Author Topic: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers  (Read 1410 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« on: April 18, 2021, 05:32:59 pm »
I-41/US 41:
1.  All US41 labels for intersecting routes along I-41 should be changed to I-41. (list of those not already mentioned below or already done: WI60, WI144, WI33, WI28, WI67, WI49, WI26, WI44, WI91, WI21, WI76, WI114, WI125, WI47, WI55, WI172, WI29)
2.  The 39 label should be moved south to the US 18 interchange and given a graph connection there.  (also affects US 45)  Was Wisconsin Ave ever actually Exit 39?  (Also, the ToI-41 label on US 18 should be changed to I-41.)
3.  I think you could make the case for a graph connection with WI 145 at 48A.  (keeping the current 48A as a hidden shaping point for mapping purposes)  WI 145 already has this point labeled as US41/45_S. (also affects US 45 and WI 100)
4.  164 should be 164A.
5.  165 should be 164B.
6.  168 should be 168A.
7.  169 should be 168B.
8. 170 should be 170A.  (also affects US 141)
9. 171 should be 170B.  (also affects US 141)

US 41 (after I-41 ends):
1.  LinRd should be 173.  (also affects US 141)
2.  CRB_Bro should be 176.  (also affects US 141).
3.  BroRd should be 179.  (also affects US 141)
4.  CRS_Oco should be 182.  (also affects US 141)
5.  CRD_Oco should be 185.  (also affects US 141)
6.  US141_N should be 187.  (also affects US 141)
7.  US41BusOco_S should be 197.
8.  WI22 should be 198.
9.  US41BusOco_N should be 200.
10.  I think SchLn should be CRM_Mar, and CRM_Mar should be KammRd.
11.  US41BusPes_S should be 212.
12.  US41BusPes_N should be 216.


US 45 (starting at first split with I-41/US 41):
1.  WI145 should be 60.
2.  WI60 should be 63.
3.  PleValRd should be 65.
4.  ParDr should be 68.
5.  WI33/144 should be 71.
6.  CRD_Oza should be 73.
7.  A graph connection is needed at US151_S.  (More related coming to US 151)
8.  Should LakDr be LakDr_S?
9.  The shaping point near Kinker Rd should be made visible.
10.  The shaping point by Fahrnwald Rd should be made visible.
11.  MainSt_Osh could be MainSt_N if there is not another label preventing this from occurring.

WI 145:
1.  See number 2. US41/45_S should be relabeled to I-41(48A).  US41/45_N should be relabeled to I-41(48B).
2.  US41 should be I-41(60).

WI 167: US41/45_S should be relabeled to I-41(54).  US41/45_N should be relabeled to I-41(57).

WI 44:  WI91 should be WI91_W.

WI 91:  WI44 should be WI44_S.

WI 32:  US41/54 should be  I-41(168A).  US41/29 should be I-41(168B).

US 10, US 151, WI 29, and WI 441 will be covered separately.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
WI: WI 30 Exit Numbers
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2021, 06:44:51 pm »
1.  US151>-1A
2.  FairOaksAve >-1B
3.  US51>-1C
4.  ThoDr>-2
5.  I-90>-3

