 23, 2019, 03:53:20 am
DJ107T:DC110C doesn't intersect
OSM shows that the 2 roads do intersect...

Forget it, it's DC, not DJ..... Sorry  :pan:
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 23, 2019, 07:45:51 am
DJ110:
+X1 is off


DJ110A:
DN1F is off


DJ110B:
Exceeds limits b/n DC103 and DN1F_S
DN1F_S is off


DJ110C:
Is there another branch in Ileanda to DN1C? If not, please report it to OSM


DJ110E:
DC162 is off


DJ112A:
Move DN1_E to the center of the roundabout
DN73A is off
Two new wps for Strada Noua in Codlea - one also for DN1 and E route


DJ112B:
Move DN73 between the two one-way streets


DJ112C:
DC44 is indicated being DJ112J on OSM. Please check and if OSM is wrong, please report it.


DJ112G:
DN73A is off
Replace Str13Dec by StrMihEmi wp to match DJ112H's wp StrMihEmi


DJ116B:
DN12B_W -> DN12A_W
DN12B_E -> DN12A_E


DJ118B:
+X2 is off


DJ119B:
DN11_E is off


DJ119C:
Exceeds limits b/n DC26 and DC28


DJ119F:
Are you sure about the End wp position? OSM extends it a little bit.


DJ119G:
There is no junction at the End wp and it is not the end of the route. There is just nothing that a traveler can identify as road end. See what the manual says (http://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/wayptlabels.php#end). OSM extends it a little bit and I think you should do the same


DJ119J:
DN2 -> DN2/11A
DN11A -> DN11A_E


15.79% done
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 23, 2019, 11:13:15 am
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj593a

The file has no ending. Since DJ593 has a DJ593A wp, I guess that it should be renamed and the route should be added to csv files?
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 23, 2019, 03:11:16 pm
DJ121:
+X1 is off


DJ121A:
ValMare is off
DN13E_W is off


DJ121C:
PiaKal needs to be renamed because it doesn't intersect


DJ123:
Check route at DJ123A wp! It's signed here (https://www.google.com/maps/@46.26126,25.8816347,3a,15y,63.93h,87.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sybJY_McrOwuJOXleR3lRHg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.263098&lon=25.891069
+X3 is off, see WorldImagery.


DJ123A:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.261318&lon=25.881627 (is it DJ123? See above)


DJ123B:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.358050&lon=25.812442
DJ123C_N is off


DJ123C:
Extends at south end according to OSM, GM and GSV (https://www.google.com/maps/@46.2916655,25.9057765,3a,15y,98.64h,90t/data=!3m9!1e1!3m7!1sCgqA9xA84t_4bqsBkrSWMg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i36)


DJ125:
Kov -> StrParFie
DN12_N is off
DJ125A is off


DJ126:
DJ138_N is off


DJ127:
DJ127A is off
Hag is off
+X1 is off


DJ127A:
+X4 is off
Hui is off


DJ128:
Ten is off
DC65 is off
DN12 is off


DJ129:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.936833&lon=26.021343 ?
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 24, 2019, 04:09:11 am
DJ131:
DJ132_S is off, should be in the center of the traffic island
DJ131B_S is off
StrPad: Is it a DJ131 branch? GM doesn't have it but OSM and GSV (https://www.google.com/maps/@45.9029414,25.5237892,3a,15y,332.43h,91.14t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1seXCQc0m4eZb_CMF1BQ0K_g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)
Exceeds limits b/n +X3 and Var


DJ131C:
DJ131E is off, see WorldImagery


DJ131D:
+X1 -> Dop


DJ131E:
DC66 should be moved to the next junction to the west


DJ132:
Routing around DC31 wp (which is 30 on GM!?) is not clear. Is it the northern route (as OSM) or southern route (as GM)? If OSM is right, I'd add two wps to make it clear that the substandard street is the right one. If OSM is wrong, please report the error to OSM. btw, what's your main source out of the three indicated (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/hwy_data/ROU/roudj/README.md) if data is ambiguous? It should be added to http://travelmapping.net/credits.php

Move DN13 between the branches, again, check WorldImagery
DJ105A doesn't intersect. Extend DJ105A or rename the wp which should be ToDN13


DJ132A:
DJ131A_N --> DJ132_N
DJ131A_S --> DJ132_S


DJ132C:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.120202&lon=25.023076 heading to DN13


DJ134A:
Split it into two routes. Rule of thumb: The concurrency with DN13C is longer than the length of each remainder


DJ135A:
+X3 is off
DC27 is off


DJ135B:
StrBud -> StrBud_N
StrDez -> StrDez_N
Move DJ152A to the center of the roundabout


DJ136A:
Exceeds limits b/n DN13A and +X4


DJ138:
+X1 is off
DJ126_W is off
DN12 is off


DJ138B:
+X1 is off


DJ139:
I'd replace StrDem by StrNicBal http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.939533&lon=26.027741 because of all these one-way streets
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 24, 2019, 08:29:03 am
DJ140:
DC103 is off
Move DJ156 between the branches
DN72 is off


DJ141:
+X3 is off


DJ141B:
DJ142F is off
Bie -> StrNicBal (or better, replace it by wp for DC24)


DJ142:
DJ151B_S is off
DJ151B_N should be positioned on the traffic island
Move DN14A to the center of the roundabout


DJ142A:
DN14A is off


DJ142F:
+X1 is off


DJ142G:
New +wp +@ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.008848&lon=24.354962


DJ143A:
CopMare is off
DN14 location. You have this unsigned (https://www.google.com/maps/@46.2188187,24.667286,3a,75y,172.45h,86.89t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sb4Xd50pldpMplTnFAWsd8Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) but the signed one looks like a road (https://www.google.com/maps/@46.2179766,24.6628034,3a,75y,229.78h,82.51t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGZOL56HP4I8pGRFxSyDbKg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656). OSM has the latter, GM both.


DJ148:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.790706&lon=26.381296


22.19% done!
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 25, 2019, 04:59:42 am
Note: It is allowed (not mandatory) to keep alt labels in use for preview systems ;)


DJ151:
DJ154D doesn't intersect here. Add or extend route, or rename wp
DN17VO doesn't intersect here. Add route, or rename wp (the direction signs on GSV from August 2018 are quite confusing - DN17/E58 on the bypass or through the town -, and it wasn't changed compared to 2012 GSV)


DJ151B:
+X1 is off


DJ151C:
TriSus -> TriJos


DJ152A:
DN15 location is wrong, it should be at the junction to the east according to OSM, GM and GSV
Exceeds limits b/n +X8 and DN15
+X3 is off
DN13E -> DN15E


DJ152B:
DN13E -> DN15E


DJ153A:
Exceeds limits b/n DN15 and Cal


DJ153F:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ107G and DC93


DJ154:
Move DJ154B to the traffic island


DJ154A:
StrSub -> StrSar


DJ154B:
DN15 location is wrong, it should be at the junction to the south according to OSM, GM and GSV


DJ154C:
DC12A_N is off


DJ154D:
+X2 is off


DJ154J:
DN16 is off


DJ155B:
Exceeds limits b/n DC21 and DN15B_W


DJ155F:
DN15_S is off
+X1 is off
StrPri is off


DJ155I:
DJ158 is off


DJ157E:
Move DN15C between the branches


DJ157G:
StrVet is quite off


DJ159:
DJ159D is off
Bac is off


DJ159Car:
DN2 is off
+X2 is off


DJ159:
Reverse order so that it's a continuation of the other route
+X3 is off


DJ159B:
DC98 is off


DJ159D:
Exceeds limits b/n DC72 and DJ159
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 25, 2019, 06:29:18 am
DJ112B:
Move DN73 between the two one-way streets
DC44 is indicated being DJ112J on OSM. Please check and if OSM is wrong, please report it.

I don't find any DC44 or DJ112J near DJ112B...I implemented the other changes.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 25, 2019, 06:31:36 am
DJ112B:
Move DN73 between the two one-way streets
DC44 is indicated being DJ112J on OSM. Please check and if OSM is wrong, please report it.

I don't find any DC44 or DJ112J near DJ112B...I implemented the other changes.

sorry, it's at DJ112C.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 25, 2019, 08:36:05 am
DJ112B:
Move DN73 between the two one-way streets
DC44 is indicated being DJ112J on OSM. Please check and if OSM is wrong, please report it.

I don't find any DC44 or DJ112J near DJ112B...I implemented the other changes.

sorry, it's at DJ112C.

