Author Topic: usaush: United States Historic US Routes  (Read 165656 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline neroute2

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 976
  • Last Login:Today at 02:01:03 am
Re: usaush: United States Historic US Routes
« Reply #210 on: July 23, 2020, 10:02:19 am »
For future checking: US 6 in Palmdale (not on Sierra Highway): https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=27290

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:38:25 am
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
Re: usaush: United States Historic US Routes
« Reply #211 on: July 24, 2020, 11:25:39 am »
Look at any of your base maps for Council Bluffs, Iowa. Iowa 192 used to run through the heart of Council Bluff (as a N-S arterial) and whomever set up the routing for Historic US 6, had the western extent end at (the now former) routing of Iowa 192.
Yes, there is no Iowa 192 signed in Council Bluff. I don't recall seeing any signs for that road when I was in Council Bluff/Omaha, last year (doing Lincoln Hwy traveling).
It died in the great 2016-ish Council Bluffs decommissioning where Iowa turned over the state-maintained roads in city limits to the city.
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton

Offline norheim

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Last Login:September 14, 2021, 09:30:53 pm
Re: usaush: United States Historic US Routes
« Reply #212 on: August 22, 2020, 03:49:36 pm »
Historic US 10 is signed in George, Washington.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: usaush: United States Historic US Routes
« Reply #213 on: October 30, 2020, 01:47:42 pm »
mo.us066hisstl: MOs_O -> MOsO
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
  • Last Login:March 27, 2024, 09:35:08 pm
Re: usaush: United States Historic US Routes
« Reply #214 on: October 31, 2020, 06:41:10 pm »
https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1e9xGop5WRImvXKmPwGgksVz2jXfY4Mwu&usp=sharing

Field checking of old US 20 which has been moderately signed recently.  Signage is not thorough as I would expect.  Highway63 might have a history though.  Dubuque has signs on University (but ambiguity exists by JFKennedy, Loras Blvd and Locust St (But not Bluff St (one-way opp Locust) which make sense if Locust was 2-way back then.  Got all the way to Dyersville before being cut off by construction.
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AR: I&; AZ: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; IL: I; IN: I*; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I*; NE: I; NJ, I; OH: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI; (AR, IN pending expansions.)

*Previously completed

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: usaush: United States Historic US Routes
« Reply #215 on: November 20, 2020, 05:50:24 pm »
IL US66HisWil
This is signed with an actual Spur banner. So it makes sense to put it in the Banner field in the CSV (which does allow 6-character double banners) rather than dumping it into the City field.

usaush;IL;US66;His;Wil;(Spur) Williamsville;il.us066hissprwil;
->
usaush;IL;US66;HisSpr;Wil;Williamsville;il.us066hissprwil;

so the "adjective(s)" on the right modify the "nouns" on the left, and the .list name matches the root, can you dig it.

Or, if you don't want to break list files even though this system is in preview,
usaush;IL;US66;HisSpr;Wil;Williamsville;il.us066hissprwil;US66HisWil


US66HisChi, in the same neighborhood
IL123 doesn't even mark the end of a multiplex; IL123 just ends there while concurrent. Better off naming it after something else.
IL123 -> US66HisSpr_W
US66HisSpr -> US66HisSpr_E


IL US66HisCha
Same deal as US66HisCha

usaush;IL;US66;His;Cha;(Spur) Chain of Rocks;il.us066hissprcha;
->
usaush;IL;US66;HisSpr;Cha;Chain of Rocks;il.us066hissprcha;
Or,
usaush;IL;US66;HisSpr;Cha;Chain of Rocks;il.us066hissprcha;US66HisCha



Systemwide:
There should probably be state abbreviations in the city fields. Only 2 routes have them.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: usaush: United States Historic US Routes
« Reply #216 on: November 22, 2020, 02:17:44 pm »
CA US40HisAub:
What's up with that weird self-intersecting loop at the S end? I see historic signs on Lincoln Way, but not Maple St.
Up north, I see a sign heading sough from CA49_N but nothing north of there.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
  • Last Login:March 27, 2024, 09:35:08 pm
Re: Canada and USA state/province/territorial highways master thread
« Reply #217 on: December 29, 2020, 06:17:56 am »
I thought that usaush was going to be scrapped.
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AR: I&; AZ: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; IL: I; IN: I*; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I*; NE: I; NJ, I; OH: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI; (AR, IN pending expansions.)

*Previously completed

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: Re: Canada and USA state/province/territorial highways master thread
« Reply #218 on: December 29, 2020, 11:37:36 am »
I thought that usaush was going to be scrapped.
I would love that, in fact...
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: usaush: United States Historic US Routes
« Reply #219 on: December 29, 2020, 02:09:08 pm »
CA US40HisSac is not itself an exit-numbered route.
46A(CA160) -> CA160(46A)
46B(CA160) -> CA160(46B)
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
  • Last Login:March 27, 2024, 09:35:08 pm
Re: usaush: United States Historic US Routes
« Reply #220 on: December 30, 2020, 10:45:19 am »
https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1e9xGop5WRImvXKmPwGgksVz2jXfY4Mwu&usp=sharing

Field checking of old US 20 which has been moderately signed recently.  Signage is not thorough as I would expect.  Highway63 might have a history though.  Dubuque has signs on University (but ambiguity exists by JFKennedy, Loras Blvd and Locust St (But not Bluff St (one-way opp Locust) which make sense if Locust was 2-way back then.  Got all the way to Dyersville before being cut off by construction.
Made it to Waterloo on a different trip about a week later.  Beyond Delaware County, Buchanan only had one or two small signs and I saw zero signs in Black Hawk County.  Highway63 certainly has the log, but given the rule of unsigned I'd be only willing to enter Delaware and Dubuque Counties (Maybe Buchanan).  Given the attention to US6 in Iowa, I think this is an emerging project that will continue as time progresses and funding is found.
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AR: I&; AZ: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; IL: I; IN: I*; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I*; NE: I; NJ, I; OH: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI; (AR, IN pending expansions.)

*Previously completed

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:38:25 am
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
Re: usaush: United States Historic US Routes
« Reply #221 on: December 30, 2020, 02:23:50 pm »
There is one Historic US 20 sign on US 18/20 WB just west of Lusk, WY (GMSV. There isn't any corresponding signage on the EB side, and I've only seen the one sign. Since this is signed just about as well as US 6 Historic in Gretna NE, I think it should be in, but I don't know where it should be cut off on either end. Thoughts?
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton

Offline Duke87

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 939
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:48:52 pm
Re: Re: Canada and USA state/province/territorial highways master thread
« Reply #222 on: December 30, 2020, 07:46:06 pm »
I thought that usaush was going to be scrapped.
I would love that, in fact...

I would too. Or at least, put it on a shelf to be revisited once we have the ability for users to toggle systems on and off in their stats.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4234
  • Last Login:February 13, 2024, 07:19:36 pm
  • I like C++
Re: Re: Canada and USA state/province/territorial highways master thread
« Reply #223 on: December 30, 2020, 10:32:43 pm »
I think it belongs with *cough* usanyt.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline bejacob

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
  • Last Login:March 26, 2024, 02:31:28 pm
Re: Re: Canada and USA state/province/territorial highways master thread
« Reply #224 on: December 31, 2020, 10:25:35 am »
I thought that usaush was going to be scrapped.
I would love that, in fact...

Count me in favor of scrapping usaush as well. Since they show up on the mapview, I try to drive these routes when I can. They are probably at or near the bottom of my priorities when in an area.