User Discussions > Other Discussion
Spurs
yakra:
How about MD's Interstate spurs?
Markkos1992:
--- Quote from: yakra on June 23, 2021, 11:34:17 am ---How about MD's Interstate spurs?
--- End quote ---
They are practically signed by these mile markers. (at least for I-895, I am unsure about I-270)
Of course, I would consider these more or less as similar to unsigned interstates.
mapmikey:
--- Quote from: Markkos1992 on June 23, 2021, 11:43:18 am ---
--- Quote from: yakra on June 23, 2021, 11:34:17 am ---How about MD's Interstate spurs?
--- End quote ---
They are practically signed by these mile markers. (at least for I-895, I am unsure about I-270)
Of course, I would consider these more or less as similar to unsigned interstates.
--- End quote ---
I-270 SPUR is explicitly signed on a BGS - https://goo.gl/maps/cKKTLNrvyHYKWRZBA
osu-lsu:
I vividly remember several spur routes for Louisiana state highways, south of Baton Rouge, during my LSU days (04-09).
I thought Arkansas may had some spur routes, but that is 20 years ago for me.
jayhawkco:
So tl;dr, do we want to leave them in as "Spur" even though the general convention is to not have things in TM that aren't signed? I get that these routes are signed, but basically they're signed incorrectly if you boil it all down.
Chris
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version