Author Topic: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers  (Read 1409 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Highway63

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 388
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 11:52:10 pm
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #30 on: July 11, 2021, 12:19:09 am »
The above issues should be resolved shortly. Those related to US 10 and WI 120 were known because those routes were part of the last batch I sent this week.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #31 on: July 11, 2021, 08:31:40 am »
One more minor thing for US 53 in Superior:  US2Trk should be US2Trk_W.

I do not think I can fully justify changing the I-535 label.  I think that I-535/35 may be better than just plain I-535, but I have no problem with you leaving it alone since I-535 basically ends there now.

Offline Highway63

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 388
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 11:52:10 pm
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #32 on: July 19, 2021, 02:31:23 pm »
Since US 53 does not intersect US 2 Truck twice, I believe US2Trk is the correct name on 53.

This does bring up a related issue, though: On US 2, the point US53 should probably be US53/2Trk. I say "probably" because the east end of the truck route is poorly signed. There are no signs at the 2/53 intersection, the one from US 53 points to generic "Truck Route", and the first one we see is an old unbannered 2 shield.

However, the rest of the route is well-signed at surface streets.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1831
  • Last Login:September 16, 2021, 09:28:12 am
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #33 on: July 19, 2021, 03:06:19 pm »
Since US 53 does not intersect US 2 Truck twice, I believe US2Trk is the correct name on 53.

This does bring up a related issue, though: On US 2, the point US53 should probably be US53/2Trk. I say "probably" because the east end of the truck route is poorly signed. There are no signs at the 2/53 intersection, the one from US 53 points to generic "Truck Route", and the first one we see is an old unbannered 2 shield.

However, the rest of the route is well-signed at surface streets.

I would stick with US53_N for US 2, but this is mainly out of my PA bias where truck routes are not worth putting in labels where possible because they get changed so often.

Offline terminal_moraine

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 04:21:04 pm
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #34 on: July 27, 2021, 07:28:12 pm »
The following appear to be broken concurrencies in WI (my apologies if these have already been noted/are being remediated):

The US10 concurrency with I-39/US51 between exits 163 and 158 is broken (appears to be missing exit 161 point)

The WI27 concurrency with US14 and US61 between Viroqua and Westby is broken (appears to be missing points for CRY_Ver and the north end of the concurrency)


The current total mileage in WI is 11768.3, which is ~42 miles higher than it was before May.  I don't think the above broken concurrencies are enough to account for the difference, but I haven't located any others yet.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 12:00:24 am
Re: WI: Route point concerns and exit numbers
« Reply #35 on: August 06, 2021, 06:47:42 am »
The US10 concurrency with I-39/US51 between exits 163 and 158 is broken (appears to be missing exit 161 point)

The issue here seems to be two points sharing the same coordinates, 161(39) & +X29a, in US-10's file.

Code: [Select]
163(39) http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.569895&lon=-89.597948
161(39) http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.547774&lon=-89.553420
+X29a http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.547774&lon=-89.553420
159(39) http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.540630&lon=-89.544067

The solution here is to correct 161(39) in US-10's file to the following:
Code: [Select]
161(39) http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.548277&lon=-89.576125
« Last Edit: August 06, 2021, 06:52:45 am by rickmastfan67 »

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 12:00:24 am
Re: WI: US 10 and WI 441 Exit Numbers and Point Concerns
« Reply #36 on: August 06, 2021, 07:10:56 am »
US 10:
20.  CRG_Por and CRO_Por should be marked as closed. (also affects WI 34)

Are we sure they should be marked as closed?  Seems to me that was a brand new expressway bypass built there and there was never any intersection between those two routes and US-10 (except on the old road).

CR O (10/08)
CR G (10/08)

Thus, I think they should both be removed instead.