GSV from July 2018 indicates it as DC44. It also doesn't appear in the official list.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 26, 2019, 03:27:39 am
DJ161B:
DN1/15 -> DN1_W
Add the missing DN1/15 wp


DJ161C:
DN1C_N is off, should be on the main route between the branches


DJ161D:
+X2A is off
DJ161E is off


DJ161G:
Cai is off
DJ161K is off, check Esri WorldImagery


DJ161H:
DN16 is off
DC48 is off


DJ161J:
DN16 is off


DJ162:
Routing through Visuia? If I would travel the route, I would shortcut it and would need two wps east of DC21_W on the "main route".
DC21_E is off


DJ162A:
DC154 is indicated being DC158 on OSM and GM
DC173 is off
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 26, 2019, 09:04:29 am
DJ170A:
DC39A is off
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.295684&lon=24.205719 to make the routing a little bit more clear


DJ171B:
DJ186D -> DJ171D


DJ171E:
DN18B is off


DJ172B:
+X193419 is off


DJ172D:
DJ172J is off


DJ172G:
Move DJ173C_N between the branches
DJ173_S is off


DJ172J:
DN17D_N is off


DJ173:
DN16_E is off
+X1 is off
+X3 is off


DJ173A:
DJ173D is off


DJ173B:
DN17VO, see DJ151
DC32 is off
DC33 is off


DJ174B:
DN15 is off
+X2 is off


DJ176:
+X6 is off


DJ177:
DN17A is off
ManHum -> StrToaBub


DJ177A:
DN17 is off


DJ177D:
Exceeds limits b/n +X3 and +X4
DJ209A doesn't intersect here (in HB) because the wp is missing at DJ209A


DJ178:
Move DN2H to the center of the roundabout
StrBogVoda is off
DJ209K_W is off
Move DJ178D to the center of the roundabout
DJ178E is off
DJ209C is off


DJ178B:
+X1 is off
DN2_N is off
DN2_S is off


DJ178C:
Move DN2H to the center of the roundabout
Exceeds limits b/n DN2E and Bil


DJ178D:
DC43 is off


DJ178E:
DC19 is off


DJ178F:
+X1 is off
DN2H_E is off
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 26, 2019, 04:00:08 pm
btw, what's your main source out of the three indicated (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/hwy_data/ROU/roudj/README.md) if data is ambiguous? It should be added to http://travelmapping.net/credits.php

Which one is it?


I think you agree that when there is a junction with the concurrent routes of DN18B and DN23A, that we call the wp DN18B/23A.
But if the routes are DN18 and DN18B, do we call it DN18/18B or just DN18? I prefer the latter and draft the French routes like this. It's shorter, simpler, better. I think that other hwy data manager do it similar. What do you prefer?
I can look up and report all these wp labels. No problem. Just let me know.


DJ182B:
DN18/18B label, see above
There is a ferry b/n DJ108A_N and DJ108E_S but it seems that a bridge is u/c. Was it demolished and is being rebuild? Or is it a completely new bridge? Do you know when the bridge should be opened? If it's a new bridge the opening will not be in early 2020, the route should be split.
DN1C_N is off
DJ182C is off
Move StrEur to the center of the roundabout


DJ182C:
DC33 is off
DJ184B is off


DJ183:
Exceeds limits b/n +X7 and +X8
CimVes is not a junction. Do we need the wp at all? If so, replace it by StrIoanPat just a few meters to the north.
DN19 is off


DJ183C:
DJ184 is off
DN18 is off


DJ184:
+X4 is off


DJ185:
I think that it exceeds the limits b/n +X5 and +X6
Move DN18_E a little bit to the west between both junctions


DJ186:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ171A and DJ186C


DJ187:
PoiMun is off


DJ187A:
Moc is not at a junction
GM indicates the route north of the river here. There is also no bridge for cars (https://www.google.com/maps/@47.7195667,24.4496724,3a,75y,126.72h,86.55t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s6tPUAvAh7y0v8UwUZBwteQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) on "your" route to change the bank.
StrRau_N -> StrRau_E





Is the pace fine to you or should I try to accelerate and get the review done by January 6? I don't know how much time I'll have from week 2.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 27, 2019, 02:19:14 am
DN17VO doesn't intersect here. Add route, or rename wp (the direction signs on GSV from August 2018 are quite confusing - DN17/E58 on the bypass or through the town -, and it wasn't changed compared to 2012 GSV)

You made the wpt file and updates.csv entry (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3456) but you have not yet edited roudn.csv and roudn_con.csv. The update entry is visible for users but the link doesn't work.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 27, 2019, 05:19:28 am
btw, what's your main source out of the three indicated (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/hwy_data/ROU/roudj/README.md) if data is ambiguous? It should be added to http://travelmapping.net/credits.php

Which one is it?

The main source for micro situation are OSM, GM and GSV. If there is a contradiction, I just use common sense, the problem is that the routes are not always signed so GSV is not always helpful. The list just gives the main points on the road and it's good for the general routing. Geoportal seems to be pretty old and not updated. So nothing else to be added.

Quote
I think you agree that when there is a junction with the concurrent routes of DN18B and DN23A, that we call the wp DN18B/23A.
But if the routes are DN18 and DN18B, do we call it DN18/18B or just DN18? I prefer the latter and draft the French routes like this. It's shorter, simpler, better. I think that other hwy data manager do it similar. What do you prefer?
I can look up and report all these wp labels. No problem. Just let me know.
I also named like DN18/18B. If the routes are of the same category I used both, if a road is of higher category, used just this one.

Quote
Is the pace fine to you or should I try to accelerate and get the review done by January 6? I don't know how much time I'll have from week 2.
The pace is up to you. I am always a few posts behind your review, so if you will increase the pace , the difference will be higher. The only problem is that you will report errors twice (for example if a WP is off, you may see the same error when you come to the second DJ). If you decrease the pace after KW2, it's no problem, as my time will be also more limited afterwards.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 27, 2019, 07:43:20 am
Geoportal seems to be pretty old and not updated. So nothing else to be added.

But please remove useless links from readme.md.

Quote
I think you agree that when there is a junction with the concurrent routes of DN18B and DN23A, that we call the wp DN18B/23A.
But if the routes are DN18 and DN18B, do we call it DN18/18B or just DN18? I prefer the latter and draft the French routes like this. It's shorter, simpler, better. I think that other hwy data manager do it similar. What do you prefer?
I can look up and report all these wp labels. No problem. Just let me know.
I also named like DN18/18B. If the routes are of the same category I used both, if a road is of higher category, used just this one.

I think you didn't get me :)
It's not about category - I agree, only highest one is mentioned in wp name - but same category and same "root route". DN18 and DN18B. I don't mention both in France, example:

D122 and DJ123A intersect with D123
D123A wp is called D122/D123
D123 wp is called D122/D123A
But: D122 wp is called D123 only, not D123/D123A

But it's up to you.

The only problem is that you will report errors twice (for example if a WP is off, you may see the same error when you come to the second DJ).

I generally don't report issues twice! You always need to update all relevant routes!

Let's say, I had reported an issue for DJ181's wp DJ197, I would not report it for DJ197 again.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 27, 2019, 07:43:31 am
Please check routings through Tasnad (DN1F, DJ191, DJ109P, DJ108L). OSM, GM and GSV show different routings.


DJ191:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.477875&lon=22.573246 independent of DJ191 routing to the north or to the east
DC38 is off


DJ191A:
Move DN19E between the branches
DJ191D is off

How are DN1F and E81 routed through Zalau? 2018 GSV (https://www.google.com/maps/@47.1929959,23.0606947,3a,15y,176.55h,92.62t/data=!3m9!1e1!3m7!1susteXL22yCnEMeNGZmcmaQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i36) indicates E81 routed like it's on OSM and in HB. The sign didn't exist in 2012 (https://www.google.com/maps/@47.1928374,23.0607632,3a,75y,189.31h,66.92t/data=!3m9!1e1!3m7!1sKnF7BYJrdlDZT6BAfxEEeQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i36). E81 is also signed on the eastern route as you can see on a sign in the south (https://www.google.com/maps/@47.1674882,23.0736449,3a,15y,346h,101.02t/data=!3m9!1e1!3m7!1stm2DpSIw0iWmFhpv5tjs7A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i36) (was already there in 2012). Thus I'd suggest:
- DN1F -> DN1F_N
- DN1F, E60 and DJ191A need a new wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.186457&lon=23.058921

But the signs do only indicate E81, not DN1F. I assume that E routes are always concurrent to DN routes but I don't know for sure. Maybe DN1F is on the western route through Zalau as it's indicated on OSM? What do official sources say?


