Author Topic: Slovakia Cesta II. Triedy (svkii)  (Read 3660 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4555
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 04:04:16 pm
Slovakia Cesta II. Triedy (svkii)
« on: January 28, 2018, 05:28:16 am »
Fix four sharp angle data check errors or mark them FP.

I13/E575 concurrency is broken close to the Hungarian border
I51/II504 concurrency is broken north of Trnava
NMP II503/II510


II106:
Fine


II425:
Fine


II428:
Fine


II484:
Fine


II487:
Fine


II499:
GSJ b/n D1 and I61


II503:
I61/62 --> I61/I62


II504:
II560 --> II560_N


II507:
I49/49A --> I49/I49A


II515:
I54/61 --> I54/I61


II520:
R3_B --> R3_W
R3_A --> R3_E


II529:
I66/72 --> I66/I72


II531:
I16/72 --> I16/I72
Is it signed concurrent with I72? If not, I would split it


II558:
Is it signed concurrent with I74? If not, I would split it


II563:
I64/75 --> I65/I75


II587:
I16/67 --> I16/I67


I still have to look into detail for routes from II500 to II595

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4555
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 04:04:16 pm
Re: Slovakia Cesta II. Triedy (svkii)
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2018, 02:03:35 pm »
II500:
Fine


II501:
Is StaCes really required?
Is PlaPod really required?


II502:
SokCes could be replaced by Stu_S which seems to be the more important road


II503:
Exceeds limits b/n Jak and StuCes


II504:
I54_S --> I51_S


II505:
New wp JanaJon @VW and/or directly at VW parking lot


II506:
Fine


II507:
Is MilCes really required?
Is Jal really required?
Is JarCes really required?
Is NovaVesVah really required?


II509:
Fine


II510:
Fine


II511:
Should be N-S instead of S-N


II512:
Should be W-E instead of E-W


II513:
Fine


II514:
Fine


II515:
See previous post


II516:
Fine


II517:
Fine


II519:
Fine


II520:
Is NovaBys really required?


II524:
Fine


II526:
Isn't it closed through the military zone?
Remove +X322872


II527:
Is SpoCes really required?


II527b:
New BanCes wp to match II527 wp


II529:
Fine


II531:
N-S instead of S-N


II532:
N-S instead of S-N


II533:
N-S instead of S-N


II534:
N-S instead of S-N; Many routes are "wrong" if the rule is a rule to be considered. I'll ignore it for the rest (and some previous)


II535:
Fine


II536:
wp for D1 exit 351 required, see concurrent I18
Exceeds limits b/n Jam and II547


II537:
Fine


II538:
Fine


II539:
Fine


II540:
Fine


II541:
Fine


II542:
Fine


II543:
Fine


II545:
Is Ful really required?


II546:
I18 --> D1?


II547:
Exceeds limits b/n VelFol and Cer


II548:
Fine


II549:
Fine


II550:
Fine


II552:
Fine


II554:
Fine


II555:
Fine


II556:
Fine


II558:
Exceeds limits b/n RusPot and II566


II559:
Fine


II560:
Fine


II561:
Exceeds limits b/n Trs and Top


II562:
Fine


II563:
See previous post


II564:
Fine


II566:
Fine :)


II567:
Fine


II571:
Fine


II572:
Fine


II573:
Delete +X468487
Delete +X816310


II574:
Fine


II574a:
Fine


II575:
Fine


II576:
Fine


II578:
Fine


II578Kre:
Fine


II579:
Fine


II580:
Fine


II581:
Fine


II582:
Is Klo really required?


II583:
Fine


II583a:
Fine


II583b:
Fine


II583c:
Fine


II583d:
Fine


II584:
New wp @ road III2213 / Brnice


II584a:
Fine


II584bys:
New wp @ road III2373


II585:
Fine


II587:
See previous post


II588:
Exceeds limits b/n Svo and Kur


II589:
Fine


II590:
Fine


II591:
Delete +X319780


II592:
Fine


II593:
Fine


II594:
Fine


II595:
Is VelVes really required?