Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Will craft the files tonight.  However, will hold off on submitting till I have some proof that 686A is actually signed.  I assume it will be, but want to play it safe.

EDIT: Well, FL-686A is CONFIRMED to be signed when the route opens.  TY GSV!
2
Updates to Highway Data / Re: MD: Scenic US 40 Question
« Last post by Duke87 on Yesterday at 10:04:08 pm »
It's worth noting here that US 40 Scenic is not actually a state highway. And thus, SHA has no official definition of it. The HLR log doesn't even mention it at the MD 144 intersection, it's just "CO 1036 NATIONAL PIKE".

So, signs are all we really have to go by, and, well, in the face of some slight inconsistency I'm inclined to stick with the logical option of having the route actually return to US 40 itself rather than randomly end a tenth of a mile or so past the turnoff to it.

Either way it has a short MD144 concurrency so no clinchable mileage is gained or lost.
3
R56:
Ros: Should be MR00666.
R397_N. R397 appears to have been truncated. Signs at R56 and R391 mentioning R397 have been replaced with signs that don’t mention it. Should be MR00669.
Mol: Should be SmiSt.
R397_S: Should be R397.
+X921391: Could be replaced by a visible point at DR02642.
+X371409: Could be replaced by a visible point at MR00670.
Ind: Should be StaSt.
+X541390: Could be replaced by a visible point at DR02828.
Ida: Should be MN20713.
+X824691: Could be replaced by a visible point at DR02863.
Dik: Should be DR03209.
+X924429: Could be replaced by a visible point at DR08084.
+X711709: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Kinirapoort.
R394: Not R394. Should be P604.
+X593178: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Droewig. OSM says it is D602, but I can’t quite read this kilometerpost.
+X827071: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Bouneparts.
N2_W: A new interchange has been built, so the point will have to moved.
+X469034: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Harding.
+X942194: Could be replaced by a visible point at L2259.
P121: I was not able to verify whether this is P121, but this is Shepstone Street.
RitRd: Should be R103_S.
I think we have the wrong northeastern terminus for R56. While the RDDA says R56 ends at R103, Wikipedia says R56 ends at N3. At Alan Paton Avenue, R56 is signed as turning east, and R56 is signed from N2, exit 77.
R57:
Curie Boulevard (between R553 and R42) may be M4. M4 is signed following Curie west from the roundabout at Faraday Boulevard, but then there are no signs at the roundabout at Curie and Mc Colm. The signs at R57 do not mention M4.
R57 has numbered exits between R42 and R82. RavSt→2, MinSt→241, R59→239, JanHaak→237, Coa→231.
R549: Not R549. Signed for Deneysville.
You could break up a 31.02-mile stretch between R549 and R723 with a point at S1064.
R57 is signed both through Heilbron and around it on the route we have in TM. I think this requires creating an R57Hei. (A sign on the north side of Heilbron. Signs at R34_E south of Heilbron.)
+X353383: Could be replaced with a visible point at S219.
+X261716: Could be replaced with a visible point at S511.
FisSt: Fischer Street has an underpass beneath R57. I would replace this point with one at Voortrekker Street_E, since that’s where traffic heading for northbound R26 is likely to turn off.
+X355368: Could be replaced by a point at S1246.
+X459695: Could be replaced by a visible point at S187.
Afr: Should be S186/S232.
+X155768: Could be replaced by a visible point at S231.
R58:
+X191117: Could be replaced by a visible point at DR03199.
+X798655: Could be replaced by a visible point at DR03179.
You could break up a 36.73-mile stretch between R390_N and R391 with no visible points by adding one at DR03163.
+X790587: Could be replaced by a visible point at DR02762.
R391: Should be R391_S.
Dre: Should be R391_N.
Son: Should be DR03173.
+X887081: Could be replaced by a visible point at DR03180.
+X773722: Could be replaced by a visible point at DR03225.
R59:
+X945777: Could be replaced by a visible point at S1201.
+X339707: Could be replaced by a visible point at S304/T1826.
+X139880: Could be replaced by a visible point at S1005.
+X575097: Could be replaced by a visible point at S1330.
PriGeoRd: Should be PriGeoSt.
+X459455: Could be replaced by a visible point at S531.
+X892256: Could be replaced by a visible point at S634.
ForSt: The next intersection to the west of this point might meet the bare minimum qualifications for being an interchange, so this point should maybe be replaced by one there.
+X138771: Could be replaced by a visible point at S949.
S713: Should be S713/S717.
+X661368: Could be replaced by a visible point at S275.
R42: While the RDDA, Wikipedia, OSM, and Google Maps all agree that R42’s southwestern terminus is R59, R42 is not signed at all along the 6.6-mile stretch south of the Gauteng/Free State border, despite the presence of numerous signs that should mention R42.
ParRd: Numbered as exit 350.
1: Numbered as exit 360.
N12: Numbered as exit 402, albeit using N12’s exit numbering.
R60:
You could break up a 22.3-mile stretch with no visible points between HighSt_W and RivRd_W with a point at this road signed for Aan de Doorns, which serves as an eastern bypass around Worcester to get to N1 eastbound.
+X840347: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Bonnievale, which serves as a connector between R317 and R62.
VanEedSt: Should be AshRd.
4
Updates to Highway Data / VA: VA 16 Point Concerns
« Last post by Markkos1992 on Yesterday at 08:03:11 pm »
1. Consider replacing the shaping point south of SR 603 with a visible point at SR 658.
2. Consider replacing the shaping point south of ComCreRd with a visible point at SR 741.
3. Consider replacing the shaping point south of FlaRidRd with a visible point at SR 676.
4. FlaRidRd>-FlatRidRd
5. SteCreRd>-SleCreRd
6. I am not seeing a road at SR703.
7. The shaping point south of MillDamRd should be replaced with a visible point at Ridgedale Rd (RidRd).
5
Updates to Highway Data / Re: ROU: DEx16 + DN1Y opening
« Last post by michih on Yesterday at 02:43:37 pm »
There are some issues now:
1. E79 is missing the wp "DEX16" of DN1/E60.
2. "DEX16" should be called "DEx16" here + A3 + DNCOra since we also use "DEx12"
3. DN79 needs "StrOgo" as alt label for DNCOra since it was in use by me (and maybe others)
8
Solved Highway data updates / Re: UT: UT 287 Decommissioned?
« Last post by US 89 on Yesterday at 08:22:41 am »
I would keep an eye on this. Yes this is not a full decommissioning yet, but the state route landscape is so fluid in that part of the valley that we’ll probably see the rest removed soon enough. If I had to guess, it will probably come as a trade off with extending SR 131 north to Bangerter/154.
9
Updates to Highway Data / Re: MD: Scenic US 40 Question
« Last post by cockroachking on April 23, 2024, 09:41:57 pm »
MDOT SHA GIS shows that MD144 as mapped is correct In GSV, I only see the one US-40 Scenic End sign disputing what is mapped, so I guess SHA/Washington County just put it in the wrong place.