DJ191D:
DN1H/19B is off


DJ191F:
+X2 is off


DJ193:
DN1C is off


DJ193A:
DJ195 is off


DJ193F:
I'd move Soc wp to the next junction within the village - as it's also indicated on OSM


DJ194:
BulICBra -> BlvdICB or BlvdIonBra or BlvdConBra, also for concurrent DN19A
See question in a previous post about both names in label. If you prefer both:
- DN19_S -> DN19/19A_S
- DN19_N -> DN19/19A_N


DJ194B:
New wp for DC64 in Pelisor
+X1 is off


DJ194D:
BabNov -> BabaNov


DJ195Ard:
Rename file and route short name to DJ195 (keep Ardud in city field though), ask if procedure is not clear


DJ195B:
DC141 is off
+X1 is off


DJ195C:
Exceeds limits b/n Dom and DN19_N, please add wp(s) so that it's clear whether it's the western or the eastern route (GM indicates east, OSM both). If both, make a circle.
DC51 is off
DN1F_S is off
DN1F_N is off


DJ195Pot:
DN1C is off


DJ196:
DJ196A is off
DC9A is off


DJ196B:
DJ196C location looks odd. OSM and GM have a different route to the south
DN19_S is off
DN19_N is off


DJ197:
D19_W is off




36.62% of the routes done!
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 27, 2019, 07:47:04 am

DJ182B:
DN18/18B label, see above
There is a ferry b/n DJ108A_N and DJ108E_S but it seems that a bridge is u/c. Was it demolished and is being rebuild? Or is it a completely new bridge? Do you know when the bridge should be opened? If it's a new bridge the opening will not be in early 2020, the route should be split.

The bridge should have been finished in october 2019. Due to a construction error, it will be opened most probably in april-may 2020. It's a totally new bridge.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 27, 2019, 08:24:51 am
Is the pace fine to you or should I try to accelerate and get the review done by January 6? I don't know how much time I'll have from week 2.
The pace is up to you. I am always a few posts behind your review, so if you will increase the pace , the difference will be higher.
If you decrease the pace after KW2, it's no problem, as my time will be also more limited afterwards.

I think it's better to keep the difference small.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 27, 2019, 09:47:11 am
Is the pace fine to you or should I try to accelerate and get the review done by January 6? I don't know how much time I'll have from week 2.
The pace is up to you. I am always a few posts behind your review, so if you will increase the pace , the difference will be higher.
If you decrease the pace after KW2, it's no problem, as my time will be also more limited afterwards.

I think it's better to keep the difference small.

After the next site update, I am 1 post behind. Just corrections from post 42 have to be implemented.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 27, 2019, 10:38:24 am
I think it's better to keep the difference small.

After the next site update, I am 1 post behind. Just corrections from post 42 have to be implemented.

It's fine. And do the Oradea stuff. I just think that it's better for me not be too much ahead in case you have a question. That's why I review some gbnb routes collateral.
If I'm too slow and you have time, you can also start with SCT, WLS or DEU-HE.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 27, 2019, 03:31:38 pm
DJ200:
DNCB must be positioned here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.515292&lon=26.190387


DJ200A:
DNCB must be positioned here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.539369&lon=26.142322


DJ201:
DJ306 is off


DJ201B:
StrIng -> StrEng, energy, not engineer ;)
DJ403 doesn't intersect in HB because the wp is missing on DJ403 route


DJ202:
DN23A/23B is off


DJ202A:
DN23 is off
Rac is off


DJ202B:
DN23 is off


DJ202E:
Exceeds limits b/n DC186 and DN2
DN2N is off


DJ202F:
I cannot see any route on WorldImagery between +X2 and +X3. Show me or split the route.


DJ203D:
DC34 -> DC24


DJ203G:
DN10 is off
Are you sure about the route at +X03? OSM and GM do both indicate the eastern road being DJ203G.
Merge DN1B_E and DN1B_W into one wp


DJ203J:
DJ203K should be moved to the next junction just a few meters to the west


DJ203K:
Move DJ204C to the traffic island
DN2_S is off, move it to the underpass of the GSJ
+X3 is off


DJ203R:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ203P and +X1
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 28, 2019, 12:59:57 am

DJ195Ard:
Rename file and route short name to DJ195 (keep Ardud in city field though), ask if procedure is not clear

I confess I don't understand what you mean. There is no DJ195Ard, just DJ195 and DJ195Pot. DJ195 has Ardud in the city field and it's the longest of the 2 roads. Should I rename the file rou.dj195.wpt to rou.dj195ard.wpt?

Quote
DJ196B:
DJ196C location looks odd. OSM and GM have a different route to the south
DN19_S is off
DN19_N is off
There is just one DN19 on DJ196B. Position was slightly off, corrected.

Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 28, 2019, 03:13:49 am
DJ195Ard:
Rename file and route short name to DJ195 (keep Ardud in city field though), ask if procedure is not clear

I confess I don't understand what you mean. There is no DJ195Ard, just DJ195 and DJ195Pot. DJ195 has Ardud in the city field and it's the longest of the 2 roads. Should I rename the file rou.dj195.wpt to rou.dj195ard.wpt?

Sorry, I assumed that the wpt name is wrong but I only checked the list name in HB:

Code: [Select]
.list name: ROU DJ195Ard
The error is in the roudj.csv file (_csv is fine):

Code: [Select]
roudj;ROU;DJ195;;Ard;Ardud;rou.dj195;
roudj;ROU;DJ195;;Pot;Potău;rou.dj195pot;

Ard is entered in the abbrev field which is not required / wrong. The longest route does not get an abbreviation.
I thought that the wpt file name contains ard too but it doesn't.

The manual (http://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/hwydata.php) doesn't mention it but there is an example (grc.a005):

Code: [Select]
The route is a concatenation of 3-digit zero-padded number designation (e.g., a005, us042, pa343, la3132), the banner if applicable (bus, trk), and the 3-letter Abbrev. if applicable (e.g., cat, pit).
Examples:

    fra.a021.wpt = France A21.
    pa.pa042trkeag.wpt = Pennsylvania PA 42 Truck (Eagles Mere).
    grc.a005.wpt = Greece A5 (main piece).
    grc.a005art.wpt = Greece A5 Arta section.


Please fix it for other routes too. Always check in wpt editor or HB which route is the longest:
Code: [Select]
DJ105D
DJ159
DJ194B (3 routes)
DJ195
DJ208G
DJ222D (4 routes)
DJ255A
DJ562
DJ682E
DJ707L
DJ709A

Quote
DJ196B:
DJ196C location looks odd. OSM and GM have a different route to the south
DN19_S is off
DN19_N is off
There is just one DN19 on DJ196B. Position was slightly off, corrected.

DJ106C.

Sorry, I have a text file offline. I always add the issues at the end. Sometimes I forget to enter the line with the next route name and add the issue to the last route of the list by accident. That means, if you don't find it, it's often just the next route, or one of the next routes... ;)
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 28, 2019, 03:17:50 am
Please check routings through Tasnad (DN1F, DJ191, DJ109P, DJ108L). OSM, GM and GSV show different routings.

Was it correct?


Maybe I missed it but I don't see changes in Zalau in this pull requested: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3463
Are the "post 42" issues not yet completely revised?

Please check routings through Tasnad (DN1F, DJ191, DJ109P, DJ108L). OSM, GM and GSV show different routings.


DJ191A:
How are DN1F and E81 routed through Zalau? 2018 GSV (https://www.google.com/maps/@47.1929959,23.0606947,3a,15y,176.55h,92.62t/data=!3m9!1e1!3m7!1susteXL22yCnEMeNGZmcmaQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i36) indicates E81 routed like it's on OSM and in HB. The sign didn't exist in 2012 (https://www.google.com/maps/@47.1928374,23.0607632,3a,75y,189.31h,66.92t/data=!3m9!1e1!3m7!1sKnF7BYJrdlDZT6BAfxEEeQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i36). E81 is also signed on the eastern route as you can see on a sign in the south (https://www.google.com/maps/@47.1674882,23.0736449,3a,15y,346h,101.02t/data=!3m9!1e1!3m7!1stm2DpSIw0iWmFhpv5tjs7A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i36) (was already there in 2012). Thus I'd suggest:
- DN1F -> DN1F_N
- DN1F, E60 and DJ191A need a new wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.186457&lon=23.058921

But the signs do only indicate E81, not DN1F. I assume that E routes are always concurrent to DN routes but I don't know for sure. Maybe DN1F is on the western route through Zalau as it's indicated on OSM? What do official sources say?
Title: Re: wp is off
Post by: michih on December 28, 2019, 05:21:45 am
Just a general note:

When I mention a wp being "off", I don't go with OSM only (like I did in pre-canmb-times) but always check the location on Esri WorldImagery too.
That means: I zoom-in to max with OSM Default layer, zoom-out twice. I click through the table and check the wp location and all non-TM-route label names (here, DC route names, street names, village names). When the wp looks off on OSM, I change to Esri WorldImagery layer. If it's also off here, I report the wp as being "off".

Note: Sometimes OSM is off compared to WorldImagery. Sometimes the junction is larger than it looks like on OSM. Sometimes the real situation and the best wp position is only clear - traffic island, road markings, slip roads,... - when checking on WorldImagery. I think that I don't report about 30...50% of the wps which look "off" on OSM. OTOH, I don't check wps on WorldImagery at all which look fine on OSM.

This should be considered when updating the location.

I recommend peer-reviewing other systems similarily.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 28, 2019, 06:27:12 am
Was it correct?

Maybe I missed it but I don't see changes in Zalau in this pull requested: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3463
Are the "post 42" issues not yet completely revised?