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
WI: US 51 Point Concerns and Exit Numbers
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2021, 07:56:08 pm »
1.  The shaping point south of CRM_RocE should be replaced with a visible point at Kidder Rd (KidRd).
2.  The shaping point north of CRB/AB_Dan should be replaced with a visible point at Mahoney Rd (MahRd).
3.  PfaRd should be PflRd.
4.  WI19 should be 61.
5.  WinRd should be 63.
6.  To handle the relocation north of WinRd, VinRd and CRDV_Dan should be removed as points completely.  You can add an updates entry if you see fit here.
7.  CRV_DanW should be 65.
8.  CRV_DanE should be marked as closed.
9.  The shaping point north of WI60_W could be replaced with a visible point at Loveland Rd (LovRd).
10.  Should CRVJ_Col be CRJ/V_Col instead?
11.  CRR/N_Mar should be 188.  (also affects WI 29)
12.  MouRd should be 190.  (also affects WI 29)
13.  WI29_W should be 191
14.  WI52 should be 192.
15.  BriSt should be 193.
16.  CRU_Mar should be 194A.  (with a slight recentering)
17.  US51BusWau should be 194B.  (with a slight recentering)
18.  CRWW_Mar should be 197.
19.  CRQ_Lin should be 205.
20.  WI64 should be 208.
21.  CRK_Lin should be 211.
22.  CRS_Lin should be 225.
23.  WI86 should be 229.
24.  CRA_Lin should be 231.
25.  US8 should be 234.
26.  I recommend looking at replacing the shaping point between CRN_Vil and CRH_Vil with a visible point.  (maybe at Day Lake Rd?)
27. The shaping point just south of CRC_Iro (which should arguably be split into two points for two intersections) should be CRCC_Iro.
28.  The shaping point northwest of CRC_Iro could maybe be replaced with a visible point at Center Dr (CenDr).
29.  Note that the line on US 51 between WI 77 and US 2 briefly enters Michigan.  Maybe a point at 10thAve (10thAveN) would rectify this.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
WI: US 10 and WI 441 Exit Numbers and Point Concerns
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2021, 06:27:09 pm »
US 10:
1.  The shaping point east of WI29/25 should be replaced with a visible point at 1170th St.
2.  I recommend adding a visible point at 510th St and a hidden shaping point east of here for shaping purposes.
3.  The shaping point east of CRCC_Pie should be replaced with a visible point at 330th Ave.  I also recommend a hidden shaping point southeast of here as the route almost goes out of tolerance.
4.  I recommend adding a point at CRZZ_Pie east of CRS_Pie for shaping purposes.
5.  The second shaping point southwest of WI25/85 should be replaced with a visible point at MainSt. (also affects WI 25)
6.  I recommend adding a point at Dorwin's Mill Rd (DorMillRd) for shaping purposes.
7.  The shaping point east of CRBB_Pep should be replaced by a visible point at Kothbauer Rd (KotRd).
8.  I recommend adding CRFF_Buf for shaping purposes.
9.  I recommend adding Peterson Rd (PetRd) for shaping purposes.
10.  CRK_Tre should be CRKK_Tre.
11.  The shaping point east of CRT_Jac should be replaced with a visible point at Bramer Rd (BraRd).
