Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: froggie on January 22, 2020, 09:03:15 am

Title: MA: I-90/MA 9 in Framingham
Post by: froggie on January 22, 2020, 09:03:15 am

I know the goal/intent is to have shaping points on two intersecting routes line up so as to avoid NMP, but shouldn't the I-90/MA 9 point be where the two mainlines intersect?  The existing point for the topic is way off the MA 9 mainline.

Title: Re: MA: I-90/MA 9 in Framingham
Post by: neroute2 on January 22, 2020, 03:01:52 pm

Speaking of MA 9, I see a bunch of missing interchanges on both sides of 128.

Title: Re: MA: I-90/MA 9 in Framingham
Post by: yakra on January 28, 2020, 08:18:07 pm

MA9's I-90 point moved to the double trumpet connection.
Interchanges added near 128.
ToDo: shaping point cleanup, with concurrent routes

Title: Re: MA: I-90/MA 9 in Framingham
Post by: Markkos1992 on May 06, 2021, 06:35:00 pm

yakra, am I correct that you completed this via the following pull request (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3563 (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3563))?

Title: Re: MA: I-90/MA 9 in Framingham
Post by: yakra on May 13, 2021, 03:07:53 pm

Quote from: yakra on January 28, 2020, 08:18:07 pm

ToDo: shaping point cleanup, with concurrent routes

In with the MA I-95 (and MA128) exit renumbering (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/4772)