Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Markkos1992 on September 01, 2021, 02:44:24 pm

Title: NC: NC 111 and NC 222 Further Point Concerns
Post by: Markkos1992 on September 01, 2021, 02:44:24 pm
NC 111:
1.  NC41_S should be NC41_W (https://www.google.com/maps/@34.8349508,-77.7996093,3a,75y,258.95h,85.93t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sKx5iEEttYvwaywP30uD1iA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
2.  CliNeuRd should be ParkEntRd (Park Entrance Rd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.2341094,-77.8991025,3a,15y,183.78h,87.58t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGuXT190UuVf_OEYIokJ2Mg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  The shaping point north of CliNeuRd should be replaced with a visible point at Broadhurst Rd (BroRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.2581683,-77.9105989,3a,15y,226.31h,85.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swn-Y-14slDgmBsTnjfSuTg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).  I am unsure about the shaping point north of here.
4.  ChuGodRd could be relocated slightly if desired.
5.  The shaping point northeast of Eureka should be replaced by a visible point at Watery Branch Church Rd (WatBraRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.5630209,-77.847785,3a,37.5y,214.52h,83.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1syjeJImlOyFdeaAFVVLN6dw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
6.  It looks like NC58_N should be slightly recentered. The shaping point west of here probably looks best as-is.
7.  The first shaping point southwest of US264Alt could be removed.  The second shaping point southwest of US 264 should be replaced by a visible point at Speight School Rd (SpeSchRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6354688,-77.7950429,3a,37.5y,269.67h,91.53t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sUNjol7LShNQ7OQY3FgY7pg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).

NC 222:
1.  The NC43 labels should be N and S (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6933984,-77.4989377,3a,75y,354.78h,79.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPxRLGiz7h91kMu4pE0kvFQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) instead of W and E.
2.  The shaping points west of NC43_W should be replaced with visible points at Spain Bridge Rd (SpaBriRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.7018954,-77.5677851,3a,75y,45.56h,82.15t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sox20IetQfMiN2aczgMwPHQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) and King Farm Rd (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6816474,-77.589857,3a,37.5y,203.98h,90.17t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s4bOa6Q0DCtX5ZWED0pXJDg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
3.  The shaping point east of US 258 could probably be removed.
4.  The shaping point west of US 258 could probably be replaced by a visible point at Eagle's Cross Rd (EagCroRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6602764,-77.69836,3a,37.5y,197.59h,84.46t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sTzBuq2I5mQSJrBPB7PxmXQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DTzBuq2I5mQSJrBPB7PxmXQ%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D29.65069%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
5.  See 5-7 under NC 111.
6.  The shaping point west of NC 111 should be replaced by a visible point at Airport Rd (AirRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.5272588,-77.9370609,3a,75y,52.13h,84.04t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s8P4EN5fGMwDxt1lCDWdHKw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D8P4EN5fGMwDxt1lCDWdHKw%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D337.1723%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656).
7.  Is AycSt necessary?
8.  I think that EdmSprRd should be relocated to Hooks Rd (HooRd) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.5586716,-77.9988261,3a,15y,321.63h,88.18t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQ55SYgr0PUY8y92Jw7RdHg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656), but it would be Winding Spring Ave (WinSprAve) (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.5582277,-77.9974855,3a,75y,263.78h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFCWNfAsTje2iL5D2M8se1w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) if it needs to stay as-is.
Title: Re: NC: NC 111 and NC 222 Further Point Concerns
Post by: mapmikey on September 19, 2021, 08:58:48 am
changes made