12.  The shaping point west of CRG_Cla should be replaced with a visible point at Collier Ave (ColAve).
13.  The shaping point southeast of CRB_ClaE should be replaced with a visible point at Sidney Ave (SidAve).
14.  CanRd should be RobAve (Robin Ave).
15.  I think that CRK_ClaN should be recentered.
16.  The shaping points between CRW_Cla and CRY_Cla should be replaced with visible points at Granton Rd (GraRd) and Fremont Rd (FreRd).
17.  WI13_S should be WI80.
18.  WI13_N should be 187.  (also affects WI 13)
19. WI13/34 should be 204. (also affects WI 13 and WI 34)
20.  CRG_Por and CRO_Por should be marked as closed. (also affects WI 34)
21.  WI34_N should be 208. (also affects WI 34)
22.  I-39(165) should be 213.
23.  CRJ_Por should be 230 and slightly recentered.
24.  CRK_Por needs to be recentered.
25.  WI161 needs to be recentered.
26.  CRKK_Por should be 237.
27.  CRB_Por should be 238.
28.  CRA_Por should be 240.
29.  WI49/54 should be 250. (also affects WI 49 and WI 54)
30.  WI22_W should be 252.  (also affects WI 22, WI 49, and WI 54) 
31.  ChuSt should be 253.  (also affects WI 22, WI 49, and WI 54)   
32.  WI22/54 should be 254.  (also affects WI 22, WI 49, and WI 54) 
33.  The shaping point east of WI22/54 should be replaced by a visible point at Harrington Rd (HarRd). (also affects WI 49)
34.  WI110_N should be 260A.  (also affects WI 49 and WI 110)
35.  CRF_Wau should be 260B.   (also affects WI 49 and WI 110)
36.  WI49/110 should be 264.  (also affects WI 49 and WI 110)
37.  WI110 should be 267.  (also affects WI 110)
38.  Shaping points are needed between WI110 and US45_N as the route goes out of tolerance.
39.  US45_N should be 273.  (also affects US 45)
40.  US45_S should be 276.  (also affects US 45)
41.  WI76 should be 284.
42.  CRCB_Win should be 286.
43.  US41/441 should be 287. (also affects WI 441)
44.  RacRd should be 289A and should be recentered.  (also affects WI 441)
45.  CRAP_Win should be 289B and should be recentered.  (also affects WI 441)
46.  WI47 should be 290.  (also affects WI 441)
47.  WI441 should be 291.  (also affects WI 441)
48.  CRN_Cal should be slightly recentered inside the roundabout.
49.  A point should be added at Rusch Rd (RusRd) east of WI32/57 as the route goes out of tolerance here.
50.  The shaping point east of CRPP_Cal should be replaced with a visible point at LongLakeRd.
51.  I recommend adding a point at Stone Rd (StoRd) west of I-43(154) for shaping purposes.
52.  I think that the US151 point should be moved to the center between US 10 EB and US 10 WB as usually done when routes are on split alignments.
53.  MadSt should be MadSt_W and be moved to the 8th St/Madison St intersection.
54.  I think that LakDr should be made hidden.
55.  I think that Ferry should be labeled LakeMicFry (for Lake Michigan Ferry).  I am not sure what the best solution here is, but I know that the ferry points have been discussed in other threads.
56.  Unused alternate labels that can be removed: WI73_S US10Bus/73

