1
News:
Travel Mapping's main site is at https://travelmapping.net/ . Old tm.teresco.org URLs and http:// URLs are redirected there, and will continue to work indefinitely.
Recent Posts
2
Updates to Highway Data / Re: Spain fixes
« Last post by neroute2 on Today at 02:33:27 pm »ESP-MD A3: 50 -> 51; add 50 to the west
ESP-CM A3 and ESP-CM NIIITar should not overlap east of Tarancón
ESP-CM A3 interchanges (eastbound onramp and westbound onramp) between 149 and 153
ESP-VC A3 343 no access
ESP-MD A4 broken overlap with E5
ESP-MD A4 exit 23
missing ESP-CM A4a
ESP-AN A4 interchange between 437 and 441, 471 and 475, 514 and 521 (two)
Does ESP-AN NIVa still go all the way to A4(434)?
ESP-AN NIV interchange between A8030 and A471; A471 relocated
ESP-GA AC551 interchange in the middle
ESP-CM A3 and ESP-CM NIIITar should not overlap east of Tarancón
ESP-CM A3 interchanges (eastbound onramp and westbound onramp) between 149 and 153
ESP-VC A3 343 no access
ESP-MD A4 broken overlap with E5
ESP-MD A4 exit 23
missing ESP-CM A4a
ESP-AN A4 interchange between 437 and 441, 471 and 475, 514 and 521 (two)
Does ESP-AN NIVa still go all the way to A4(434)?
ESP-AN NIV interchange between A8030 and A471; A471 relocated
ESP-GA AC551 interchange in the middle
3
In-progress Highway Systems & Work / chnsh: (China) Shanghai Provincial Expressways
« Last post by Nagamasa on Today at 11:26:09 am »chnsh is ready to review! Just a short one, 269 miles, 12 routes: https://travelmapping.net/user/system.php?units=miles&sys=chnsh
Sources: OSM, Wikipedia. The odd exit number that is missing from either is from watching videos online.
Sources: OSM, Wikipedia. The odd exit number that is missing from either is from watching videos online.
4
Updates to Highway Data / Re: OR: Missing suffixes
« Last post by pderocco on Today at 02:59:09 am »In GSV, it looks like 104S is shown on every street sign along it as Alt Hwy 101. Yet it wasn't in the original 2007 imagery. Was it actually Alt 101 in those days, but has since been demoted to a mere street name, only used by the Post Office?
Also, I just noticed that ODOT TransGIS shows the nearby end of 101B as being routed up Marlin Ave to the traffic light, instead of to the RIRO across from 104S, and GSV shows BUSINESS 101 signs at that light. So I think that's something that needs fixing in TM. (The other route seemed so illogical that I drove both last time I was there, just to be sure I had clinched it.)
Also, I just noticed that ODOT TransGIS shows the nearby end of 101B as being routed up Marlin Ave to the traffic light, instead of to the RIRO across from 104S, and GSV shows BUSINESS 101 signs at that light. So I think that's something that needs fixing in TM. (The other route seemed so illogical that I drove both last time I was there, just to be sure I had clinched it.)
5
Updates to Highway Data / Re: FL 570 new exit 20
« Last post by rickmastfan67 on Yesterday at 11:19:52 pm »Added.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8331
Also added 'BraRd' on FL-559Aub which connects to the new exit.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8331
Also added 'BraRd' on FL-559Aub which connects to the new exit.
6
Updates to Highway Data / Spain fixes
« Last post by neroute2 on Yesterday at 10:06:12 pm »Missing A1a?
NIGum is signed on the dead-end bypass alignment with km posts and signs. What we have as NI is signed only as what it leads to, even at the south end. km posts show BU-922.
Another NI at Oquillas (also has at least one "real" sign)
ESP-CL NI: CalVit has been closed
ESP-CL NI interchange (Rub) between CalVit and BU701
ESP-CL NI: BU701 moved to new interchange
ESP-CL NI interchange (Qui_N?) between BU701 and BUV7022
ESP-CL NI interchange between BU730 and BU535
ESP-PV NIEst is actually A3310 like OSM shows (and ESP-CL NIPue is also signed that way south of A3310, but there is a NI km post)
Does ESP-PV NILan really exist all the way to the north end, or does it end at the turnoff for Nanclares de la Oca?
