Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
the only one I couldn't was from changing MEX15D to MEX15DCha (since the obvious longer route became MEX15D).

It's fine if the route had no traveler since the alt route name would not be necessary at all. If there was a traveler, you should undo it since it is an active system!
Look at the route and tell me why the short spur should be 15D and the long trunk should have a suffix.

To avoid breaking user list file entries!
2
There's a concurrency on MEX15DMex where I don't think there's supposed to be one. MEX15DMex's western terminus is correctly placed at the point where the central toll lanes separate from the free lanes (MEX15), but then the westernmost segment of MEX15DMex is shown to be concurrent with MEX15.
Fixed. Thanks.
3
the only one I couldn't was from changing MEX15D to MEX15DCha (since the obvious longer route became MEX15D).

It's fine if the route had no traveler since the alt route name would not be necessary at all. If there was a traveler, you should undo it since it is an active system!
Look at the route and tell me why the short spur should be 15D and the long trunk should have a suffix.
4
There's a concurrency on MEX15DMex where I don't think there's supposed to be one. MEX15DMex's western terminus is correctly placed at the point where the central toll lanes separate from the free lanes (MEX15), but then the westernmost segment of MEX15DMex is shown to be concurrent with MEX15.
5
the only one I couldn't was from changing MEX15D to MEX15DCha (since the obvious longer route became MEX15D).

It's fine if the route had no traveler since the alt route name would not be necessary at all. If there was a traveler, you should undo it since it is an active system!
6
It's been updated: https://travelmapping.net/user/mapview.php?sys=mexd,mexed
I tried to keep all in-use labels and route names; the only one I couldn't was from changing MEX15D to MEX15DCha (since the obvious longer route became MEX15D).

Please let me know if there are any issues. Cheers!
7
Other Discussion / Re: New Travels and Stats Discussion
« Last post by froggie on Yesterday at 09:35:49 am »
It looks like my car-specific alternate user "a3" is done adding TM mileage.  I've tracked my travels in my 2015 Audi A3 since I bought it 5 1/2 years ago.  It finishes with 6573 TM miles from the 92,000+ miles I put on the car.  Its engine failed last week with only 101,000 miles on the car, and it's becoming clear it doesn't make sense to repair (which would require an engine replacement).

Not sure what I'll do next, as I wasn't planning financially for a car replacement any time soon.  I hate car loans in any circumstance, but when interest rates are what they are, it's especially unappealing to go much beyond what I could put toward a car from savings.


I ran into a similar problem 2 months ago.  Where I was looking at a car 23K miles past warranty and $2500 worth of bushings, bearings, and tie rods (amongst other repairs).  A week befire I was supposed to drive to Florida.  My wife commented that it “sounds like a car payment to me”.

I drove out of the dealership with a car lease.  Didn’t like the idea of a car payment again, but options were few.
8
Updates to Highway Data / Re: I-11 Nevada northern extension
« Last post by SSOWorld on Yesterday at 09:09:37 am »
Most notably, nonzero signs for I-11 in NV already exist. The other examples cited have no signs within the given state.

I think it's fine to go ahead with.
Light I-444 in OK, I-345 in TX, I-105 going past I-605, etc...

TM - where we include unsigned US Interstates because traditions, exclude unsigned everything else because....
9
Other Discussion / Re: Security Certificate Expired Error (?)
« Last post by Jim on Yesterday at 08:40:20 am »
Should be good now.
10
Other Discussion / Re: Security Certificate Expired Error (?)
« Last post by computerfan0 on Yesterday at 07:32:37 am »
This issue is occurring again, at least for me.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10