WI 441:
1.  See 43-47 under US 10.
2.  CRKK should be 7.
3.  CRCE should be 8.
4.  CROO should be 10.
5.  US41_N should be 11.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2021, 07:08:20 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
WI: WI 29 Point Concerns and Exit Numbers
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2021, 07:32:27 pm »
1.   East of WI35/65, points should be added at 850thSt and 790thSt as the route goes out of tolerance here.
2.   It looks like CRB_PieW should be relocated.
3.   The shaping point southeast of CRK_Dun should be replaced with a visible point at Meadow Hill Dr (MeaHillDr).
4.   500thSt should be relocated to Stokke Pkwy (StoPkwy). (also affects US 12)
5.   I-94 should be 60.
6.   US12/40 should be 61.
7.   I think that CRH_DunS should be just CRH_Dun, and CRH_DunN should be 970thSt.
8.   CRT_Chi should be 69.
9.   WI29BusChi_W should be 72.
10.   I recommend adding a shaping point between WI29BusChi_W and US53_S.
11.   I think I interpret the entire US 53 interchange as one.  (One point makes it 75.  Two as-is would mean 75A (in place of US53_S) and 75.)
12.   A shaping point or two is needed between US53 and WI178/29Bus as the route goes out of tolerance here.
13.   WI178/29Bus should be 79.
14.   CRX_ChiW should be 80.
15.   CRJ_Chi should be 81.
16.   CRX_ChiE should be 87.
17.   A shaping point is needed east of CRX_ChiE as the route goes out of tolerance here.
18.   WI27 should be 91.
19.   CRD_Chi should be 97.
20.   CRH_Chi should be 101.
21.   WI73_N should be 108. (also affects WI 73)
22.   A shaping point should be added east of WI73_N for shaping purposes.  (also affects WI 73)
23.   Should CRO_ClaS be just CRO_Cla?  (CRO_Cla on WI 73 should be CRO_ClaN.)
24.   WI73_S should be 118.  (also affects WI 73)
25.   CarAve should be 122.
26.   CRE_Cla should be 127.
27.   WI29BusAbb_W should be 131.
28.   WI13 should be 132.
29.   A shaping point is needed east of WI13 as the route goes out of tolerance here.
30.   WI29BusAbbE should be 134.
31.   WI97 should be 145.
32.   CRH_Mar should be 150.
33.   WI107 should be 156.
34.   CRO_Mar should be marked as closed.  The point at the new interchange with CRO_Mar should be 159.
35.   S72ndAve should be 162.
36.   WI52 should be 164A.  US51_N should be 164B.  See the US 51 thread for the US 51/WI 29 concurrency.
37.   I-39 should be 170.
38.   US51Bus should be 171.
39.   CRX_Mar should be 173.
40.   CRJ_Mar should be 177.
41.   CRQ_Mar should be 181.
42.   CRY_Mar should be 185.
43.   A point should be added at BassLakeRd as the route goes out of tolerance here.
44.   US45/29Bus_N should be 195.  (also affects US 45)
45.   WI29Bus should be 196. (also affects US 45)
46.   US45/29Bus_N should be 198. (also affects US 45)
47.   CRQ_ShaN should be Townline Rd (TowRd).
48.   Points should be added at Middle Branch Rd (MidBraRd) and River Rd (RivRd) for shaping purposes.
49.   CRG_Sha should be CRG_ShaS.
50.   A point should be added at Hickory Rd (HicRd) as the route goes out of tolerance here.
51.   WI22 should be 225.
52.   WI47/55 should be 227. (also affects WI 47 and WI 55)
53.   WI47/117 should be 234.  (also affects WI 47 and WI 55)
54.   WI55/160 should be 242.  (also affects WI 55)
55.   A point should be added at Redwood Dr (RedDr) for shaping purposes.
56.   WI32/156 should be 249. (also affects WI 32)
57.   HilRd should be 255.  (also affects WI 32)
58.   RivDr should be marked as closed.  (also affects WI 32)
59.   A point is needed at the interchange west of I-41 where WI 29 (WI32_S) splits from WI 32 (WI29_E).  (no exit numbers here) Then add Duck Creek Pkwy (DuckCrePkwy) for WI 29 to break the WI 29/WI 32 concurrency.
60.   US41 should be I-41.
61.   The shaping point southwest of CRC_KewS should be replaced with a visible point at Angle Rd (AngRd).