Tasnad was correct (I remember I spend some time there also while drafting), have to also check Zalau. That's the only missing point from Post 42.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 28, 2019, 07:13:56 am
DJ202F:
I cannot see any route on WorldImagery between +X2 and +X3. Show me or split the route.

There is one, but different from initial draft. Modified.

Quote
DJ203J:
DJ203K should be moved to the next junction just a few meters to the west

No, as DJ203J becomes DJ203K at the border between Buzau and Braila counties.


Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 28, 2019, 02:38:04 pm
DJ204B:
DN23A is off


DJ204D:
Merge DJ205P_S and DJ205P_N into one wp


DJ204E:
DJ205I doesn't intersect in HB, there is no DJ205I in HB but on OSM and GM


DJ205B:
Move DN2M_E to the center of the roundabout
DJ205E is off


DJ205E:
DN2L is off
DN2D_E is off


DJ205H:
DN2L is off


DJ205J:
DioRed is off
DC41 is off


DJ205M:
PoduNAr -> PoduNar


DJ205N:
Exceeds limits b/n DC126 and +X1


DJ205P:
Exceeds limits b/n DC143 and DJ204D_E
StrIzv -> StrIzv_S


DJ205S:
DN2D/2M -> split off / new wp ?
DC142 -> DC142_N
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 30, 2019, 07:19:17 am

DJ205S:
DN2D/2M -> split off / new wp ?

See your comment in Post 9. It was originally separated, but you suggested to make one WP out of the 2.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 30, 2019, 12:24:11 pm
See your comment in Post 9. It was originally separated, but you suggested to make one WP out of the 2.

I guess that's why I had the "?" at the end :P

have to also check Zalau. That's the only missing point from Post 42.

Ok, I'll hold off.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on December 31, 2019, 08:40:57 am

have to also check Zalau. That's the only missing point from Post 42.

Ok, I'll hold off.

Zalau is done.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on December 31, 2019, 02:15:06 pm
DJ207A:
StrCuc is off
DJ282E doesn't intersect here
DJ282D -> DJ282E

DJ207C:
DJ207D_N is off


DJ207E:
+X2 is off
Routing at south end: OSM indicates it being DN27, GM doesn't route DJ207E to the south but to the east, 2018 GSV indicates DJ207E, DN15D (must be a "To") and DN24 (https://www.google.com/maps/@46.6238806,27.6971131,3a,15y,305.78h,93.24t/data=!3m10!1e1!3m8!1sYh-KF9vmVR1IYhsP40DDVQ!2e0!5s20180801T000000!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i36). Funny. No action required :)


DJ207F:
DN2_S is off
DC6_N is off


DJ207G:
Move DN2_N to http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.574951&lon=26.930993 ?


DJ208:
DJ208G_W is off
DN28A_W is off
DJ281 is off
DJ208I is off
DJ208A is off
DJ208A -> DJ208A/208S
DJ208E is off
DC6 is off
DJ208C is off


DJ208A:
DJ208 -> DJ208/208S


DJ208B:
DN29A is off
DJ208D_W is off


DJ208C:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ207N and +X2


DJ208D:
DJ208U is off
DC57C is off
DN29A is off


DJ208E:
+X1 is off
DJ208F is off
DN2 is off


DJ208F:
Mov is off
DC134 is off


DJ208H:
DN28B_S is off


DJ208I:
+X2 is off


DJ208N:
East end: GM and both route it to Todiresti. Since both show the same, are you sure how you've drafted it?


DJ208S:
Move DC134 to the traffic island


DJ208T:
DC63 is off
DN29C is off


DJ209A:
DN2E is off
Hor is off


DJ209B:
Sab is off


DJ200C:
DN2E is off


DJ209D:
DC35 is off
DN17... off


DJ209J:
DN2E is off


DJ209K:
DN2H is off
DN2E/17A is off


DJ209M:
DC15 is off
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 01, 2020, 10:42:34 am
DJ211 + DJ211B:
Have a different routing through Tataru according to OSM and GM


DJ211:
DN2B is off


DJ211A:
DN21_S is off


DJ211D:
The route in HB (Calarasi) is confirmed by OSM but not GM nor GSV. There is another route in Braila b/n DJ211 (Rosiori) and DJ211C (Florica) according to OSM, GM and 2012 GSV (https://www.google.com/maps/@44.8061322,27.3821104,3a,15y,341.1h,85.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sRhdvJNBRimKbktmUmfEpsA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
The 2015 route list from the Ministry of Transport has only the one we have in HB. Fine.
DJ310 doesn't intersect in HB because the wp is missing on DJ310


DJ218:
OSM has the end more to the north. The HB route is 1.8km shorter than the 17.0km indicated on the official list and the route is not that winding as other routes


DJ219:
StrBer -> StrBer_W
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 01, 2020, 04:52:26 pm
DJ220:
DC158 is off
DN22 is off


DJ221:
DN22_S is off


DJ221B: Braila :)
StrBac -> StrTudVla as indicated on GM? Or have you field-checked it?


DJ222:
Exceeds limits b/n DN2A_W and +X1
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.244248&lon=28.260030
DJ229P doesn't intersect in HB here


DJ222A:
+X4 is off
DJ229C doesn't intersect in HB here


DJ222B:
DC39 is off
+X6 is off
+X5 is off


DJ222C:
StrPac -> StrPac_S
DJ222_N -> DN22
DJ222 -> DJ222_N


DJ22D:
Exceeds limits b/n +X3 and +X4


DJ222F:
Pec is off
DN22A is off


DJ222K:
DN22D is off


DJ223:
A2 is off


DJ223A:
+X162531 is off
SlaCer is off
+X3 is off
+X2 is (far) off, different routing according to OSM and GM!
DJ222E_W doesn't intersect in HB here
DJ225 doesn't intersect in HB here


DJ223B:
End -> IvrMic


DJ225:
+X6 is off
+X80 is off


DJ226:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.317373&lon=28.617073


DJ226B:
DN2A is off


DJ229:
DJ229C is not in HB
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 02, 2020, 10:05:52 am
DJ238:
DC69 is off
+X2 is off
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 03, 2020, 05:40:14 am
DJ241A:
Exceeds limits b/n DN2F_W and +X5
DJ241E is off
+X4 is off
DJ241B_N is off
+X3 is off


DJ241B:
+X4 is off
DJ241D might be positioned better


DJ241F:
DN24 is off
DC91 -> DC94 as indicated on OSM and GM


DJ242:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.898558&lon=27.848633
DN24D is off


DJ243A:
DN11A is off
DN24_N is off
DJ243 doesn't intersect in HB because wp is missing on DJ243 route


DJ243B:
Exceeds limits b/n +X8 and DC81


DJ243E:
Cio -> Cor


DJ244:
DN24A is off


DJ244D:
DN24 is off


DJ244F:
Exceeds limits b/n DC67 and DN28_S
DJ249 is off


DJ244G:
PoduHAg is off
PoduHAg -> PoduHag
DN28 is off


DJ244K:
+X2 is off


DJ246:
+X11 is off
D +128 -> DC128
Suh is off
+X8 is off
DJ248F is off
+X2 is off
Move DN24 between the branches


DJ247:
DN15D is off


DJ247A:
End if off


DJ248:
DC88B -> DC28B according to OSM and GM


DJ248A:
DN15D is off
DJ248B_S is off
DC28_W is DC27 according to OSM


DJ248B:
+X3 is off


DJ248D:
DN28_S is off
DJ248C is off


DJ249:
DC34 is off


DJ249A:
DC16 is off
StrSfIoan -> StrSfaIoan

DJ249C:
Is indicated on the list but missing on HB



54.69% of the routes done!
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 03, 2020, 01:51:29 pm
DJ251:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ255A and DJ255C
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.445496&lon=28.010277
E584_N is off. I'd move the wp for E584 route to the center of the roundabout (BlvdMil) and move the DJ251 wp to Soseaus Smardan. That's exactly as OSM and GM have it.
DN26 -> DN2B/26


DJ251G:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.866420&lon=27.788959


DJ252:
+X4 is off


DJ252B:
DC88 is off
+X3 is off


DJ252C:
DC98 is off
+X1 is off


DJ253:
DN24_S is off


DJ254A:
All wps are off!


DJ255:
DN26 is off
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.734587&lon=27.891291


DJ255:
Exceeds limits b/n DN2B_E and +X3


DJ255ACis:
DC34A -> DC3A
DJ255C is off, check satellite view
DN25_W is off


DJ255B:
Is 2.27km long but the document indicates a length of 6.592km. I drafted a full circle back to DJ255A via the eastern route (which is indicated being DJ255B on OSM) and that's about 5.7km. Still too short. GM also uses the eastern route and ends more to the north which is also just 4.2km (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/45.5878841,27.9925186/45.5642635,28.0112921/@45.5765491,28.0034209,15z). GM plus western route (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/45.5836289,28.0067609/45.5642635,28.0112921/@45.5765491,28.0034209,15z/data=!4m9!4m8!1m5!3m4!1m2!1d28.0075387!2d45.5713344!3s0x40b6e5ff056f84dd:0x643209ddd5d2bea4!1m0!3e0) is 7.0km in total. GSV is not available.
What do you think?

