Recent Posts

1

Updates to Highway Data / IRL and NIR: Issues and point requests

« Last post by shiggins on Today at 05:32:00 pm »

Issues:
The R763 appears to have been realigned at its eastern terminus at the R764. A new road was built in 2018 to the north of the old alignment, and, while the R763 is not signed at the new roundabout (or anywhere from the R764), there is this sign instructing through traffic to avoid the old alignment. (And you don't have to worry about adding in a new point or breaking anybody's list file when fixing this, as I am the only user to have traveled through that junction.)
The N81/R756 junction is actually two separate intersections with a brief (a little over 100 feet) concurrency, not one intersection as we have mapped.
It appears that the B201 continues west along the A2 briefly before turning off to the south and heading into Limavady.
The A26 is missing a point at the interchange with Lisnasoo Road between B93/B94 and B64.

Point requests:
On the R579, could you replace the shaping point between R617 and R618 with a point at L2777?
On the R514, could you replace the shaping point north of the R513 with a point at L8864?
On the R460, could you replace the shaping point +X200334 (between R476_N and New) with a point at L1008/L1010 just to the west?
Thank you!

2

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: frabfcdXX: Bourgogne-Franche-Comte Routes Départementales

« Last post by cenlaroads on Today at 03:41:02 pm »

D1:  D4J_N -> D4J_W and D4J_S -> D4J_E
D1:  D4_S -> D4_W and D4_N -> D4_E
D4G:  D4_S -> D4_W and D4_N -> D4_E
D4H:  D36_N -> D36_W and D36_S -> D36_E
D4M:  D9_E -> D9_N and D9_W -> D9_S
D5:  D101_W -> D101_N and D101_E -> D101_S
D5:  D29_E -> D29_N and D29_W -> D29_S

There is no 'signed direction'. Please explain why you think I should change them.

I was basing it on the guidance here, where it says to use the relative position of the waypoints along the route whose file is being made.  However, looking at the link you provided, now I understand that the rules are different when identical waypoints result from multiplexes as opposed to when they result from multiple intersections without multiplexes.  I was thinking of the suffix as always identifying the waypoint.  So, disregard these suggestions


The other points you mentioned make sense.  Thanks for the clarification about departmental boundaries.  Is that small arrow commonly used to mark them?

3

Updates to Highway Data / Japan fixes

« Last post by neroute2 on Today at 03:38:56 pm »

E1A new exit 13-2
New N145 branch at Gobara?
New N353 branch at Shibukawa

more to come

4

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Other Japanese freeways

« Last post by neroute2 on Today at 03:38:51 pm »

These could go in a jpnsf system, or maybe there's a special term for them in Japan. I will be adding to this post as I find more.
Nagoya-Seto Expressway or Nagoya-Seto Road, E1 to N155
Sanage Green Road, N155 to N153
Rokko-Kita Toll Road, Karato to P95
Rokko Toll Road
Flight Road, N486 to P73
Yamaguchi-Ube Road, N190 to N9 (including an overlap with E2)
Nanbu East Road
Nansatsu Jukan Road
Ibusuki Skyline (extends north to E3/E3A)
Osumi Longitudinal Road (name?)
Miyakonojo-Shibushi Road
Hitotsuba Toll Road
Kumamoto Nishi Expressway
Shimabara Road
Megami Bridge
Nishisonogi Road
Ube Coastal Road
Okayama Blue Line
Mimasaka-Okayama Road
Higashiharima Road
Sanroku Toll Road
Harbor Highway
Ise Futami Toba Line
Shigiikoma Skyline
Minamichita Road
Gorin-ohashi Toll Road
Loop Road
Miura Jukan Road
former Chiba-Sotobo Toll Road
Kujukuri Toll Road
Togane-Kujukuri Toll Road
new road at east end of E80
Miyagi-Kenpoku Road (two segments)

5

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: chnbjs, chntjs, chnjjjs: Beijing, Tianjin, Jing-Jin-Ji Inter Expwys [Ready]

« Last post by Nagamasa on Today at 03:17:01 pm »

S66:
Does the route extend at east end? There is another GSJ just west of the toll station that could be the right end point. I don't know what "da xiu lu" means, the wp might also be called Lus for Lushangfen

Good question--I don't need any signage for S66 past the tollbooth for G4501, despite the the exit numbering continued: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Xx4y1b7oN/?spm_id_from=333.337.search-card.all.click&vd_source=45addfe14efe619bf0f24730196bf14b

6

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: chnbjs, chntjs, chnjjjs: Beijing, Tianjin, Jing-Jin-Ji Inter Expwys [Ready]

« Last post by michih on Today at 11:03:12 am »

Please fix this first:
https://courses.teresco.org/metal/hdx/?load=chnbj.nmp
https://courses.teresco.org/metal/hdx/?load=chntj.nmp


S66:
Does the route extend at east end? There is another GSJ just west of the toll station that could be the right end point. I don't know what "da xiu lu" means, the wp might also be called Lus for Lushangfen

7

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: frabfcdXX: Bourgogne-Franche-Comte Routes Départementales

« Last post by michih on Today at 10:45:19 am »

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8372

D1:  D4J_N -> D4J_W and D4J_S -> D4J_E
D1:  D4_S -> D4_W and D4_N -> D4_E
D4G:  D4_S -> D4_W and D4_N -> D4_E
D4H:  D36_N -> D36_W and D36_S -> D36_E
D4M:  D9_E -> D9_N and D9_W -> D9_S
D5:  D101_W -> D101_N and D101_E -> D101_S
D5:  D29_E -> D29_N and D29_W -> D29_S

There is no 'signed direction'. Please explain why you think I should change them.

