Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Duke87 on June 04, 2021, 12:56:40 am

Title: MT: S-229 is not signed
Post by: Duke87 on June 04, 2021, 12:56:40 am

Per field check yesterday evening. So this should be removed from the HB (may want to hold onto the .wpt in case we decide to map the unsigned routes in the future though).

Title: Re: MT: S-229 is not signed
Post by: the_spui_ninja on July 22, 2021, 04:04:53 pm

Can't believe this fell through the cracks! If we end up including unsigned routes I can probably just re-map the route (it's not that hard especially since it's straight). As such, if there's no objection I'll axe this from the HB the next time I do a highway update.

Title: Re: MT: S-229 is not signed
Post by: yakra on July 24, 2021, 09:33:45 pm

Quote from: the_spui_ninja on July 22, 2021, 04:04:53 pm

Can't believe this fell through the cracks! If we end up including unsigned routes I can probably just re-map the route (it's not that hard especially since it's straight)

...or even pull it out of the git history.

Title: Re: MT: S-229 is not signed
Post by: the_spui_ninja on July 28, 2021, 10:58:57 pm

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/4999 (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/4999)