Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Solved Highway data updates => Topic started by: rickmastfan67 on June 20, 2022, 03:01:02 am
-
NEW? -> 7 (Willets Point Blvd, mainly because it's separate from the Cross Island Parkway ramps. Mainly suggesting it this way because of the 'old' 8 exit on the other side of the bridge there.)
7 -> 8
8 & 9 -> 9 merge together & recenter
I-95 -> 12 https://goo.gl/maps/ZLK28oxW5uGgcnwT8
-
NEW? -> 7 (Willets Point Blvd, mainly because it's separate from the Cross Island Parkway ramps. Mainly suggesting it this way because of the 'old' 8 exit on the other side of the bridge there.)
7 -> 8
Leaving this as-is. One point is sufficient here, and it doesn't pass the each half connects to a different highway that we are also mapping (https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/points.php#double_half) test.
8 & 9 -> 9 merge together & recenter
I-95 -> 12 https://goo.gl/maps/ZLK28oxW5uGgcnwT8
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5871
-
NEW? -> 7 (Willets Point Blvd, mainly because it's separate from the Cross Island Parkway ramps. Mainly suggesting it this way because of the 'old' 8 exit on the other side of the bridge there.)
7 -> 8
Leaving this as-is. One point is sufficient here, and it doesn't pass the each half connects to a different highway that we are also mapping (https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/points.php#double_half) test.
I'd still then suggest the renumbering, mainly because since it's centered on the highway we're mapping's exit is posted as 8 (https://goo.gl/maps/V6RUHdaMUxjsGxbS9). But that's just me in this case.