Code: [Select]
41 DJ 255B Lungime: 6,592 Km Reclasat din: DC 33 (DJ 255A - Vila Gârboavele :L=2,100km) + DE (L=4,492km)
Origine: Km 0+000 DJ 255A
Destinaţie: Km 6+592 Pădurea Gâboavele

DJ260s are fine.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 04, 2020, 03:14:33 am
http://travelmapping.net/devel/datacheck.php?rg=ROU&hide=SHARP_ANGLE,VISIBLE_DISTANCE
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on January 04, 2020, 05:21:18 am


DJ255B:
Is 2.27km long but the document indicates a length of 6.592km. I drafted a full circle back to DJ255A via the eastern route (which is indicated being DJ255B on OSM) and that's about 5.7km. Still too short. GM also uses the eastern route and ends more to the north which is also just 4.2km (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/45.5878841,27.9925186/45.5642635,28.0112921/@45.5765491,28.0034209,15z). GM plus western route (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/45.5836289,28.0067609/45.5642635,28.0112921/@45.5765491,28.0034209,15z/data=!4m9!4m8!1m5!3m4!1m2!1d28.0075387!2d45.5713344!3s0x40b6e5ff056f84dd:0x643209ddd5d2bea4!1m0!3e0) is 7.0km in total. GSV is not available.
What do you think?

Code: [Select]
41 DJ 255B Lungime: 6,592 Km Reclasat din: DC 33 (DJ 255A - Vila Gârboavele :L=2,100km) + DE (L=4,492km)
Origine: Km 0+000 DJ 255A
Destinaţie: Km 6+592 Pădurea Gâboavele

Very difficult one, could not find another source. Drafted now according to OSM and GM.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 04, 2020, 08:08:52 am
DJ281:
DJ281D_W is off
DJ282D doesn't intersect in HB, file missing in csv file
DJ282D -> DJ282D_N

DJ281A:
End -> DC46


DJ281C:
StrAvrIan_E -> StrAvrIan_W


DJ282:
DC41 -> DC141
Merge DJ292 into DN29_W wp, see satellite view


DJ282A:
DN29D is off
+X1 is off
Exceeds limits b/n DJ282 and DC32


DJ282D:
Route is missing in HB
DJ281 -> DJ281_W


DJ282H:
DN24C is off


DJ284:
DC21 is off
+X1 is off


DJ284A:
End -> ManBuj ?


DJ291:
DN29B is off
DC66 is off
DN29C_N is off
DN29C_S is off


DJ291A:
DC36 is off
DN29 is off


DJ291C:
+X1 is off
DJ291E does not intersect in HB, rename wp since it's not on the list


DJ291D:
DC83A is off
+X5 is off
+X1 is off


DJ292:
Exceeds limits b/n DC88 and +X2


DJ293:
DN24C is off
DJ298_S is off


DJ294:
DN24C is off


DJ294B:
+X1 is off
+X2 is off


DJ296A:
DN29D is off


DJ297:
+X2 is off



http://travelmapping.net/logs/unprocessedwpts.log

Code: [Select]
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj101u.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj104j.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj107usib.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj131mai.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj205i.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj229c.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj229g.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj229p.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj282d.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj593a.wpt
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 04, 2020, 12:42:16 pm
DJ301:
DJ412_E doesn't intersect here in HB (just at _W wp)
There should be a second route south of the river up to DJ411 according to the list, OSM and GM


DJ304:
DN3A_W is off


DJ306:
DN3A_W is off


DJ307A:
Check route in Vâlcele (or Vâlcelele ?). It might exceed the limits if it's the western route. If it's the eastern route, you might add a wp south of the village where the western route intersects.
DN3_S is off
+X2 is off
+X1 is off


DJ381:
A2 is off


DJ391:
DJ391_N -> DJ391_E
DJ391 -> DJ391_N
DJ391B doesn't intersect in HB and doesn't exist according to the list from the Ministry of Transport


DJ392:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.947854&lon=28.255117


DJ401:
DJ401A is off
DNCB is off
DN4 is off, I'd move it to the roundabout to the west
btw, I'd add wps to the secondary highways (yellow on OSM) for the DN routes in Bucharest


DJ401A:
DJ602_W is off


DJ401C:
DJ412 is off


DJ402:
Exceeds limits b/n Nana and +X6
Exceeds limits b/n DJ403 and StrCarI_S
OSM and GM indicate the route via Tarnadau Mare
+X23 is off


DJ411:
Add wp for missing DJ301
DJ412_S is off


DJ411A:
Split route at DN5A into 2 routes, the (unsigned) concurrency is too long compared to the short eastern segment.
Exceeds limits b/n StrCon and DN6_N


DJ412:
DJ301_N doesn't intersect in HB here


DJ412C:
DJ601 is off, I guess that only the northern branch is DJ412C as indicated on OSM and GM
DN61_S is off



63.86% of the routes done!
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 05, 2020, 01:18:35 pm
DJ503A:
Exceeds limits b/n DC24 and +X1


DJ504B:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ703 and DJ612_N


DJ505:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ504A_W and DN5C, see GM


DJ506:
Exceeds limits b/n Mag and DN6
DC2 doesn't intersect here but to the west according to OSM and GM
DC131 is off


DJ543:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ642_S and DJ546
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.779894&lon=24.525446


DJ546:
Sae should be replaced by the name of any street around
DX12 is likely off and there is no junction right now. Remove it by a shaping wp or just rename it to +DX12
BlvdAleIoanCuza_E -> BlvdAEC_E or BlvdAleCuza_E or BlvdIoanCuza_E
Move DJ703D to the traffic island or west of it on the DJ546 main route


DJ546A:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ653_N and DJ546B
Exceeds limits b/n DJ653_W and DJ546_S


DJ552:
DJ561A doesn't intersect in HB here (NMP)


DJ553:
DN56_N is off
DN55A_W is off
DN55A_E is off


DJ561A:
DJ606A_W is off


DJ561C:
DJ542 -> DJ542/604


DJ561D:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ561A_N and DC61
DN55A_E is off
DN55A_W is off
DJ561G doesn't intersect in HB here, no wpt file, not on list -> rename wp!


DJ562A:
DJ606 is off


DJ563:
Pun is off


DJ563A:
DJ606B is off


DJ565:
DN56C is off
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 05, 2020, 03:14:49 pm
DJ571:
DN57_N is off
DJ571C is off
+X4 is off


DJ571B:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.828566&lon=21.805300
DJ571G_E is off
DJ571G_W is off
DC135 is off
+X1 is off


DJ571C:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.902050&lon=21.566216 and new route for branch to DN57/57C
Move DN57_N between the branches
StrRac -> StrRac_E
Soc is off
DJ571K is off
Nai is off


DJ571E:
DN57B is off


DJ571F:
DN57B is off


DJ572:
Check DJ682 routing in Lipova. OSM + GM indicate a different route. Minimum at wp for Strada Mihai Viteazul
DJ592D is off


DJ572B:
DN57B is off


DJ573C:
DN57B_W is off


DJ581A:
+X1 is off


DJ582:
Move DN6 between the branches
DJ582C is off


DJ582C:
+X7 is off
+X6 is off


DJ583:
DN58B is off


DJ583:
+X1 is off
DJ608B is off


DJ585:
DN58B_W is off


DJ586:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ586A and +X3


DJ587:
Exceeds limits b/n Rugi and DN58_N
Apa is off
DN58_E is off


DJ588:
DN57 is off


DJ588A:
DJ173 is off


DJ592:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.755620&lon=21.254304
StrSteMare -> StrSteMare_N


DJ592D:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.687322&lon=21.897506


DJ593:
DJ593A is off
DJ593A doesn't intersect in HB here (unprocessed wpt file)


DJ594B:
DN6 is off


DJ595:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.741334&lon=21.238654


DJ595D:
Does not exist according to the list from the Ministry of Transport
If it exists, it should extend to DJ595 as indicated on OSM and GM


What's about the unprocessed wpt files I reported earlier? Should all be added to csv files or are some wrong and should be deleted? You can add them at the end of the first round of my review (2nd round will be quick) but it would be nice to know. Thanks.



71.18% of the routes checked!
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 05, 2020, 04:05:26 pm
DJ561D:
DJ561G doesn't intersect in HB here, no wpt file, not on list -> rename wp!

Why have you added DJ561G (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3514/files#diff-902bc6dd270d8ad0f14ce744283c99ba)?
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 06, 2020, 05:44:43 am
DNCB:
It has totally wrong coordinates for DJ401 wp!


DN7:
DJ100A does not exist in HB. I guess it's DNCB now? However, it's indicated on OSM where our wp is. I'd rename the wp which is not a point in use, and add the corresponding wp to DN1A route.


