Author Topic: updates.csv: non-root data in the root column  (Read 1586 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4244
  • Last Login:Today at 03:19:02 pm
  • I like C++
updates.csv: non-root data in the root column
« on: February 14, 2022, 05:30:29 pm »
ut.ut085 (West Jordan)
" (West Jordan)" was probably intended to be in the Route rather than Root column. Though oddly, there's only one UT85 in the HB now, without a City, and updates.csv doesn't mention I don't see another one being deleted and folded into a main UT85 route.
Edit: Ah. Found it: 2019-03-30;(USA) Utah;UT 194;ut.ut194;New route number for former discontiguous section of UT 85 in Lehi

autsisrab -> ita.autsisrab

il/il057 -> il.il057

gbna (here & here) and mnem ("Re-entered"?") don't produce a valid link to a single route in the HB. These fields could be left blank, but these entries may be better suited for systemupdates.csv instead.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2022, 05:50:07 pm by yakra »
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Duke87

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 972
  • Last Login:June 15, 2024, 09:32:12 pm
Re: updates.csv: non-root data in the root column
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2022, 05:51:22 pm »
ut.ut085 (West Jordan)
" (West Jordan)" was probably intended to be in the Route rather than Root column. Though oddly, there's only one UT85 in the HB now, without a City, and updates.csv doesn't mention another one being deleted and folded into a main UT85 route.

There is no mention of that because that didn't happen. There is, however, this:
Quote
2019-03-30;(USA) Utah;UT 194;ut.ut194;New route number for former discontiguous section of UT 85 in Lehi

You're right about "(West Jordan)" being in the wrong column though, that's an oopsie and lemme fix that. Gonna keep the reference to West Jordan since there were two UT85 segments at the time of that update.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3158
  • Last Login:Today at 03:02:34 pm
Re: updates.csv: non-root data in the root column
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2023, 03:51:56 pm »
autsisrab -> ita.autsisrab

gbna (here & here) and mnem ("Re-entered"?") don't produce a valid link to a single route in the HB. These fields could be left blank, but these entries may be better suited for systemupdates.csv instead.

I am guessing si404 more or less never saw this thread or forgot about it.

il/il057 -> il.il057

I fixed this one.  Also I-72 should have been I-172 in the original updates entry.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/6769