D4:  Maybe add a point at Chemin du Pont St. Jacques since there are few bridges across the river in this area

All are very small roads. I don't think that anyone would ever need that wp.
btw, I often tried to find matching points on routes were intersecting roads lead to. It's not a rule but my practise. That would mean, I also had to add a wp to D4J. This could to a domino effect...

D1:  D4J_N -> D4J_W and D4J_S -> D4J_ED4L:  Reverse the waypoint order?  It seems more north-south
D4Land - All good

If we see both D4L segments as one route, it's more west-east

D5B:  The route is extending into Yonne and ending at D965 of that system; Should be truncated to the department border

Departement boundaries are tricky, and just as everything in France, highly depending on the departements' practise. I'm either gone with official coords (not available for BFC), departement signs at the boundary (often off from OSM's boundary lines), change in pavement or any marking (if GSV was available) or what's indicated on OSM/GM. I usually spent quite some time to find the best boundary locations (not for the first systems drafted (FRA-IDF) but once I got familar with the practise).
It's rare that routes extend far into the other departement like D5B but it's clearly signed at D965. Yonne does have a D5 but far away from D5B's location. Thus, I don't think that D5B is a child of Yonne's D5.

D5D:  Also extending into Yonne; needs to be truncated

I'm gone with this small marking.

D6die:  There is no graph connection with D901_E

I think it's OK since there is a short connection road b/n both. Not 1PPI: https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=frabfc.d000621die&lat=47.516636&lon=5.073173&zoom=17

8

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: chng: China National Expressways

« Last post by michih on Today at 02:14:07 am »

As well, I believe only about half of the system is only mapped (which is already the size of usai)

It's already 19% longer than usai, almost 60,000 miles.

Mostly missing exit numbers, there's a lot of in the middle of nowhere.
Naming all the exits G123_Que knowing there's a "final form" that would require scrubbing a route again is not fun :/

Not G123_Que but Que only. Sure, it's annoying but it might take years or decades till everything will be updated on OSM. Who knows.

We do currently only have 10 travelers. You are no. 1 with just 0.32% traveled. Thus, I see no urgency to enable travelers getting update entries in case of future changes.
However, I think that it would ease the review process to clearly see what's done.

We might have two systems:
- chng China National Expressways
- chngi China National Expressways (incomplete)

Similar to what si404 did with asiah by having an additional asiaho system for outlined routes - in devel status though. I think that si4040 also had a "review" system in the past.

Any strong feeling against that approach from anyone else?

9

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: frabfcd21 - Côte-d’Or Routes Départementales

« Last post by cenlaroads on Today at 12:06:38 am »

frabfcd21 - Côte-d’Or Routes Départementales

No errors noted in data check list.  There are no unmarked NMPs.  Concurrencies look good in HDX.  I'll continue to check those as I review the routes.


Reviewing the routes through D6E:


D1:  D4J_N -> D4J_W and D4J_S -> D4J_E
D1:  D4_S -> D4_W and D4_N -> D4_E

D1A, D1B, D1C, D1D, D2, D2sav, D2A, D3, D3B, D3C - All good

D3D:  Add point at the partial interchange with D903B
D3D:  Add point at Route de Savigny.  This seems to be the only way to access D903B southbound in this area.

D4:  Maybe add a point at Chemin du Pont St. Jacques since there are few bridges across the river in this area
D4:  D36/D954 -> D954_W - the concurrency with D36 continues south of here

D4A, D4B, D4C, D4D, D4E, D4F - All good

D4G:  D4_S -> D4_W and D4_N -> D4_E

D4H:  D36_N -> D36_W and D36_S -> D36_E

D4J, D4K - All good

D4L:  Reverse the waypoint order?  It seems more north-south

D4Land - All good

D4M:  D9_E -> D9_N and D9_W -> D9_S
D4M:  Consider replacing shaping point +X16 with a point at RueRoc

D5:  D101_W -> D101_N and D101_E -> D101_S
D5:  D29_E -> D29_N and D29_W -> D29_S

D5A - All good

D5B:  The route is extending into Yonne and ending at D965 of that system; Should be truncated to the department border

D5C - All good

D5D:  Also extending into Yonne; needs to be truncated

D5E:  RueEgl appears to be an unmarked driveway for the church.  Move point to RueCit or RueCha

D5F, D6 - All good

D6die:  There is no graph connection with D901_E

D6A, D6B, D6C, D6D, D6E - All good

10

Updates to Highway Data / Re: OR: some endpoints are off

« Last post by pderocco on Yesterday at 09:49:10 pm »

Based on ODOT's GIS and the Digital Video Log, the endpoints of several dead-end routes are no longer in the correct locations.

...

   OR 255 should be rerouted at the north end to the 101/Carpentersville Rd junction just south of the Pistol River bridge

...

Actually, it looks like OR-255 follows Carpenterville Rd north, then multiplexes with US-101 instead of following Pistol River Rd, and then follows Myers Creek Rd for its entire length. OpenStreetMap shows the same thing that ODOT TransGIS does.