ESP-PV NI interchange between NC/PV and 409, 418 and 419
ESP-AR A2 260 closed
ESP-AR NIIaAlm realigned; new end at A2302
Does ESP-AR NIIMue still exist? I can't find any signs
ESP-CT NIIa: A2(559) is too far east
Should ESP-CT NIIa's east end be at the A2 onramp halfway between 559 and 562?
ESP-CT NIIMat interchange between GI512 and TerBra
NIGum is signed on the dead-end bypass alignment with km posts and signs. What we have as NI is signed only as what it leads to, even at the south end. km posts show BU-922.
Another NI at Oquillas (also has at least one "real" sign)
ESP-CL NI: CalVit has been closed
ESP-CL NI interchange (Rub) between CalVit and BU701
ESP-CL NI: BU701 moved to new interchange
ESP-CL NI interchange (Qui_N?) between BU701 and BUV7022
ESP-CL NI interchange between BU730 and BU535
ESP-PV NIEst is actually A3310 like OSM shows (and ESP-CL NIPue is also signed that way south of A3310, but there is a NI km post)
Does ESP-PV NILan really exist all the way to the north end, or does it end at the turnoff for Nanclares de la Oca?
ESP-PV NI interchange between NC/PV and 409, 418 and 419
ESP-AR A2 260 closed
ESP-AR NIIaAlm realigned; new end at A2302
Does ESP-AR NIIMue still exist? I can't find any signs
ESP-CT NIIa: A2(559) is too far east
Should ESP-CT NIIa's east end be at the A2 onramp halfway between 559 and 562?
ESP-CT NIIMat interchange between GI512 and TerBra
7
Updates to Highway Data / Re: Greece fixes
« Last post by michih on Yesterday at 12:50:50 pm »https://www.skyscrapercity.com/posts/193037868/
It's anything but official though!
I'd say, no-build.
2018 national road register: https://www.statistics.gr/documents/20181/16874224/02%CE%92.+%CE%9C%CE%B7%CF%84%CF%81%CF%8E%CE%BF+%CE%95%CE%B8%CE%BD%CE%B9%CE%BA%CF%8E%CE%BD+%CE%9F%CE%B4%CF%8E%CE%BD+%28+2018+%29.xlsx/524475fa-9aa8-b9a1-3489-cd1823f1313a?version=1.0&t=1579604934134&download=true
It's anything but official though!
New A23 near Komotini?
I'd say, no-build.
8
Updates to Highway Data / FL 570 new exit 20
« Last post by neroute2 on Yesterday at 12:33:07 pm »9
Updates to Highway Data / espa: some Spanish autopista exits renumbered by km (and other changes)
« Last post by neroute2 on Yesterday at 02:22:04 am »ESP-CL AP1/ESP-PV AP1Arm:
1
2 -> 7
3 -> 36
4 -> 57
4A -> 66
5 -> 74
6 -> 78
A1 -> 84
ESP-AR AP2:
1 -> 19
1B -> 23
2 -> 43
3 -> 67
4 -> 114
ESP-CT AP2 is still sequential 5-12 (as of February 2025).
ESP-AN AP4 should take the left fork at exit 15. See signage at the split, km 14 on the left split, while the right split is AP-4A. In any case, 13 is not signed, so should be NIV on a new AP4A.
ESP-AN AP4 24 is only an onramp, so is unsigned and should be NIV_Pal.
Same for ESP-CL AP6 82; there's no offramp to be signed as exit 82, so change it to N110.
ESP-CT AP7/ESP-VC AP7Cas (still sequential):
12 -> 12A
C60 -> 12B
24 -> 23
AP2_W -> AP2
A7_N -> 298? AP7 takes the exit though
50 -> 302
51 -> 307
Or does AP7 end at A7_N -> A7? km posts south of there are for A7.
ESP-VC AP7:
527
532
535
58 -> 544
59 -> 558
60 -> 572
61 -> 588
61A -> 592
62 -> 608
63 still 63 as of February 2024, ditto for 64-66
ESP-VC AP7Tor 724 -> A7 (there's no exit, just a merge, so no signed exit number)
ESP-MC AP7 872 -> 878
ESP-AN AP7 (reverse direction):
Some numbers are unchanged; most overhead signs have a blank space but they are still on gore signs.
