Author Topic: NC: NC 150 Further Point Concerns  (Read 1057 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3075
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 08:55:40 pm
NC: NC 150 Further Point Concerns
« on: March 23, 2021, 06:39:34 pm »
1.    HavParkLn should be replaced with Olivers Crossing Dr (OliCroDr), which does have a traffic signal with NC 150.  This way the fact that HavParkLn is in-use is a minimal issue.
2.   Adding Central Rd (CenRd) drastically improves the shaping, and is somewhat useful due to Hartman Rd connecting to Hickory Tree Rd connecting to I-285/US 52/NC 8.
3.   SimRd is one intersection too far north.
4.   The shaping point northeast of NC 152 should be replaced by a visible point at Centenary Church Rd (CenChuRd).
5.   I think that NC152Trk_W should just be McLAve (McLelland Ave).  We have precedent for this on the north end of PA 523 with PA 281.
6.   I would personally like to have a point added at Williamson Rd (WilRd) west of I-77.  This is from stopping on a mission trip to Atlanta in 2011 to eat at the nearby Bojangles.  A point at Perth Rd (PerRd) may also be worthwhile to help out with the shaping a little.
7.   I think that the shaping points between NC 27 and NC 16 should be replaced with visible points at Lee Lawing Rd (LeeLawRd), King Wilkinson Rd (KingWilRd), and Curve View Rd (CurViewRd).
8.   NC27Trk should be NC27Trk_W.
9.   I wonder if points should be added on the Crouse Bypass to prevent confusion with OSM.
10.   The first shaping point west of NC 274 should be replaced with a visible point at Paul H Beam Rd.
11.   The second shaping point west of NC 274 should be replaced with a visible point at SpeDr (Sperlings Dr).
12.   Note that OSM shows a relocation of NC 180 as a part of the Shelby Bypass currently under construction.
13.   ColAve should be ColAve_W.
14.   HumFarmRd should be replaced by RivRd (Riverside Rd).
15.   A numerous number of alternate labels along the US 421 concurrency can be removed for not currently being in-use. (make sure to keep any highlighted in red)  IvyLn can also be removed for not being in-use.

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1171
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 08:16:21 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: NC: NC 150 Further Point Concerns
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2021, 11:05:37 am »
changes made

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3075
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 08:55:40 pm
Re: NC: NC 150 Further Point Concerns
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2021, 11:05:20 am »
Quote
8.   NC27Trk should be NC27Trk_W.

This change was not done.  Otherwise, the rest are good.

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1171
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 08:16:21 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: NC: NC 150 Further Point Concerns
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2021, 05:04:33 pm »
fixed