DN6 / DN58 / E70:
Check routing at Caransebes but according to OSM and GSV from 2012 and 2018:
- DN6 and E70 are signed via the bypass
- DN58 extends to the rounabout north of the town.
I'm not sure about the official dedication of the DN routes but E70 must definitely be changed in HB as there is no dedication but just raw description of city names!
GM still indicates all routes through the town which is obviously not 100% correct (minimum for E70).


DJ601:
The list only indicates Bucharest as end point. The TM route does currently end where OSM has the end. We might extend it to the south to E81's SosVit wp. The gap is very small, just 200m. This and DJ602 are the only routes which end without intersecting with another TM route in Bucharest.


DJ601D:
StrFlo -> StrFlo_E


DJ601D:
DJ601 -> DJ503


DJ601E:
DJ601 -> DJ401A/DJ601
Ends in Ulmi according to the list and GM.
The segment from DC54 to DJ601A is DJ151E according to the list, GM and OSM. There is currently no DJ151E in HB.


DJ602:
Why does it end at Drumul Saril (length 40.6km according to GM), not at Strada Brasov (38.6km) as indicated on OSM? The list indicates the route from km 0+000 to 40+090 ending in "Bucharest", not more specific.
OSM indicates DJ602 again south of the Dambovita River at E81 wp DJ602 up to the parliament palace :) Either extend DJ602 to E81 or rename E81's wp which is not a point in use.


DJ604:
Extends limits b/n DJ604A and DJ542_N


DJ605A:
DN6B_N is off
DN6B_S is off
Rad is off
DJ676F is off


DJ606:
Add wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.323061&lon=23.777059
Move DN6 to the center of the roundabout


DJ606A:
DC22 is off


DJ606C:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ606B_E and +X2


DJ606D:
DJ606A -> DJ606A/561A


DJ606F:
DC115 is off


DJ607A:
+X3 is off


DJ607C:
DN6 is off


DJ608:
Cru -> DC33 ?


DJ608A:
MunMic is off


DJ607A:
DNVCS must be changed, see DN6 / DN58 / E70


DJ609:
DJ609C doesn't intersect in HB here; DJ609C end is correct when I look at its section length. Rename wp!


DJ609A:
DN6 is off


DJ609B:
DN6 wp must be at the next junction to the east according to OSM, GM and 2018 GSV
A6 -> ToA6 since it's possible to turn at the roundabout


DJ609D:
Are you sure about the routing through Timisoara? Maybe it's concurrent to DN6 instead?
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on January 06, 2020, 11:28:43 am
DJ561D:
DJ561G doesn't intersect in HB here, no wpt file, not on list -> rename wp!

Why have you added DJ561G (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3514/files#diff-902bc6dd270d8ad0f14ce744283c99ba)?

The route is definetely a DJ, the km posts are blue (looks like they were newly painted, so I can't see the road number), and it's confirmed from OSM and GM. The MT list is quite old, 2014, so some into DJ redesignated DC are not in the list.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on January 06, 2020, 11:34:58 am

What's about the unprocessed wpt files I reported earlier? Should all be added to csv files or are some wrong and should be deleted? You can add them at the end of the first round of my review (2nd round will be quick) but it would be nice to know. Thanks.

71.18% of the routes checked!

Sorry for forgetting to say, I plan on adding them at the end, as I would gladly ask you to perform the datacheck on it. Maybe there are some others files that have to be added, so I thought it's better to do it just once. The percentage looks good, almost 3/4 done :)
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 06, 2020, 01:24:54 pm

What's about the unprocessed wpt files I reported earlier? Should all be added to csv files or are some wrong and should be deleted? You can add them at the end of the first round of my review (2nd round will be quick) but it would be nice to know. Thanks.

71.18% of the routes checked!

Sorry for forgetting to say, I plan on adding them at the end, as I would gladly ask you to perform the datacheck on it. Maybe there are some others files that have to be added, so I thought it's better to do it just once. The percentage looks good, almost 3/4 done :)

I run data check every day after I merged in your pull requests ;) It was just a little bit annoying that I had to look up whether there is a wpt file or not when the wp label started with DJ.... but there was no intersecting route link in HB.
Tuesday is my first day back at work. I don't know how much time I can spend on TM from tomorrow. Maybe more than in 2019, maybe less (definitely less than in the last weeks). We will see :)
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on January 08, 2020, 03:06:39 am

DJ609D:
Are you sure about the routing through Timisoara? Maybe it's concurrent to DN6 instead?

Geoportal show it like this. It's difficult to verify the exact route from other sources, as it's not signed and there are no km posts in the city.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 12, 2020, 05:36:00 am
DJ612:
DJ612A is off


DJ612A:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.108176&lon=24.991351
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.109553&lon=25.001146
BlvdCom_S + BlvdCom_N, is it DJ612C as indicated on OSM and GM ?
DN6 -> DN6/65A


DJ641:
DJ643F_N + DJ643F_S: route doesn't intersect in HB


DJ642A:
DN54_N is off


DJ643:
exceeds limits b/n DC154A and DC154B
DN67B is off


DJ643B:
DN67B is off


DJ644:
DX12 -> +DX12


DJ646:
DN64 is off


DJ651B:
Exceeds limits b/n Pre and +X1


DJ653:
DN52 is off


DJ654:
Is missing in HB, indicated on OSM, GM and GSV


DJ655:
Is missing in HB, please check


DJ656:
DN64A_S is off
Tisa -> ToDJ654


DJ657:
DN67B is off


DJ657B:
Exceeds limits b/n DN65_E and Sar


DJ657E:
DJ703 doesn't intersect in HB here because it's missing this wp


DJ659:
Exceeds limits b/n DC118 and DC116
GliSus is off, move it to the next junction to the west which seems to be more important
DJ703B_S is off


DJ659C:
Is indicated being DJ679C on OSM, GM and GSV


DJ661:
DN67B_E is off, add another wp north of it?
DC44 is off


DJ662:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.785271&lon=23.500625
DN6B is off


DJ663:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.966487&lon=23.293304 is it a branch?
+X2 is off


DJ663A:
Move DJ674A to the other junction as indicated on OSM and GM - onto the paved road
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.970557&lon=23.299886 DJ663 branch?


DJ664:
+X3 is off


DJ665:
DN67C_N is off
DN67C_S is off
DJ675C doesn't intersect in HB here

DJ665C:
DN67B is off


DJ667:
+X3 is off


DJ667A:
DN66 is off


DJ668A:
+X3 is off


DJ669:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.162296&lon=24.004666
Extends on OSM and GM from that wp to the north, not to the east
The MT document indicates that the route replaces DC145 but the "eastern" extension is indicated being DC147
In addition, the document indicates a route length of 2.982km. The new wp is at ~2.6km, the current end point at ~3.4km. If we are not sure, we should only indicate the route to the point where we are sure and omit the unknown remainder
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 12, 2020, 03:22:00 pm
DJ670:
DJ671E_S is off
DN67D_E is off


DJ671A:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.870958&lon=22.807443 to match wp DC45


DJ671B:
+X3 is off


DJ671E:
DN67D is off


DJ672:
DJ672A is off
+X3 is off
DN67D_E -> DN67D_W
DN67D_W -> DN67D_E


DJ672C:
ValPes is off


DJ672D:
DN67 -> DN67D


DJ674:
Fac -> Far


DJ674A:
Move DC53 between the branches
Do we really need StrUni_W and StrPet wps? There don't seem to be important and there are no corresponding wps on DN67. They are not necessary as shaping point nor wps in use.


DJ674B:
DC79A is off


DJ674C:
Move DC95 between the branches


DJ675C:
DN67B is off


DJ676:
DN67B is off
DC69 is off


DJ676A:
DN67B is off


DJ677:
DN64_S is off
DJ667 -> DN67B


DJ677A:
DN67B is off


DJ677F:
+X1 is off


DJ678:
DJ678D is off
DN67B is off


DJ678A:
DJ703H -> DN7D but check that HB's DN7D is correct since OSM indicates it being DJ703H


DJ678D:
I'm quite sure that it must be extended to DJ678A as it is indicated on OSM and GM. The MT document indicates that DC34 is replaced.


DJ678H:
Bar is off
Check routing between Bar and DJ648. OSM and GM show it on the other route and the MT document indicates does NOT indicate that DC37 is replaced but DC36A.


DJ679:
Move DJ703_W to the south between the branches
DJ653 -> DJ612A/653


DJ680A:
Tin is off
DN68A -> DN68


DJ680B:
Check routing east of LapSus, I think it might be a "Lapsus" ;) The segment from +X2 to End seems to exceed the limits. If you are not sure about the routing, truncate the route although the route should have a length of 25km instead of 16km.


DJ681:
+X3 is off
+X2 is off


DJ681A:
A1_Dum is off
A1_Dum -> A1 ?