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
WI: US 12 Point Concerns and Exit Numbers
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2021, 08:16:16 pm »
US 12:
1.   CRU_StC and CRT_StCN should be recentered.
2.   CRQ_Dun should be CRQ_DunN, and CRA_Dun should be CRQ_DunS.
3.   The shaping point southeast of CRBB_Dun should be replaced with a visible point at 429thSt.
4.   500thSt should be relocated to Stokke Pkwy (StoPkwy). (also affects WI 29)
5.   A shaping point or visible point is needed between WI29/40 and CRH_Dun as the route goes out of tolerance.
6.   The shaping point east of CRA_Eau should be replaced with a visible point at Schultz Rd (SchRd).
7.   CRD_Eau needs to be relocated to the correct intersection.
8.   The shaping point southeast of CRD_Eau should be replaced with a visible point at Sunrise Dr (SunDr).
9.   It looks like CRAF/HH_Eau should be just CRAF_Eau.
10.   The shaping point southeast of CRM_EauE should be replaced with a visible point at Kempton Rd (KemRd).  (also affects WI 27)
11.   The shaping points south of WI95 should be replaced with visible points at Garage Rd (GarRd) and WestRd. (also affects WI 27)
12.   The shaping point southeast of WI27_S should be replaced by a visible point at Castle Mound Rd (CasMouRd).
13.   The shaping point southeast of OakRidRd should be replaced with a visible point at Old County I
14.   The shaping point northwest of CREW_Mon should be replaced with a visible point at Blueberry Rd (BluRd).
15.   A point should be added at CRW_Mon for Mill Bluff State Park. (also affects WI 16)
16.   The shaping point southeast of WI80_S should be replaced with a visible point at Sumlec Rd (SumRd). (also affects WI 16)
17.   The shaping point southeast of CRK_Jun should be replaced with a visible point at NoeRd.  (also affects WI 16)
18.   The shaping point southeast of CRHH_Jun should be replaced with a visible point at DeesRd.  (also affects WI 16)
19.   Should I-90/94(85) be just I-90(85)?
20.   Should WI23_W be WI23_S?
21.   The shaping point southeast of WI23_S should be replaced by a visible point at Hillman Rd (HilRd).
22.   I-90/94(92) should be 211.
23.   US12BusBar_W should be 212.
24.   ReeRd should be 214.
25.   WI33_W should be 215.  (also affects WI 33)
26.   WI33/136 should be 218.  (also affects WI 33)
27.   US12BusBar_E should be 219
28.   *OldUS12_Bar should be recentered.
29.   CRC_Sau should be relocated.
30.   A point could be added at 26thSt if you consider that as a partial interchange.
31.   A shaping point may be useful between CRY_Dan and CRKP_Dan.
32.   ParSt should be 249.
33.   CRM_Dan should be 250.
34.   US14_W should be 251.  (also affects US 14)
35.   GreBlvd should be 252.  (also affects US 14)
36.   OldSaukRd should be 253.  (also affects US 14)
37.   CRS_Dan should be 254.  (also affects US 14)
38.   GamRd should be 255.  (also affects US 14)
39.   WhiWay should be 257.  (also affects US 14)
40.   US18/151 should be 258.  (also affects US 14, US 18, and US 151)
41.   SemHwy should be 258A.  (also affects US 14, US 18, and US 151)
42.   FroRd_A should be 259 and moved to the Todd Drive underpass.  I recommend removing FroRd_B and putting that label under 259.  (also affects US 14, US 18, and US 151)
43.   FishHatRd should be 260.  (also affects US 14, US 18, and US 151)
44.   US14/151 should be 261. (also affects US 18 and US 151, US 14 seems to have a different number here)
45.   RimRd should be 262.  (also affects US 18)
46.   JohnNolDr should be 263. (also affects US 18)
47.   CRBW_Dan should be 264.  (also affects US 18)
48.   CRBB_Dan should be 265.  (also affects US 18)
49.   US51 should be 266.  (also affects US 18)
50.   I-39/90 should be 267.  (also affects US 18)
51.   Note that there are plans for CRAB_Dan to become an interchange.  (also affects US 18)
52.   CRN_Dan should be 272.  (also affects US 18)
53.   I would think that there would be one point (and a graph connection) at WI 73.  (also affects US 18 and WI 73)
54.   CRG_Jef should be relocated.
55.   I am unsure that US 12 and WI 26 BUS (Fort Atkinson)’s routes in the HB are right.  I can at least state that it looks like US 12 EB and WB are split between Robert St and Main St/3rd St in Fort Atkinson.
56.   The shaping point northwest of US12BusWhi_W should be replaced with a visible point at HogeRd.  (also affects WI 89)
57.   WalSt should be WalAve.  (also affects WI 89)
58.   I-43 should be 321A.  CRNN_Wal should be 321B (and slightly recentered).
59.   WI120_N should be 328 and slightly recentered.  (also affects WI 120)
60.   WI50/120 should be 330.  (also affects WI 120)
61.   PellLakeDr should be 335.
62.   Unused alternate labels that can be removed: WI58/82 US12BusWBa_W