186 -> 1042
185 -> 1043
184 -> 1044
182 -> 1045
181 -> 1047A
180 -> 1047B
172
157 -> 1068
155 -> 1070
153 -> 1071
142
133
ESP-PV AP8:
Lap -> 4
Remove Oia? It doesn't look like you can legally U-turn at the rest area
70 -> 69
75 is gone, replaced by 77
AP8Bui -> 117
126 -> 125
ESP-GA AP9:
15 -> AP9Fer (no signed exit number)
65 -> 64
70 missing
81 seems to have no legal U-turn, and may not be signed as 81
130 is only an onramp, so has no exit number
177 -> A55 (there seems to be no signed exit number)
ESP-GA AP9Vig:
0V -> 151
ESP-NC AP15:
1 -> AP68 (no exit number signed)
ESP-AN AP46:
0 -> A45 (no exit, so no exit number)
missing exit 6
south end doesn't line up with point on A7
ESP-CL AP51:
81 -> AP6 (81 is only the number on AP6)
ESP-CL AP61:
61 -> AP6 (no exit, so no exit number)
ESP-RI AP68:
12 -> 12A
128 -> 12B
1
2 -> 7
3 -> 36
4 -> 57
4A -> 66
5 -> 74
6 -> 78
A1 -> 84
ESP-AR AP2:
1 -> 19
1B -> 23
2 -> 43
3 -> 67
4 -> 114
ESP-CT AP2 is still sequential 5-12 (as of February 2025).
ESP-AN AP4 should take the left fork at exit 15. See signage at the split, km 14 on the left split, while the right split is AP-4A. In any case, 13 is not signed, so should be NIV on a new AP4A.
ESP-AN AP4 24 is only an onramp, so is unsigned and should be NIV_Pal.
Same for ESP-CL AP6 82; there's no offramp to be signed as exit 82, so change it to N110.
ESP-CT AP7/ESP-VC AP7Cas (still sequential):
12 -> 12A
C60 -> 12B
24 -> 23
AP2_W -> AP2
A7_N -> 298? AP7 takes the exit though
50 -> 302
51 -> 307
Or does AP7 end at A7_N -> A7? km posts south of there are for A7.
ESP-VC AP7:
527
532
535
58 -> 544
59 -> 558
60 -> 572
61 -> 588
61A -> 592
62 -> 608
63 still 63 as of February 2024, ditto for 64-66
ESP-VC AP7Tor 724 -> A7 (there's no exit, just a merge, so no signed exit number)
ESP-MC AP7 872 -> 878
ESP-AN AP7 (reverse direction):
Some numbers are unchanged; most overhead signs have a blank space but they are still on gore signs.
186 -> 1042
185 -> 1043
184 -> 1044
182 -> 1045
181 -> 1047A
180 -> 1047B
172
157 -> 1068
155 -> 1070
153 -> 1071
142
133
ESP-PV AP8:
Lap -> 4
Remove Oia? It doesn't look like you can legally U-turn at the rest area
70 -> 69
75 is gone, replaced by 77
AP8Bui -> 117
126 -> 125
ESP-GA AP9:
15 -> AP9Fer (no signed exit number)
65 -> 64
70 missing
81 seems to have no legal U-turn, and may not be signed as 81
130 is only an onramp, so has no exit number
177 -> A55 (there seems to be no signed exit number)
ESP-GA AP9Vig:
0V -> 151
ESP-NC AP15:
1 -> AP68 (no exit number signed)
ESP-AN AP46:
0 -> A45 (no exit, so no exit number)
missing exit 6
south end doesn't line up with point on A7
ESP-CL AP51:
81 -> AP6 (81 is only the number on AP6)
ESP-CL AP61:
61 -> AP6 (no exit, so no exit number)
ESP-RI AP68:
12 -> 12A
128 -> 12B
10
Updates to Highway Data / Re: CO: US85->CO85 in Colorado Springs
« Last post by rickmastfan67 on April 28, 2025, 10:45:54 pm »In everyone's opinion, would using an end point of "VenBlvd_N" just south of the railroad bridge work?
If that's the name of the road south of there as well, then it's a valid label.