DJ681C:
DN68A_W is off


DJ682:
End is off
End -> TriCon
A1 is off
DJ682A is off
DJ682N doesn't intersect in HB
DJ709E doesn't intersect in HB
DJ682M doesn't intersect in HB
DN59C/59F -> DN59C because DN59F doesn't intersect here (or extends), it's just concurrent.


DJ682A:
DJ693 is off
DJ683 doesn't intersect in HB here because the wp is missing
DJ693 -> DJ693_W


DJ682E:
Igrfry -> IgrFry


DJ683:
Mar -> Maru


DJ684:
DJ687D is off


DJ684B:
DC111 is off


DJ685:
DJ686A -> DJ686C


DJ686:
DJ686A -> DJ686C
DJ686C -> DJ686A


DJ687:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.757636&lon=22.901339 (BlvdDac_S)
BlvdDac -> BlvdDac_N


DJ687F:
+X1 is off


DJ687M:
StrCer -> StrCer_E


DJ687E:
DJ708D doesn't intersect in HB here


DJ691:
Move DNCT to the center of the roundabout
A1 is off
DC62 is off
+X4 is off
+X2 is off
DJ682N_N doesn't intersect in HB
DJ682N_S doesn't intersect in HB
DJ693 -> DJ682A/693


DJ691A:
DC68 is off


DJ692:
DN69 is off


DJ692A:
DC46 is off


DJ693:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ692_S and DN69_S


DJ693B:
DN59_S is off
DC197 is off
Ceb is off



86.73% of the routes checked
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on January 22, 2020, 05:09:43 am
DJ612A:
BlvdCom_S + BlvdCom_N, is it DJ612C as indicated on OSM and GM ?

No sign of DJ612C on the field, and it's not in the list.

Quote
DJ641:
DJ643F_N + DJ643F_S: route doesn't intersect in HB
Route DJ643F is not on the list, and GSV (I know, it's old, from 2012) show the road as DC4. Changed to DC4_N and S.

Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 23, 2020, 03:11:22 pm
DJ700:
DJ700C is off


DJ701:
DJ711 is off


DJ701B:
DN1A is off


DJ701D:
Does it extend at west end? It should be 17km longer than we have right now.


DJ702B:
DN72_N is off
DN72_S is off


DJ702C:
DC58 is off


DJ703:
DJ679F doesn't intersect in HB


DJ703A:
DN65B -> DN67B


DJ703F:
Exceeds limits b/n Url and DJ678A


DJ703I:
Does it extend at north end? It should be 19km longer than we have right now.


DJ703P:
DN7D is off


DJ704:
DN67C is off
+X18 is off
+X8 is off
DN7 is off


DJ704E:
Exceeds limits b/n DC206 and +X3


DJ704G:
Exceeds limits b/n DC252 and Cic


DJ705:
+X3 is off
DJ761 doesn't intersect in HB


DJ705A:
DJ705F is off


DJ705B:
DN7_E is not at the junction, move to the south and move DJ7's DJ705B_E to the east


DJ705C:
End -> Inu


DJ705E:
End -> SalDeal


DJ706:
+X3 is off
+X4 is off


DJ706A:
DC147C is off
DN76_S is off
DC21 is off
DN76_W is off


DJ706B:
DN76 is off


DJ706D:
DJ761 doesn't intersect in HB here


DJ707:
DN76 is off


DJ707A:
DN68A is off


DJ707G:
DC157 is off


DJ707J:
BlvdDec_E -> BlvdDec_S


DJ707L(fol):
PriFolFry -> PriFoltFry
FolPriFry -> FoltPriFry


DJ708:
DN79A_E is off


DJ708B:
DJ708C is off


DJ708D:
Vet_S is not a junction, should be a hidden wp


DJ708E:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.866278&lon=22.907454
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.869750&lon=22.900440


DJ709:
Check location of DN7
Mas -> DJ709A_N
DJ709A -> DJ709A_S


DJ709A:
DJ764F doesn't intersect in HB here
Remove "abbrev" entry in csv file so that the .list name changes from DJ709APet to DJ709


DJ709AMas:
DJ792C -> DJ709
DJ709 -> DJ792C


DJ709B:
DN79A_W is off
DN79A_E is off


DJ709F:
Exceeds limits b/n +X2 and HotRusu
HotRusu -> Rusu


DJ709H:
Extends at north end to DN66 according to OSM, MT list and GSV


DJ709J:
Exceeds limts b/n DJ709B_S and DJ709B_N, and concurrency to DJ709B broken
DJ792C is off
+X4 is off
+X1 is off
DN7 is off
DJ709_W -> DN7B_W
DJ709_E -> DN7B_E


DJ709K:
Exceeds limits b/n +X6 and +X5
Should be truncated at south end, see DJ709H
+X4 is off



93.09% of the routes checked
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 25, 2020, 08:59:51 am
DJ711:
DJ711A is off


DJ712:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.927958&lon=25.465418
Are you sure about DN71_S location? OSM indicates a different routing, GM and GSV doesn't have it. MT list just indicates 'Târgovişte (DN 71)'. But yes, TM indicates 16.877km, TM route is 19.26km - too long and would be longer if we position the DN71_S wp to the other location.


DJ712A:
DC122 is off


DJ714:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.372354&lon=25.433950 to match CabZan wp


DJ716:
Add wp to DN71 to match DJ716's ToDN71 wp


DJ720:
Exceeds limits b/n DC114 and DJ101P


DJ720A:
DN1A is off


DJ732:
DN73 is off
DJ732A is off
DC8 is off


DJ732B:
Should extend at north end, MT list indicates a length of 12.7km but TM route has just 6.8km right now


DJ732C:
DN73C_E is off


DJ734:
Does it extend at north end as indicatd on OSM?


DJ737:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.263898&lon=25.044437


DJ739:
DC53 is off


DJ740:
Pau is off
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on January 25, 2020, 02:57:47 pm
DJ750B:
DN75 is off
+X2 is off


DJ750C:
Split into 2 routes because there is no visible road on OSM nor WorldImagery b/n west of Vale and +X1 wp


DJ750G:
Oco -> DN75


DJ762:
DN75 is off


DJ762A:
Exceeds limits b/n +X2 and MunGai


DJ763A:
DN76 is off


DJ764D:
Exceeds limits b/n DN1 and DJ108I_W


DJ764A:
DJ108J doesn't intersect in HB here


DJ767:
Exceeds limits b/n Til and DJ108I_E


DJ767A:
Exceeds limits b/n +X6 and +X7
DN1 is off


DJ767B:
DN76 is off


DJ767F:
+X1 is off


DJ792:
DN79A is off


DJ792C:
Exceeds limits b/n DN79 and DJ709B_N


DJ792C:
DN79A is off


DJ793:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ709_N and DJ792A_N
DC58/60 -> DC60 ? First, OSM indicates DC59 and DC60 but not DC58 and it's the only wp in roudj system where you indicate both DC route names. DC60 is the one intersecting.
DN79A_W is off


DJ793A:
DJ793_W -> DJ792A/DJ793


DJ793C:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.410362&lon=22.165936


DJ795A:
Ocs -> Osa



Round one finished :)
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on January 27, 2020, 02:33:30 am
DJ708D:
Vet_S is not a junction, should be a hidden wp

I know, but I need the point. Because of an emergency, had to leave once DN7 and head for the first forest...
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: neroute2 on January 27, 2020, 09:10:31 am
DJ708D:
Vet_S is not a junction, should be a hidden wp

I know, but I need the point. Because of an emergency, had to leave once DN7 and head for the first forest...

Not a reason to make it a junction. Hide it and use the +Xwhatever in your list file.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on January 29, 2020, 04:02:55 am

Round one finished :)

Thank you, implemented the changes, will add the missing routes to csvs files and mark as FP the false positive errors in the next days, than you can start the round 2.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on February 03, 2020, 10:50:14 am
Round 2 can be started.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on February 03, 2020, 02:59:08 pm
Please check NMPs first: http://travelmapping.net/logs/nmpbyregion/rou.nmp

For instance, the very first one. I think that it should be one wp only, see satellite view.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on February 07, 2020, 03:49:27 am
I think I have all NMPs corrected, the other ones seem to be FP.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on February 07, 2020, 02:48:52 pm
I think I have all NMPs corrected, the other ones seem to be FP.

DN73A + DJ112E + DJ112G:
There is still one NMP* (and general issue) at DN73A see attachment.


DJ109K + DJ109L + DJ197:
See attachment


E671:
Should E671 extend to D70 in Timisoara? There is just a gap of 0.26mi.


E77:
E577 misses DJ102H wp of concurrent DN1B at Mizil


DJ101B:
DC14 -> DJ101U


DJ131:
DJ131_Mai -> DJ131Mai and update the label selfre FP entry


DJ571C:
DJ571C_Nai -> DJ571CNai and mark the label selfref FP afterwards



*The other NMPs we have right now seem to be FPs.
Do you know how to enter the NMP FPs or should I do it?


