Author Topic: MT: S-229 is not signed  (Read 267 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Duke87

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 550
  • Last Login:Today at 12:41:02 am
MT: S-229 is not signed
« on: June 04, 2021, 12:56:40 am »
Per field check yesterday evening. So this should be removed from the HB (may want to hold onto the .wpt in case we decide to map the unsigned routes in the future though).

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 492
  • Last Login:September 15, 2021, 11:57:44 pm
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
Re: MT: S-229 is not signed
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2021, 04:04:53 pm »
Can't believe this fell through the cracks! If we end up including unsigned routes I can probably just re-map the route (it's not that hard especially since it's straight). As such, if there's no objection I'll axe this from the HB the next time I do a highway update.
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3397
  • Last Login:Today at 02:02:30 am
Re: MT: S-229 is not signed
« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2021, 09:33:45 pm »
Can't believe this fell through the cracks! If we end up including unsigned routes I can probably just re-map the route (it's not that hard especially since it's straight)
...or even pull it out of the git history.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline the_spui_ninja

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 492
  • Last Login:September 15, 2021, 11:57:44 pm
  • THE Western SD Highway Nut
An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. - G.K. Chesterton