US 12 BUS (Whitewater):
1.    OldUS12 should be slightly relocated.
2.   The shaping point southeast of OldUS12 should be replaced by a visible point at Indian Mound Pkwy (IndMouPkwy).
3.   WI59 should be WI59_E.  (On WI 59, US12Bus should be US12Bus_W.)
4.   Bluff Rd (BluRd) should be relocated onto the roundabout to the south.  (also affects WI 59)
5.   CoxRd should be slightly relocated.  (also affects WI 59)


Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
WI: US 14 Point Concerns and Exit Numbers
« Reply #6 on: April 24, 2021, 04:23:34 pm »
US 14:
1.  BooMillRd should be BloMillRd. (also affects US 61)
2.  CRM_Lac should be relocated.  (also affects US 61)
3.  The shaping point south of CRM_Lac should be replaced with a visible point at CRMM_Lac.  (also affects US 61)
4.  The shaping points east of CRGG_Ver should be replaced with visible points at Cut-A-Cross Rd and Lovaas Ridge Rd (LovRidRd). (also affects US 61)
5.  WI56/82 should be slightly recentered.  (also affects US 61 and WI 27)
6.  The shaping point southeast of WI56/82 should be replaced with visible points at CRJJ_Ver and CRT_Ver.  (also affects US 61)
7. CRE_Ric and CREE_Ric should be relocated.
8.  The shaping point south of CREE_Ric should be replaced by a visible point at JimTownRd.
9.  CRG_Ric should be slightly recentered.
10.  Points should be added at CRKK_Ric and DeerRunRd for shaping purposes.
11.  I recommend adding a point at Tuckaway Valley Rd (TucValRd) for shaping purposes.
12.  6thSt should be 6thSt_E.
13.  A point should be added at Old Sextonville Dr (OldSexDr) for shaping points.
14.  WI19/78 needs to be relocated.
15.  The shaping point south of WI19/78 should be replaced by a visible point at Olson Rd (OlsRd).
16.  I would think that the CRKP points would be CRKP_Dan, CRKP_DanN, and CRKP_DanS.
17.  See US 12 for the US 12 concurrency in Madison.
18.  US12/18_E should be 132.
19.  McCoyRd should be 133.
20.  A point needs to be added at Lacy Rd (Exit 134).
21.  CRMM_Dan should be 139.
22.  WI138 should be 140.  ParkSt should be removed as it is already practically in the interchange.
23.  I recommend adding a point at Rutland Rd (RutRd) for shaping purposes.
24.  MainSt should be MainSt_W.
25.  A point should be added at Riley Rd (RilRd) as the route goes out of tolerance here.
26.  A point should be added at Harmony Town Hall Rd for shaping purposes.
Unused alternate labels that can be removed: WI78/F

WI 80: Should CRN/Q_Ric be two separate points?



Offline Highway63

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 388
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 11:52:10 pm
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2021, 12:58:15 pm »
I merged all the recent Wisconsin posts into one thread to avoid clutter on the board. I am working through these.

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 07:03:51 pm
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2021, 12:43:50 am »
Did I miss something? I thought exit numbers as waypoint names was "author's discretion" beyond interstates.
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AR: I; AZ: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; IL: I; IN: I; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I; NE: I; NJ, I; OH: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI; (AR, IN, MO pending expansions.)

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3397
  • Last Login:Today at 02:02:30 am
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2021, 01:34:57 am »
Did I miss something? I thought exit numbers as waypoint names was "author's discretion" beyond interstates.
Required for new (E.G. state, provincial, select freeway, etc.) routes.
Originally when US Highways got underway on CHM, exit numbers were prohibited for US Highways. It may have had to do with in, part, coping with the headache of multiple, potentially overlapping, exit number sequences. Or something.
In any case, Standards on how to deal with this have since become a little more solidified, and we've moved away from that old rule. Many US Routes have been changed to use exit numbers. Many others have stayed no-build.
As I view it, it's author's discretion whether to update to use exit numbers on US Routes, or go no-build and keep the existing old-style named labels.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #10 on: April 29, 2021, 08:54:15 am »
Did I miss something? I thought exit numbers as waypoint names was "author's discretion" beyond interstates.
Required for new (E.G. state, provincial, select freeway, etc.) routes.
Originally when US Highways got underway on CHM, exit numbers were prohibited for US Highways. It may have had to do with in, part, coping with the headache of multiple, potentially overlapping, exit number sequences. Or something.
In any case, Standards on how to deal with this have since become a little more solidified, and we've moved away from that old rule. Many US Routes have been changed to use exit numbers. Many others have stayed no-build.
As I view it, it's author's discretion whether to update to use exit numbers on US Routes, or go no-build and keep the existing old-style named labels.

As I have explained in other recent posts, it is not a full cut-and-dry issue.  Most of these roads have significant freeway and expressway portions that curtail more towards exit numbers.  (not just one random exit number or two that shows up and then none for many miles)

In the sense of WI specifically, I even found a list from WIDOT that has a list of exit numbers on US and state routes along with interstates.  I do not mind us having further discussion on whether certain sections of road should be changed to exit numbers or not.  (sort of like what is going on in the IA thread now)