NMP copy for comparsion:

Code: [Select]
rou.dj291a@DN2_N 47.951164 26.067553
rou.dj291a@DN2_S 47.950747 26.067378
rou.dj291a@DN2_N 47.951164 26.067553
rou.dn002@DJ291A_W 47.950747 26.067378
rou.dj291a@DN2_N 47.951164 26.067553
rou.e85@DJ291A_W 47.950747 26.067378
rou.dj291a@DN2_S 47.950747 26.067378
rou.dn002@DJ291A_E 47.951164 26.067553
rou.dj291a@DN2_S 47.950747 26.067378
rou.e85@DJ291A_E 47.951164 26.067553
rou.dn002@DJ291A_E 47.951164 26.067553
rou.dn002@DJ291A_W 47.950747 26.067378
rou.dn002@DJ291A_E 47.951164 26.067553
rou.e85@DJ291A_W 47.950747 26.067378
rou.dn002@DJ291A_W 47.950747 26.067378
rou.e85@DJ291A_E 47.951164 26.067553
rou.e85@DJ291A_E 47.951164 26.067553
rou.e85@DJ291A_W 47.950747 26.067378
rou.dj194a@DJ194C_E 47.840449 22.906395
rou.dj194a@DJ194C_W 47.840897 22.906668
rou.dj194a@DJ194C_E 47.840449 22.906395
rou.dj194c@DJ194A_N 47.840897 22.906668
rou.dj194a@DJ194C_W 47.840897 22.906668
rou.dj194c@DJ194A_S 47.840449 22.906395
rou.dj194c@DJ194A_N 47.840897 22.906668
rou.dj194c@DJ194A_S 47.840449 22.906395
rou.dj280a@DN28 47.206488 27.010802
rou.dj280b@DN28 47.206884 27.011272
rou.dj280a@DN28 47.206488 27.010802
rou.dn028@DJ280B 47.206884 27.011272
rou.dj280a@DN28 47.206488 27.010802
rou.e583@DJ280B 47.206884 27.011272
rou.dj280b@DN28 47.206884 27.011272
rou.dn028@DJ280A 47.206488 27.010802
rou.dj280b@DN28 47.206884 27.011272
rou.e583@DJ280A 47.206488 27.010802
rou.dn028@DJ280A 47.206488 27.010802
rou.dn028@DJ280B 47.206884 27.011272
rou.dn028@DJ280A 47.206488 27.010802
rou.e583@DJ280B 47.206884 27.011272
rou.dn028@DJ280B 47.206884 27.011272
rou.e583@DJ280A 47.206488 27.010802
rou.e583@DJ280A 47.206488 27.010802
rou.e583@DJ280B 47.206884 27.011272
rou.dj155b@DJ155I_E 47.179807 26.53777
rou.dj155b@DJ155I_W 47.180103 26.537443
rou.dj155b@DJ155I_E 47.179807 26.53777
rou.dj155i@DJ155B_N 47.180103 26.537443
rou.dj155b@DJ155I_W 47.180103 26.537443
rou.dj155i@DJ155B_S 47.179807 26.53777
rou.dj155i@DJ155B_N 47.180103 26.537443
rou.dj155i@DJ155B_S 47.179807 26.53777
rou.dj161e@DJ172A_E 46.959933 24.117404
rou.dj172a@DJ172I_S 46.960134 24.117833
rou.dj161e@DJ172A_E 46.959933 24.117404
rou.dj172i@DJ172A_S 46.960134 24.117833
rou.dj172a@DJ161E_E 46.959933 24.117404
rou.dj172a@DJ172I_S 46.960134 24.117833
rou.dj172a@DJ161E_E 46.959933 24.117404
rou.dj172i@DJ172A_S 46.960134 24.117833
rou.dj151@DN16_E 46.784324 24.204874
rou.dj151@DN16_W 46.784676 24.204702
rou.dj151@DN16_E 46.784324 24.204874
rou.dn016@DJ151_N 46.784676 24.204702
rou.dj151@DN16_W 46.784676 24.204702
rou.dn016@DJ151_S 46.784324 24.204874
rou.dn016@DJ151_N 46.784676 24.204702
rou.dn016@DJ151_S 46.784324 24.204874
rou.dj242@DJ255_E 45.788202 27.979232
rou.dj242@DJ255_W 45.787761 27.979522
rou.dj242@DJ255_E 45.788202 27.979232
rou.dj255@DJ242_S 45.787761 27.979522
rou.dj242@DJ255_W 45.787761 27.979522
rou.dj255@DJ242_N 45.788202 27.979232
rou.dj255@DJ242_N 45.788202 27.979232
rou.dj255@DJ242_S 45.787761 27.979522
rou.dj105d@CarFry 45.796711 24.559888
rou.dj105dcar@CarFry 45.796286 24.560162
rou.dj705@DJ705D_N 46.090499 23.130995
rou.dj705@DJ705D_S 46.090079 23.131379
rou.dj705@DJ705D_N 46.090499 23.130995
rou.dj705d@DJ705_N 46.090079 23.131379
rou.dj705@DJ705D_S 46.090079 23.131379
rou.dj705d@DJ705_S 46.090499 23.130995
rou.dj705d@DJ705_N 46.090079 23.131379
rou.dj705d@DJ705_S 46.090499 23.130995
rou.dj224@DN2A_E 44.535889 28.232267
rou.dj224@DN2A_W 44.536254 28.232117
rou.dj224@DN2A_E 44.535889 28.232267
rou.dn02a@DJ224_N 44.536254 28.232117
rou.dj224@DN2A_E 44.535889 28.232267
rou.e60@DJ224_N 44.536254 28.232117
rou.dj224@DN2A_W 44.536254 28.232117
rou.dn02a@DJ224_S 44.535889 28.232267
rou.dj224@DN2A_W 44.536254 28.232117
rou.e60@DJ224_S 44.535889 28.232267
rou.dn02a@DJ224_N 44.536254 28.232117
rou.dn02a@DJ224_S 44.535889 28.232267
rou.dn02a@DJ224_N 44.536254 28.232117
rou.e60@DJ224_S 44.535889 28.232267
rou.dn02a@DJ224_S 44.535889 28.232267
rou.e60@DJ224_N 44.536254 28.232117
rou.e60@DJ224_N 44.536254 28.232117
rou.e60@DJ224_S 44.535889 28.232267
rou.dn002@DNCB 44.498828 26.204098
rou.dn002@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.dn002@DNCB 44.498828 26.204098
rou.e60@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.dn002@DNCB 44.498828 26.204098
rou.e85@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.dn002@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.dncb@DN2 44.498828 26.204098
rou.dn002@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.e60@DNCB 44.498828 26.204098
rou.dn002@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.e85@DNCB_N 44.498828 26.204098
rou.dncb@DN2 44.498828 26.204098
rou.e60@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.dncb@DN2 44.498828 26.204098
rou.e85@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.e60@DNCB 44.498828 26.204098
rou.e60@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.e60@DNCB 44.498828 26.204098
rou.e85@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.e60@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.e85@DNCB_N 44.498828 26.204098
rou.e85@DNCB_N 44.498828 26.204098
rou.e85@StrSom 44.498677 26.20379
rou.dj100@DJ301_N 44.38171 26.342468
rou.dj100@DJ301_S 44.3814 26.342886
rou.dj100@DJ301_N 44.38171 26.342468
rou.dj301@DJ100_E 44.3814 26.342886
rou.dj100@DJ301_S 44.3814 26.342886
rou.dj301@DJ100_W 44.38171 26.342468
rou.dj301@DJ100_E 44.3814 26.342886
rou.dj301@DJ100_W 44.38171 26.342468
rou.dj677f@DJ678 44.928938 24.272755
rou.dj678@DJ678D 44.928624 24.272841
rou.dj677f@DJ678 44.928938 24.272755
rou.dj678d@DJ678 44.928624 24.272841
rou.dj678@DJ677F 44.928938 24.272755
rou.dj678@DJ678D 44.928624 24.272841
rou.dj678@DJ677F 44.928938 24.272755
rou.dj678d@DJ678 44.928624 24.272841
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on February 10, 2020, 05:22:46 am
Corrected, will do the selfreff stuff tomorrow, when the errors will be visible after the site update. I don't know how to mark NMPs as FP, but will be glad to learn.
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on February 10, 2020, 02:01:37 pm
I don't know how to mark NMPs as FP, but will be glad to learn.

Copy all lines starting with rou. from nearmisspoints.log (http://travelmapping.net/logs/nearmisspoints.log) to nmpfps.log (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/nmpfps.log) (between New Zealand and Scotland).
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: michih on February 12, 2020, 03:30:46 am
System looks fine now :) Activate it!

Minor issue: nmpfps.log is ordered by country, then region within the country. Romania is not part of USA ;)
Title: Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
Post by: panda80 on February 12, 2020, 07:38:26 am
Done, it will become active after the next site update  :)