Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: Jim on May 30, 2022, 01:58:15 pm

Title: MN: NMPs
Post by: Jim on May 30, 2022, 01:58:15 pm

@froggie, same as you might have seen in some other threads.  Would you object to me taking a pass through the MN NMPs and fixing or marking as FPs as appropriate?

Title: Re: MN: NMPs
Post by: froggie on May 30, 2022, 11:50:57 pm

I'll have some time to look at it on Wednesday.  Though I can tell you the MN 298 ones are false positives.

Title: Re: MN: NMPs
Post by: Jim on May 31, 2022, 08:03:39 am

Thanks.  I added the MN 298 ones to the FP list.  Everything else looks like a straightforward lining up of points that should match up.

Title: Re: MN: NMPs
Post by: froggie on June 06, 2022, 10:22:58 am

Currently working on these.  I do have at least one other FP:  292/61, where 292 turns onto 61's frontage road.  I may or may not have later FPs depending on how I deal with I-35W/MN 62 and I-35W/I-94.  Both are cases where the freeways are parallel but on separate carriageways, with ramps to one but not the other.

Title: Re: MN: NMPs
Post by: Jim on June 09, 2022, 10:54:21 pm

Marked the remaining NMP group near Red Wing as FPs:

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/commit/3083ce46755e412a71a28c42260f2794627100e9