EDIT:  Update for new interchange coming on WI 29: https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=6819.msg2604037#msg2604037
« Last Edit: April 29, 2021, 08:58:12 am by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #11 on: May 02, 2021, 08:54:18 am »
Further US 18 Concerns: (not mentioned previously and on nonconcurrent sections with US 151 and US 12)
1.  The shaping points south of WI27 should be relocated (with the latter replaced by a visible point at Wacouta St (WacSt).  (also affects WI 60)
2.  HunHolRd looks like it should be slighly relocated.
3.  Does CRN_Jef still intersect US 18?  I did not see any signage for it.
4.  CRJ_Jef should probably be changed to CRW_Jef.
5.  The shaping points east of CRY_Jef could be replaced by visible points at Coffee Rd (CofRd) and Helenville Rd (HelRd).
6.  Should there be discussion on whether US 18 Temporary should be added into the HB?  (I would say no based on what I see in Waukesha, but I am not 100% on that.)
7.  Should CRG_WauS be changed to BraRd (Brandybrook Rd)?
8.  WI59_S should be WI59_W.  WI59_N should be WI59_E.
9.  MorBlvd should be MorBlvd_W.
10.  MainSt should be MainSt_E.  (also affects WI 164 as shown below)
11.  I think that CRYY_WauN should be CRO_Wau.  I am unsure where I am at on CRYY_WauS.
12.  ToWI175 should be WisAve_W.
13.  It looks like US 18 has been rerouted between 17thSt_N and WI145 to use Highland Ave east to WI 145 and then turn south.  (could justify graph connection with a new I-43 point labeled 72E.  Otherwise WI 145 would just need a US18_W at Highland Ave with US18 becoming US18_E.)
14.  Unused alternate labels that can be removed: CRC_Wau_N
 
WI 35: US18/60_W should be just US18/60.

WI 60: US18/35_E should be just US18/35.

WI 59: SunDr_E should just be SunDr.  (only intersects it once unlike US 18)

WI 164:
1.  SunDr_E should just be SunDr.  (only intersects it once unlike US 18)
2.  The MainSt_W point on US 18 needs to be added to this route due to a broken concurrency.  MainSt should be MainSt_E.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2021, 09:07:07 am by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #12 on: June 02, 2021, 05:18:55 pm »
Many of the non-exit number related changes (including WI 30's change to all exit numbers) are included in (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/4846).

EDIT:  WI 16:  I  still wonder if this should instead be CRW_Mon instead of CRW_Mil.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2021, 08:17:45 am by Markkos1992 »

Offline Highway63

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 388
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 11:52:10 pm
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2021, 04:04:05 pm »
Looking closer at the map, you are right. I wish county lines were more visible in OSM. I have also noted the point shift in WI 27 at I-94.

I foresee the rest of Wisconsin coming in three or so chunks. I'm giving a little breathing room between them for the soft cleanups like the WI 16 point. There may be a couple of junction areas where concurrencies will be temporarily broken, but I think all of them will match by the end of the month.

Offline bejacob

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 06:57:04 pm
WI: Multiple broken concurrencies in SW Wisconsin
« Reply #14 on: June 03, 2021, 09:11:34 pm »
US61 and US14 should be concurrent with WI27 and WI82 south of Viroqua. It looks like US61 and US14 share a concurrency as do WI27 and WI82. From what I can deduce, two waypoints (CRJ_Ver & CRNN_Ver) were added recently to the WI routes but not to the concurrent US routes.

Additionally, WI56 and WI82 should be concurrent as they head east out of town. I can't figure out the source of the error other than it seems to be tied to the intersection of of Decker and Main Streets. I'm not sure, but it looks like there might be two near miss waypoints (US14/61 and US14/61_N) which should be located at the same coordinates.

And on the north end of town, WI27 now has a broken concurrency with US14/61.

What appears to have been a well-intentioned update to a couple state routes in WI has created a broken concurrency nightmare in this area. There appear to be a similar problem in Richland County with US14 and WI60. Given the widespread nature caused by these recent point additions, I suspect there might be other broken concurrencies.

My apologies in advance if these concurrency issues were intended to be fixed on a subsequent update. I went in to correct a new log error caused by the recent changes and discovered quite a bit more problems than I anticipated.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2021, 09:22:19 pm by bejacob »