Recent Posts1
Updates to Highway Data / Re: ME: US 202 Truncated?
« Last post by yakra on Today at 02:38:33 pm »US202 has ended at I-395 on paper for decades; Cameron Kaiser puts the truncation somewhere between 1986 and 1989.
When I was a new roadgeek, there was still signage at US2 if not elsewhere on Main St, but that's slowly been disappearing.
While the old overhead signage on 395 was arguably enough IMO to justify continuing US202 to its parent, the new signage you linked from the 395/9 connector topic, along with the END sign especially, clinches it (pardon the pun).
I'll submit this along with the 9 relocation in a couple days, saving some time to get up there & drive it for myself, even if this is all perfectly straightforward.
Routes ending in at an unnumbered road while on a useless multiplex aren't unheard of.
ME111 ending at Main St in Biddeford while concurrent with ME9 immediately comes to mind.
There's also the E end of ME154.
May be worth checking out ME100 in the field just for due diligence's sake.
When I was a new roadgeek, there was still signage at US2 if not elsewhere on Main St, but that's slowly been disappearing.
While the old overhead signage on 395 was arguably enough IMO to justify continuing US202 to its parent, the new signage you linked from the 395/9 connector topic, along with the END sign especially, clinches it (pardon the pun).
I'll submit this along with the 9 relocation in a couple days, saving some time to get up there & drive it for myself, even if this is all perfectly straightforward.
Quote
I wonder what this means for ME 100, since it ended at US 202 and now it just ends in an overlap for no reason.I bet it will stay the same. Old habits die hahd up heah.
Routes ending in at an unnumbered road while on a useless multiplex aren't unheard of.
ME111 ending at Main St in Biddeford while concurrent with ME9 immediately comes to mind.
There's also the E end of ME154.
May be worth checking out ME100 in the field just for due diligence's sake.