Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: ntallyn on January 06, 2021, 08:34:13 pm

Title: NC 32, NC 37, and NC 94
Post by: ntallyn on January 06, 2021, 08:34:13 pm

The repeated connections, joins, and separations of these 3 routes leave the labels to be desired. I'm not sure I have a great solution, but (for example), along NC32, waypoint NC37_S is the NORTH end of the NC32/NC37 concurrence. I realize that waypoint NC37_N is the northern intersection with NC37, but feel that this one should be relabeled so the concurrence has the expected waypoints.

Similarly, NC94 has multiple waypoints with NC32 labels. I would recommend the NC32_A point be renamed to NC37_N, as this is the end of its concurrence.

The whole thing is a bit of a mess...

Title: Re: NC 32, NC 37, and NC 94
Post by: mapmikey on February 05, 2021, 02:46:32 pm

I came up with solutions that seem a little better and was able to utilize alt labels in all but one case over the 3 files.

In the queue

Title: Re: NC 32, NC 37, and NC 94
Post by: ntallyn on February 06, 2021, 01:03:41 pm

Looks good to me. I'll update my .list, and I suspect most of those alt-labels can go away.

Title: Re: NC 32, NC 37, and NC 94
Post by: ntallyn on February 06, 2021, 01:07:28 pm

Quote from: ntallyn on February 06, 2021, 01:03:41 pm

Looks good to me. I'll update my .list, and I suspect most of those alt-labels can go away.

Or not. It looks like I was only using 2 of them.