Thus, I would vote "no-build."
10
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: zafr: South Africa Main Provincial Roads
« Last post by shiggins on April 23, 2024, 09:39:48 pm »
R49:
Jac: This road is signed as 139. I don’t know if there is/are (a) letter(s) that ought to precede it.
R50:
Missing a point at M23 (De Villabois Mareuil Drive) between M10 and M31.
RieView: Should be SinDr.
+X358400: Could be replaced by a visible point at K175.
+X789458: R50 has been realigned to allow the expansion of a coal mine.
+X800686: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Kendal.
+X270289: The first intersection south of this point may meet the bare minimum definition of an interchange.
+X226384: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Charl Cilliers.
+X428549: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Cedarmont.
+X564370: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Bosmanskrans and Holmdene.
+X306490: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Vlakfontein.
+X383488: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Elmtree.
Missing a point at R546_N, just west of R39.
R51:
+X572431: Could be replaced by a visible point at OakRd.
AloeRd: Should be DurRd_N or GelRd_S.
Missing a point at M56 (Hospital Road) between R29_W and R29_E.
Missing a point at M46 (South Main Reef Road) between R29_E and R554.
M63_N: Should be M63.
Missing a point at the Plantation Road interchange between M63_N and WitsRd_N.
WitsRd_N: Should be WitRd_N.
PriRd: Should be M45.
M63_S: Is not M63. Should be 3rdLn.
StuSt: Stuart Street has been renamed to Johnny Mokoena Street. Also, I think this point should be split into JohMokSt_E and JohMokSt_W, since southbound R51 traffic heading for R23 eastbound would turn east just before the current StuSt point.
Lee: Should be S27_N.
The southern terminus for R51 is probably wrong. Wikipedia’s route description says it ends at N3, and signs at that interchange switch over to R54. However, OSM and the RDDA match what we have in TM. See below for the evidence for and against R54 being truncated and rerouted to N3 instead of through Villiers.
R52:
Boi: Should be KhuSt.
+X410788: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Putfontein.
+X133783: This point is quite a ways off the highway.
R509: I think this point should be split into two: BroSt_N and BroSt_S. R52 does not quite intersect R509, and the two streets connecting them are two blocks apart.
R53:
+X137009: Could be replaced with a visible point at this road signed for Grootpan.
+X953816: Could be replaced with a visible point at this road signed for Nooitgedacht.
+X777338: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Naauwpoort.
+X138892: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Rooipoortjie.
Consider adding a point between N12 and R500 at Potchefstroom Road, which seems like a major route between Potchefstroom and Vanderbijlpark.
+X966780: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Lindequesdrift.
+X636344: Could be replaced by a point at this road signed for Venterskroon.
R54:
Ens: This point is just at a grain silo. You could move the point east to this road signed for Eigenaarsfontein and the Fochville train station.
+X536925: Could be replaced by a visible point at this road signed for Rietspuit.
MosRd: Should be M1.
LinRd: Should be M4.
RedRd: Should be M61.
KipRivDr_S: Should be KliRivDr_S.
VaalMar: Should be AncRd.
+X499055: Could be replaced with a visible point at this road signed for Zandfontein and Grootvlei. The point could be labeled ToR51.
Vil: Should be KerkSt.
The southern terminus of R54 is unclear. Wikipedia’s route description says it continues straight on to N3 (what we currently have as the southernmost segment of R51). The RDDA and OSM say R54 turns south through Villiers to R26 (what we currently have in TM). The signs at N3 and the intersection to the west seem to say that R51 ends at N3, R54 continues to N3, and R54 has a spur that proceeds south into Villiers. However, the signs at R26 do not mention R54.
R55:
While the northern terminus of R55 that we have in TM matches the RDDA and Wikipedia’s route description, R55 is signed north from Sarel Avenue and south from Denyssen Avenue.
M2: Should be M22.
R561: Is not R561. Should be M39.
R564_N: Is not R564. Should be M9.
R564_S: Should be R564.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10