Recent Posts

1

Updates to Highway Data / KY: KY-35 point suggestion

« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Today at 01:06:15 am »

Recommend a point @ Kentucky Speedway Blvd just north of the I-71 interchange to allow those who have gone to the track to be able to at least claim a little bit of the route if they came from I-71.

2

Updates to Highway Data / KY: KY-2857 label issue

« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Today at 01:00:19 am »

LaGraPkwy_S -> ErnHarPkwy_S

3

Updates to Highway Data / CT: CT219/CT318 Intersection Reconfigured

« Last post by cockroachking on Yesterday at 11:53:25 pm »

The intersection of CT219 and CT318 was reconfigured sometime between 2018 and 2021 from a wye to a T intersection. The points here need to be adjusted to reflect that.

4

Updates to Highway Data / IL: I-55 BL (Springfield)/IL 29/US 66 His Broken Concurrency

« Last post by Markkos1992 on Yesterday at 09:53:39 pm »

IL 29 and US 66 His needs to have the same coordinates as the IL29_S point on I-55 BL (Springfield).  (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.831004&lon=-89.636469)

5

Updates to Highway Data / Re: SD: US 14/83 Relocation (Pierre)

« Last post by the_spui_ninja on Yesterday at 11:51:43 am »

A little update, I got a response back from SDDOT saying the route is not signed. Obviously this may be subject to change, someone may accidentally discover it signed later, who knows.

Willing to bet signs won't go up until the Euclid utility project is done. I'll check in September.

6

Updates to Highway Data / ID: US95 Realignment South of Moscow

« Last post by cockroachking on July 15, 2025, 10:40:25 pm »

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2025/jul/14/a-legacy-project-new-section-of-us-highway-95-open/

A 26-year dream to make U.S. Highway 95 a four-lane highway between Moscow, Idaho, and Lewiston is almost a reality.

The long-awaited four-lane, 6-mile stretch of Highway 95 from the southern end of Moscow to Reisenauer Hill opened to drivers earlier this month, according to the Idaho Transportation Department. About one more mile of widened highway and a bridge over Thorn Creek, which are expected to be finished this fall, is all that's left to complete.

The new highway has been repeatedly delayed over the years by an environmental group's lawsuits challenging the transportation project.

The nearly $90 million highway realignment not only creates more lanes, but makes the road straighter, flatter and safer, according to Megan Jahns, ITD senior public information officer in Coeur d'Alene. The old two-lane highway has sharp curves, steep hills and several driveways intersecting the highways, leading to several injury and fatal crashes over the years, Jahns said.

The new alignment is shown on Google Maps and OSM.

7

In-progress Highway Systems & Work / Re: usanht: United States National Historic Trails

« Last post by shiggins on July 15, 2025, 05:15:52 pm »

The LC Trail (right bank) in Missouri is missing a point at the intersection of US 69 and Liberty Parkway (between LibPkwy_E and I-35(13)).

8

Updates to Highway Data / Re: MO: US-71 MAJOR issue with Exits 17/18

« Last post by Markkos1992 on July 15, 2025, 02:13:46 pm »

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8493

I put in Highway63's updates last weekend so I am probably at least somewhat responsible.

9

Updates to Highway Data / MO: US-71 MAJOR issue with Exits 17/18

« Last post by rickmastfan67 on July 15, 2025, 11:45:56 am »

Code: [Select]

mo.us071 I-29(15),I-29(17),I-29(18) SHARP_ANGLE 160.09 mo.us071;I-29(15);I-29(17);I-29(18);SHARP_ANGLE;160.09
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/commit/cceea82510a39c09cf6bd34d20f627420a7cba9f#r162144905

The coordinate change for the 'I-29(17)' label made on July 11th, needs to be revereted. Completely broke US-71 here along I-29.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.353646&lon=-94.761930 needs to go with Exit 18, while http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.345549&lon=-94.747982 needs to be back to being 17 to resync it with I-29.

10

Updates to Highway Data / Re: PRT A19 wrong exit numbers

« Last post by Jim on July 15, 2025, 11:31:34 am »

My understanding is that if the route could be renumbered with the correct (not made up) new exit numbers, an updates entry is not needed but I also see no harm in adding on as it was a substantial change for the route.  I am strongly opposed to using labels that don't match what's posted just to avoid breaking list files.  Of course we use alt labels to minimize breakage but sometimes an accurate update will break some things and it will be up to users to update (if they care to do so).