Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Markkos1992 on December 29, 2022, 10:42:25 am

Title: NC: Various Point Concerns from 12/20/2022 Trip
Post by: Markkos1992 on December 29, 2022, 10:42:25 am
US 264 ALT (Wilson): 
1.   Consider replacing the shaping points west of NC 581 and NC 231 with visible point(s).
2.   It is probably best to replace EatSt with a nearby intersection.

NC 32:
1.   EdgAve>-EdgDr (https://www.google.com/maps/@35.5352828,-77.0381809,3a,15y,101.05h,85t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sgHPGyApJ_fP-NjE9nqqzJw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)
2.   RivRd>-RivRd_E
3.   Is there a good replacement for CasLn?
4.   Is there a good replacement for MidLn?
5.   Should the NC45Ply labels be switched?
6.   US17_N>-US17 (if possible)
7.   Consider replacing the shaping point south of NC37Her_S with a visible point.

NC 33:  US264>-US264_W.  US264Alt_E>-US264_E.

NC 35:  Consider replacing the shaping point near Severn with a visible point.

NC 45: 
1.   NC32_S>-NC32/99 or keep as-is
2.   NC32Ply_S>-NC32_N
3.   NC32Ply_N>-US64/32_W
4.   NC32_N>-US64/32_E

NC 94:  Consider replacing the shaping points with visible points between NC32_N and NC 32.

NC 121:  Consider replacing the shaping point west of US258Bus_N with a visible point at Church St. 

NC 137:  Consider replacing shaping points with visible points.

NC 171: 
1.   Look into replacing shaping points with visible points.
2.   HolSprChRd should be shortened.

NC 306:  Should the AurBayFry labels instead be BayAurFry?

NC 561: 
1.   Consider replacing the shaping point east of NC 58 with a visible point.
2.   Consider replacing the shaping points west and east of SprHillRd with visible points.

NC 581 TRUCK (Bailey):  MainSt>-MainSt_E  (signage here has not changed to put NC 581 on the truck route as of 12/21/2022)
Title: Re: NC: Various Point Concerns from 12/20/2022 Trip
Post by: mapmikey on December 31, 2022, 07:29:12 pm
changes made and in the queue
Title: Re: NC: Various Point Concerns from 12/20/2022 Trip
Post by: Markkos1992 on January 03, 2023, 09:13:30 am
Looks good besides NC 581 TRUCK though that may be best as a no-build anyway.
Title: Re: NC: Various Point Concerns from 12/20/2022 Trip
Post by: mapmikey on January 07, 2023, 03:28:07 pm
Quote from: Markkos1992 on January 03, 2023, 09:13:30 am
Looks good besides NC 581 TRUCK though that may be best as a no-build anyway.

omission was unintentional...edited
Title: Re: NC: Various Point Concerns from 12/20/2022 Trip
Post by: Markkos1992 on January 08, 2023, 07:13:31 pm
Quote from: mapmikey on January 07, 2023, 03:28:07 pm
Quote from: Markkos1992 on January 03, 2023, 09:13:30 am
Looks good besides NC 581 TRUCK though that may be best as a no-build anyway.

omission was unintentional...edited

The file is shown as changed on Github, but the change is not online...   ???
Title: Re: NC: Various Point Concerns from 12/20/2022 Trip
Post by: mapmikey on March 04, 2023, 07:20:21 pm
corrected
Title: Re: NC: Various Point Concerns from 12/20/2022 Trip
Post by: Markkos1992 on March 19, 2023, 01:38:20 pm
I am not sure why I still do not see the point label changed.
Title: Re: NC: Various Point Concerns from 12/20/2022 Trip
Post by: mapmikey on April 30, 2023, 07:15:41 pm
edited the label one more time...