Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Updates to Highway Data / Re: I-11 Nevada northern extension
« Last post by Jim on Today at 09:54:53 am »
It's not like we're a navigational tool so it's not worth going to too much trouble to find exactly the right time.  I wouldn't get too worried about either making the switch before all the signs have caught up or letting it linger as I-515 a bit longer.
2
Updates to Highway Data / Re: I-11 Nevada northern extension
« Last post by vdeane on Today at 09:03:26 am »
^ In that case, when NDOT stops publicly referring to I-515 and signs are majority I-11 (sounds like we'll hit the latter soon) would seem to be a good time for the switch.
3
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usatr: United States select tourist routes
« Last post by Markkos1992 on Today at 06:34:52 am »
I think that the Lewis and Clark Trail in Pierre now has a broken concurrency resulting from the new points on US 14 TRUCK/US 83 TRUCK/SD 34.
4
Updates to Highway Data / IN: NW Indiana Point Requests
« Last post by the_spui_ninja on Today at 04:17:20 am »
I would like to request a couple of points in Northwest Indiana:

US 231: Division Street (OSM has the wrong name, just updated it to the correct one) in DeMotte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/41.202622/-87.198756)

IN 2: Clay Street (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/41.289351/-87.276463)
5
Updates to Highway Data / IL: North Suburbs Point Requests
« Last post by the_spui_ninja on Today at 04:13:37 am »
I would like to request a couple of points in the Chicago area:

US 12/US 45: Touhy Ave in Des Plaines (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/42.00962/-87.885850)

US 14: Devon Avenue (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/41.997312/-87.766756)
6
Updates to Highway Data / Re: I-11 Nevada northern extension
« Last post by cl94 on Today at 01:27:09 am »
Quote from: neroute2 on Yesterday at 09:06:38 pm
One thing to note is that 11 is partly a renumbering. We do include signed but unofficial Interstates (695 over the Key Collapse, 895 south of 695, 80 west of 101), so we would still need to keep 515 until we determine enough signs have changed that it's gone.

And this is why I haven't yet pushed the update. "Does 515 still exist?" is a real question. How many cases of something like this have we had in the history of TM? I'm fine holding off on pulling the trigger because we're not adding any mileage, just changing a number and extending an overlay. I could also do the intermediate step of extending 11 but keeping 515 because 11 now has multiple tangible signs of extending beyond AASHTO approvals and 1 interchange.

On the NDOT side, nearly everything internal has made the switch, though there are still public-facing items that refer to I-515. Signs, from what I can tell on the forum, are nearing 50-50.
7
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usatr: United States select tourist routes
« Last post by Jim on Yesterday at 10:00:26 pm »
Going in from Highway63 with tonight's site update (assuming I got it all sorted into the right places): Jefferson Highway in Iowa.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/commit/2ff33e9208460d461e79418cec53e755b83f39f8
8
Updates to Highway Data / Re: I-11 Nevada northern extension
« Last post by vdeane on Yesterday at 09:41:14 pm »
Quote from: neroute2 on Yesterday at 09:06:38 pm
One thing to note is that 11 is partly a renumbering. We do include signed but unofficial Interstates (695 over the Key Collapse, 895 south of 695, 80 west of 101), so we would still need to keep 515 until we determine enough signs have changed that it's gone.
I feel like that hits the distinction between "not recognized by FHWA but signed as part of the interstate by the DOT" and "no longer an interstate, but the signs haven't yet been removed/changed".
9
Updates to Highway Data / Re: I-11 Nevada northern extension
« Last post by neroute2 on Yesterday at 09:06:38 pm »
One thing to note is that 11 is partly a renumbering. We do include signed but unofficial Interstates (695 over the Key Collapse, 895 south of 695, 80 west of 101), so we would still need to keep 515 until we determine enough signs have changed that it's gone.
10
Updates to Highway Data / Re: I-11 Nevada northern extension
« Last post by Duke87 on Yesterday at 06:19:21 pm »
There is a distinction between "this interstate is unsigned intentionally" and "this interstate will be signed but isn't yet".

An arbitrary distinction, perhaps, but it's why 444 is in and 344 is not.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10